Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
HOMEBREW Digest #4823
HOMEBREW Digest #4823 Fri 12 August 2005
FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org
***************************************************************
THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
Northern Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies
Visit http://www.northernbrewer.com to show your appreciation!
Or call them at 1-800-681-2739
Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********
Contents:
Competition announcement: Dayton beerfest, Sept 10 ("Gordon Strong")
hops problem ("Randy Scott")
attenative yeast/bottling & cidery taste ("Fredrik")
Cloning liquor and mixer in a bottle ("Adam M. Bumpus")
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* The HBD Logo Store is now open! *
* http://www.hbd.org/store.html *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Suppport this service: http://hbd.org/donate.shtml *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org
If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!
To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.
HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.
LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.
The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.
More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.
JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
and Spencer Thomas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:22:02 -0400
From: "Gordon Strong" <strongg at speakeasy.net>
Subject: Competition announcement: Dayton beerfest, Sept 10
Entries are now being accepted for the 10th Dayton (Ohio) Beerfest. The
competition will be held on September 10th; entries are due by September
3th. All details are on our web site:
http://hbd.org/draft/daybeerfest.html.
Quick summary: Easy online entry, no recipe, 2 bottles, $5, any type of
bottles including draft packaging, enter sub-categories as often as you want
(only top-scoring is eligible for prize in a single sub-category). All 2004
BJCP styles accepted including mead and cider. Nice wooden plaques
for category winners (ribbons for 2nd/3rd).
Gordon Strong
Dayton Regional Amateur Fermentation Technologists
strongg at earthlink.net
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:42:10 -0500
From: "Randy Scott" <ras at rscott.us>
Subject: hops problem
A couple weeks ago I brewed a porter and apparently goofed on the bittering
hops (I was using whole-leaf hops which may have been too damp, throwing off
the weight). There isn't enough hops bitterness to offset the malty
sweetness. I figure it's underhopped by maybe 30%.
Is there a way to correct this after the fact? I was thinking of boiling an
ounce or so of hops in a couple quarts of water for an hour, cooling, and
adding it to the beer. Is this going to work?
It's only the bitterness I'm concerned about; being a porter, the hops
flavor and aroma are negligible anyway.
thanks
ras
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:43:44 +0200
From: "Fredrik" <carlsbergerensis at hotmail.com>
Subject: attenative yeast/bottling & cidery taste
Hello all,
Some comments on some previos posts.
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 15:09:04 -0400
> From: leavitdg at plattsburgh.edu
> Subject: highly attenuative yeasts, and quantity of bottling sugar?
> When bottling with a highly attenuative yeast, should one
> take this into account and use just a touch less corn sugar?
No, I don't think so. Relative attenuation refers to the wort which contains a
range of sugars.When you use mainly "easy" sugars like glucose and sucrose,
all normal strains (I'm sure there are always odd exceptions) should for all
practical purposes fully attenuate glucose or sucrose. I have hard to see that
any differences in the trace residuals are significant to the carbonation level.
My guess is something else causes the observed variation in carbonation.
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Ted Teuscher <t_teuscher at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Apple cidery taste
>
> The starter itself smelled very strong of apples when
> I pitched the yeast into the wort (which was also well
> oxygenated). I would like to say it is what John
> Palmer calls "acetalyhde" in his How To Brew brook.
> The beer is also rather cloudy.
>
> What did I do to cause such a strong apple cidery
> smell and taste? None of my other beers have ever had
> this problem. It has been kegged for 2 weeks now and
> not really dissipated at all. The beer is drinkable
> but is overwhelmed by the apple cidery taste.
FWIW Some ideas if it can help...
I don't know for sure what you mean with apple cidery, but the green
apple like aroma might be acetaldehyde like you mention yourself
(though IMO acetaldehyde doesn't actually smell *apple* but I can
appreciate to an extent the association with green fresh apples. But
I also associate it a bit with "hangover breath".)
I find the starter beer that has been aerated, never tastes as
good as the cleanly fermented beer, I find it to often
have an excessive acidity to flavour as well as aroma and
I wouldn't be surprised to find some acetaldehyde in the starter
beer either. I always decant off this. But if it's truly massive,
I'd personally suspect either some infection or excessive aeration?
When aerating the ethanol mixture I think there is also a
possibiliy for traces of acetobacter to grow to the point
where they are a problem. I prefer to minimzed this,
and focus on aeration at refeeding to not encourage
aerobic bacteria.
I've exposed finished beer to air a few times as experiments, and
sometimes it just turns into acetaldehyde, sometimes it turns
into stale carboard notes, sometimes winey and sometimes all 3.
Ive gotten acetaldehyde from commercial beer this way too.
I recall one weissbeer I deliberately staled, and it developed
first acetaldehyde notes, and then some faint funky carboard
notes.
I've also exposed a moderately attenuated beer to oxygen, and found
as it seems a slight renewal of yeast activity upon aeration. And along
with this sometimes an increased fairly *massive* acetaldehyde aroma.
In high concentration acetaldehyde is really nasty and irritating gas.
I did this only a few times and I am not 100% sure wether it's all the
revived original yeast activity or if there are some bacteria or wild yeast
involved too. I know that it has happend that some bottles have not been
clean and bottling. I just found from microscopic inspection that
yeasts were very abundant, and yes the beer turned cloudy.
I could at lesat conclude in my case, that most of the *visible* haze
were due to yeast activity, not bacteria. But that doesn't exclude bacteria
in lower levels. If a beer is hazy to the point that you can see if with the
naked eye and it's because of biological activity, you should be able
to probe some in a microscope.
Unless you aerated the beer, fermentation performance was abnormal or
you didn't decant that massively flawed starter (and it stayed even at
1:20 dilution?), it sounds like you have some some infection?
/Fredrik
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:09:45 -0500
From: "Adam M. Bumpus" <adam at bump.us>
Subject: Cloning liquor and mixer in a bottle
By far the easiest way to clone a drink that is made from rum and
generic 7-up is to mix rum and generic 7-up and pour it into a bottle
with a funnel. If you want the berry flavored sort you can buy flavored
syrups in the coffee section at most super markets.
The only reason these are referred to as 'Malt Beverages' is to allow
them to be treated under beer rules rather than hard liquor rules. This
usually means favorable tax treatment and greater access to retail outlets.
If you wanted to make Bacardi Silver/Zima/Mike's Hard Something/Smirnoff
Ice the way that the beverage companies do you would need to start with
a very high adjunct mash, ferment it with a clean fermenting strain and
then put it through an activated charcoal filter. If this process yields
51% of the alcohol in the beverage it's a 'Malt Beverage' and can be
treated as beer under the law. The remainder comes from what will be
referred to as natural and/or artificial flavors on the label. It's
probably a mixture of neutral spirits and a bit of the brand name liquor
that's on the package.
I'm not saying that these aren't tasty beverages, it's just that the way
they're produced doesn't resemble making beer in any meaningful way. If
you were going to do it without concerns about taxation or retail
availability you probably wouldn't want to go about it in the way that
the guys who sell the stuff.
Adam
> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:59:47 -0400
> From: "Ken Koppes" <koppeskl at hotmail.com>
> Subject: bacardi silver clone
>
> My wife likes the Bacardi Silver Malt beverages. Has anyone had luck with
> making them or know where I could find a recipe for them?
------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #4823, 08/12/05
*************************************
-------
