Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

HOMEBREW Digest #4953

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
HOMEBREW Digest
 · 7 months ago

HOMEBREW Digest #4953		             Wed 15 February 2006 


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

Northern Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies
Visit http://www.northernbrewer.com to show your appreciation!
Or call them at 1-800-681-2739

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********


Contents:
Re: overcarbonation ("Greg 'groggy' Lehey")
Re: warm pitching/hop poles ("Greg 'groggy' Lehey")
Re: Percent of Rye... (Petr Otahal)
re: O2, cell membranes & more ("steve.alexander")
Why ask rye? (Glyn Crossno)


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* The HBD Logo Store is now open! *
* http://www.hbd.org/store.html *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Suppport this service: http://hbd.org/donate.shtml *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
and Spencer Thomas


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:15:45 +1030
From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog at lemis.com>
Subject: Re: overcarbonation

On Monday, 13 February 2006 at 21:37:08 -0600, KEITH R BUSBY wrote:
> I have two batches which turned out to be quite overcarbonated after
> bottling. What to do? Open them, leave for ? hours and recap? Anyone
> else done this?

Certainly you're not the first person to overcarbonate his beer :-)
What you do now depends mainly on how overcarbonated it is:

1. If it's really, really high, you'll need to let off the pressure.
Your idea sounds good, but I have no idea how long to leave them
for. I'd be inclined to chill to about between 5 and 10 <insert
degree sign here>C (9 and 18 <insert degree sign here>F) cooler
than how you like to drink the beer and leave for a while. The
lower temperature will ensure that it's still properly carbonated
at drinking temperature.

I've never had to resort to this, so don't rely on the details.

2. If it's less overcarbonated, but you're afraid of bottle bombs,
just keep it really cool. I currently have a Wei<insert German ss
character here>bier which ended up rather overcarbonated. It
should be pretty heavily carbonated anyway, but this one takes a
couple of minutes settling before I can get it all into one glass.
Again, the low temperature helps (I have it round freezing).

Greg
- --
Finger grog at lemis.com for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:23:09 +1030
From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog at lemis.com>
Subject: Re: warm pitching/hop poles

On Tuesday, 14 February 2006 at 15:40:00 -0500, steve.alexander wrote:
>
> [good stuff about yeast competition and pitching temperatures dropped]
>
> On hops supports - NO !!!! I don't think guy-wired PVC
> will support much hops. FWIW I used guy-wired electrical
> conduit tripods (1.5 inch the thick walled stuff) and it did a fine
> job till late summer when the hops were full leaved and the first big
> wind bent the conduit up like pretzels. This is sort of amazing since
> I can't bend this stuff - major force from the wind. My hunch is that
> the PVC will crack under a good wind load.

I use baling twine (nylon, I suppose). If you have horses and feed
them hay, you'll have lots of this stuff left over. It's flexible and
strong; I can't begin to imagine it failing under strong winds (which
we get here too).

Greg
- --
Finger grog at lemis.com for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:31:50 +1100
From: Petr Otahal <petr.otahal at aardvark.net.au>
Subject: Re: Percent of Rye...

Hi Mike,

I have used 53% malted Rye in a Roggenbier. Was a very oily mash and had
to use heaps of rice hulls to get the sparge to flow.

Cheers
Petr


Michael Eyre wrote:

>What's the most percentage of a grain bill you've ever used with Rye?
>I'm thinking of a huge Rye beer, and wanna know what the upper limit,
>percentage wise, might be for use of Rye. Ideas?
>
>Mike



- --
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.5/256 - Release Date: 10/02/06




------------------------------

Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:59:53 -0500
From: "steve.alexander" <-s at adelphia.net>
Subject: re: O2, cell membranes & more

Frederik writes,

<<

I don't have the reference at hand but I recall another
paper where it was confirmed in one specific test that with
the proper timing, and control of the aeration, you could
reduce the ppm value from 16 to 8 ppm and still end up with
the same membrane quality. This indicates that a lot of the
oxygen is somehow wasted, [...]
>>

I recall reading this perhaps in one of Kathrine Smart's
annual yeast research books. Another point is that all the
O2-req lipids at conventional yeast pitching rates require
only ~2ppm of O2 so there is a lot of inefficiency which
remains unexplained.

As background, squalene is a precursor to all sterols, but
to convert squalene to sterol requires O2 and energy.

As far as sterol creation and "timing" of O2, Quain
published a paper in JIB 1988 which notes that a decrease
in the yeast storage carbohydrate glycogen is strongly
correlated to sterol production in yeast. It seems likely
the two are linked. Yeast accumulate storage carbohydrates
throughout the log phase of growth, but also as a spurt at
the point of flocculation.

If you create a healthy anaerobic starter, then these yeast
should be full of squalene and glycogen. If you expose
such a slurry to O2 it begins rapidly decomposing the
glycogen and producing sterol. This is one reason that the
iodine test for yeast glycogen is a crummy test unless you
keep the O2 away. Oxygen triggers this conversion so long
as the squalene & glycogen are present.

Anyway if your yeast starter is healthy & anaerobically
finished then dropped into aerated wort (this probably
applies to dry yeast too), then the yeast rapidly converts
all the squalene&glycogen to to sterol. One or the other will
drop low within abt 2 hours, and the levels only increase
slowly throughout fermentation. Your best bet for oxygen
utilization is very early on and then again long after
2 hours and I'd suggest 6+ hours.

If your yeast is aerobically grown (say freshly off a stir
plate) then it probably already has optimal sterol levels
and there is no reason to aerate the wort/beer until 6+
hours after pitching when the yeast squalene & glycogen
has started to increase. OTOH there may be no need
aerate the wort at all in this case if your yeast have
enough O2-lipids!

==

In a fine list of advantages for cold pitching Chad
Stevens includes:
<<
4. No diacetyl. No need for a diacetyl rest because you've
fermented in temperature ranges where the yeast are converting
all of the precursors readily.
>>

I'm not sure I buy that one and would like to hear more on
it. I think the major pathway to diacetyl is when pyruvate
is converted to alpha-acetolactate on the way to amino acid
synthesis, and the alpha-acetolactate is non-enzymatically
decarboxylated to diacetyl. I can't see how fermentation
temp makes a big difference here. The acetolactate doesn't
pool because ... ??why??

-S




------------------------------

Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:48:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Glyn Crossno <graininfuser at yahoo.com>
Subject: Why ask rye?

The most I have used is 20% rye. In my experence most
people do not even like that much, I do. Keep the
grain bed hot. If the mash temps fall to low it is a
slow sparge.

I find bailing twine perfect for hops. It lasts the
full season, but by the next spring you can just pull
and break it. And it is VERY cheap at the farmers
co-op, buy the BIG ball.

Glyn
So. Middle TN




------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #4953, 02/15/06
*************************************
-------

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT