Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
HOMEBREW Digest #5117
HOMEBREW Digest #5117 Sun 31 December 2006
FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org
***************************************************************
THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
Northern Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies
Visit http://www.northernbrewer.com to show your appreciation!
Or call them at 1-800-681-2739
Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********
Contents:
Bill Tobler & HERMS ("Bev D. Blackwood II")
One other thing that's going to kill HBD.... ("Bev D. Blackwood II")
Please comment on 'mash schedule' feature of brewing software (Bill Velek)
RE: To HERMS or not to HERMS (Robert)
Hacking an Optical Mouse for Liquid Level Measurement (Kevin Eggemeyer)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* The HBD Logo Store is now open! *
* http://www.hbd.org/store.html *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Suppport this service: http://hbd.org/donate.shtml *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org
If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!
To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.
HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.
LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.
The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.
More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.
JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
and Spencer Thomas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:18:47 -0600
From: "Bev D. Blackwood II" <bdb2 at bdb2.com>
Subject: Bill Tobler & HERMS
What Bill doesn't say is that he makes award winning beer with his
system, and that's an endorsement on its own! I've judged Bill's
beers and can certainly speak to his quality. Can you do the same?
YMMV. But Bill does know what he's talking about!
My .02
-BDB2
Bev D. Blackwood II
Was-was-was-was-was-was-Waz
Former Secondary Fermenter
Former Competition Coordinator
Former Brewsletter Editor (X3)
Former Dixie Cup Coordinator
The Foam Rangers
http://www.foamrangers.com
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:26:59 -0600
From: "Bev D. Blackwood II" <bdb2 at bdb2.com>
Subject: One other thing that's going to kill HBD....
(Oh wait.. I sent this without doing the conversion and it got
rejected... silly me....) ;-P
- ---
Is the fact it rejects MIME encoded e-mails. Time for HBD to catch
up to the modern world. I can post to my club e-mail list (volunteer
moderated) without fear of rejection and same goes for AHA Tech-
Talk. Last conversation I heard regarding HBD among the AHA folk was
that it's dying a slow death... well, getting posts rejected
regularly only speeds that process. I realize this is a volunteer
effort, but technical currency is an essential element to being
relevant.
-BDB2
Bev D. Blackwood II
Was-was-was-was-was-was-Waz
Former Secondary Fermenter
Former Competition Coordinator
Former Brewsletter Editor (X3)
Former Dixie Cup Coordinator
The Foam Rangers
http://www.foamrangers.com
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 11:40:46 -0600
From: Bill Velek <billvelek at alltel.net>
Subject: Please comment on 'mash schedule' feature of brewing software
Last October I purchased BeerToolsPro during it's initial release, but I
have never used any other brewing software before so I didn't know what
to expect.
QUESTION: Does the 'mash schedule' in other programs have any effect
upon what the program calculates as far as showing any impact whatsoever
on attenuation, mouthfeel, and that sort of thing? If I mash the exact
same recipe under two dramatically different schedules, I would expect
to see some sort of difference reflected in the resulting beer; e.g., if
I mash at 135F for a FULL hour, I would expect the beer to be more
attenuated and therefore dryer, with less mouthfeel, and more alcoholic
in flavor, whereas if I mash the same grist at 160F for maybe HALF an
hour, I would expect more unfermentable dextrines resulting in lower
attenuation, more mouthfeel, and less alcohol. While BeerToolPros will
allow a user to customize a mash schedule and, in the process, calculate
the amount and temperature of water to be added at each step, it does
not show ANY difference at all in the effects on beer style;
furthermore, it also has an 'Analysis' feature which supposedly reports
the grams and calories of alcohol, carbs, and protein per serving ...
but that appears to be completely unaffected by the mash schedule, too,
which tells me that it is not accurate but rather that it just
approximates the nutritional value based on some unknown 'average'.
This has been my primary disappointment with BTP, but perhaps I have
expected too much; however, the reason I expected all of this to work is
some of the promotional language they use, such as: "BeerTools Pro is a
software package for formulating beer recipes, FOR DESIGNING MASH
SCHEDULES and for calculating other factors when brewing beer. It is
simple enough for the beginner yet POWERFUL ENOUGH FOR THE PROFESSIONAL"
(capitals are my emphasis). I don't know; maybe even 'professional'
brewing software doesn't do what I was thinking this would do: predict
how alterations to my mash schedule will affect my beer.
So how does ProMash, BeerSmith, StrangeBrew, and any other brewing
program out there react to changes in the mash schedule; do they adjust
any calculations or give any indication at all?
If it will help to discuss the matter, BeerToolsPro permits a user to
set any factor in the mash -- thickness, strike temperature, time for
each stage, and I guess just about as many steps as you want; it also
takes into consideration the thermal mass and heat transfer rate of your
equipment based on calibration steps the user performs.
Other than my disappointment re the above, I am extremely pleased with
BTP; I have no affiliation with the program or developers whatsoever.
Thanks for any replies.
Cheers.
Bill Velek
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:59:29 -0800
From: Robert <home_brew at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: RE: To HERMS or not to HERMS
Bill,
In your response to Mike you stated that you attached a PDF file with
drawings, pictures and arrows of your system. Maybe it is a property or
function of the list but I did not see an attachment. Could you email
the PDF file to me. I am in the process of converting from extract to
all grain brewing and am building a HERMS system using 3 half-barrel
kegs, which will all be at the same elevation, similar to the Beer, Beer
and More Beer B3-2100 brew sculpture. I have 2 Ranco temperature
controllers and 2 Marsh mag drive pumps. My plan is to circulate water
from the HLT through a stainless plate heat exchanger with one pump and
wort from the mash/lauter tun with the other pump. The plate heat
exchanger will also be used as a wort cooler. Heat source will be
propane burners with one of the temperature controllers controlling a
gas solenoid like the Beer, Beer and More Beer Digital Hot Liqour
option. Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Robert
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:38:09 -0800
From: Kevin Eggemeyer <keggemeyer at charter.net>
Subject: Hacking an Optical Mouse for Liquid Level Measurement
A question for the collective: Has anyone thought of or used a hacked
optical mouse to measure liquid level in a tank?
My idea is this... For my HLT, I would like to be able to measure the liquor
level to within a reasonable degree of accuracy (say 0.1 gallon?) and have
the controller (in my case a Javelin Stamp connected to a PC) open or
close a solenoid valve to control the flow and give an on screen
representation of the tank's level. The mechanical parts would include
a 4 inch stainless float connected to a stem (a piece of stainless flat bar, or
aluminum for weight considerations) that could also be used by an 'optical
human' to measure the level. The stem's travel is controlled at two points,
one at the tank lid and one above the tank lid to keep its travel vertical.
The optical mouse parts sit well above the lid of the tank to avoid issues with
steam (approx 6 inches above) and against the stem (which could be
mistreated with a wire brush to add optical data marks). The mouse reads
the travel of the float and communicates it to the PC.
To 'zero' the system, the float is pulled against the lid of the tank and
both mouse buttons are pushed, signaling the PC to clear the level reading
and begin measuring from the zero point (or alternatively the measurement
could be zeroed when the tank is empty and the float is against the bottom
of the tank). As the float is lowered and raised, the PC keeps track of the
position in much the same way it positions the pointer on the computer
screen. This would, of course, require hacking the mouse driver software
so that it is not recognized as the mouse.
To make it even more complex...
- I would use a wireless mouse (hacked to eliminate the battery charger).
- I already have the temperature of the HLT to use for level correction
due to expansion. Simple math for the PC, right?
- If this works, I would like additional setups, one for the HLT, one for
the grant, one for the boil kettle. (Sticking with Bill Tobler's comment,
"For me, I would not have a HERMS unless I could automate it completely.")
Any thoughts or ideas on how this might be done? Any collaborators
out there?
Kevin Eggemeyer
O'Fallon, MO
------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5117, 12/31/06
*************************************
-------
