Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

Doom Editing Digest Vol. 01 Nr. 014

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
Doom editing
 · 7 months ago
1

From:      owner-doom-editing-digest 
To: doom-editing-digest@nvg.unit.no
Subject: doom-editing-digest V1 #14
Reply-To: doom-editing
Errors-To: owner-doom-editing-digest
Precedence: bulk


doom-editing-digest Friday, 21 October 1994 Volume 01 : Number 014


----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: harrison@hedgehog.darkside.com (Harrison Page)
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 94 19:02:10 PDT
Subject: Re: admin stuff (again)

joost schuur <apple!studserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de!zxmsu01> writes:

> well, incase you missed it the last time, i'm still looking for
> someone to maintain this list for me. if you're interested, get in touch
> with me. i really don't have the time anymore and if i can't find
> someone, i'm afraid i have to take this list down.

I may be - just a few questions. How many subscribers? Should I expect a lot
of people posting binaries (I can handle the load, but can't stand the
practice). Let me know - I've got the time and interest. Ta,

..Harrison

- --
Harrison Page (harrison@hedgehog.darkside.com || harrison@wiretap.spies.com)
Box 4436 Mountain View California 94040 +1 415 962 4800 x3957
"Nope. Nothing wrong here." - The Sharp Cereal Professor

------------------------------

From: jrife@loanstar.tamu.edu (Jeff Rife)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 1994 12:40:16 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Two-sided flag on LINEDEF's

Well, I've been kicking this around in my mind for a while, especially after
doing some special-effects WAD stuff, so, here goes...

I think that we need to get the WAD editor designers, the spec maintainers,
and us to call that bit the "shoot through" bit, or something similar. My
reasoning:

1. A LINEDEF with two SIDEDEF's does *not* have to have this bit set to
function correctly. This bit does not determine "two-sidedness". If you
don't believe this, I have a sample WAD that you can look at both sides
of a LINEDEF with this bit unset, and there are textures on both sides,
with no HOM.

2. Monsters and players cannot shoot through a LINEDEF with this bit unset.

3. Monsters don't even think they can see through a LINEDEF with this bit
unset, and *can* see through a LINEDEF with this bit set, regardless of
textures.

4. Players and monsters can pass through a LINEDEF with this bit unset,
although the AI encourages monsters to find an alternate route.

So, basically, all the bit really controls is what happens when a projectile
hits this LINEDEF, and whether monsters think they can attack through this
LINEDEF.

The reason I suggest the change in naming convention is that I was very
confused until I figured out the *real* effects. At the very least, we need
to add these notes to the specs.

- --
Jeff Rife P.O. Box 3836 | "Because he was human; because he had goodness; College Station, TX 77844 | because he was moral they called him insane.
(409) 696-4252 or 847-8775 | Delusions of grandeur; visons of splendor; nabs@tamu.edu | A manic-depressive, he walks in the rain."

------------------------------

End of doom-editing-digest V1 #14
*********************************

← previous
next →

Comments

1
guest's profile picture
@guest

thanks for sharing

7 months ago
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT