Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Doom Editing Digest Vol. 01 Nr. 028
From: owner-doom-editing-digest
To: doom-editing-digest@nvg.unit.no
Subject: doom-editing-digest V1 #28
Reply-To: doom-editing
Errors-To: owner-doom-editing-digest
Precedence: bulk
doom-editing-digest Sunday, 30 October 1994 Volume 01 : Number 028
Re: Node building
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Scott D. Webster" <webstes@iia.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 1994 19:56:36 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Node building
On Sat, 29 Oct 1994 cgasparo@cymbal.aix.calpoly.edu wrote:
<discussion of problems w/ deu & bsp node building
> Umm... silyl question I know but you are using 1.666 yes? And all of the
> sector references on your linedefs are facing the correct sectors?
> You're not missing any textures? Do you pass all of DEU's checks?(if you
> use DEU)
> Steve H.B.
Well I'll go back and check it again, but it _did_ pass deu521gcc's f10
checks. It also passed doomcad's checks (doomcad worked for the
nodebuilding). Do you think it would actually work correctly with
doomcad even though it had an error? I looked for all the things that
have caused HOM's for me before (the things the faqs said to look for).
It's definately not the textures. I'll check about the sector references
again. If you flip a linedef deu should correct the sidedefs, right?
Scott D. Webster Junior, Computer Science - William Paterson College
webstes@iia.org ??????????????????????????????????????????
scottw@deathstar.wilpaterson.edu ?? How many wigs would a whizzywig whiz ??
?? if a whizzywig could whiz wigs? ??
??????????????????????????????????????????
------------------------------
End of doom-editing-digest V1 #28
*********************************
