Doom Editing Digest Vol. 01 Nr. 033

Published in

· 7 months ago

From:      owner-doom-editing-digest 
To:        doom-editing-digest@nvg.unit.no 
Subject:   doom-editing-digest V1 #33 
Reply-To:  doom-editing 
Errors-To: owner-doom-editing-digest 
Precedence: bulk 

 
doom-editing-digest      Wednesday, 2 November 1994     Volume 01 : Number 033 

Re: DEU Primer 
Re: DEU 5.3 -wad conversions to DOOM2 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

From: Mag8@aol.com 
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 1994 19:52:22 -0500 
Subject: Re: DEU Primer 

> > I have stacks of printouts surrounding me here in my basement (the doom 
faq, 
> > etc) that I've printed and would like to punch holes in to put in a 
> > notebook, but the left margin doesn't leave room. 
> If I had thought anyone wanted them, I would have uploaded .ps versions to 
> infant2 after I finished reformatting them. Unfortunatly I deleted them 
once I 
> printed them... 

Actually a fairly simple if not obvious method is to just copy the pages at a 
reduced size on a copier, then you'll have plenty of room for hole punches. 
Low tech but fast :-) 

Of course, if the author were to save a version in word or wordperfect format 
half the planet with a word processor could manipulate it any way they like. 

Mark 

------------------------------ 

From: Enigma <hsimpson@unixg.ubc.ca> 
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 1994 16:53:31 -0800 (PST) 
Subject: Re: DEU 5.3 -wad conversions to DOOM2 

> Lessi....  There WILL be a GCC "port" version.  (Incidently, I do all of 
> my work in GCC and then port back to BCC for memory reasons. ;)  I don't 
> know if the official release will be the BCC version or the GCC version. 
> We are/were tossing around the idea of compiling under BCC 4.0, but we 
> decided that it definately had to be BCC 3.0 compatable. 

Keeping it compatible with BCC 3.0 is a good idea considering the number  
of people out there who haven't yet uprgraded to version 4.0; however,  
why not compile the exe using 4.0 so that extended memory can be used in  
one version. It's ok to release a GCC, a BCC 3.0, and a BCC 4.0 version  
- -- most people don't care about the source code. 

Borlands seemless integration of C and 32bit Enhanced Mode is much more  
handy than the kludge that is GCC. 

------------------------------ 

End of doom-editing-digest V1 #33 
*********************************