Ooparts - Objects out of time
In this article I'd like to delve into the topic of ooparts, specific objects that are, in essence, "out of time." In other words, they are found in contexts that are highly unlikely, if not outright impossible, according to the conventional flow of history as we understand it. To provide a clear illustration, consider the scenario of discovering a mobile phone inside a sealed tomb dating back to 2000 BC—an object that clearly could not have existed during that era.
While no cell phones have actually been unearthed in ancient tombs, there exist numerous mysterious objects and discoveries that warrant investigation. Some appear to be evidently false, while others leave us genuinely astounded. Regardless, the explanations offered for how such objects or findings could exist typically fall into one of two categories:
- Firstly, there are those who argue that our understanding of past history is incomplete and that humans may have inhabited the Earth millions of years ago, potentially even coexisting with dinosaurs.
- Alternatively, some interpret certain ooparts as glimpses into the future, suggesting that these objects would only be explicable in their respective time periods if humans were capable of traveling back in time and inadvertently leaving modern artifacts behind.
However, let's proceed systematically and present the most renowned ooparts known to date.
The stones of Ica
They derive their name from the city of Ica in Peru, where a doctor named Javier Cabrera Darquea reportedly discovered thousands of these stones in a mysterious and unknown cave.
Allegedly, some farmers in the area sold him stones they claimed to have found along the river. Subsequently, the doctor conducted extensive research until he located the cave and uncovered additional stones.
The remarkable feature of these stones lies in the engravings adorning them: they depict seemingly impossible scenes, including meticulously drawn dinosaurs of various species, human-dinosaur battles, and even advanced technologies. Such depictions defy conventional archaeological understanding because, as widely known, dinosaurs became extinct approximately 65 million years ago, while Homo sapiens only emerged around 200,000 years ago.
As evident from the images, the first depicts a sort of tyrannosaurus, while the other two showcase creatures resembling a brontosaurus, with the latter displaying intricate details, as seen in the final stone. Undoubtedly, these depictions raise significant questions.
If the stones are genuine, they would serve as compelling evidence that ancient Peruvians were acquainted with prehistoric history, coexisting and occasionally battling dinosaurs in eras devoid of documented human or other intelligent life forms. Alternatively, their authenticity could imply the survival of dinosaurs into much more recent times than previously thought, potentially even inhabiting subterranean realms today, with ancient Peruvians possessing knowledge of their existence.
However, the authenticity of these stones is subject to considerable skepticism. The circumstances of their discovery, along with the mysterious and elusive nature of the purported cave, cast doubt on their validity. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that Peruvian farmers could create similar stones using rudimentary tools, artificially aging them with cow dung or by exposing them to chicken coops. While fervent supporters of the Annunaki may interpret these stones as incontrovertible proof of their presence, others view them as a testament to the ancient beings' influence on human civilization, with the engravings serving as a record of their interactions with Homo sapiens.
Forming a definitive opinion on the matter proves challenging. While it would be intriguing to authenticate these stones, their susceptibility to replication casts doubt on their veracity. Thus, despite their captivating nature, the abundance of uncertainties surrounding these artifacts leans more toward the possibility of a hoax rather than authentic discoveries.
Kingoodie's hammer
Less documented but equally renowned is the so-called "Kingoodie Hammer." This discovery is truly enigmatic, and unlike other cases, it does not appear to be a hoax. In Scotland, a piece of sandstone dating back approximately 350 million years was unearthed in this location, a dating confirmed by the British Geological Survey.
What makes this discovery extraordinary is that within this sandstone block, a genuine hammer with a wooden handle was found. Remarkably, the hammer was encased INSIDE the sandstone, with the material forming around it, effectively serving as a kind of "case."
This finding remains unexplained to this day and there is no way to prove that it is a hoax; objects like this for "back to the future" lovers could be explainable if you think of a future in which we humans will be able to go back in time, accidentally leaving behind some objects, including this hammer. In my humble opinion it is truly an exceptional find that is really difficult to explain, so much so that the first time one sees it, one is often struck.
Hieroglyphics in Hunter Valley National Park, Australia
When it comes to mysteries, the Egyptians always seem to be involved, and this case is no exception.
In my opinion, it's an extraordinary discovery that hasn't received the documentation or study it deserves. We find ourselves in Australia, specifically in the Hunter Valley National Park, where hieroglyphs resembling, if not identical to, Egyptian ones are engraved above three sandstone rocks, forming a kind of "cave." Additionally, there's an unmistakable image of the god Anubis.
This unmistakable depiction of Anubis leaves little room for doubt—it is undeniably him. The inevitable question arises: Did the Egyptians somehow make their way to Australia? And if so, how? While evidence of Egyptian ships exists, these vessels were primarily designed for navigating the Nile or coastal waters near Egypt. It seems far-fetched to suggest that they possessed the means to reach Australia and establish a colony there. Some speculate whether Egyptians were already present in Australia in ancient times, or if other civilizations transported them there—perhaps the same civilizations responsible for constructing the three Great Pyramids of the Giza Plateau, utilizing natural resources and energies to perfectly cut and assemble stones.
This enigmatic artifact warrants further exploration. Besides a few detailed images, there is limited information about these hieroglyphs, making it challenging to determine if they genuinely originated from Australia. Unfortunately, this topic appears to garner little interest from scholars and archaeologists. If we were to verify their authenticity, we would need to undertake a journey to Australia ourselves—assuming the stones are even accessible. However, if authentic, these findings would serve as compelling evidence of the mysteries surrounding humanity's recent history, suggesting the existence of highly advanced pre-diluvian civilizations and survivors of cataclysmic events who preserved their writing and culture, known as "Egyptians" in Egypt.
The Antrim giant
Sometimes, however, it is precisely the least documented and oldest things that arouse many, many doubts, especially because at the beginning of the 1900s there were not many techniques for creating "special effects" in order to generate artificially impossible objects. This is the case of the Antrim giant; Only two photographs of him published by Strand magazine are known.
Discovered during a mineral exploration in Ireland, this figure stood at an impressive height of 3.70 meters and notably possessed six toes on each foot. Were these giants remnants of an advanced pre-Flood civilization? Did they truly exist? Do these photographs genuinely capture the unveiling of a being that defies conventional understanding?
It's difficult to ascertain. However, what adds to the intrigue is the subsequent disappearance of both the mummified body and its discoverer, leaving behind a trail of speculation and mystery. This disappearance lends credence to the notion that perhaps something was unearthed and displayed that was never meant to be discovered.
In my humble opinion, there seemed to be no justification for the speculation and pursuit of fame surrounding this discovery in 1895, much like the questionable circumstances surrounding the Ica stones now housed in the discoverer's paid museum. While it's unlikely that we'll ever encounter this giant again, the impact of these photographs on me was profound upon first viewing.
The pyramid of Cheops
Although it is not an oopart (but the whole Pyramid could be considered as such in reality), I want to close this short article with the interpretation of a 19th century text, to demonstrate how sometimes we get too carried away and we jump to hasty conclusions without thinking in the simplest way possible.
The interior of the Great Pyramid has been studied in detail and, in section, it turns out to be more or less like this.
Overlooking the legend relating to the letters in the figure (suffice it to say that the letter C is the king's chamber), there are many sites that oppose this well-studied and proven scheme, reporting a different one, exactly this one.
It might be possible to create such a scheme based on a text titled "On the Pyramids of Egypt and Their Construction - Thoughts and Observations" by Cav. Emarese Enrico, dated 1861. It appears that this scheme was more or less depicted within the book, as Enrico, being a typographer, likely illustrated what he described. Although I initially found it implausible that a drawn section of the Pyramid could be crafted in 1861, I read Enrico's lines which seem to justify the existence of a large central cavity. He describes, "...what was my surprise when I realized I was in the of a large square tower, so high that the many lights of the elevated candles could not illuminate its top?"
This description, reminiscent of Columbus's egg or Brunellesco's, suggests that Enrico believed the entrance door's height from the ground was due to uneven ground levels. He also suggests that the corridor's hasty descent was engineered to facilitate the sliding of stones into the pyramid's center. Lastly, he proposes that raising such a massive structure could be achieved by elevating the stones to the inclined landing and then sliding them down to the center using a sturdy winch.
Enrico's mention of a "large room" resembling a square tower at the pyramid's center aligns with the scheme depicting a central room perpendicular to the pyramid's base. However, it's unclear how Enrico, armed only with candles, could ascertain that he was precisely at the pyramid's center. Additionally, to access the "king's chamber" (merely a title, as no king was ever buried there), one must traverse a tunnel—square and inclined—resembling a tower. This tunnel, present in reality but missing from the second scheme, raises doubts about its accuracy. Moreover, the tunnel is so long that it's doubtful one could see its end even with ample lighting.
In my opinion, it's highly likely that the printer drew a scheme different from the one presented, as what one encounters upon entering the Pyramid of Cheops is a vast tunnel resembling a tower, leading to the "King's chamber." If the second scheme were accurate, it's unclear how one could reach the King's chamber, especially considering the absence of the upward-sloping tunnel that actually exists and which I myself have traversed (albeit with considerable effort).
This discussion underscores the importance of exercising caution when exploring ooparts (out-of-place artifacts) and not blindly accepting information from various sources. It's essential to form a personal opinion on the matter, but ideally, one should verify claims firsthand, as I did with the Pyramid of Cheops.
Comments