Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
HOMEBREW Digest #5695
HOMEBREW Digest #5695 Wed 09 June 2010
FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org
***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
Sponsor The Home Brew Digest!
Visit http://www.hbd.org/sponsorhbd.shtml to learn how
Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********
DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:
HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton Township, MI 48187-6309
or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************
Contents:
Brix/Plato/SG ("A. J. deLange")
Brix ("A.J deLange")
berliner weisse (rgriller)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.
Financial Projection As of 04 Jun 2010
Projected 2010 Budget $3305.65
Expended against projection $1066.11
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) ($940.36)
As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org
If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!
To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.
HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.
LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.
The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.
More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.
JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
and Spencer Thomas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:33:00 -0400
From: "A. J. deLange" <ajdel at cox.net>
Subject: Brix/Plato/SG
Jim tried to post this without success:
Thanks (as always) A.J. for the detailed explanation. Trying to find an
answer when I'm not sure exactly what I'm looking for can be a challenge,
but when someone addresses a specific question with a specific answer
and a detailed "here's why" it makes it much easier to comprehend.
Fortunately, it doesn't look like I've broken my well-worn copy of
ProMash. What I was reporting were the raw wort readings in Brix and the
corresponding SG
values. But, in ProMash a Brix of 6.0 doesn't necessarily equal 6.0
Plato, which is why I wasn't showing SG = 1.02369. However, when I enter
a Brix value of
6.24 (to "correspond" to 6.0 Plato), it displays SG=1.02370 (close enough!).
It appears as if the relationship 1.04*Plato = Brix is a constant since
9P = 9.36B and 12P = 12.48B produce the desired SGs, but this is just
the default ProMash Brix correction factor, which in practice would
depend on the actual instruments being used, right?
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The conversion factor between Plato and Brix is 1.00000. Balling, Brix
and Plato all strove to do the same thing: find the desnity of a sucrose
solution of given concentratiion. 10 Balling, 10 Brix and 10 Plato all
mean the same thing: a sucrose solution 100 grams of which contains 10
grams of sucrose. The differences are in the densities they measured for
those solutions. The Kaiser launched the Normal-Eichungskommission in
order to correct errors in the Brix/Balling tables in the 5th and 6th
decimal places. We'll take comments on the Teutonic love of precision as
read.
I just found a table of Brix vs. relative density at
http://www.davidberryman.co.uk/technical/density/. On another page on
their site they make it clear that "relative density" means 20C/20C and
so, for a given relative density, a Brix value from that table is
directly comparable to a Plato value taken from the ASBC table or
polynomial. If I do that and compute the difference between Plato and
Brix the differences for individual points the rms difference
corresponda to about 0.000027 units of specific gravity, i.e. in the
fifth decimal place. But it is clear from looking at a plot of the
differences that the errors are mostly due to quantization and this is
to be expected as the Berryman table is only given to 4 decimal places.
The mean error is 0.00077 Plato which corresponds to 0.000003 SG units
i.e. the mean error is in the 6th decimal place. I conclude, therefore,
that at some time in the past the fruit juice industry adopted the Plato
tables and that the 2 scales are the same.
I'll note that I did find 2 errors in the table (over the range of the
ASBC table which is as far as I went). In one case 2 values separated by
0.1 Brix (the increment in which the table is give) had exactly the same
relative density value assigned. In the other case a density was given
as being lower than the density of the entry preceding it which is
clearly an error. I "fixed" both those errors before doing the
comparison (by linear interpolation). I'm sure they are data entry
errors and not parts of the official Brix table (if there is such a
thing and there probably is).
Thus, there is still something fishy with ProMash.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:00:47 -0400
From: "A.J deLange" <ajdel at cox.net>
Subject: Brix
Ah, I finally get it. This is a factor to be used with a
refractometer. That makes sense. So I feel a little foolish because
looking at the way the instructions are written I can smell A.J. in
there. Can't say I remember it though.
Cheers, A.J.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:22:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: rgriller at chass.utoronto.ca
Subject: berliner weisse
please do post the complete recipe, Thomas. I've been to Berlin a number
of times and myself often drink it ohne Schuss -- I like the sourness. How
sour does yours turn out? I've done the lactofermentation before and never
gotten the level of sourness I wanted (probably need to leave the
lactic-bacteria fermenting longer before introducing the yeast), so
perhaps a sour mash would be the way to go if it gets a good intense
sourness!
Robin
------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5695, 06/09/10
*************************************
-------
