Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
HOMEBREW Digest #4655
HOMEBREW Digest #4655 Fri 19 November 2004
FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org
***************************************************************
THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
Beer, Beer, and More Beer
Visit http://morebeer.com to show your appreciation!
Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********
Contents:
Carbonating a Lagering Beer ("Steve Laycock")
Re: Bottles and Labels (David Radwin)
ISFET pH Meters (ILRI)" <r.kruska@cgiar.org>
Re: Roasting Barley (Grant Family)
RE: Go Wolverines! ("Brian Lundeen")
I'd rather lurk ("Peed, John")
pH for homebrewers ("Antony Hayes")
Fermenting to Thin (Michael Fross)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* The HBD Logo Store is now open! *
* http://www.hbd.org/store.html *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Suppport this service: http://hbd.org/donate.shtml *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org
If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!
To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.
HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.
LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.
The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.
More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.
JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
and Spencer Thomas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:13:57 -0800
From: "Steve Laycock" <slaycock at discoverynet.com>
Subject: Carbonating a Lagering Beer
Greetings,
Mike asked about carbonating his Lager beer while its lagering.
"> I'm in the process of making my first lager and I completed the Diacytal
rest
> and have just gotten it down to lagering temperature (36F). I'm planning
on
> leaving it at that temp for three or four weeks (OG: 1.048) but was
wondering
> if I could kill two birds with one stone by carbonating it now."
I always transfer my lagers into kegs after the lagering period is completed
to give more sediment time to fall out of suspension. If you carbonate now,
(I'm assuming that your lagering in the keg) you'll loose that additional
step/time to achieve your crystal clear beer that lagers are known for.
Also if you carbonate during lagering, and then transfer to (another) keg
your going to have to deal with the foaming (outgassing of C02) as you
transfer your beer & give yourself additional issues with oxidation as a
result.
I'd recommend to allow your beer to lager in peace and carb up after your
lagering period is complete.... it'll only take a day or 2 to carbonate &
be ready to drink.
Oh.....Enjoy your first Lager & Congrats!! Next you can do a decoction! :)
Steve n KC
"Highwater Brew Haus"
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:45:59 -0800
From: David Radwin <dradwin at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Bottles and Labels
Tony Brown wrote:
> Otherwise, which beers should I be drinking that have labels that use
> water soluable glue for easy removal (and are re-cappable of course)?
Sorry for the lateness of my response. In my experience, the beer with
the absolutely easiest to remove labels is made by Drake's Brewing Co in
San Leandro, CA. http://www.drinkdrakes.com The labels are not paper
but plastic that is "shrink-wrapped" onto the bottle, similar to some
beverage and medicine bottles. No soaking required--just cut the label
off with a box cutter or X-acto knife. I wish I had a photo to show it.
Otherwise it is a standard brown pry-off beer bottle.
The downside is that I think their distribution is rather limited. I
live only 15 miles away and I only discovered it a couple of years ago
when they were selling their IPA at Costco.
Also, the beer happens to be pretty good. :)
David in Berkeley, CA
responses to news [ignore this] at davidradwin.com
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:16:44 -0800
From: "Kruska, Russ (ILRI)" <r.kruska at cgiar.org>
Subject: ISFET pH Meters
Dear all,
I appreciate A.J. deLange's recent email about pH meters. I was a frustrated
(and broke) pH meter user for years but was fed up with having to buy a new
electrode every 10-12 months! A.J. advised me through personal email that I
should check out the new ISFET meters. I bought one 15 months ago and am
very happy with it. I will post how long it actually lasts! Having said all
that, I bought the 0.1 resolution model...so A.J. may be upset with me. The
beer has been very good though in the past 15 months!
Russ Kruska
Nairobi, Kenya
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:53:44 +1100
From: Grant Family <grants at netspace.net.au>
Subject: Re: Roasting Barley
Rowan asked:
>Can I bake some of this stout malt and obtain roasted barley from
>the stout malt or am I barking up the wrong tree?
I reckon you can bake any malt in the oven. I experimented with this
quite a bit when I was starting out all grain and didn't have good
access to lots of specialty malts like roasted barley.
Keep in mind that "roasted barley" is actually actually unmalted and
that you won't get the same dry roastiness by roasted the malted
stuff. But most stouts probably use black/roasted malt anyway; it's
mainly the Guinness clones that require roasted barley.
Find a good guide on how to do it, or just make it up your self. My
advice is to start at lower temperatures, say 120C, and ramp it up
to 200C over about 2 hours. Don't go above 200C as the malt
darkens very quickly at this temp (and may catch fire).
Good luck,
Stuart Grant
Hobart.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:57:07 -0600
From: "Brian Lundeen" <BLundeen at rrc.mb.ca>
Subject: RE: Go Wolverines!
> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:35:32 -0500
> From: "Dave Burley" <Dave_Burley at charter.net>
> Subject: Go Black and Blue,
>
> I did my B.S. at Ohio State
Dave, thanks for sharing that. I have long wondered where your BS came
from. ;-)
Cheers
Brian
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:00:51 -0500
From: "Peed, John" <jpeed at elotouch.com>
Subject: I'd rather lurk
I think I'd rather lurk than post, particularly when it comes to things like
pH meter threads, but it seems to me that a discussion of some specific
experiences with specific meters might be in order. For years I used the
cheapy Checker meter. The interaction between the two calibration pots made
it a real pain to calibrate, it didn't hold calibration well at all and it
wasn't temperature-compensated at all. I tried the Hanna Phep5 for a short
time but found the automatic calibration extremely annoying - it was slow,
it demanded that you change cal solutions almost instantly and if you
dallied at all it would tell you that the second solution was wrong and it
would proclaim that forever until you removed the batteries and waited
several hours ... if there was any other way to correct that, I never found
it. It also had a very large probe, so required a lot of each calibration
solution. Finally, I found it to not hold calibration well at all (and I
didn't relish going through that cal routine). It finally got so fond of
saying that the second cal solution was wrong that it became unusable. In
fairness, I have not discussed the symptoms with Hanna and it might turn out
to be a problem with the probe. However, having gotten fed up with the
PHep5, I decided to go ahead and spring for the Hanna Piccolo. Now THAT's a
pH meter! The pros may not think so, but as a home brewer I can say that it
appears to me to be a genuine instrument (it appears that there's something
to "amplified signal technology" and the explanation on Hanna's Web site
makes sense). It's kind of a large, crude looking thing, but it's easy to
calibrate, it locks onto readings much more quickly than the other meters
I've used, it's very stable, holds calibration well and it's
temperature-compensated to 158 degrees F. This is probably the least you
can spend and get a really usable pH meter. I see no point in getting a
lesser meter because, to me, the lesser meters become more of a distraction
from the brewing process than an enhancement ("how long is it going to take
to get this thing calibrated/why don't the cal solutions read what they
should an hour later/is the reading ever going to stabilize/is the sample
cool enough to measure/do I really trust what this thing is telling me?!).
And by the way, I just noticed that Williams Brewing has them on sale
through the 28th of this month for a $30 savings - need I say that I'm in no
way affiliated? One more good thing about the Piccolo is that it doesn't
require a lot of calibration solution. I use the center "bobber" part of an
air lock (3, actually) to hold the two cal solutions and the sample - just a
few cc's of each. One inch holes drilled in a utility shelf hold the sample
holders nicely. Should you be so frugal as to not pop for fresh cal
solutions yearly? Probably not. Should you pop for the storage solution,
and keep a bit in the probe cap between uses? I'm no expert, but I'd have
to say yes, absolutely.
Kinda long winded, ain't I? OK, I'll go back to lurking now.
John Peed
Oak Ridge, TN
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:43:51 +0200
From: "Antony Hayes" <anthayes at telkomsa.net>
Subject: pH for homebrewers
pH meters are finicky and expensive to maintain.
My sense is that there may be a difference in efficiency, and certainly
taste at extremes, but for home application pH meters are more trouble than
they are worth.
I bought a cheap meter (about $100) which was less accurate than my granny.
I was given a more expensive meter (about $500) which is more temperamental
than an Alfa Romeo.
I now use the council pH specs and fixed acid additions according to time of
year and ingredients.
Now if I had more money and patience, perhaps?
Ant Hayes
Johannesburg
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:25:10 -0600
From: Michael Fross <michael at fross.org>
Subject: Fermenting to Thin
Hello everyone,
I've been having trouble lately with my yeast fermenting out to much leaving a
thin beer. I just tried my first lager, a Vienna. It had an OG of 1.048, but it
was very thin. After checking the refractometer, it reads 1.008 as the FG. (and
it's just been only lagering for about a week). I was targeting 1.012.
Is there anything that I can do to increase the body a bit? Both for this batch
and future batches?
The obvious answers to me are:
1. Use a less attentuve yeast. But I am not using a highly attentuitive one.
2. Mash at a higher temperature. I usually mash at 152 to 153 degrees.
Would #2 above make much of a difference? Say mash at 155F?
Many thanks.
Frosty
------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #4655, 11/19/04
*************************************
-------
