Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
HOMEBREW Digest #5066
HOMEBREW Digest #5066 Wed 27 September 2006
FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org
***************************************************************
THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
Northern Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies
Visit http://www.northernbrewer.com to show your appreciation!
Or call them at 1-800-681-2739
Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********
Contents:
Re: Oak chips (Alan Semok)
Re: Airation in meads. (Christopher Bartlett) ("Eric Wescott")
what happened to my fusels/harshness? ("Peter A. Ensminger")
Re: Airation in meads. (Mail Box)
Re: Taste and Gender (Mail Box)
Looking for source for Cargill Caramel 60 ("Dave Humes")
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* The HBD Logo Store is now open! *
* http://www.hbd.org/store.html *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Suppport this service: http://hbd.org/donate.shtml *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org
If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!
To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.
HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.
LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.
The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.
More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.
JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
and Spencer Thomas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:51:18 -0400
From: Alan Semok <asemok at mac.com>
Subject: Re: Oak chips
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:13:48 -0400, "Kevin Gray" <kevin.gray at
gmail.com> wrote:
> ...could you conceivably use JD barrel chips in a beer to simulate
> a whiskey
> flavor? And if so, how would you first ensure that you weren't
> introducing some undesired micro-organism?
You could indeed
...my 2006 Christmas Strong Ale has been aging away for a few months
now in bulk, on bourbon oak.
As far as keeping the brew clean, you could steam the chips then soak
them in whiskey...or nuke 'em in the ol' microwave. I can't imagine
that any baddies would survive that (input from a microbiologist
member would be most welcome here!!)
Just don't overdo the oak...I've tasted quite a few potentially great
homebrewed beers virtually ruined by too much "wood". Really good
beer is all about BALANCE.
By the time it is considered ready, my holiday brew (10 gallons, OG
1.079) will have spent about 5 months aging with a total of just
under 3 tablespoons full of a combination of bourbon barrel oak and
toasted Hungarian oak chips.
cheers,
AL
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:30:08 -0400
From: "Eric Wescott" <eric.wescott at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Airation in meads. (Christopher Bartlett)
Yes - Aerate the heck out of meads at start! Pump with O2 if you
want. The same tricks to get a big healthy yeast colony in beer are
good for mead.
I would not pump it with air or O2 after about 1 day of fermentation
(unless something went wrong, and I was trying to fix it). Assuming
you have an active ferment, I would rely on that iniital aeration and
perhaps one additional stir at +12 to +24 hours.
The staggering of nutrients is also a great way to create a complete
fermentation. Since many meads go to the ABV limit of hte yeast,
those last 2% can take 4 times as long as the first 10-12%. SNA helps
to keep the yeast fed and energized and to reach the finish line.
- --EW
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:25:41 -0400
From: "Peter A. Ensminger" <ensmingr at twcny.rr.com>
Subject: what happened to my fusels/harshness?
Greetings,
On August 7, I posted www.hbd.org/hbd/archive/5042.html#5042-5 and
received several replies (www.hbd.org/hbd/archive/5043.html#5043-4,
www.hbd.org/hbd/archive/5043.html#5043-5,
www.hbd.org/hbd/archive/5043.html#5043-7,
www.hbd.org/hbd/archive/5044.html#5044-4) regarding a braggot I made
that was very harsh. My BJCP-trained tastebuds interpreted this as due
to the presence of fusel (higher) alcohols.
Following your responses, on Aug 18 I added 2 oz of "heavy toast oak
chips" (Crosby & Baker) to my 5-gal corny keg of braggot. The keg has
been maintained at ~42 deg F throughout and had some residual Nottingham
ale yeast and Red Star Champagne yeast present.
Well, I just had some of the braggot tonight (Sept 25) and it was
wonderfully drinkable. It was just a bit "hot", but not offensive for a
~12% beer. There was no oak character. Since there was no "control", I
cannot attribute the improvement to the oak chips. But this experience
makes me wonder:
Q1: Was the harshness (present 5 weeks after pitching) really due to
fusels? [I don't have HPLC/GC/MS in my kitchen, so have to rely on my
limited experience in drinking cheap whiskey, whose extreme harshness is
attributed to fusels.]
Q2: What exactly happened to improve my braggot? Did the yeast play a
role? Was it the oak chips? Anyone care to speculate?
TIA for your feedback!
Peter A. Ensminger
Syracuse, NY
Apparent Rennerian: [394, 79.9]
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:09:45 -0400
From: Mail Box <mail-box at adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: Airation in meads.
> From: Christopher Bartlett <bridgeweaver at khanfusion.net>
[snipped]
> I have a couple of
> questions, specifically about aeration.
>
> So, should I airate my mead at pitching time? If I'm going to
> experiment with the incremental nutrition regime mentioned earlier
> this week, (could someone provide me a reference where I can read
> more about this) should I airate at each addition of nutrient?
Chris,
You should definitely aerate your must at pitching. I can't comment on
your incremental nutrition regime, since I haven't read it, but some
folks do divide the nutrient into 2-3 additions and add it over the
first 2-3 days. I don't practice that method, but I do aerate at 24 and
48 hours (no fancy O2 set up, just about 5 minutes of stirring with a
hand held kitchen mixer). At this point there is no danger of
oxidation, as the yeast are still utilizing it and the CO2 production
will strip any excess. Oxidation is a concern with mead as it is with
wine and beer, but not at this point in the fermentation process.
Hope this helps!
Cheers,
Ken
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:44:13 -0400
From: Mail Box <mail-box at adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: Taste and Gender
> From: "Alexandre Enkerli" <enkerli at gmail.com>
[snipped]
> It was never my intention to generalize and I was explicitly trying to
> get away from the stereotypical "girlie beers" (wheat and/or fruit).
> As it so happens, this stereotype seems well known among this group,
> which is quite telling. This stereotype is not at all universal.
>
> My intention was to get some "success stories" from people who have
> gone beyond the stereotype and have been able to brew a beer that
> would convince someone that there is more to beer than what they
> thought before.
Alexandre,
I'll weigh in late. :)
I went through the process you describe with my wife. When we met she
wouldn't consider a beer. But she is an open minded person and is
willing to try new tastes, and also supports my hobbies. And so while
she might not order a beer, she was very willing to sip various kinds of
beers that I made or ordered out. This was more of an adventure than a
religious conversion, to try to put in the proper context. I wasn't
trying to get her to like beer so much as I was sharing my hobby and my
enjoyment of beer with her. Now she occasionally will order a porter,
or lacking that (and we find that while nearly every microbrewery has an
IPA, not all microbreweries make a porter) a stout. She likes a
chocolate "stout" (quotes since it is a 23 rather than a 13, being 50/50
wheat/barley and with cocoa powder) I brew, but no others. The specific
flavor profile she enjoys is the roasty flavors, coffee and/or chocolate
notes, very low hop bitterness and no sourness (Guinness clones or
stouts with a soured addition are right out).
As has been stated several times in this thread and as you acknowledge,
while there may be a stereotype about womens preferences in beer, not
every individual will fall into that stereotype. It's certainly not
just women who enjoy wheat and fruit beers. I love apricots, and every
spring when Pyramid releases their Apricot ale, I buy a case. Without
the apricot flavor, this is not a beer I would typically enjoy at all.
Belgian wheat beers are just lovely, and some of the more intense
banana/clove 15As really suit my tastes as well.
Cheers,
Ken
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:29:30 -0400
From: "Dave Humes" <dhumes001 at comcast.net>
Subject: Looking for source for Cargill Caramel 60
I'm looking for a source for Cargill Caramel 60. I've used it for years in
a ESB recipe and have been able to order it from my local supplier. But,
they've had to order a whole 55lb bag and hope to sell what I don't
purchase. I only want 5-10lb, and don't want my supplier to get stuck.
Anyone know of a supplier that's selling smaller quantities?
Thanks.
- --Dave
------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5066, 09/27/06
*************************************
-------
