Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

HOMEBREW Digest #4922

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
HOMEBREW Digest
 · 7 months ago

HOMEBREW Digest #4922		             Thu 29 December 2005 


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

Northern Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies
Visit http://www.northernbrewer.com to show your appreciation!
Or call them at 1-800-681-2739

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********


Contents:
Keg conditioning ("D. Clark")
Re.: Renewed Fermentation ("Sean Richens")
Water Analysis ("Mike Long")
Burtonization, was London Water (David Edge)
how do I know if my 10 lb. CO2 tank is full? ("larry maxwell")
1056/1728 Comparison ("Ken Anderson")


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* The HBD Logo Store is now open! *
* http://www.hbd.org/store.html *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Suppport this service: http://hbd.org/donate.shtml *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
and Spencer Thomas


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:29:03 -0500
From: "D. Clark" <clark at capital.net>
Subject: Keg conditioning

Hi List,

I brewed a wheat beer for a Christmas gathering at my brothers
house. Brewed it on December 3, figuring to rack to a secondary a week
later and then keg it mid week before Christmas so it could spend a few
days carbonating. Sounded good anyway. This was my usual wheat beer, made
with pilsner malt, malted and raw wheat and a pound of vienna malt. Yeast
was 3068 from Wyeast. I have had some off flavors develop with this yeast
when it ferments in too warm a place, so I put my fermenter in the spare
bedroom with the door closed. I didn't note the room temperature, but it
is cool without being cold. Well, I never got around to racking to the
secondary, and now it's December 20. Okay, so I'll rack straight to the
keg, should be okay. I hadn't noticed any airlock activity so I figured
fermentation was far enough along that the beer should be finished. Popped
the top on the pail to see a big foamy head on my beer. This was not
good. Hydrometer reading was 1.020. I usually see it down to 1.012. Now
what?

I opted to transfer the beer to the keg and leave it in the warm kitchen to
see what would happen. If the fermentation restarted, I could bleed off
the pressure so it would keep going, and then I could carbonate it sometime
late Friday or Saturday and hope for the best. This particular keg does
not have a relief valve in the lid, so I had to depress the gas-in poppet
to let the pressure off, and wow, did it build up some pressure! I was
blowing yeast and foam all over the kitchen every time I tried it, so by
Saturday I ended out on the deck with a hose, spraying water on the keg as
I vented gas and beer all over the place. My wife was very amused by
all of this. I still didn't know what I had in the keg because I couldn't
get the lid off, so with the tap attached I drew off a glass of foam that
settled out to a very nice tasting beer. Just what I wanted, and it was
certainly well carbonated! I left the keg outside to chill and served it
Christmas day. It was a beautiful golden cloudy wheat beer with that
clovey banana taste from the 3086. Everyone enjoyed it.

Does anyone out there do keg conditioning on a regular basis? This was
accidental for me, but I don't see why you couldn't add corn sugar or DME
to a keg of finished beer and let it go. Would the time be the same for a
keg as it would be for a bottle? More things to try I guess.

Just wanted to share my story with those who would understand. Have a
happy and safe 2006.

Dave Clark
Eagle Bridge, New York






------------------------------

Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:17:42 -0600
From: "Sean Richens" <srichens at mts.net>
Subject: Re.: Renewed Fermentation

Mike:

For fear of bottle bombs, I would keep your Russian Imperial Stout at
fermentation temperature and let it finish out. Champagne yeasts are cold
and alcohol tolerant by function, so you might as well let it go. To
restore some body and sweetness, try lactose. Once the beer is stable, take
a sample and do a dosing trial. I've used 1/2 lb per 5 USG, 1 lb would be
more than enough. I find it has a "tang" that goes away slowly after
bottling then it's fine.

Sean



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:02:22 -0600
From: "Mike Long" <fourrivbrew at hotmail.com>
Subject: Water Analysis

Hello to all,

I am new to the industry and am faced with the following water situation. I
am hoping someone can give some guidence on how to deal with this water for
brewing ales.

pH--------7.2 (fluctuating)
specific conductivity----------235
color--------------colorless
clarity-----------clear
M alkilinity----------50
Tot Hardnes-----------96
Ca Hardnes----------74
Mg Hardnes-------------22
total iron----------<0.05
Silica-----------5
Nitrate-----------3
Nitrite---------<1
Chloride----------8
Sulfate-------------44
Phosphate------1

All in ppm.

Any comments and guidence would be greatly appreciated!!
Regards,

Mike Long



------------------------------

Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:56:15 +0000
From: David Edge <david.j.edge at ntlworld.com>
Subject: Burtonization, was London Water

Oops!

I confused Fred Johnson and maybe others by referring to
the addition of mineral salts to liquor as "Burtonization".
That was the term used at the time (nineteenth century) when
liquor treatment with salts began and is still sometimes
used today in the UK.

The point I was making was not that Fullers (Fred is trying
to replicate ESB) treat their liquor to match Burton, but they
(a pound to a penny) don't treat it to match some ancient
"London" water profile which made poor pale ales and bitters,
rather aim for a composition that suits their product. So my
suggestion for an ESB would be chuck some CaCl at it,
RDW&HAH.

The only reason I can see for replicating eighteenth or nineteenth-
century London water is if you're going to get the Weber out
and make your own blown (ie popped) brown malt to make
an original porter or if you want to see why Burton IPA was so
much more successful than the original London sort.

David Edge, Derby



------------------------------

Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:27:23 -0500
From: "larry maxwell" <larrymax at bellsouth.net>
Subject: how do I know if my 10 lb. CO2 tank is full?

Maybe this is a goofy question, but I haven't used my
CO2 setup in a while and forgot how many psi my 10 lb.
tank holds when full. The gauge reads about 750 psi.
Is it going to handle my New Year's Eve crowd?

Larry Maxwell
Atlanta



------------------------------

Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:58:23 -0500
From: "Ken Anderson" <kapna at adelphia.net>
Subject: 1056/1728 Comparison

There's been recent discussion on the B&V in regard to 1056 robustness
and reliability. Here's a comparison of the actual fermentation
profiles of both a 1056 and a 1728 fermentation. It was the last time I
used 1056. I would imagine there are still many happy users of 1056
though.

These are the first two CO2 graphs I created:

http://users.adelphia.net/~aken75/Comparison/Comparison2.html

Ken Anderson



------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #4922, 12/29/05
*************************************
-------

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT