Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
HOMEBREW Digest #4479
HOMEBREW Digest #4479 Thu 19 February 2004
FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: janitor@hbd.org
***************************************************************
THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
Beer, Beer, and More Beer
Visit http://morebeer.com to show your appreciation!
Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********
Contents:
New Take On Reinheitsgebot ("Phil Yates")
re: Cooling Coils & Pressure Calculations (Dane Mosher)
Residual Alkalinity ("A.J deLange")
Re: Counter Flow Chillers ("David Houseman")
Re: Crystal Malt Use (Robert Sandefer)
Light and Dark Munich Malts (Robert Sandefer)
how do they manage? (Nathaniel Lansing)
Cooper Carbonation Drops (Bob Hall)
re: High Gravity Yeast/Many-Generation Brewpubs (Jason Poll)
Re: Covering starter containers ("Vivian Wallick")
Re: Covering starter containers ("Rob Dewhirst")
Bottling without counterpressure ("Steve Dale-Johnson")
Indefinite Repitching and Yeast Mutation (Alexandre Enkerli)
4VG and yeast metabolism (Andrew Tate)
Re:Counterflow chiller (Tim & Cindy Howe)
Re: How much crystal malt is too much? (Grant Family)
Re.: geek alert ("Sean Richens")
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* The HBD Logo Store is now open! *
* http://www.hbd.org/store.html *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Suppport this service: http://hbd.org/donate.shtml *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org
If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!
To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.
HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.
The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.
More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.
JANITOR on duty: Pat Babcock and Spencer Thomas (janitor@hbd.org)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:25:28 +1100
From: "Phil Yates" <phil.yates at bigpond.com>
Subject: New Take On Reinheitsgebot
Dane Mosher says:
>If you can find people who will pay you
>money for wombat beer, then what's the problem? Keep
>in mind that if you poison your customers, they will
>sue you and spread the word.
Now just a moment here Mr Mosher.
I'm not selling my beer. I'm a homebrewer! I trial all my beers on my
darling wife Jill. Well I did, till she got wise and went back to drinking
commercial beers, the most expensive she can find! And she always checks the
seal on the twist top for possible interference.
Some years back, Jill declared that the best beer I ever made was a wheat
beer (even better than the rice lager) and from then on she demanded I make
it for her time and time again. The minute I stop, she goes out and buys
very expensive beer, just to punish me. So why shouldn't I poison her?
Besides, she's busy trying to break my neck forcing me to ride these blasted
horses!
But Mr Mosher, I'd never dream of poisoning a customer. Perhaps the above
circumstances are a good case for insisting on a Reinheitsgebot, at least
from Jill's point of view.
Phil
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:49:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Dane Mosher <dane_mosher at yahoo.com>
Subject: re: Cooling Coils & Pressure Calculations
Michael Noah wrote:
"My question is this...I calculate that the standard
120-foot cooling coils offered for sale introduce 60
psi of resistance...That's a lot of CO2 to overcome
what looks to be a standard design for a cooling
coil."
Yes it is a lot of pressure, but it's correct. I
recall running those jockey boxes at 50-60psi when I
used to do that kind of thing for a living. Less
pressure than that and the beer will get too foamy,
which is somewhat counterintuitive.
There is another style of jockey box that runs the
beer through smaller lengths of tubing which are
embedded in a thick, flat aluminum plate. These run
at less pressure, but are not as good IMO.
Be sure to bleed the excess pressure from the kegs
when you are done serving to keep the remaining beer
from getting way overcarbonated.
Aloha!
Dane Mosher
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:13:51 +0000
From: "A.J deLange" <ajdel at cox.net>
Subject: Residual Alkalinity
Todd asked about alkalinity values after decarbonation by boiling. If
you do a really good job of decarbonation (by using lime for example)
you can expect to achieve decarbonation to about 1 mEval (50 ppm as
CaCO3). Just boiling on your stove top or King Cooker would probably
get you to twice this i.e. 100 ppm as CaCO3. At he low level of
pre-boil alkalinity (111 mg/L) your water contains I doubt much calcium
or bicarbonate is being removed.
The water going in has 50*39.3/20 = 98 ppm (as CaCO3) calcium hardness
and 50*11.7/12.15 = 48 ppm (as CaCO3) magnesium hardness. The residual
alkalinity is, thus, 111 - (98 + 24)/3.5 = 76 which isn't too bad
really and should serve perfectly well for most beers especially if a
little darkish malt is added to grists.
If you really want to get more of that bicarbonate out the way to do it
is with excess calcium during the boil and the best source for calcium
I know of in this regard is lime (food grade lime is available as
"pickling lime" where canning supplies are sold) because there is no
flavor causing anion associated with it. If you are shy on chloride or
sulfate then gypsum or calcium chloride are, of course, fine to use as
a calcium source. As I stated at the beginning you should be able to
get close to 50 ppm alkalinity with lime (or another source of excess
calcium) and this would drop your RA below 50 which is enough to make
most brewers happy.
Decarbonation with lime is a little tricky. If you have a pH meter you
can follow Hubert Hanghoffer's method (see his website). Otherwise
essentially you add lime, stir it up, let the water settle and decant
(I also add a little chalk to supply nucleation sites - don't know if
this really helps). You now have clear water with a pH of about 10.
This you must aerate or sparge with CO2 to get the pH back down to a
reasonable level.
Cheers, A.J.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:16:48 -0500
From: "David Houseman" <david.houseman at verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Counter Flow Chillers
Tim asked:
>So anyhew, now that I'm pondering a counterflow
chiller,
> a few questions come to mind.
> Any opinions on:
> a) minimum diameter for the inner tube
> b) minimum diameter for the outer tube
> I'm thinking 1/4'' inner 3/8" outer or 3/8" inner
> 1/2" outer. I haven't looked into fittings/adapters
> etc and that may be a factor as well.
> Oh yeah, one other question: Is natural gas pipe
> suitable for brewing?
Tim, I don't see any benefit to a copper exterior. I found that using a
standard 3/4" garden hose works great. In fact I believe it's Listermann
who has a great adapter kit that contains all the fittings for 3/8" interior
copper tubing inside a garden hose. I made one of these and it works great.
Simple. BTW, they may have coils, but you will have to straighten them out
first to get one inside the other and then carefully re-coil so as not to
kink the copper, a fatal mistake for the new CFC.
Dave Houseman
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:23:39 -0500
From: Robert Sandefer <melamor at vzavenue.net>
Subject: Re: Crystal Malt Use
I regularly use 1 pound of crystal malt per 5-gal batch of porter or
stout. In lighter beers (of which I make few) I generally use no more than
.5 pound of crystal malt.
While the recipe provided (with 2.15 lbs crystal, .85 lbs Munich, and 1.75
lbs honey malt) has quite a bit of specialty malts, I believe it has a
chance at being a good beer. I'm not getting any warning signals per se.
I cannot comment on the use of honey malt (as I have not used it).
Robert
Arlington, VA
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:33:33 -0500
From: Robert Sandefer <melamor at vzavenue.net>
Subject: Light and Dark Munich Malts
Since apparently no one read Digest #4476 :) I am asking again:
What are the differences (if any) between the taste and usage of light
(8L) and dark (16L) Munich malts (of German origin)?
PS: Anyone who has used Munich malt (there are a lot of you I'm sure) can
contribute to this discussion.
What style did you use light Munich malt in? And dark?
What amounts did you use? How did the beers taste and how did they differ
from a beer without Munich in the grist?
Awaiting a plethora of insightful responses,
Robert
Arlington, VA
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:21:51 -0500
From: Nathaniel Lansing <delbrew at compuserve.com>
Subject: how do they manage?
Reading the posts about high gravity beers and the peril
they put yeast through made me wonder; how do the big
breweries manage to consistently brew 16P worts and have
the yeast survive? They even go so far as to dilute their
wort FAN levels with corn and rice adjuncts yet still keep
the yeast viable.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:22:12 -0500
From: Bob Hall <rallenhall at toast.net>
Subject: Cooper Carbonation Drops
It seems to me that someone asked about carbonation drops some time ago,
but I don't remember any posted responses. Has anyone out there tried them?
Would be interested in any info as I wait impatiently for a kolsch and pils
to bottle condition.
Bob Hall
Napoleon, OH
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:52:46 -0500
From: Jason Poll <jtpoll at mtu.edu>
Subject: re: High Gravity Yeast/Many-Generation Brewpubs
Dane Mosher comments on a brewpub's multi-generation yeast use:
> A few years ago, I heard of a brewpub that repitched indefinitely--more
> than 100 batches--and claimed to have great beer. Maybe so, but that
> yeast was surely a long way away from where it started. Their customers
<snip>
Now, first let me say that I totally agree with you -- I'd find it very
unlikely that a brewery's 100th+ generation yeast is producing the same
beer as the 1st generation yeast (although I wouldn't say it's impossible.)
I'm just of the opinion that this isn't necessarily a bad thing. I like the
idea of a brewery having their own 'house-yeast' strains -- adding another
way that their beers can be truly unique.
The only way I'd say these unique/mutated yeast strains would be a
'problem' would be if the yeast are not producing beer that the brewer (or
maybe more importantly the brewery's consumers,) finds to be a good beer.
Jason Poll
Boston, MI
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:31:21 -0700
From: "Vivian Wallick" <brewstersyeast at earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Covering starter containers
Rob asks about covering starter containers to allow passage of air (and
other gases) to pass through without contamination. As a long-time reader,
I am finally moved to post and hope to do so with breaking any rules or
offending anyone.
When working in microbiology labs I have often used plastic foam plugs.
Here at Brewsters Yeast we also use them with good results. They come in a
couple sizes (I think 75 mm is largest, which may work for your flasks, but
probably not for beakers) and can be autoclaved several times before losing
their elasticity. I believe we buy them from Cynmar. Fisher Scientific has
them also - they're a very standard item in labs. If you have trouble
finding them contact us and we'll help.
Jack Wallick
<brewstersyeast at earthlink.net>
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:17:36 -0600
From: "Rob Dewhirst" <rob at hairydogbrewery.com>
Subject: Re: Covering starter containers
First, thanks to all who responded about covering starter containers. I
received many private replies in addition to the public ones posted
here. Here's a summary.
- A lot of people suggested aluminum foil. This is what I use today and
I am specifically trying to increase atmospheric oxygen availability
with another solution. So foil is a great cover, but not for my
purpose. I mentioned allowing "air to pass but no contaminants." I
understand foil will allow escape, but not air coming in.
- Foam stoppers from williams brewing. These look like a good solution
for large flasks, but not beakers or jars. I am definitely going to try
these for flasks. Both soakable in sanitizer or autoclavable(!).
- Sterile 4x4s (presumably of gauze) that are used for wound dressing.
Available in pharmacies. I am trying these out as well (and a special
thanks to the fellow who offered to send me some to try!) for beakers
and mason jars.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:36:47 -0800
From: "Steve Dale-Johnson" <sdalejohnson at hotmail.com>
Subject: Bottling without counterpressure
The *other* Steve A (from Arkansas) asked....
>Anyway - has anyone else tried to avoid using the counter pressure bottle
>filler? Is it better to just buy the CPBF? What are your experiences?
My own completely non-scientific method is to use a *proper* tap - don't
cheap out on the cobra tap-, overcarbonate slightly, bleed the keg pressure
to a slow non-foamy pour, and then (after sanitizing the tap nozzle) just
spin the tap to about a 45 deg angle and stick it in the bottle. Pour until
foam comes out the top and cap immediately on the foam.
I've been warned that the initial exposure to oxygen may oxidize the beer,
but I can't see a single C02 purge cycle witha CP filler changing that in
the least - think of the keg filling thread lately.....
I have never noticed oxidation in beers bottled this way, but the longest
any of mine have remained bottled this way is a few days.
Steve Dale-Johnson
Brewing at 1918 miles, 298 degrees Rennerian
Delta (Vancouver), BC, Canada.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:09:56 -0400
From: Alexandre Enkerli <aenkerli at indiana.edu>
Subject: Indefinite Repitching and Yeast Mutation
Dave Mosher said (HBD 4478):
> A few years ago, I heard of a brewpub that repitched
> indefinitely--more than 100 batches--and claimed to have great beer.
> Maybe so, but that yeast was surely a long way away from where it
> started.
Our brewclub visited a fairly large Vermont micro where the master
brewer claims they have been repitching the same yeast (Yorkshire,
apparently) ever since they opened (something like 11 years ago). They
don't report any contamination problem and their beers are consistently
good. Even though they brew fairly different styles, all their beers
exhibit a very obvious "house flavour" that may be due in part to the
yeast used. Yorkshire strains are allegedly used by many breweries but
produce very different beers.
Is it in any way possible that once a yeast strain has adapted to a
brewery it may remain rather stable for a large number of generations?
An answer to this must have been part of Dr. Cone's Fortnight of
Yeast...
http://consumer.lallemand.com/danstar-lalvin/fortnightyeast.html
He did address mutations...
Cheers!
Ale-X (in the middle of mashing his first lager)
Moncton, New Brunswick (Canada)
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:48:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Andrew Tate <atate at yahoo.com>
Subject: 4VG and yeast metabolism
I wanted to thank everyone for their replies to my
earlier post regarding wort darkening. Your
suggestions were most helpful.
Since traffic has be unusually low lately, I'd like to
throw out a question for the brewing
scientists/biochemists.
I'm interested in 4VG production from a biochemical
standpoint. Does anyone have any information on the
pathways, enzymes, genes, etc. involved in the
generation of 4VG? How about regulation? Any other
yeast metabolism that makes German wheat yeasts what
they are, other than flocculation? Anything you guys
have would be interesting, even pointers to journal
articles.
Thanks in advance. Private emails are OK.
Andrew
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:14:13 -0500
From: Tim & Cindy Howe <howe at execulink.com>
Subject: Re:Counterflow chiller
>From: Kent Fletcher <fletcherhomebrew at yahoo.com>
>Tim, the absolute minimum wort (inner) tube size is
>3/8" OD. If you went with 1/4" it would take foreever
>to chill 5 gallons. Given that, the minimum outer
>tube size you owuld want to use is 5/8" OD, and 3/4"
>would be better.
Thanks for the input.
>As to the last question, what are you asking?
>Suitable to run wort through? If that's the question,
>the answer is certainly not. The only pipe materials
>suitable for wort transfer are stainless steel,
>copper, and brass (and machined brass fittings should
>be "pickled" to remove surface lead).
In these parts, they sell copper tubing with a Natural Gas sticker along
the side. It's significantly more expensive than "general" copper tubing,
so the purpose of my question was really to ask What makes NG copper piping
more expensive than general copper piping? I suppose the answer is really
moot, as given the price of the stuff, I'd probably go with a commercial
model CF Chiller before I used NG tubing to build my own...
Cheers,
Tim Howe
London, Ont
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:40:04 +1100
From: Grant Family <grants at netspace.net.au>
Subject: Re: How much crystal malt is too much?
G'day,
Pat (I assume) asked about his grain bill for an American amber ale.
>My ... IBUs are right in line. My concern is that I have created
>an overly malty, potentially super-sweet beer because of my
>liberal use of caramel and honey malt.
I think those two statements contradict each other somewhat.
Hypothetically, you COULD create a beer with too much crystal malt,
but for your (sound) recipe, all I think you'll need to do is to increase
the hopping a little bit to counter the sweetness. Your IBU value of 26.1
is quite low in the range of ProMash US amber ale hopping rates
(20-40 IBUs). I'd suggest you increase this to ~35 for the amount of
residual sweetness you're likely to have. Another option, of course, is
to cut back on the crystal - especially if you're not a hophead.
Mashing quite low will also counter the sweetness a little bit.
The problem with inventing recipes by following style guides (which is
exactly what I do!) is that they don't have "values" for everything. That
is, you can have a 26 IBU amber ale that seems quite bitter (ie. it has
little or no crystal), and a 26 IBU amber ale which is quite sweet (ie.
possibly akin to your recipe). Sometimes you have to look closely at a
given combination of ingredients and think what unmeasured effects
they will have on the beer.
Good Brewing
Stuart Grant,
Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 21:06:45 -0600
From: "Sean Richens" <srichens at mts.net>
Subject: Re.: geek alert
Props to Jeremy for the apoptosis link! That last line about the (sort-of)
well-known technique of storing yeast in distilled water was worth the whole
article! I've never quite grasped why the water had to be distilled rather
than simply not wort until now.
Sean Richens
Proudly wearing my propellor beanie in Winnipeg
------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #4479, 02/19/04
*************************************
-------
