Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Netizens-Digest Volume 1 Number 297
Netizens-Digest Saturday, April 24 1999 Volume 01 : Number 297
Netizens Association Discussion List Digest
In this issue:
[netz] Personal Domain Name Ownership Organization
[netz] Democratic International Domain Name Organizations Source List
[netz] "There's a natural human tendency to look for someone to blame and to look for explanation of what is inexplicable and unthinkable."
[netz] [RRE]Citizens at the Crossroads: Whose Information Society?
[netz] Monopoly Telco/Cable Buyout
[netz] Brook Meeks & Internet Governance: US Government failing the Challenge
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 12:34:51 -0400
From: "P.A. Gantt" <pgantt@icx.net>
Subject: [netz] Personal Domain Name Ownership Organization
Subject: cr> Iperdome to Organize Netizens for Internet Governance
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 01:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Cyber Rights <cyber-rights@cpsr.org>
To: "Multiple recipients of list cyber-rights@cpsr.org"
<listserv-reply-errors@snyside.sunnyside.com>
ATLANTA, April 22 /PRNewswire/ -- Iperdome, Inc., the company
offering Personal Domain Name services under the .per(SM) name and Top
Level Domain (TLD), has formed the Personal Domain Name Holders
Association (http://www.pdnha.org ), a new organization designed to
give individuals a voice in the legislative branch of ICANN.
Specifically, the PDNHA will continue the fight for fair and open
processes, the protection of minority interests, and most importantly,
the protection of civil liberties.
According to Jay Fenello, President of Iperdome and the interim
Executive Director for the PDNHA, "U.S. citizens have come to expect
certain rights and civil liberties from our government.
Unfortunately, this unique American perspective has collided with the
governance philosophies found in the other 240+ countries throughout
the world. Consequently, many of our most closely held beliefs about
governance have not been incorporated into ICANN. Things like no
taxation without representation, due process, consent of the governed,
etc.
The PDNHA will continue the fight for these truly American values, not
just for Americans, but for all Netizens of the world."
Netizens who believe in traditional American values, who own a Personal
Domain Name (i.e. Yourname.com), and who wish to participate in Internet
Governance are encouraged to join.
SOURCE Iperdome, Inc.
Web Site: http://www.pdnha.org
Web Site: http://www.iperdome.com
(Unreadable URL removed--Andy)
Respectfully,
Jay Fenello
President, Iperdome, Inc.=A0 404-943-0524=A0
http://www.iperdome.com Mailto:Jay@Fenello.per.to
~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~-~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~
Posted by Andrew Oram - cr-owner@cpsr.org - Moderator: CYBER-RIGHTS
A CPSR Project -- http://www.cpsr.org -- cpsr@cpsr.org
http://www.cpsr.org/cpsr/nii/cyber-rights/
ftp://www.cpsr.org/cpsr/nii/cyber-rights/Library/
Materials may be reposted in their _entirety_ for non-commercial use.
~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~-~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~
- --
P.A. Gantt, Computer Science Technology Instructor
Electronic Media Design and Support
http://user.icx.net/~pgantt/
[the Internet] could remain what it ought to be:
just a public instrument. There ought to be efforts --
not just talk but real efforts -- to ensure Internet
access, not just for rich people but for everyone.
~~ Noam Chomsky ~~
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 12:54:01 -0400
From: "P.A. Gantt" <pgantt@icx.net>
Subject: [netz] Democratic International Domain Name Organizations Source List
Source:
PDNHA
Personal Domain Name Holders Association
"...While the formation of Internet Governance has been
occurring over the last couple of years, only a small number
of stakeholders have been involved in the process. Those
that were, however, represented many large corporate
and government interests. Thankfully, a handful of
individuals and small organizations have been in the trenches
fighting for fair and open processes, protection of minority
interests, and most importantly, representation for the
only constituency that ultimately matters -- the Internet
users (aka Netizens)...
...Please Join Us
If you would like to participate in Internet Governance,
if you believe in traditional American values, and if you own
a Personal Domain Name (i.e. Yourname.com), please join us.
To find out more about the PDNHA, or if you would
like to join or support our efforts, please send a short message to
info@pdnha.org
...Other Netizen Organizations
If you would like to explore some other ways to participate
in Internet Governance, here are some other
organizations to consider:
The Domain Name Rights Coalition
http://www.domain-name.org/
International Congress of Independent Internet Users
http://www.iciiu.org/
The Democratic Association of Domain Name Owners
http://www.democracy.org.nz/
..."
- --
P.A. Gantt, Computer Science Technology Instructor
Electronic Media Design and Support
http://user.icx.net/~pgantt/
[the Internet] could remain what it ought to be:
just a public instrument. There ought to be efforts --
not just talk but real efforts -- to ensure Internet
access, not just for rich people but for everyone.
~~ Noam Chomsky ~~
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 13:21:37 -0400
From: "P.A. Gantt" <pgantt@icx.net>
Subject: [netz] "There's a natural human tendency to look for someone to blame and to look for explanation of what is inexplicable and unthinkable."
Source:
Original Post of Declan McCullagh to Politech
Subject: FC: Colorado shootings: Looking for someone to blame
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 12:34:49 -0400
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: politech@vorlon.mit.edu
Source:
Wired News
Printable Version:
http://www.wired.com/news/print_version/culture/story/19291.html?wnpg=all
[Use Ctrl C + Ctrl V for long URLs twice]
http://www.wired.com/news/news/culture/story/19291.html
Looking for Something to Blame
by Declan McCullagh
8:55 a.m. 23.Apr.99.PDT
WASHINGTON -- Just minutes after Eric
Harris and Dylan Klebold gunned down
over a dozen of their high school
classmates, the world began searching
for an explanation. The massacre seemed
too abrupt, too painful, and too
inexplicable not to probe into the young
men's psyches, just a little.
A profile of the duo soon emerged in news
reports. They were Hitler admirers,
outcasts, possibly Y2K buffs, and
certainly loners.
They were also reportedly computer
geeks, fans of Doom and Quake. Harris
had, like many avid players, created
additional levels of the game. His alleged
Web site on America Online, since yanked
by the company, reportedly detailed plans
for constructing bombs.
[...]
Trying to shield vulnerable members of
society from disruptive influences is a
response as old as humanity itself. Circa
500 BC, the Greek philosopher Anaxgoras
was tossed in a dungeon after claiming
that the gods were mythical abstractions,
not reality. A jury in 1852 convicted a
Franciscan friar of burning a King James
Bible in violation of Irish law.
[...]
Congress' reaction this week is not new.
In congressional hearings in 1952, mental
health experts from the Mayo Clinic
blamed delinquency on TV "murder,
violence, shooting, hanging, kidnapping,
and the doings of wicked witches."
Laboratory studies in the 1960s -- since
called into question -- seemed to confirm
that violent films or cartoons led to
violent behavior.
[...remainder snipped...]
- --
P.A. Gantt, Computer Science Technology Instructor
Electronic Media Design and Support
http://user.icx.net/~pgantt/
[the Internet] could remain what it ought to be:
just a public instrument. There ought to be efforts --
not just talk but real efforts -- to ensure Internet
access, not just for rich people but for everyone.
~~ Noam Chomsky ~~
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 99 13:32:25 EDT
From: Michael Hauben <hauben@columbia.edu>
Subject: [netz] [RRE]Citizens at the Crossroads: Whose Information Society?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
This message was forwarded through the Red Rock Eater News Service (RRE).
Send any replies to the original author, listed in the From: field below.
You are welcome to send the message along to others but please do not use
the "redirect" command. For information on RRE, including instructions
for (un)subscribing, see http://dlis.gseis.ucla.edu/people/pagre/rre.html
or send a message to requests@lists.gseis.ucla.edu with Subject: info rre
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 18:07:49 -0400
From: Bernd Frohmann <frohmann@julian.uwo.ca>
Subject: Call for Papers
[..]
The University of Western Ontario, Government of Canada's Department of
Canadian Heritage and the Canadian
International Development Agency
Call for Papers
CITIZENS AT THE CROSSROADS: WHOSE INFORMATION SOCIETY?
October 21-24, 1999, London, ON Canada
Abstracts and papers are invited for a conference to address issues
related to the growth of the knowledge-based economy and society.
Specifically the conference, as part of a government-wide policy
research agenda, will address citizenship in the information society
by exploring the forces that advance and impede civic participation
domestically and internationally, in the developing and developed
world.
The conference is expected to attract both researchers and policy
professionals.
Abstracts and papers are invited on these topics:
Ownership and control of electronic and other media networks,
services and information; different forms of commercial and
political control; impact on access and on the exercise of
citizenship
Controversial content, censorship, propaganda, and privacy;
tensions between freedom of expression and the control of illegal
activities; new forms of propaganda and censorship; the protection
of children
Civic knowledge, education, and participation: rights and
responsibilities and citizenship in an information society;
is a virtual education, education?; how the net and other forms
of communication expand and constrain civic participation.
Democracy and political action: effects of new networks and
the freer flow of information on national and other identities,
political cultures and the way people mobilize for action within
and across borders (esp. in biotechnology as information)
Human rights, diversity, and marginalization: importance of access
to information and communication media for human rights; risks of
marginalization and homogenization.
Abstracts: May 31, 1999
Papers: October 1, 1999
Submissions should be sent electronically to
fims-conference@julian.uwo.ca and should include a one-page abstract
of a paper or panel proposal in MS word or ASCII format. In addition,
the Program Committee needs a one-page C.V. or biography, which
includes citations of relevant work. Selected papers should be no
more than 30 pages. Papers not received by the October 1 deadline
will be removed from the program. The conference also intends to
provide access to all accepted papers either through publication or
via our web site. A monograph will be published based on a selected
number of papers presented at the conference. Please check our web
site at www.fims.uwo.ca after May 1 for conference and registration
information.
Manjunath Pendakur, Dean
Chair, Conference Program Committee
Faculty of Information and Media Studies
The University of Western Ontario
London, ON N6A 5B7 Canada
- --
Bernd Frohmann, Associate Professor
Faculty of Information & Media Studies
The University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario N6A 5B7 CANADA
voice: (519) 661-2111 ext. 4235 | fax: (519) 661-3506
http://www.fims.uwo.ca/people/faculty/frohmann.html
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 17:31:17 -0400
From: "P.A. Gantt" <pgantt@icx.net>
Subject: [netz] Monopoly Telco/Cable Buyout
Source:
C|Net News Dispatcher
C|Net: The Computer Network
News.com Dispatch
Breaking News at the Speed of the Net
Friday, April 23, 1999
"...AT&T: Broadband or bust
Continuing its transformation from a long distance behemoth to
a broadband powerhouse, AT&T makes a surprise bid for cable
operator MediaOne. Chief executive C. Michael Armstrong is
wasting no time trying to reshape the once-lumbering phone
giant into a broadband superpower..."
http://www.news.com/News/Item/0%2C4%2C35557%2C00.html?dd.ne.txt.0423.08
Why didn't the FCC block this?
Why didn't the FTC block this?
- --
P.A. Gantt, Computer Science Technology Instructor
Electronic Media Design and Support
http://user.icx.net/~pgantt/
[the Internet] could remain what it ought to be:
just a public instrument. There ought to be efforts --
not just talk but real efforts -- to ensure Internet
access, not just for rich people but for everyone.
~~ Noam Chomsky ~~
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 08:22:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ronda Hauben <ronda@panix.com>
Subject: [netz] Brook Meeks & Internet Governance: US Government failing the Challenge
Jay Fenello <Jay@Iperdome.com> wrote:
>:FYI:
>:Some of the names have changed,
>:but the story remains the same:
I disagree. The story turns out to be different from what Brook
Meeks thought.
>======================================
> [Early August, 1997]
>http://www.msnbc.com/news/wwwashington.asp
>Domain Names and the Threat to the Net
>A tale of intrigue, double-dealing and global power struggles
> by Brock N. Meeks, MSNBC
>WASHINGTON - This is a tale that has all the intrigue, double-dealing and
>global power struggles of a spy novel. But the plot line is real, with
>nothing less then the fate of the Internet community hanging in the
>balance. Call it the 'Domain Name' factor.
>It starts with a group of self-appointed technocrats, a kind of Internet
>cabal, which operates with no authority of law or formal governance, which
>has simply rushed in to fill the power vacuum on the Internet, which has,
>since inception, operated in a spirit of consensus and community.
The U.S. government's actions to privatize the Internet Names and
Numbers functions (IANA) is really a different scenario than Brock
Meeks recognized in his article two years ago. Meeks seemed to
believe that there were those outside the U.S. government
who were acting to steal the owership and control of these vital
Internet functions. Instead it seems that a small group of
those with ties to certain private interests but inside
the U.S. government have realized that the Internet Names
and Numbers functions, and protocols which have grown up
under the scientific process that ARPA made possible, needed a
safe and protected home to be able to scale and to function.
Instead of welcoming such a public purpose, they took that
as the sign that they could fleece the public in the biggest
heist ever, and grab for a small set of private interests,
these public and cooperative assets and processes that
make it possible for the Internet to function.
Despite the Report of the Office of Inspector General of the
NSF in February 1997 which pointed out that these assets are
invaluable public assets, created at the expense of millions
of dollars of public funding, and that these public assets
need to be protected by those in the U.S. government,
certain private interests set out to grab control over these
public assets for their own private and self serving interests.
The Internet grew up because there was an effort and a means
of keeping the "vested interests" at bay and protectinig
its development from them.
This plan of privatizing the IANA functions with no concern for the
public interests or assets nor for most commercial interests
who depend on the Internet as a communciation medium,
is being carried out by the National Telecommunication Information
Administration of the U.S. Dept of Commerce, despite the fact that
they have *no* authority to give away this public property,
and it is in violation of their governmental obligations to only
do what is permitted by law.
When Becky Burr was asked by a U.S. Congressman by what authority
the NTIA was giving away public assets to some unknown private
sector entity, she said that the Dept of Commerce lawyers said they
had the authority.
Then when the NTIA issued a Memorandum of Agreement for a design
and test entity to carry out their illegitimate plan to create
a corporation to privatize the Internet Names and Numbers and
protocols functions and assets, they listed only the authority
of the NTIA to write contracts, *not* any authority to create
private corporations to give away public assets and functions and
policy making authority over the Internet to.
There is no legal or constitutional authority for the U.S. government
to be giving away these public assets. And yet public officials
are proceeding as if they make up their own rules as they go
along, rather than that they have any obligation under the law
or constitution. All of the public property and rights are
thus being put in jeopardy by this activity of the U.S. government,
as government is thus becoming a rule of disdain for the law
and the constitution, rather than having any authority of law
or constitutional authority. The action of the NTIA and those
in the U.S. government who are functioning to support the
actions of the NTIA show that with regard to actions of the
U.S. government only those with money and power have any sway
and that the U.S. government will only function at their behest
and to give them whatever they wish despite the lack of any
authority in law or constitutional authority to do so.
So the U.S. government is announcing itself as a "government
of the disdain for law" as a "government of the powerful and
privileged" and as a means of their fleecing the public of
all their rights and property.
The U.S. government has had a challenge put up to it. The
challenge is to act via the processes and procedures authorized
by law and by the Constitution which will provide a way
to create a proper form to protect the Internet Names and Numbers
and protocols from the vested interests who want to seize them.
The vested interests are out in force campaigning for their
own enrichment and against the public interest. Thus far
it seems that the U.S. government has demonstrated its
incapacity to be able to respect its own obligations and
responsibilities to the public.
This is a serious challenge to the U.S. government and to
governments around the world. If those public officials who
have any understanding of government and its compact with
the people via a constitution that only allows that which is
provided for to be done are *not* able to act because they
will loose their jobs, and only those public officials who
are willing to do the bidding of those with financial
interests to pressure them, then this shows the fact that
there is a need for the people to do what is necessary to
create a government of law and one that is bound by its
compact with the public.
The U.S. government is facing a very serious test. And thus
far it is failing the test in a way that will have very
serious ramifications for people around the world.
The Internet has been the hope that there could be a fairer
shake for the common folk. And it has held out the promise
that all could have a voice, not just the rich and powerful.
And the U.S. federal district court in Philadelpia in the
case overturning the Communications Decency Act passed by
the U.S. Congress, and affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court,
instructed the U.S. government to protect the ability of
the average people to the important new communications medium
that the Internet has become.
But by the U.S. government's plan to transfer not only
the domain name system, but also the root server system, the IP
numbers and protocols that make it possible to have an
Internet, to some secret and illegitimate entity that has
been created by behind the scenes maneuvers and power plays,
it is showing the world that only corruption and criminality
rules when it counts in the U.S. And it is announcing to the
world that only the narrow commercial interests of a few large
corporate entities are being protected by the U.S. government
and that the people's right to participate in having a voice
in Internet development is being abandoned.
This is a great challenge. And thus far those who try to
stand up to the challenge are penalized, and those who
give into the powerful and the corrupt are rewarded.
So Brock Meeks statement below, 2 years ago, was but an
understatement. It presented a challenge to the U.S .government
and the challenge remains.
Ronda
ronda@panix.com
Meeks wrote:
>Not since the OPEC oil cartel of 1970s have so few held so many in economic
>bondage. The Internet cabal holds no less power over the global economic
>infrastructure we call cyberspace.
>This cabal intends to control how and when new domain names will be added
>to the current list of .com, .org, .edu, .gov and .mil, and who gets the
>rights to act as a registry of those domain names.
>THE MEMO
>The group operates from a document, known as the Generic Top Level Domain
>Memorandum of Understanding, produced by 11 self-appointed participants in
>closed-door meetings in Geneva.
>The group set up a U.N.-style international tribunal that operates under
>the auspices of the International Telecommunications Union, which has
>headquarters in Geneva. The group steadfastly contends that the process has
>been `open` from the beginning and that such a document is needed to ensure
>fair competition and stability for the registration of domain names and the
>Internet.
>But the group has garnered no consensus in the Internet community. During a
>two-day meeting on the issue of domain name registry held in Washington
>last week, the veneer of openness and cooperation being spun by the cabal
>began to be stripped away.
>Make no mistake, this process is not about technology, it is all about
>power, said Jay Fenello, president of Iperdome, a small company that is
>vying to compete in the domain name registry business.
>THE INTRIGUE
>This whole mess started as a result of the troubles Network Solutions Inc.
>had in its role as the sole administer of so-called 'Top Level Domain'
>names, those ending in .com, .edu, .org, etc. NSI operates as a
>government-subsidized monopoly under a contract set to expire next year.
>Anticipating the end of that monopoly, two influential groups decided that
>some plan had to be put in motion to guide the Internet going forward.
>Those two groups are the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, or IANA, and
>the Internet Society, known as ISOC.
>The IANA operates under a loose charter from the U.S. government to act as
>kind of administrator for handing out the blocs of numbers that are tied to
>each formal domain name, such as MSNBC.COM, which are used by "root
>servers" to determine what message goes where. The ISOC is a non-profit,
>scientific, educational and charitable entity, incorporated in 1992 in
>Washington.
>FUTURE OF THE INTERNET
>These two groups put together the Internet International Ad Hoc Committee,
>which hunkered down for eight weeks with members of the ITU and World
>Intellectual Property Organization and hammered out the memo of
>understanding, a document that essentially sets up a global governance
>scheme for the future of the Internet.
>That document spawned other organizations, such as the Policy Oversight
>Committee, which is intended to oversee policies outlined in the memo.
>Members of the oversight committee were chosen from those who drafted the
>document. It then fell to the ITU to circulate the memo for signatures from
>its members, which are comprised of sovereign states.
>To date, the memo has garnered more than more than 150 signatories.
>However, those signatories come with a huge caveat: not a single
>government, save Albania, has signed on.
>This process has drawn the ire of virtually everyone outside the small
>cabal of organizations that had a hand in drafting the document. The memo,
>"although without the stature of a treaty because it can be signed by
>parties other than sovereign states, is clearly an intergovernmental
>agreement that possesses significant binding force and effect... as public
>international law," writes Tony Rutkowski, former executive director of ISOC.
>Remember, IANA and ISOC have absolutely no formal authority to proceed with
>this process -- they just decided to "do it." Indeed, when ITU called a
>meeting of signatories and potential signatories of the memo in Geneva
>earlier this year, Secretary of State Madeline Albright sent a secret
>cable, which was leaked to the Internet, to the U.S. mission in Geneva,
>upbraiding the ITU secretary general for calling such a meeting "without
>authorization of the member governments." She instructed U.S. diplomats to
>"cover" the meeting, but with lower-level staff, so as to not give the
>appearance of U.S. support of the memo.
<...>
>THE POWER GRAB
>The cabal is moving this process forward on a fast track, claiming that
>action must be taken quickly to keep the Internet from folding in on
>itself. This hurry-up stance goes against the entire culture of the
>Internet and is yet another reason why critics claim the memo is simply a
>power grab.
>The moves by this cabal are set on a train wreck course with the U.S.
government. Currently a government interagency working group is asking the
>Internet community for suggestions on how to handle the domain name issue.
>On July 2, the Commerce Department put a notice in the Federal Register
>seeking comments on how to proceed with the issue. "The Government has not
>endorsed any plan at this time but believes that it is very important to
>reach consensus on these policy issues as soon as possible," the notice says.
>HANGING IN THE BALANCE
>In discussions with dozens of people ranging from industry to government
>officials, a theme I keep hearing is that this structure of global
>governance for the Internet won't stop at domain names. "The governance
>models that we choose today for the Internet will be the ones that are
>placed on society in the next century," a U.S. government official told
>me, in what he admittedly called a "messianic" remark. "Sometimes this
>thought keeps me up at night."
>I won't go that far, but I do know that setting up a global body that
>operates on the U.N. model will sound the death knell for an open and
>thriving spirit of innovation and cooperation that has driven the Internet
>to date. Such a governing body, emboldened by a successful domain name
>coup, isn't likely to stop there. They will take on other issues, such as
>content and marketing, in a kind of cyberspace governing mission creep.
>Let's hope that enough people respond to the Commerce Department's notice
>in time for the government to step up and stop the Internet cabal before it
>puts its plan into action.
>Meeks out....
>1997 MSNBC
See also
http://www.columbia.edu/~rh120/other/dns_proposal.txt
http://www.columbia.edu/~rh120/other/testimony_107.txt
Netizens: On the History and Impact
of Usenet and the Internet
http://www.columbia.edu/~hauben/netbook/
in print edition ISBN 0-8186-7706-6
------------------------------
End of Netizens-Digest V1 #297
******************************
