Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

Doom Editing Digest Vol. 01 Nr. 157

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
Doom editing
 · 7 months ago

From:      owner-doom-editing-digest 
To: doom-editing-digest@nvg.unit.no
Subject: doom-editing-digest V1 #157
Reply-To: doom-editing
Errors-To: owner-doom-editing-digest
Precedence: bulk


doom-editing-digest Tuesday, 14 February 1995 Volume 01 : Number 157

Re: The Enemy...
Re: DCK 2.0
Re: DCK 2.0
DEU 5.3 Beta
DoomCAD notes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "C. Sheldon" <sheldonc@acy.digex.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 18:39:15 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: The Enemy...

On 13 Feb 1995 jdh15@po.cwru.edu wrote:

>
> Hi!
>
> you never ran across this denizen of hell. Or have you? I think
> the portrait (which is wall texture MARBFAC2, by the way) bears a
> striking resemblance to the ArchVile. Just wondering what you
> thought.
>
> -j
>

It stands to reason that much of the artwork, etc, would tend
look "alike" as does most artwork by a specific artist. I can see
similarities in ALL of the doom monsters, with the possible exception of
the mutant soldiers but, even they have some "similar" facial features to
IMPS (if you look carefully) =)

Later Days,

DrWu

P.S.: at this resolution its so hard to tell anyway











------------------------------

From: Lane Copley <lcopley@crl.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 15:55:23 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: DCK 2.0

> Your .sig is too large.

Don't worry, I'm sure it will appear in alt.fan.warlord soon.

- --
Lane Copley
Je suis terrarement du tout les produits du lait.
Deiner Film mit den explitzit insectenschadenfreude sehr interessant war.



------------------------------

From: Anthony Spataro <ads@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 16:05:06 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: DCK 2.0

> > I hate to say it, but I think it is. =) Works fine on mine, except for
> > the vidcard detection which is my bastard halfbreed card's fault and the
> > hosed DPMI which is Borland's fault. It's the Curse of the New Hot
> > System, striking again.
> >
> Are you sure that this problem doesn't have anything to do with bugged
> Pentiums? Just a thought........

Actually, methinks it may. Why? Well, given that I'm a lowly segmented
mode scumsucker, this might be flawed, but, in 32-bit protected mode, you
deal with a lot of 32-bit numbers--in fact, your dealings are almost
exclusively 32-bit. So it follow that any div operations are gonna hafta
be fdiv, since normal div can't handle 32-bit inputs. Pentium's problem
is with the fdiv instruction, ne? So...make the connection.


------------------------------

From: l-sieben@MEMPHIS.EDU (ulasieben)
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 18:19:47 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: DEU 5.3 Beta

Finally! Its out! YES! Beta 1 is great...it just has those usual
beta bugs. Saving doesn't work, things don't work, etc... Good work,
though. Also, the run all checks feature is great. Some suggestions
for next Beta/Release. Put the ability to type names for textures and
flats back in. The scroll bars are nice, but if you know the name of
a texture, its easier to type its name in. Also, some of the buttons
report "Not Implemented Yet", but it works. Ex: I edit sidedef 1,
change a texture, and click OK. It says "NIY", but the changes
are saved. Also, if possible, make the pull-down menus more like
Windoze and other progs. Ex: in Windoze, you click on any menu, and
drag the pointer, and the other menus are selected. Once again, great
work!
-- Evil Genius (Jimmy Sieben)

------------------------------

From: matt.tagliaferri@pcohio.com (Matt Tagliaferri)
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 18:53:00 -0500
Subject: DoomCAD notes

DoomCAD 6.0
current status: beta (available to list members on request)

DO>Full edit capability
NO: all GUI based

DO>multi-object selections
Yes

DO>Prefab operations
Door, Room with Hallways, Sectors w/in sector, Stairs, Sprial Stairs,
Polygon sector, teleporter.

DO>Freeform sector draw N
Not really. Need two steps: lay down vertices, trace around for sector.
All lDef/sDefs are created.

DO>Multi-view Y
Implemented as Modes (Thing Mode/lDef Mode etc.

DO>Multi-mission Y
Using included WADMerge, yes

DO>Cut&and paste N
Removed for 6.0, as it was buggy as hell.

DO>Undo/Redo N
Nope.

DO>Built-in NODES Y
DO>builder 90%
Implements Raphael's first builder. Some bugs in convex sectors.
Includes DOS based builder for speed.

DO>Built-in BLOCKMAP builder Y

DO>Built-in REJECT builder N

DO>Game support
Doom 1, Doom2, Heretic.

Any new game following the WAD standard can be added by adding a new
.INI file to the directory.

DO>Supported platforms Windows 3.1, '95

DO>Cost $20- cripple-free honor system shareware only.

DO>Notes:

3D wireframe preview (w/ hidden lines removed).
almost 100% Bob-compliant consistency checker, several orders of magnitude
better than previous versions.

matt tag
- ---
þ OLX 2.1 TD þ Stamp out and eradicate superflous redundancies!

- ---------------------------------------------------------------
PC-Ohio PCBoard pcohio.com
The Best BBS in America Cleveland, OH
DATA: 216-381-3320 FAX: 216-291-2685
- ---------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

End of doom-editing-digest V1 #157
**********************************

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT