Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

Geological Implications of an Expanding Earth (part 2)

robot's profile picture
Published in 
Nature
 · 1 month ago

Cox & Doell (1961a) further considered that, if contemporaneous palaeomagnetic data from two localities on the same stable continental block have different inclinationsI1 and I2(Figure 52) so that the two localities are on different circles of geomagnetic latitude, and if the ancient geomagnetic field was dipolar, then the ancient Earth radius Ra may be found from:

R_a = d/(cot^{-1} (½tanI_1) - cot^{-1} (½tanI_2))

Where d is the linear length of the great circle arc connecting the two sampling sites (Hospers & van Andel, 1967; van Andel & Hospers, 1968a).

Cox & Doell (1961a) used this method to evaluate the Earth's radius during the Permian, from data analysed from palaeomagnetic studies of 16 sample sites from western Europe and 5 sample sites from Siberia (Figure 53). The European and Siberian data being chosen specifically because they were the only data available at the time located supposedly on, or approximately on, the same palaeomeridian.

Figure 53 Permian virtual geomagnetic pole positions used by Cox & Doell (1961) to determine the
Pin it
Figure 53 Permian virtual geomagnetic pole positions used by Cox & Doell (1961) to determine the palaeoradius of the Earth. Palaeomagnetic data are from sampling sites located at (1) Siberia and (2) Western Europe, represented by virtual geomagnetic pole positions at (3) Siberia and (4) Western Europe. (From Cox & Doell, 1961)

The method of calculation adopted by Cox & Doell (1961a, 1961b) was to pair each of the inclinations from Western Europe with those from Siberia giving a total of 80 determinations of Ra. The average of the 80 values calculated for the Earth's radius during the Permian was found to be:

R_{Permian} = 6310 kilometres

with a standard deviation of 1080 kilometres, and Ra/R ratio of 0.99 (van Andel & Hospers, 1968a).

Compared with the present Earth radius of 6371 kilometres Cox & Doell (1961a) therefore concluded that the Permian magnetic field, as seen from the two sampling areas almost 5000 kilometres apart on the European land-mass, was consistent with a Permian Earth radius equal to the present.

The palaeomeridian method of determining palaeoradius from site data located along the same palaeomeridian is mathematically sound only if the primary assumptions are correct. That is, assuming that the continental lithosphere between the sample sites has remained spatially static and site separation has remained essentially constant. For the excessive site separation chosen, and continental area involved however, Earth expansion must involve some adjustment for relief of surface curvature.

This point was considered by Carey (1958, 1975, 1976, 1986) and appreciated in principle by most palaeomagneticians considering palaeoradius (eg. Cox & Doell, 1961, 1961b; Ward, 1963; van Hilten, 1963, 1965, 1968; van Andel & Hospers, 1968a, 1968b; McElhinny & Brock, 1975; Schmidt & Clark, 1980) however was largely ignored.

Palaeomagnetic sample sites used by Cox & Doell (1961a) are shown in Figure 53 located in Western Europe (France and England) and Siberia, with a site separation of almost 5000 kilometres on the present radius Earth. This may be compared to the Arctic Ocean small Earth sequential spreading history (Figure 24) detailed previously. As can be seen in this small Earth figure, modeling indicates that the northern European continent has undergone a considerable amount of crustal extension, from the Early Jurassic to the present, in sympathy with opening of the Arctic Ocean. This extension occurred throughout the region, in particular the West Siberian Basin (Ob sphenochasm of Carey (1976)), the Baltic Sea and North Sea regions. The sample sites, when relocated on the Early Jurassic small Earth model also suggest that the actual site separation at that time, and throughout much of the Mesozoic, crossed the North Atlantic spreading axis, as it extended into the Arctic Ocean region.

Figure 54 Suggested radial dispersal of continental fragments and development of Tertiary intracrato
Pin it
Figure 54 Suggested radial dispersal of continental fragments and development of Tertiary intracratonic sedimentary basins for Western Europe and Siberia during the Phanerozoic. In this model geocentric angles p 1 , p 2 , and p 3 do not decrease as assumed by Cox & Doell (1961) hence site separation increases, resulting in a palaeopole position and R a /R ratios which mistakenly suggest that the Earth has not expanded.

Figure 54 is a schematic representation of the northern European region used by Cox & Doell (1961a) demonstrating the effect of radial expansion, crustal thinning, fragmentation and formation of Tertiary intracontinental sedimentary basins. In this model the geocentric angles between sites do not decrease as assumed by Cox & Doell (1961a), palaeocolatitudes accord with the conventional dipole equation and site separation increases with time, resulting in Ra/R ratios approaching unity, mistakenly considered by Cox & Doell (1961a) to imply a constant Earth palaeoradius.

In contrast, by adopting the present day site separation of approximately 5000 kilometres, and assuming that the European continent has undergone a radial expansion of its continental lithosphere to the present, marked by opening of the Ob sphenochasm for instance, then during the Early Jurassic the site separation calculates as approximately 2650 kilometres. This equates with the actual separation of the same sites located on the Early Jurassic small Earth model (Figure 24).

Van Hilten's triangulation method

The method, developed by van Hilten (1963) and modified by van Hilten (1968), utilises palaeomagnetic data not located on the same palaeomeridian. The method uses spherical trigonometry to determine a pole position from the intersection point of great circles passing through the sample localities, in the direction given by the declination.

Figure 55 Van Hilton's (1963, 1968) triangulation method of determining palaeoradius of the Earth fr
Pin it
Figure 55 Van Hilton's (1963, 1968) triangulation method of determining palaeoradius of the Earth from palaeomagnetic site data not on the same palaeomeridian. Right figure shows Carboniferous and Triassic palaeomagnetic site and VGP data from North America and, left figure shows Permian palaeomagnetic data from Siberia, Russia and Western Europe. (From van Hilten, 1963)

Van Hilten (1963) used five sets of palaeomagnetic data of various ages from North America and Western Europe and initially concluded that the palaeomagnetic evidence seemed to indicate a noteworthy increase in the Earth's radius since the Carboniferous, the rate of which roughly agreed with the hypotheses of Carey (1958) and Heezen (1959). Van Hilten (1968) later modified his calculation methods to calculate the palaeomagnetic positions for different radii of the Earth, in order to determine the Earth's radius for which the coeval poles of one continent show the least scatter. The method was modified to make allowance for crustal deformation, although he concluded that the consistency of area of the continents during expansion or contraction seemed justified in first approximation.

In his revised estimates of palaeoradius for the Permian of Europe van Hilten (1968) maintained that there was an inconsistency in the data which may be explained by tectonic events. His remaining calculations for North America however failed to produce evidence for either a change in the Earth's radius or a constant one.

The triangulation method used by van Hilten (1963, 1968) acknowledges some degree of crustal deformation, however the method assumes that the angular relationships of the spherical triangles used on the present Earth's radius are consistent with those of the ancient palaeoradius. As Carey (1988) pointed out however, surfaces cannot be transferred between spherical surfaces of different radii without distortion of area, angle or shape.

The triangulation method of van Hilten is in effect demonstrated in hypothetical example (3) (Figures 50 and 51). Depending on the clustering and inclination of site data used in the investigation, the VGP positions will triangulate as a palaeomagnetic pole position. Ra/R ratios calculated from the PPs will vary from the correct ratio, derived from site data containing polar located site inclinations, to ratios approaching unity for site data containing equatorially located site inclinations. Because of the statistics used in reducing the scattered pole positions to a mean pole position, Ra/R values will always be higher than the true value, and figures of 0.73 to 0.97 calculated in the hypothetical example (Figure 51) are consistent with published values (eg. van Hilten, 1963, 1968).

Ward's method of minimum scatter of VGPs

The method of minimum scatter, developed by Ward (1963), was applied to Devonian, Permian and Triassic data from Europe and Siberia. The method was again based on the assumption that, during any change in the Earth's radius, the size of each continent remained constant, and during a particular geological age being studied, the position of the pole did not changed markedly.

Figure 56 Ward's (1963) graphical representation of the dispersion of Triassic, Permian and Devonian
Pin it
Figure 56 Ward's (1963) graphical representation of the dispersion of Triassic, Permian and Devonian palaeomagnetic data from Europe and Siberia. A pole precision parameter k is represented as a function of the hypothetical Earth's radius R a , where R a =1 for the Present Earth radius. Small arrows indicate the point on each graph where k is at a maximum, the point at which palaeomagnetic poles had minimum dispersion. (From Ward, 1963)

The method of minimum scatter of VGPs established the Earth's palaeoradius by generalizing from pairs to sets of site data, using the criterion that the most probable palaeoradius was the radius derived from a set of palaeomagnetic pole positions which had minimal dispersion (Ward 1963). The analysis of dispersion on a sphere was performed by Fisher's (1953) statistical method whereby the pole positions were assumed to be distributed about a true mean. The Fisher (1953) method involved determination of the dispersion of a population of directions, referred to as the precision parameter k, where the most probable ancient Earth radius was considered to be where k was maximum (Ward 1963).

The results of Wards determinations were presented as graphs of pole precision k as a function of the hypothetical Earth's radius, where radius equals 1 for the present radius (Figure 56). From these Ward (1963) concluded that the results for Europe and Siberia could not be considered to indicate any variation of the Earth's radius during the Devonian, Permian or Triassic periods from the present radius.

Irrespective of the lack of acknowledgment of any crustal distortion within the European continent, or the possibility of radial crustal expansion, the primary flaw in this method of palaeoradius determination is the assumption that the most likely palaeoradius is that at which the precision parameter k is maximum, hence VGP scatter is at a minimum.

Hypothetical examples (1) (Figure 48) and (2) (Figure 49) demonstrate two important features not considered by Ward (1963):

  1. during Earth expansion ancient pole positions disperse along a small circle arc determined by the age of the rock formation, and;
  2. pole positions, using conventional pole equations, actually reach a maximum dispersion when Ra = Ra and a minimum dispersion only when Ra approaches unity R, on an Earth of the present radius.

Ward's method of minimum scatter of VGPs was used by McElhinny & Brock (1975) for twenty six pole positions from Triassic and Cretaceous sample sites at widely separated parts of Africa (Figure 57). The mean poles determined by McElhinny & Brock, 1975, from northwest and southern Africa, form a cluster whose distribution was considered to be typical of poles sampled from regions of continental extent. This led McElhinny & Brock, 1975, to conclude that the palaeopole position, with respect to Africa, remained in essentially the same position throughout the whole of the Mesozoic.The method of minimal dispersion of VGPs set out by Ward (1963) was applied to the African Triassic and Cretaceous groups of data separately to determine the mean pole position, and a close approximation to the palaeoradius determined using the palaeomeridian method of Egyed (1960) where:

Ra = present angular separation of the sites/past angular separation of the sites

The data of McElhinny & Brock (1975) differ from the European data of Egyed (1960) and Cox & Doell (1961a) in that, the sample sites from Africa straddle the palaeoequator. As such, the latitudes calculated from site-data were added together rather than subtracted as in the European case.

The value of Ra determined by McElhinny & Brock (1975) amounted to 1.11 ± 0.20 for the Triassic, 1.06 ± 0.24 for the Cretacious, and 1.12 ± 0.17 for all of the Mesozoic values combined. These may be compared to values of 1.08 for the Triassic and 1.03 for the Cretacious determined by McElhinny & Brock (1975), using Fisher statistics to determine the palaeoradius from a pole precision (k) maxima plot. The values of Ra determined demonstrated to McElhinny & Brock (1975) that hypotheses of Earth expansion "are very difficult to sustain".

Figure 57 McElhinny & Brock's (1975) African Mesozoic site locations (lower figure) and palaeoma
Pin it
Figure 57 McElhinny & Brock's (1975) African Mesozoic site locations (lower figure) and palaeomagnetic pole positions (upper figure) used to determine palaeoradius of the Earth. Full circles represent Triassic, and full squares represent Cretaceous site locations and pole positions in both figures. (From McElhinny & Brock, 1975)

At first glance McElhinny & Brock's (1975) determination of palaeoradius appears conclusive. Africa is generally considered geologically stable therefore site separation may be deemed constant, pole positions form a relatively neat cluster and the Ra/R ratios determined from two independent methods consistently indicated nil expansion. Like Egyed (1960), Cox & Doell (1961a, 1961b), van Hilten (1963, 1968) and Ward (1963) the primary assumption in determining palaeoradius was the constancy of continental surface area. As previously demonstrated the conventional palaeomeridian method is insensitive to crustal extension, and the method of minimal dispersion assumes that the most probable palaeoradius is determined from the point of minimal dispersion of poles. In addition it must be noted that the fundamental dipole equation determines latitude/colatitude only from site mean inclination data. The dipole equation cannot determine longitude, hence any rotation of either or both of the site locations relative to each other cannot be detected using the palaeomeridian method.

Rotation of the site locations will however decrease the meridional angular separation, while still retaining a constant angular separation and constant pole position. Intracontinental deformation of Africa was documented independently by Unternehr et al(1988), which complements observations from empirical small Earth modeling (Figure 25) suggesting the possibility of intracratonic plate rotation for Africa.This rotation allowed for a better reconstruction for South America and Africa along the South Atlantic spreading axis in both conventional and small Earth reconstructions.

The results of McElhinny & Brock (1975) therefore cannot be considered conclusive of zero Earth expansion with time, and in fact can be equally shown to be evidence for expansion.

Discussion

The geological implications of an expanding Earth, as can be appreciated, is a topic which requires as much geological input and research as has plate tectonics to do it justice. The subject is further discussed in Carey (1975, 1988, 1994) (see David Ford's web site "The EXPANDING EARTH"), covering a broad range of topics not included in this paper. The brief discussions on relief of surface curvature, orogenesis, atmospheric and hydrospheric accumulation, and palaeomagnetics were addressed as the major perceived problems confronting the general acceptance of Earth expansion as a viable alternative to plate tectonics.

During Earth expansion, when dealing with relief of surface curvature, it was considered important to recognize the broad tectonic distribution of cratons, orogens, and sedimentary basins,each with their own definitional tectonic framework, which differ fundamentally from the modern ocean basin setting. Small Earth modeling demonstrated that each of these tectonic regimes react differently during Earth expansion, from fragmentation of Precambrian cratons, such as the Canadian Arctic Islands and Greenland, to large scale continental extension marked by intracratonic sedimentary basins, such as the West Siberian Basin in central Russia.

Orogenesis was considered intimately related to asymmetric expansion of the Earth resulting in intracratonic interaction during relief of surface curvature. This asymmetric expansion process was attributted to the hemihedral and antipodal distribution of the present day continents and oceans. The radial and tangential vector components of this asymmetric expansion process giving rise to a continuum of orogenic models varying from compressional to translational and torsional.

Similarly, during Earth expansion, it was suggested that the whole column of atmosphere, hydrosphere, oceanic lithosphere and underlying mantle has been added at an accelerating rate through geological time, which Carey (1983c) considered to have been accreted primarily at the growing ridges and rift zones. As the ocean waters and ocean floors both have the same origin it is to be expected that they would be produced pari passu, with the generation of ocean water and atmosphere keeping pace with the growth of oceanic lithosphere (Carey, 1983c).

Palaeomagnetics has long been considered the cornerstone of plate tectonics yet fundamental premises regarding the constancy of continental surface area, used to determine palaeoradius, stem from the early 1960s, prior to the development of modern global tectonic concepts or completion of the oceanic crustal database. Mathematical equations were developed by palaeomagneticians from conclusions that insist that continental surface areas have remained essentially constant, hence any variation in palaeoradius was concluded to have been negligible with time. Since these equations were first derived, modern plate tectonic concepts have demonstrated that the Earth's crust is not a passive adjunct of lithospheric plates, but a dynamic, interactive layer of the Earth (Grant, 1992).

The modified palaeomagnetic equations developed in this web site for the determination of palaeopole positions since the Early Jurassic prompts a need for a more thorough overhaul of the concepts of palaeomagnetics, in particular the conclusions drawn from the interpretations of pole positions, apparent polar wander paths, and displaced terranes.

Summary and Conclusions

The many geophysical and geological paradoxes that have accumulated during the past two or three decades are apparently the consequences of forcing observational data into an inadequate tectonic model (Storetvedt 1992).

Carey (1958) demonstrated, on a globe representing the Earth's modern dimensions, that if the continents were reassembled into the Pangaean configuration the fit was reasonably precise at the centre of the reassembly, and along the common margins of northwest Africa and the United States east coast embayment, however became progressively imperfect away from these areas. Carey concluded from this research that the fit of the Pangaean reassembly could be made much more precise in these areas if the diameter of the Earth were assumed to have been smaller at the time of Pangaea.Early model makers such as Hilgenberg (1933), Barnett (1962, 1969), and Vogel (1983, 1984, 1990) in particular, demonstrated empirically, through use of small Earth models, that the Pangaean continental reassemblage could be fitted together at a reduced Earth radius of between 55 to 60% of the present radius, to form a closed crust. Vogel (1983) concluded that, the Earth has therefore expanded exponentially with time from this early Pangaean configuration to the present, with continental separation caused by a "radial expansion" of the Earth.

In order to accurately quantify any variation in the Earth's palaeoradius, and constrain plate configuration with time it was argued that, it is necessary to take into account the area and pattern of oceanic lithospheric generation as portrayed in maps such as Larson et al (1985) and CGMW & UNESCO (1990). By using the method of least squares to calculate gradients of curves of best fit from the cumulative empirical oceanic and continental surface area data, it was concluded that the goodness of fit is best described by an exponential curve of best fit. Palaeoradius was then determined and an equation for the exponential increase in palaeoradius of the Earth from the Archaean to the Present was therefore established as:

R_a = (R_0 - R_p)e^{kt} + R_p

Where: Ra = ancient palaeoradius of the Earth, R0 = present radius of the Earth,Rp = primordial Earth radius = approx. 1700 km, e = exponential,t= time before present (negative), k = a constant = 4.5366 x 10-9/yr


This equation, assuming the assumptions used to derive the equation are correct, was considered to be the "fundamental equation" for Global Expansion Tectonics, enabling the kinematics of an Earth undergoing an exponential expansion, from the Archaean to the Present, to be readily determined. Modeling the kinematics of Earth expansion suggested that the controlling influence on Earth expansion may not be a result of a secular increase in mass with time, as suggested by Carey (1983a). The cause of Earth expansion was considered however to being intimately related to a cosmological expansion of the Universe.

Very low rates of expansion during the pre-Early Jurassic were demonstrated to agree well with Glikson's (1980) conclusions of a prolonged period of widespread tensional taphrogenesis during the Archaean and Proterozoic, with intense thermal and ductile activity during the Proterozoic mobile belt phase, prior to onset of intrasialic rifting, crustal thinning and development of modern oceans and "geosynclinal" sedimentation during the Palaeozoic.

To test Global Expansion Tectonics and, in particular, the mathematical parameters developed from the empirical sea floor magnetic isochron data, spherical small Earth models were constructed. These models indicated that, if the Earth has expanded exponentially since the at least the Early Jurassic, in accordance with the derived mathematical expression for exponential palaeoradius, then small Earth reconstructions coincide fully with the spreading and geological fit data.

This coincidence applied not only to the passive margin oceans, where conventional reconstructions agree in principle, but also to the Pacific Ocean whereby the necessity for subduction of all or part of, the oceanic lithosphere generated at spreading ridges was refuted.

Relief of curvature and orogenesis on an exponentially expanding Earth, although thoroughly covered by Rickard (1969), Carey (1975, 1976, 1983a, 1986) and Glikson (1979), is still very much in its infancy, compared to the voluminous coverage of plate tectonics Earth dynamic processes. The onset of orogenesis became marked during the Early to Mid Phanerozoic as continental lithosphere fragmented and dispersed under the action of accelerating increase in surface area and isostatic crustal equilibration to the changing surface curvature. Both Rickard (1969) and Carey (1975, 1976, 1983a, 1986) put forward models for orogenesis and geosynclinal development, under conditions of surface curvature readjustment, and demonstrated that continental collision may not be required to promote orogenesis as is required in conventional plate tectonics.

The magnitude of horizontal foreshortening during isostatic equilibration of the surface curvature however, effectively demonstrated the potential for tangentially directed compression acting within a continental plate during exponential expansion of the Earth. This suggested a prime mechanism for orogenesis during Earth expansion.

The nature of mantle fluids, and mantle metasomatism, although briefly touched on, indicated, within the limitations of experimental constraints, that mantle devolatilization of the volatile species in the system C-O-H-S can exist in the Earth's mantle. It was suggested that retention of these species within the mantle was made possible by the high P-T-g conditions prevailing during the Precambrian, due to the much reduced Earth radius, and that devolatilization to form the hydrosphere and atmosphere was a progressive and possibly accelerating process of outgassing of the mantle with time, as a direct consequence of the reduction of P-T-g conditions. The implications of the application of the modified dipole equations to palaeomagnetism was such that every palaeopole position determined to date, using the existing conventional dipole equation is potentially wrong, and conclusions drawn from the interpretations of these pole positions, such as apparent polar wander paths, are therefore misleading.

It is concluded that, Global Expansion Tectonics provides the necessary "motor and mechanism" for Earth expansion, which enables the dynamic principles behind all major geologic phenomena to be resolved and readily explained.

References

  • AHMAD F., 1983. Late Palaeozoic to Early Mesozoic palaeogeography of the Tethys region. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 131-145.
  • AHMAD F., 1988a. Estimates of palaeodiameters of the Earth through geological time. Journal of the Geological Society of India31 (6), pp 386-397.
  • AHMAD F., 1988b. Estimates of palaeodiameters of the Earth through geological times comment reply. Journal of the Geological Society of India32 (6), pp 331.
  • AINES R.D., & ROSSMAN G.R., 1984. Water content of mantle garnets. Geology12, pp 720-723.
  • ANDERSON A.T., 1975. Some basaltic and andesitic gases. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics13, number 1, pp 37-55.
  • ANDREWS J.A., 1985. True polar wander: an analysis of Cenozoic and Mesozoic paleomagnetic poles. Journal of Geophysical Research90, pp 7737-7750.
  • AUDLEY-CHARLES M.G., BALLANTYNE P.D., & HALL R., 1988. Mesozoic-Cenozoic rift-drift sequence of Asian fragments from Gondwanaland. Tectonophysics155, pp 317-330.
  • AVIAS J.V., 1977. Facts and arguments about Permo-Triassic opening of a neo Pacific Ocean in an Earth expansion hypothesis. International Symposium on Geodynamics in South-West Pacific Noumea (New Caledonia), 27 August - 2 September 1976. Editions Technip, Paris, pp 381-386.
  • BAILEY D.K., & STEWART A.D., 1983. Problems of ocean water accumulation on a rapidly expanding Earth. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 67-69.
  • BARNETT C.H., 1962. A suggested reconstruction of the land masses of the Earth as a complete crust. Nature195, pp 447-448.
  • BARNETT C.H., 1969. Oceanic rises in relation to the expanding Earth hypothesis. Nature221, pp 1043-1044.
  • BECK A.E., 1960. An expanding Earth with loss of gravitational potential energy. Nature185, pp 677-678.
  • BECK A.E., 1969. Energy changes in an expanding Earth. In: Runcorn S.K. (ed.) The Application of Modern Physics to Earth and Planetary Interiors. Wiley and Sons, London, pp 77-83.
  • BELOUSSOV V.V., 1984. Certain problems of the structure and evolution of transition zones between continents and oceans. Tectonophysics105, pp 79-102.
  • BERGER W.H., & WINTERER E.L., 1974. Plate stratigraphy and the fluctuating carbonate line. In: Hsü K.J. & Jenkyns H.C. (eds). Pelagic Sediments: on Land and Under the Sea. Special Publication 1, International Association of Sedimentologists, pp 11-48.
  • BIRCH F., 1968. On the possibility of large changes in the Earth's volume. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 1, pp 141-147.
  • BLATT H., & JONES R.L., 1975. Proportions of exposed igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks.Geological Society of America Bulletin86, pp 1085-1088.
  • BLINOV V.F., 1973. Problems of possible Earth evolution (a discussion). Academy of Science, Ukraine S.S.R.,Geophysical Series54, pp 85. (in Russian).
  • BLINOV V.F., 1983. Spreading rate and rate of expansion of the Earth. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 297-304.
  • BOSS A.P. & SACKS I.S. 1985. Formation and growth of deep mantle plumes. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society80, pp 241-255.
  • BOZHKO N.A., 1987. Rifting in the Proterozoic.Tectonophysics143, pp 93-101.
  • BRIDEN J.C., HURLEY A.M., & SMITH A.G., 1981. Paleomagnetism and Mesozoic-Cenozoic paleocontinental maps. Journal of Geophysical Research86, pp 11631-11656.
  • BRÖSSKE L., 1962. Wächst die Erde mit Katastrophen? Düsseldorf.
  • BRUNNSCHWEILER R.O., 1983. Evolution of geotectonic concepts in the past century. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 9-15.
  • BULLARD E., EVERETT J.E., & SMITH A.G., 1965. The fit of the continents around the Atlantic. In: Symposium on continental drift. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A 258, pp 41-51.
  • BURRETT C.F., 1983. Early Palaeozoic palaeomagnetism and biogeography - plate tectonics or expansion? In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 79-86.
  • BUTLER R.F., 1992. Paleomagnetism: Magnetic Domains to Geologic Terranes. Blackwell Scientific Publications, USA, 319p.
  • CAREY S.W., 1958. The tectonic approach to continental drift.In: Continental Drift, a Symposium, 958. University of Tasmania, Hobart, pp 177-355.
  • CAREY S.W., 1961. Palaeomagnetic evidence relevant to a change in the Earth's radius. Nature190, pp 36.
  • CAREY S.W., 1963. The asymmetry of the Earth. Australian Journal of Science25, pp 369-383 and 479-488.
  • CAREY S.W., 1970. Australia, New Guinea, and Melanasia in the current revolution in concepts of the evolution of the Earth. Search 1 (5), pp 178-189.
  • CAREY S.W., 1975. The expanding Earth - an essay review. Earth Science Reviews11, pp 105-143.
  • CAREY S.W., 1976. The Expanding Earth. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 488p.
  • CAREY S.W., 1983a. Earth expansion and the null Universe. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 365-372.
  • CAREY S.W., 1983b. Tethys, and her forebears. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 169-187.
  • CAREY S.W., 1983c. The necessity for Earth expansion. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 375-393.
  • CAREY S.W., 1986. Diapiric krikogenesis. In: Scalera G. (ed), International Conference on "The Origin of Arcs". Urbino, Italy, September 1986, pp 1-40.
  • CAREY S.W., 1988. Theories of the Earth and Universe: A History of Dogma in the Earth Sciences. Stanford University press, Stanford, California.
  • CAREY S.W., 1994. Earth, Universe, Cosmos. University of Tasmania, Hobart. In press, 204p.
  • CEBULL S.E., & SHURBET D.H., 1992. Conventional plate tectonics and orogenic models. In: Chatterjee S. & Hotton N (III) (eds), New Concepts in Global Tectonics. Texas Technical Press, USA, pp 111-117.
  • CGMW & UNESCO, 1990. Geological Map of the World. Commission for the Geological Map of the World, Paris.
  • CHATTERJEE S., & HOTTON N., (III) (eds), 1992. New Concepts in Global Tectonics. Texas Technical Press, USA, 449p.
  • CHATTERJEE S., 1992. A kinematic model for the evolution of the Indian plate since the Late Jurassic. In: Chatterjee S., & Hotton N.,(III), (eds), New Concepts in Global Tectonics. Texas Technical University Press, Lubbock, 1992, pp 33-62.
  • CHRISTODOULIDIS D.C., SMITH D.E., KOLENKIEWICZ R., KLOSKO S.M., TORRENCE M.H., & DUNN P.J., 1985. Observing tectonic plate motions and deformations from satellite laser ranging. Journal of Geophysical Research90, pp 9249-9263.
  • CIRIC B.M., 1983a. Is subduction a real phenomenon? In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 247-257.
  • CIRIC B.M., 1983b. The Mediterranean Tethys in Alpine time - evidence for Earth expansion. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 149-160.
  • CLARKE I.F., & COOK B.J., 1983. Perspectives of the Earth. Australian Academy of Sciences Canberra, 651p.
  • CLOOS M., 1993. Lithospheric buoyancy and collisional orogenesis: subduction of oceanic plateaus, continental margins, island arcs, spreading ridges, and seamounts. Geological Society of America Bulletin105, pp 715-737.
  • CLOUD P.E. (Jr), 1968. Atmospheric and hydrospheric evolution on the primitive Earth. Science160, pp 729-735.
  • COHEN S.C., KING R.W., KOLENKIEWICZ R., ROSEN R.D., & SCHUTZ B.E., (eds). 1985. Lageos scientific results: Journal of Geophysical Research90, pp 9215-9438.
  • CONDIE K.C., 1989. Plate Tectonics and Crustal Evolution. Third edition. Pergamon Press.
  • COX A., & DOELL R.R., 1960. Review of palaeomagnetism. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America71, pp 645-768.
  • COX A., & DOELL R.R., 1961a. Palaeomagnetic evidence relevant to a change in the Earth's radius. Nature189, pp 45-47.
  • COX A., & DOELL R.R., 1961b. Palaeomagnetic evidence relevant to a change in the Earth's radius. Nature190, pp 36-37.
  • CRAWFORD A.R., 1979. The myth of a vast oceanic tethys, the India-Asia problem and Earth expansion. Journal of Petroleum Geology 2 (1), pp 3-9.
  • CRAWFORD A.R., 1986. The origin of the Pacific on an expanding Earth. In: Wezel F.C. (ed). The origin of Arcs. Developments in Geotectonics21. pp 423-434.
  • CREER K.M., 1964. A reconstruction of the continents for the Upper Palaeozoic from palaeomagnetic data. Nature203, pp 1115-1120.
  • CREER K.M., 1965. An expanding Earth? Nature205, pp 539-544.
  • CREER K.M., 1967. Earth, possible expansion of. In: Runcorn S.K. (ed),International Dictionary of Geophysics. Pergamon, London. pp 383-389.
  • CREER K.M., 1970. A review of palaeomagnetism. Earth Science Reviews6, pp 369-466.
  • CROSSLEY D.J., & STEVENS R.K., 1976. Expansion of the Earth due to a secular decrease in G - evidence from Mercury. Canadian Journal of Earth Science13 (12), pp 1723-1725.
  • DACHILLE F., 1977. Meteorites - little and big: from shooting stars to Earth shaking catastrophes. Earth and Mineral Sciences46, pp 49-52.
  • DACHILLE F., 1983. Great meteorite impacts and global geological responses. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania.
  • DALZIEL W.D., 1991. Pacific margins of Laurentia and East Antarctica-Australia as a conjugate rift pair: evidence and implications for an Eocambrian supercontinent. Geology19, pp 598-601.
  • DAVIDSON J.K., 1983. Tethys and Pacific stratigraphic evidence for an expanding Earth. In: Carey S.W. ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 191-197.
  • DAVIES F.B., & WINDLEY B.F., 1976. Significance of major Proterozoic high grade linear belts in continental evolution. Nature263, pp 383-385.
  • DEARNLEY R., 1965a. Orogenic fold-belts, convection and expansion of the Earth. Nature206, pp 1284-1290.
  • DEARNLEY R., 1965b. Orogenic fold-belts and continental drift. Nature206, pp 1083-1087.
  • DEARNLEY R., 1966. Orogenic belts and a hypothesis of Earth evolution. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 1-114.
  • DEARNLEY R., 1969. Crustal tectonic evidence for Earth expansion. In: Runcorn S.K. (ed.) The Application of Modern Physics to Earth and Planetary Interiors. Wiley and Sons, London, pp 103-110.
  • DENNIS J.G., 1962. Fitting the continents. Nature196, pp 364.
  • DERRY D.R., 1980. World Atlas of Geology and Mineral Deposits. Mining Journal Books Ltd., Sheffield, England. 110p.
  • DICKE R.H., 1962. The Earth and cosmology. Science138, pp 653-664.
  • DOOLEY J.C., 1973. The expanding Earth. Search 4, pp 9-15.
  • DOOLEY J.C., 1983. A simple physical test of Earth expansion. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 323-326.
  • EGGLER D.H., & BAKER D.R., 1982. In: Akimoto S. & Manghnani M.H. (eds), Advances in Earth and Planetary Sciences, High-Pressure Research in Geophysics12, Centre for Academic Publications, Tokyo. pp 237-250.
  • EGGLER D.H., 1987. Solubility of major and trace elements in mantle metasomatic fluids: experimental constraints. In: Menzies M.A. & Hawkesworth C.J. (eds), Mantle Metasomatism. Academic Press, London. pp 21-41.
  • EGGLER D.H., MYSON B.O., HOERING T.C., & HOLLOWAY J.R., 1979. The solubility of carbon monoxide in silicate melts at high pressure and its effect on silicate phase relations. Earth and Planetary Science Letters43, pp 321-330.
  • EGYED L., 1956. The change in the Earth's dimensions determined from palaeogeographical data. Geofisica Pura Applica33, pp 42-48.
  • EGYED L., 1960. Some remarks on continental drift.Geofisica Pura Applica45, pp 115-116.
  • EGYED L., 1961. Palaeomagnetism and the ancient radii of the Earth. Nature190, pp 1097-1098.
  • EGYED L., 1963. The expanding Earth? Nature197, pp 1059-1060.
  • EGYED L., 1969. The slow expansion hypothesis. In: Runcorn S.K. (ed.) The Application of Modern Physics to Earth and Planetary Interiors. Wiley and Sons, London, pp 65-74.
  • EHRENSPERGER J., 1988. Die Expansion des Kosmos, Die Expansion der Erge: Auflage, Verlag, Vogel W., Winterthur, Switzerland, 59p.
  • FAIRHEAD J.D., 1988. Mesozoic plate tectonic reconstructions of the central South Atlantic Ocean: the role of the West and Central African rift system.Tectonophysics155, pp 181-191.
  • FANALE F.P., 1971. A case for catastrophic early degassing of the Earth. Chemical Geology 8, pp 79-105.
  • FISHER R.A., 1953. Dispersion on a sphere. Proceedings of the Royal Society of LondonA217, pp 295.
  • GAHAGAN L.M., SCOTESE C.R., ROYER J.Y., SANDWELL D.T., WINN J.K., TOMLINS R.L., ROSS M.I., NEWMAN J.S., MULLER R.D., MAYES C.L., LAWVER L.A., & HEUBECK C.E., 1988. Tectonic fabric map of the ocean basins from satellite altimetry data. Tectonophysics155, pp 1-26.
  • GARFUNKEL Z., 1975. Growth, shrinking, and long-term evolution of plates and their implications for the flow pattern in the mantle. Journal of Geophysical Research80, pp 4425-4432.
  • GEALEY W.K., 1988. Plate tectonic evolution of the Mediterranean-Middle East region. Tectonophysics155, pp 285-306.
  • GLIKSON A.Y., 1979. The missing Precambrian crust. Geology 7, pp 449-454.
  • GLIKSON A.Y., 1980. Precambrian sial-sima relations: evidence for Earth expansion. Tectonophysics63, pp 193-234.
  • GLIKSON A.Y., 1993. Asteroids and early Precambrian crustal evolution. Earth-Science Reviews35, pp 285-319.
  • GORAI M., 1983. A consideration on the primordial size of the Earth. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 105-107.
  • GRANT A.C., 1992. Intracratonic tectonism: key to the mechanism of diastrophism. In: Chatterjee S., & Hotton N.,(III), (eds), New Concepts in Global Tectonics. Texas Technical University Press, Lubbock, 1992, pp 65-73.
  • GRAY G.G., & NORTON I.O., 1988. A palinspastic Mesozoic plate reconstruction of New Zealand. Tectonophysics155, pp 391-399.
  • GSWA., 1990. Geological Survey of Western Australia, 1990, Geology and Mineral Resources of Western Australia: Western Australia Geological Survey, Memoir 3, 827p.
  • HALLAM A., 1971. Re-evaluation of the palaeogeographic argument for an expanding Earth. Nature232, pp 180-182.
  • HALLAM A., 1984. Pre-Quaternary sea-level changes. Annual Review of Earth and Planetery Sciences12, pp 205-243.
  • HALM J.K.E., 1935. An astronomical aspect of the evolution of the Earth. Presidential Address. Astronomical Society of South Africa4, pp 1-28.
  • HANDSCHUMACHER D.W., SAGER W.W., HILDE T.W.C., & BRACEY D.R., 1988. Pre- Cretaceous tectonic evolution of the Pacific plate and extension of the geomagnetic polarity reversal time scale with implications for the origin of the Jurassic "Quiet Zone".Tectonophysics155, pp 365-380.
  • HAWKINS J.W., BLOOMER S.H., EVANS C.A., & MELCHIOR J.T., 1984. Evolution of intra oceanic arc-trench systems. Tectonophysics102, pp 175-205.
  • HEEZEN B.C., 1959. Géologie sous-marine et déplacements des continents. In: La topographie et la géologie des Profondeurs Océaniques. Colloques internationales du C.N.R.S.83, pp 295-304.
  • HERRON E.M., DEWEY J.F., & PITMAN W.C., 1974. Plate tectonic model for the evolution of the Arctic. Geology2, pp 377-380.
  • HILGENBERG O.C., 1933. Vom wachsenden Erdball. Selbstverlag, Berlin, 50p.
  • HILGENBERG O.C., 1962. Paläopollagen der Erde. Neues Jahrb. Geol. und Paläontol., Abhandl 116, Struttgart.
  • HOFFMAN P.F., 1991. Did the breakout of Laurentia turn Gondwanaland inside-out? Science25, pp 1409-1412.
  • HOLLOWAY J.R., 1977. Fugacity and activity of molecular species in supercritical fluids. In: Fraser D.C. (ed), Thermodynamics in Geology. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland. pp 161-181.
  • HOLMES D.L., 1965.Principles of Physical Geology, third edition. Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd, pp 701-708.
  • HORA H., 1983. Degenerate plasma phases to explain the expansion of the Earth while releasing energy. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 363-364.
  • HOSPERS J., & VAN ANDEL S.I., 1967. Palaeomagnetism and the hypothesis of an expanding Earth. Tectonophysics 5 (1), pp 5-24.
  • IRVINE T.N., 1989. A global convection framework: concepts of symmetry, stratification, and system of the Earth's dynamic structure. Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists84 (8), pp 2059-2114.
  • IRVING E., 1964. Paleomagnetism and its application to geological and geophysical problems. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 399p.
  • IVANENKO D.D., & SAGITOV M.V., 1961. O gipoteze rassheryayushchcusya Zemli. (The hypothesis of an expanding Earth). Vestnik Moskovskaia Universiteta, third series, 6, 83p. (in Russian).
  • IVANKIN V.P., 1990. Time increase of the Earth mass and dimensions - determinant of the Earth's development. In: Critical Aspects of the Plate Tectonics Theory; Volume II, Alternative Theories. Theophrastus Publishers, Athens, Greece, pp 95-113.
  • JACKSON M.J., & POLLACK H.N., 1987. Mantle devolatilization and convection: implications for the thermal history of the Earth. Geophysical Research Letters14, number 7, pp 737-740.
  • JACOBS J.A., 1989. Geomagnetism. Academic Press, London, 3 volumes.
  • JEFFREYS H., 1962. A suggested reconstruction of the land masses of the Earth as a complete crust; comment. Nature195, pp 448.
  • JORDAN P., 1969. On the possibility of avoiding Ramsay's hypothesis in formulating a theory of Earth expansion. In: Runcorn S.K. (ed.) The Application of Modern Physics to Earth and Planetary Interiors. Wiley and Sons, London, pp 55-63.
  • KATZ M.B., 1976. Early Precambrian granulites-greenstones, transform mobile belts and ridge-rifts on early crust? In: Windley B.F. ed. The Early History of the Earth. John Wiley & Sons, London, New York, pp 147-155.
  • KEINDL J., 1940. Dehnt sich die Erde aus? Herold-Verlag, MÜnchen-Solln, pp 1-50.
  • KHAIN V.Y., 1974. Modern ideas on causes and mechanisms of tectogenesis. An experiment in critical analysis and conclusions. International Geological Reviews16, pp 169.
  • KHRAMOV A.N., 1987. Certain problems in paleomagnetism.In: Tarling D.H. (ed), Paleomagnetology. Springer-Verlag, pp 245-259.
  • KIRILLOV I.B., 1958. A hypothesis of the development of the Earth and continents and ocean basins. (in Russian).
  • KOLCHANOV V.P., 1971. O.C. Hilgenberg's paleogeographic representations of an expanding Earth. Geotektonika 4, pp 252-259.
  • KREMP G.O.W., 1983. Precambrian events indicative of Earth expansion. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 91-99.
  • KREMP G.O.W., 1992. Earth expansion theory versus statical Earth assumption. In: Chatterjee S. & Hotton N. (III). (eds). New Concepts in Global Tectonics. Texas Technical University Press, USA, pp 297-307.
  • KUZNETSOV V.V., 1983. A model of the Earth's core and its geomagnetic field. Soviet Geology and Geophysics24 (5), pp 74-80.
  • KUZNETSOV V.V., 1984. Some aspects of the tectonics of an expanding Earth. Soviet Geology and Geophysics25 (1), pp 19-23.
  • LARSON R.L., PITMAN W.C.(III)., 1972. World-wide correlation of Mesozoic magnetic anomalies, and its implications.Geological Society of America Bulletin83, pp 3645-3662.
  • LARSON R.L., PITMAN W.C.(III)., GOLOVCHENKO X., CANDE S.C., DEWEY J.F., HAXBY W.F., & LaBRECQUE (mapcompilers) 1985. The Bedrock Geology of the World. Freeman & Co., New York.
  • LAY T., 1989. Structure of the core/mantle transition zone; a chemical and thermal boundary layer. EOS, Transaction of the American Geophysical Union70, pp 49-59.
  • LePICHON X., SIBUET J.C., & FRANCHETEAU J., 1977. The fit of the continents around the North Atlantic Ocean.Tectonophysics38, pp 169-209.
  • LINDERMAN B., 1927. Kettengebirge, Kontinentale Zerspaltung und Erdexpansion. Gustav Fischer Publishers, Jena. 186p.
  • LISOWSKI M., 1991. Recent plate motions and crustal deformation. Reviews of Geophysics, Supplement, pp 162-171.
  • LUNDBERG N., & REED D.L., 1991. Continental Margin Tectonics: forearc processes.Reviews of Geophysics, Supplement, pp 794-806.
  • MARVIN U.B., 1973. Continental Drift - the Evolution of a Concept. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington.
  • MASCLE J., BLAREZ E., & MARINHO M., 1988. The shallow structures of the Guinea and Ivory Coast-Ghana transform margins: their bearing on the Equitorial Atlantic Mesozoic evolution. Tectonophysics155, pp 193-209.
  • McDOUGALL I., MABOKO M.A.H., SYMONDS P.A., McCULLOCH M.T., WILLIAMS I.S., & KUDRASS H.R., 1994. Dampier Ridge, Tasman Sea, as a stranded continental fragment. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences41, pp 395-406.
  • McELHINNY M.W., & BROCK A., 1975. A new paleomagnetic result from East Africa and estimates of the Mesozoic paleoradius. Earth and Planetary Science Letters27, pp 321-328.
  • McELHINNY M.W., 1973. Palaeomagnetism and plate tectonics. Cambridge University Press, Great Britain, 358p.
  • McELHINNY M.W., TAYLOR S.R., & STEVENSON D.J., 1978. Limits to the expansion of Earth, Moon, Mars and Mercury and to changes in the gravitational constant.Nature271, pp 316-321.
  • MENZIES M.A., & HAWKESWORTH C.J., 1987 (eds.). Mantle metasomatism. Academic Press, London, 472p.
  • MENZIES M.A., ROGERS N., TINDLE A., & HAWKESWORTH C.J., 1987. Metasomatism and enrichment processes in lithospheric peridotites, an effect of asthenosphere-lithosphere interaction. In: Menzies M.A. & Hawkesworth C.J. (eds). Mantle metasomatism. Academic Press, London, pp 313-359.
  • MERRILL R.T., & McELHINNY M.W., 1983. The Earth's magnetic field: its history, origin and planetary perspective. Academic Press, London, 401p.
  • MESERVEY R., 1969. Topological inconsistency of continental drift on the present-sized Earth. Science166, pp 609-611.
  • MEYERHOFF A.A., TANER I., MORRIS A.E.L., MARTIN B.D., AGOCS W.B., & MEYERHOFF H.A., 1992. Surge tectonics: a new hypothesis of Earth dynamics. In: Chatterjee S. & Hotton N (III) (eds), New Concepts in Global Tectonics. Texas Technical Press, USA, pp 309-409.
  • MIDDLEMOST E.A.K., 1985. Magmas and magmatic rocks: an introduction to igneous petrology. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, 266p.
  • MILANOVSKY E.E., 1980. Problems of the tectonic development of the Earth in the light of concept on its pulsations and expansion. Revue de Geologique et de Geographie Physique22, pp 15-27.
  • MILANOVSKY Y.Y., 1978. Some aspects of tectonic development and volcanism of the Earth in the Phanerozoic (pulsation and expansion of the Earth). Geotectonics12, pp 403-411.
  • MILTON B.D., 1988. Introduction to geophysical prospecting. McGraw-Hill, New York, 867p.
  • MINSTER J.B., & JORDAN T.H., 1978. Present-day plate motions. Journal of Geophysical Research83, pp 5331-5354.
  • MOORES E.M., 1991. Southwest U.S.-East Antarctic (SWEAT) connection: a hypothesis. Geology19, pp 425-428.
  • MORGAN W.J., 1968. Rises, trenches, great faults, and crustal blocks. Journal of Geophysical Research73, pp 1959-1982.
  • MÖRNER N.A., 1981. Revolution in Cretaceous sea-level analysis. Geology 9, pp 344-346.
  • MYSEN B.O., EGGLER D.H., SEITZ M.G., & HOLLOWAY J.R., 1976. Carbon dioxide in silicate melts and crystals. Part 1. Solubility measurements. American Journal of Science276, pp 455-479.
  • NEIMAN V.B., 1962. The expanding Earth. State Publishing House, Geographical Literature, Moscow (in Russian), 80p.
  • NEIMAN V.B., 1983. Geological and geophysical proofs of the Earth's expansion. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 287-291.
  • NEIMAN V.B., 1984. Geological and geophysical proofs and possible causes of the Earth's expansion. Nauka, M., pp 116-173.
  • NEIMAN V.B., 1990. An alternative to Wegener's mobilism. In: Critical Aspects of the Plate Tectonics Theory; Volume II, Alternative Theories. Theophrastus Publishers, Athens, Greece, pp 3-18.
  • NOEL D., 1989.NUTEERIAT: Nut trees, the expanding Earth, Rottnest Island, and all that. Cornucopia Press, Perth. 200p.
  • OWEN H.G., 1976. Continental displacement and expansion of the Earth during the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London281. pp 223-291.
  • OWEN H.G., 1983a. Atlas of Continental Displacement, 200 Million Years to the Present. Cambridge Earth Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • OWEN H.G., 1983b. Constant dimensions or an expanding Earth? In: Cocks L.R.M. ed. The Evolving Earth. British Musium (Natural History), London, pp 179-192.
  • OWEN H.G., 1983c. Ocean-floor spreading evidence of global expansion. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 31-58.
  • OWEN H.G., 1992. Has the Earth increased in size? In: Chatterjee S. & Hotton N. (III). (eds). New Concepts in Global Tectonics. Texas Technical University Press, USA, pp 289-296.
  • PALMER A.R., 1983. The decade of North American Geology 1983 geologic time scale. Geology11, pp 503-504.
  • PANNELLA G., MacCLINTOCK C., & THOMPSON M.N., 1968. Paleontological evidence of variations in length of synodic month since Late Cambrian.Science162, pp 792-796.
  • PARSONS B., 1981. The rates of plate creation and consumption. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astrological Society67, pp 437-448.
  • PARSONS B., 1982. Causes and consequences of the relation between area and age of the ocean floor. Journal of Geophysical Research87, pp 289-302.
  • PATRIAT P., & SEGOUFIN J., 1988. Reconstruction of the Central Indian Ocean. Tectonophysics155, pp 211-234.
  • PFEUFER J., 1983. The thermal expansion of the Earth. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 328.
  • PHIPPS MORGAN J., 1991. Mid-ocean ridge dynamics: observations and theory. Reviews of Geophysics, Supplement, pp 807-822.
  • PINDELL J.L., & BARRETT S.F., 1987. Geological evolution of the Caribbean region: a plate-tectonic perspective. In: Dengo G., & Case J.E., (eds), The Geology of North America, Volume H, The Caribbean Region. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.
  • PINDELL J.L., & DEWEY J.F., 1982. Permo-Triassic reconstruction of western Pangea and the evolution of the Gulf of Mexico/Caribbean region. Tectonics 1, pp 179-212.
  • PINDELL J.L., 1985. Alleghenian reconstruction and the subsequent evolution of the Gulf of Mexico, Bahamas and proto-Caribbean Sea. Tectonics 4, pp 1-39.
  • PINDELL J.L., CANDE S.C., PITMAN W.C. (III), ROWLEY D.B., DEWEY J.F., LABRECQUE J., & HAXBY W., 1988. A plate-kinematic framework for models of Caribbean evolution. Tectonophysics155, pp 121-138.
  • PIPER J.D.A., 1989. Palaeomagnetism. In: Jacobs J.A. ed. Academic Press Ltd. pp 31-147.
  • PITMAN W.C., & TALWANI M., 1972. Sea-floor spreading in the North Atlantic. Geological Society of America Bulletin83, pp 619-646.
  • POWELL C.McA., JOHNSON B.D., & VEEVERS J.J., 1980. A revised fit of east and west Gondwanaland. Tectonophysics63, pp 13-29.
  • POWELL C.McA., ROOTS S.R., & VEEVERS J.J., 1988. Pre-breakup continental extension in East Gondwanaland and the early opening of the eastern Indian ocean.Tectonophysics155, pp 261-283.
  • RABINOWITZ P.D., & LaBREQUE J., 1979. The Mesozoic South Atlantic Ocean and evolution of its continental margins. Journal of Geophysical Research84, pp 5973-6002.
  • RAMBERG H., 1983. The role of gravity in orogenic belts. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 233.
  • RICKARD M.J., 1969. Relief of curvature on expansion - a possible mechanism of geosynclinal formation and orogenesis. Tectonophysics 8, pp 129-144.
  • ROMANOV E., 1966. Shtormy podzemnovo kosmosa. Tekhnika Molodezhi 9, pp 10-13.
  • ROSS M.I., & SCOTESE C.R., 1988. A hierarchical tectonic model of the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean region. Tectonophysics155, pp 139-168.
  • ROWLEY D.B., & LOTTES A.L., 1988. Plate-kinematic reconstructions of the North Atlantic and Arctic: Late Jurassic to Present. Tectonophysics155, pp 73-120.
  • ROYER J-Y., PATRIAT P., BERGH H.W., & SCOTESE C.R., 1988. Evolution of the Southwest Indian ridge from the Late Cretaceous (anomaly 34) to the Middle Eocene (anomaly 20). Tectonophysics155, pp 235-260.
  • RUBEY W.W., 1975. Geologic history of sea water; an attempt to state the problem. In: Kitano Y., (ed), Geochemistry of Water. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.
  • SAGER W.W., HANDSCHUMACHER D.W., HILDE T.W.C., & BRACEY D.R., 1988. Tectonic evolution of the northern Pacific plate and Pacific-Farallon-Izanagi triple junction in the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous (M21-M10). Tectonophysics155, pp 345-364.
  • SAVOSTOVIN L.A., SIBUET J.C., ZONENSHAIN L.P., LePICHON X., & ROULET M.J., 1986. Kinematic evolution of the Tethys belt from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pamirs since the Triassic. In: Auboin J., LePichon X., & Monin A.S., (eds), Evolution of the Tethys. Tectonophysics123, pp 1-35.
  • SCALERA G., 1988. Nonconvential Pangea reconstructions: new evidence for an expanding Earth. Tectonophysics146, pp 365-383.
  • SCALERA G., 1990. General clues favouring expanding Earth theory. In: Critical Aspects of the Plate Tectonics Theory; Volume II, Alternative Theories. Theophrastus Publishers, Athens, Greece, pp 65-93.
  • SCHEIBNER E., SATO T., & CRADDOCK C., 1991a. Tectonic map of the circum-Pacific region, southwest quadrant. Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources, U.S. Geological Survey.
  • SCHEIBNER E., SATO T., DOUTCH H.F., ADDICOTT W.O., TERMAN M.J., & MOORE G.W., 1991b. Explanatory notes for the tectonic map of the circum-Pacific region, southwest quadrant.Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources, U.S. Geological Survey, 59p.
  • SCHMIDT P.W., & CLARK D.A., 1980. The response of palaeomagnetic data to Earth expansion. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astrological Society61, pp 95-100.
  • SCHMIDT P.W., & EMBLETON B.J.J., 1981. A geotectonic paradox: has the Earth expanded? Journal of Geophysics49, pp 20-25.
  • SCHOLL D.W., & VALLIER T.L., 1983. Subduction and the rock record of Pacific margins. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 235-245.
  • SCLATER J.G., HELLINGER S., & TAPSCOTT C., 1977. The paleobathymetry of the Atlantic Ocean from the Jurassic to present. Journal of Geology85, pp 509-552.
  • SCLATER J.G., PARSONS B., & JAUPART C., 1981. Oceans and continents: similarities and differences in the mechanisms of heat loss. Journal of Geophysical Research86, pp 11535-11552.
  • SCOTESE C.R., 1987. Development of the circum-Pacific Panthallassic Ocean during the Early Paleozoic. In: Monger J.W.H. & Francheteau J. (eds), Circum-Pacific orogenic belts and evolution of the Pacific Ocean basin. Geodynamic Series18, pp 49-57.
  • SCOTESE C.R., GAHAGAN L.M., & Larson R.L., 1988. Plate tectonic reconstructions of the Cretaceous and Cenozoic ocean basins. Tectonophysics155, pp 27-48.
  • SENO T., & MARUYAMA S., 1984. Paleogeographic reconstruction and origin of the Philippine Sea. Tectonophysics102, pp 53-84.
  • SHARMAN G.F., & RISCH D.L., 1988. Northwest Pacific tectonic evolution in the Middle Mesozoic. Tectonophysics155, pp 331-344.
  • SHIELDS O., 1976. A gondwanaland reconstruction for the Indian ocean.Journal of Geology85, pp 236-242.
  • SHIELDS O., 1979. Evidence for initial opening of the Pacific ocean in the Jurassic. Palaeontology, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology26, pp 181-220.
  • SHIELDS O., 1983a. The role of gravity and asteroid impacts in Earth expansion. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 277-282.
  • SHIELDS O., 1983b. Trans-Pacific biotic links that suggest Earth expansion. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 199-205.
  • SHIELDS O., 1988. Post-Triassic Earth expansion perhaps caused by a cometary impact in Tibet. Journal of the Geological Society of India32, pp 506-512.
  • SHIELDS O., 1990. Plate tectonics on an expanding Earth. In: Critical Aspects of the Plate Tectonics Theory; Volume II, Alternative Theories. Theophrastus Publishers, Athens, Greece, pp 271-290.
  • SMILEY C.J., 1992. Paleofloras, faunas, and continental drift: some problem areas. In: Chatterjee S. & Hotton N (III) (eds), New Concepts in Global Tectonics. Texas Technical Press, USA, pp 241-257.
  • SMIRNOFF L.S., 1992. The contracting-expanding Earth and the binary system of its megacyclicity. In: Chatterjee S. & Hotton N. (III). (eds). New Concepts in Global Tectonics. Texas Technical University Press, USA, pp 441-449.
  • SPENCE W., 1987. Slab pull and the seismotectonics of subducting lithosphere. Reviews of Geophysics25, pp 55-69.
  • SRIVASTAVA S.P., & TAPSCOTT C., 1986. In: Tucholke B.E., & VOGT P.R., (eds), The Geology of North America. Volume M. The Western Atlantic Region. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, pp 379-404.
  • SRIVASTAVA S.P., 1978. Evolution of the Labrador Sea and its bearing on the early evolution of the North Atlantic. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronological Society52, pp 313-357.
  • SRIVASTAVA S.P., 1985. Evolution of the Eurasian Basin and its implications to the motion of Greenland along the Nares Strait. Tectonophysics114, pp 29-53.
  • STACEY F.D., 1977. Physics of the Earth. (second edition), John Wiley & Sons, New York, 414p.
  • STEINER J., 1967. The sequence of geological events and the dynamics of the Milky Way Galaxy. Geological Society of Australia14, pp 99-131.
  • STEINER J., 1977. An expanding Earth on the basis of sea-floor spreading and subduction rates. Geology5, pp 313-318.
  • STEWART A.D., 1977. Quantitative limits to palaeogravity. Journal of the Geological Society of London133, pp 281-291.
  • STEWART A.D., 1978. Limits to palaeogravity since the late Precambrian. Nature271, pp 153-155.
  • STEWART A.D., 1983. Quantitative limits to the palaeoradius of the Earth. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 305-319.
  • STEWART I.C.F., 1976. Mantle plume separation and the expanding Earth. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astrological Society46, pp 505-511.
  • STOCKLIN J., 1983. Himalayan orogeny and Earth expansion. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 119-130.
  • STOCKWELL C.H., 1973. Revised Precambrian time scale for the Canadian Shield. Geological Survey of Canada Paper, pp 52-72.
  • STORETVEDT K.M., 1992. Rotating plates: new concepts in global tectonics. In: Chatterjee S. & Hotton N (III) (eds), New Concepts in Global Tectonics. Texas Technical Press, USA, pp 203-220.
  • STOREY B.C., DALZIEL I.W.D., GARRETT S.W., GRUNOW A.M., PANKHURST R.J., & VENNUM W.R., 1988. West Antarctica in Gondwanaland: crustal blocks, reconstruction and breakup processes. Tectonophysics155, pp 381-390.
  • SUNDVIK M.T., & LARSON R.L., 1988. Seafloor spreading history of the western North Atlantic Basin derived from the Keathley sequence and computor graphics. Tectonophysics155, pp 49-71.
  • TALOBRE J.A., 1983. Astronomical valuation of present Earth's expansion rate. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 293-295.
  • TANNER W.F., 1983a. Absolute motion of North America, and the development of the middle America "arc". In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 219-223.
  • TANNER W.F., 1983b. Diapirism, grabens, and horizontal tension. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 227-232.
  • TARLING D.H., 1971. Principles and applications of palaeomagnetism. Chapman and Hall, London, 164p.
  • TARLING D.H., 1983. Paleomagnetism. Chapman & Hall, London, 379p.
  • TASSOS S.T., 1983. Entropy and expansion of the Earth. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 359-361.
  • TAYLOR S.R., 1983. Limits to Earth expansion from the surface features of the Moon, Mercury, Mars, and Ganymede. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 343-347.
  • TAYLOR S.R., 1984. Constraints on Earth expansion from surface features and ages of the Moon, Mercury, Mars and Ganymede. International Geological Congress27 (8), pp 310.
  • TERMIER H., & TERMIER G., 1969. Global palaeogeography and Earth expansion. In: Runcorn S.K. (ed.) The Application of Modern Physics to Earth and Planetary Interiors. Wiley and Sons, London, pp 87-101.
  • TRYON E.P., 1983. Cosmology and the expanding Earth hypothesis. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 349-358.
  • TURNELL H.B., 1988. Mesozoic evolution of Greek microplates from palaeomagnetic measurements. Tectonophysics155, pp 307-316.
  • UNTERNEHR P., CURIE D., OLIVET J.L., GOSLIN J., & BEUZART P., 1988. South Atlantic fits and interplate boundaries in Africa and South America. Tectonophysics155, pp 169-179.
  • VALDIYA K.S., 1984. Evolution of the Himalaya. Tectonophysics105, pp 229-248.
  • VAN ANDEL S.I., & HOSPERS J., 1968a. Palaeomagnetic calculations of the radius of the ancient Earth by means of the palaeomeridian method. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 1, pp 155-163.
  • VAN ANDEL S.I. & HOSPERS J. 1968b. A statistical analysis of ancient Earth radii calculated from palaeomagnetic data. Tectonophysics 6, pp 491-497.
  • VAN ANDEL S.I. & HOSPERS J. 1968c. Palaeomagnetism and the hypothesis of an expanding Earth: a new calculation method and its results. Tectonophysics5, pp 273-285.
  • VAN DER VOO R., 1993. Paleomagnetism of the Atlantic, Tethys and Iapetus Oceans. Cambridge University Press, 411p.
  • VAN DIGGELEN J., 1976. Is the Earth expanding? Nature262, pp 675-676.
  • VAN HILTEN D., 1963. Palaeomagnetic indications of an increase in the Earth's radius. Nature200, pp 1277-1279.
  • VAN HILTEN D., 1965. The ancient radius of the Earth. Royal Astrological Society Geophysical Journal 9, pp 279-281.
  • VAN HILTEN D., 1968. Global expansion and palaeomagnetic data. Tectonophysics 5, pp 191-210.
  • VEEVERS J.J., POWELL C.McA., & ROOTS S.R., 1991. Review of seafloor spreading around Australia. 1. Synthesis of the patterns of spreading. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences38, pp 373-389.
  • VOGEL K., 1983. Global models and Earth expansion. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 17-27.
  • VOGEL K., 1984. Beitrage zur frage der expansion der Erde auf der grundlage von globenmodellen. Z. geol. Wiss. Berlin 12 (1984) 5. S. 563-573.
  • VOGEL K., 1990. The expansion of the Earth - an alternative model to the plate tectonics theory. In: Critical Aspects of the Plate Tectonics Theory; Volume II, Alternative Theories. Theophrastus Publishers, Athens, Greece, pp 14-34.
  • VON HUENE R., & SCHOLL D.W., 1991. Observations at convergent margins concerning sediment subduction, subduction erosion, and the growth of continental crust. Reviews of Geophysics29, pp 279-316.
  • WALZER U., & MAAZ R., 1983. On intermittent lower-mantle convection. In: Carey S.W. (ed), Expanding Earth Symposium, Sydney, 1981. University of Tasmania, pp 329-340.
  • WARD M.A., 1963. On detecting changes in the Earth's radius. Geophysical Journal 8, pp 217-225.
  • WARD M.A., 1966. Comments on detecting changes in the Earth's radius. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astrological Society10, pp 445-447.
  • WEGENER A., 1929. Die Entstehung der Kontinente und Ozeane. 4. Aufl. Braunschweig: Verl. Vieweg & Sohn, 231p.
  • WEIJERMARS R., 1986. Slow but not fast global expansion may explain the surface dichotomy of Earth. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors43, pp 67-89.
  • WEIJERMARS R., 1989. Global tectonics since the breakup of Pangea 180 million years ago:evolution maps and lithospheric budget. Earth-Science Reviews26, pp 113-162.
  • WESSON P.S., 1973. The implications for geophysics of modern cosmologies in which G is variable. Quarterley Journal of the Royal Astrological Society14, pp 9-64.
  • WEZEL F.C., 1992. Global change: shear dominated geotectonics modulated by rhythmic Earth pulsations. In: Chatterjee S. & Hotton N (III) (eds), New Concepts in Global Tectonics. Texas Technical Press, USA, pp 421-439.
  • WILLIAMS Q., JEANLOZ R., BASS J., SWENDSEN B., & AHRENS T.J., 1987. Meeting curve of iron to 250 Gigapascals, constraint on the temperature of Earth's centre. Science230, pp 181-182.
  • WILSON J.T., 1960. Some consequences of expansion of the Earth. Nature185, pp 880-882.
  • WORSLEY T.R., NANCE D., & MOODY J.B., 1984. Global tectonics and eustasy for the past 2 billion years. Marine Geology58, pp 373-400.
  • WYLLIE P.J., 1979. Magmas and volatile components. American Mineralogist64, pp 469-500.
  • YARKOVSKII I.O., 1899. Vsemiroetyagotenie, kak sledstvie obrazovaniya vesognoi materri vnutri nebesnich tel. (Universal gravitation as a consequence of the formation of matter within celestrial bodies). Moscow, 79p. (in Russian).
  • YUEN D.A., & PELTIER W.R., 1980. Mantle plumes and the thermal stability of the "D" layer. Geophysical Research Letters 7, pp 625-628.
  • ZHI-GENG C., 1990. Initial values of the basic parameters and the average change rate of the expanding Earth. Acta Geophysica Sinica33 (5), pp 611-618.

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT