Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
HOMEBREW Digest #4393
HOMEBREW Digest #4393 Thu 06 November 2003
FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: janitor@hbd.org
***************************************************************
THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
Northern Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies
http://www.northernbrewer.com 1-800-681-2739
Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********
Contents:
Homebrew Supplier Desert ("Sweeney, David")
Why I(didn't stop brewing/yeast,procedures ("-S")
Beer night leaves historic hangover (Jeff Renner)
Re: Swinging Fermentation Temperatures (gornicwm)
Competition Email notices (Dion Hollenbeck)
Interesting Observation (Duane Drake)
Can't find 10 gal cornys Convert a Sanke? ("Gary Smith")
Peppers in beer ("Gary Smith")
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* The HBD Logo Store is now open! *
* http://www.hbd.org/store.html *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org
If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!
To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job. Note that the Digest now
automagically protects your address, so spam-proofing is a waste of
your time, anyway :^)
HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.
The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.
More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.
JANITORS on duty: Pat Babcock and Spencer Thomas (janitor@hbd.org)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 22:35:33 -0600
From: "Sweeney, David" <David at studentlife.tamu.edu>
Subject: Homebrew Supplier Desert
The first victim was my local homebrew supply house - Brewstuff in
College Station. After struggling for 7 years, they went out
of business about 1.5 years ago. So I widened my net and started
getting supplies through the mail from St. Patrick's of Texas,
located in Austin. Son of a gun! If you would believe it, Lynne
has chosen to get out of the ingredients business and focus solely
on brewing and winemaking (high margin) equipment - no more
ingredients. This is especially grievous because St. Pat's was
the only North American supplier of Budvar undermodified malt.
For those of you who have used it, you know what I'm talking
about. For those of you who haven't, you missed out on a great
Pilsner malt!
Anyway, I'm in need of some advice on a reputable Internet supplier
of homebrew ingredients. Freshness and customer service are at
the top of my list.
David Sweeney
Texas Aggie Brew Club
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 07:06:53 -0500
From: "-S" <-s at adelphia.net>
Subject: Why I(didn't stop brewing/yeast,procedures
Tim apparently decided to give brewing another go after discovering that
there are other methods and lower cost sources for his ingredients. I
number of years ago I was about to give up brewing too.
When I began brewing in the early 80's the local 'package' shop had
Laaglander's (~60% attenuation) extracts, stale hops pellets - months old in
cellophane stored in sunlight with no varietal name and no AA% rating. Also
the horrible kits of HB legend - nasty dried yeast, and instructions which
ignored sanitation and advised 50% table sugar.
I originally had a British book which was rather comical ('Better Beer and
How to Brew It'), then a couple years later I became aware of Charlie
Papazian's then new book and quite a few years later yet Dave Miller's
'CHBoHB'. Still, without access to better ingredients I had few options ..
if I added no sugar and watched the sanitation and added some hops and maybe
a little bit of Laaglander and went through the pain of priming and bottling
I could make a tiny range of so-so ales from a 'Pilsener' kit. I had hit a
wall.
Around this time, about a decade ago, I was on a business trip to Phoenix
and a local co-workers invited me over to his place on a weekday evening to
help in an all-grain brew session. I had read Miller's book cover to cover
and understood the mash and lauter 'on paper' , but had never seen one. I
was intimately familiar with the squalor and frenetic tenor of my stovetop
extract brewing including the canonical dialogue with SWMBO about the
boilover, spills, smells and noise of the late-night cleanup. I thought I
knew what to expect.
Mark and I arrived at his place around 6pm and this was Winter when it gets
dark early. There, a dozen yards from his house into the desert-like
backyard of the suburbs near South Mountain I experienced my first all-grain
brew session. There were no trappings of kitchen brewing. Two cut-off
sankes, huge to my newbie eyes, were in the yard, one perched on a powerful
propane burner was filled with groaning water nearing strike temperature
thanks to Mark's wife. Mark had crushed the malt beforehand so in a matter
of minutes the malt and water were mixed in the mash tun with a bit of
gypsum for a single infusion. A little stirring then the mash tun was
covered with an old sleeping bag for insulation to rest for the better part
of an hour. Plenty of time to sample beers and nosh on finger food. He had
a very hoppy ale and a memorable dry stout in corny kegs - big flavored
beers but very clean yeast flavor and very well balanced compared to
anything I had made. My memory has faded but I think he used a Phils Phalse
bottom and showed me his EZ-Masher homemade design and a mason-jar hopjack
in the works derived from a post on something called HBD. The lauter and
daylight finished in sync and the heat and yellow-orange glow of the boiler
burner and the wafting aroma of malt and hops were welcome as the nighttime
desert air and dark but star bestrewn Western sky engulfed us. The time for
the boil, cooling and pitching seemed to pass in minutes rather than hours -
as time with friends and a beer at hand always does. The outdoor garden
hose & sponge cleanup seemed more like a nicely scheduled intermissions than
a chore. In this serene setting it became obvious that very good beer can
be made with simple and streamlined procedures devised to suit the process.
I learned a lot and had some great beers with a new friend that evening.
When I got home I was surprised to find that new owners bought out the local
'package' shop within the past year and now carried REAL HB ingredients like
malt and labeled hops and Wyeast. That week I bought a big propane burner
and enough plastic buckets and to make a zapap lauter. Within a month I was
on my second all-grain brew and has some cornelius kegs on order.
If there is a moral to the story it's this ....you must have good
ingredients to make good beer, but you must have well honed practical
procedures to make brewing pleasant. I happily came across some of each at
the same time.
It's far easier to get good ingredients these days. I've tasted HB made
with extracts like Munton&Fison and I've experimented with dry yeasts from
DCL and have tasted beers made with Lallemand yeasts and these high quality
extracts and dry yeast are no impediment to brewing great beer. All-grain
brewing and liquid yeast give the brewer additional range and maximum
control, but there is no reason to suggest that all-grain&liquid yeast
stands head and shoulders above extract & dry yeast as it once did.
The other issue of streamlined procedures for brewing is the bigger
challenge; one I still struggle with. We should think through each step in
the brewing process and consider how to make the whole simpler and more
convenient. Some simplifications come from incremental improvement as we
learn our process, and many of these 'tips' can be found on this forum for
the asking. Yet most of the big improvements require radical changes like,
/ kegging rather than bottling
/ big burners & pots rather than oversized pots on underpowered stovetops
/ CFC coolers,
/ RIMS, HERMS and variants
What I have learned about achieving a pleasant brewing process is this ...
there is always considerable cost involved in stepping to that next major
level of convenience and the cost always appears immense in foresight yet
trivial in hindsight. HomeBrewing is not economically practical if you even
consider labor at minimum wage rates (forget the ingredients), but like all
hobbies it has value to the psyche. The added several hundred dollar cost
of kegging hardware and an extra fridge is completely unjustifiable
economically, but add so greatly to the pleasure of the hobby that these are
practical requirements for the serious Hbrewer.
The guys who first though up cutting the lids off sankes for pots, kegging
hardware for serving and RIMS for mash/lautering were thinking far outside
the box. Don't be afraid to let your imagination wander outside the bounds
of economic practicality when looking for a better way.
Don't be afraid to buy the necessary tools for convenience. If you believe
you'll be brewing for the next 5 years then invest in a pot and burner for
10 gallon use, kegging hardware and a fridge and a CFC at least and enjoy
it. You can always sell these off to another brewer if you change your
mind.
(sorry for the length)
-Steve
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:43:21 -0500
From: Jeff Renner <jeffrenner at comcast.net>
Subject: Beer night leaves historic hangover
Brewers
Quite a story at
http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/sports/7169640.htm
about the day in 1974 that the Cleveland Indians sold beer at the
stadium for ten cents and the. It's worth reading.
Beer night leaves historic hangover
The Tribe's front office has put together some ridiculous promotions
over the years...but the concept of distributing virtually unlimited
quantities of an intoxicating beverage is one for the ages.
Jeff
- --
Jeff Renner in Ann Arbor, Michigan USA, JeffRenner at comcast.net
"One never knows, do one?" Fats Waller, American Musician, 1904-1943
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:56:33 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
From: gornicwm at earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Swinging Fermentation Temperatures
I do not think that you need to take steps to protect the beer. I think its
pretty much done. I have found that the more I have screwed with my beers the
worse they turn out. You should end up with a nice drinkable!!! The cool
fermentation with scotch ale - one of my favorite styles - is appropriate in
order to bring out the clean maltiness. The good news is that any residual
sweetness left behind in your brew is completely within style as long as its
not cloying.
Nothing wrong with slow fermentation, but I would stick to the guidelines that
the yeast specifies until you have "test drove" the yeast with a few batches
and know what it can do at higher and lower temps...this will come with
experience.
Wyeast 1968 is a strong floculator - meaning that it will drop from suspension
and go to sleep if it is not COMPLETELY happy. The drop in temp could have
dropped the yeast out and it may need to "GENTLY' be roused. However, rousing
can be dangerous and introduce oxidation and many off-flavors into your final
product. I NEVER rouse - the bad outweighs the good in my opinion!!!
A suggestion that I have is that "IF" you are looking for a long, slow
fermantation for a scotch ale, Wyeast Scotish Ale yeast might be a better bet.
The wyeast is better adept at lower temperature fermentations (50's).
You could always take a gravity reading to make sure that everything is
completed as you anticipated too, but my feeling is that your fermentation is
finished.
It'll be fine. The majority of ale fermentation is done in the primary, so
if the secondary stops bubbling I wouldn't be too concerned - its supposed
to stop eventually. :-)
Bill Gornicki
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 13:05:17 -0800
From: Dion Hollenbeck <hollen at woodsprite.com>
Subject: Competition Email notices
This is a topic which should probably be discussed offline, as it only is
slightly related to brewing. Please respond directly to me at the Email below.
When the BJCP gives us the judge list for a competition, we send Email to
judges with Email addresses. After a reasonable amount of time, we send
postcards to all judges without Email and those whose Email bounced. I am
currently the "competition data guy" but want to train someone else to take
over for me.
The problem is that I currently do the mailings with Perl scripts on Unix,
allowing me to send an individual customized Email to each judge. The
reason for this is that so many sites are now filtering out spam and long
recipient lists tend to get rejected by spam filters.
Are there any of you who have made this process easy to do on Windoze? I
would like to make the process available to anybody to take over from me
and not too many people have 1) a Unix machine to use and 2) the skill to
do the Perl programming which makes it possible for me to do this
easily. If we had to cut and paste an Email address into a single Email
for each of the 200+ judges in CA, AZ and NV, we would not do it.
thanks,
dion
- --
Dion Hollenbeck Email: hollen at woodsprite.com
Home Page: http://www.woodsprite.com
Brewing Page: http://hbd.org/hollen [1359.5,263.7] Rennerian
QUAFF - Threepeat Nat'l HB Club of the Year, CAL HB Club of the Year
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:22:08 -0500
From: Duane Drake <drd at littleduck.org>
Subject: Interesting Observation
I recently (10/26) brewed 10 gallons of a strong stout (OG:1.074) and split the
wort into two containers. One was a 6-1/2 gallon carboy and one the standard 5
gallon plastic bucket. I decanted and split a 1/2 gallon starter of White Labs
Irish Ale yeast between the two after aeration. Both took off quickly and I
had to switch to a blow-off setup by the next evening, or I was going to have a
serious mess on my hands. Both vessels were sitting side by side at
approximately 70 degrees F.
Now the interesting part. This past Monday, the krausen had receded enough to
rack to secondary. When I measured the gravity, the carboy was 1.025 and the
bucket was 1.020. What would cause this difference? The same wort, the same
yeast, the same vigorous fermentation, and the same temp. Was it the number of
yeast cells in my highly scientific splitting of the yeast starter?
Thanks,
Duane Drake
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:17:19 -0600
From: "Gary Smith" <mandolinist at ameritech.net>
Subject: Can't find 10 gal cornys Convert a Sanke?
Hi all,
I've been looking mostly futily for 10 gallon Corny kegs. I want the 10 gal
ones for fermenting in. Since I brew 10 gal batches it would be nice to
ferment in the 10 gal Corny & then transfer to a separate 10 gallon one as
the secondary. All that would take is I/O connectors, tubing and sanitizing
with StarSan. It would be the easiest solution for easy kegging. (After
totaling the car into a cement wall at 50 mph I like not having to lift things
more than I have to.) To go from the secondary to two 5 gal cornys would
be the same procedure & "pour" from these. No light, no oxidation, no
cleaning bottles. simple & the easiest way for me not to lift fermentors.
I found some 10 gal Cornys but at $50 shipping each I decided that was a
pure opportunist rake & have pretty much given up on finding any 10
gallon variety.
I'm getting resigned to having a local welder weld the top of a corny onto a
Sanke & doing a FDA weld from the inside & then use this kluge for a
fermentor. The welding is going to be a pretty penny & one shop said 2
hours to do the job which I though was padding their pockets a bit. If I go
through with that I'll end up with 15 gal of play space & room inside to
reach in and clean.
If there was some way to be 100% sure the organic crap was removed
from soaking in Star San, using an intact keg would be a cheap way to go
assuming you had all the fittings to move from the 2ndary keg to the
cornys after fermentation is over. Getting the spring in & out of the top of
the Sanke is a hassle though & how the heck would you be able to clean it
& be sure your next batch isn't the same as your last batch...
So any ideas on any of this that might help me out?
Thanks,
Gary
http://musician.dyndns.org/homebrew.html
http://musician.dyndns.org/rims.html
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 21:21:21 -0600
From: "Gary Smith" <mandolinist at ameritech.net>
Subject: Peppers in beer
Someone mentioned needing more ludicrous peppers in beer...
Other than not on my watch.
I'd suggest a good look at "Dave's Insanity Sauce" Don't know what
peppers it has in it but... It sure keeps the SWIMBO's dit-brained rabbit
from chewing at electrical cords...
If you get it on your fingers don't plan on any foreplay for a week or more...
Talkin' about Golf of course...
Ahem
Gary
Gary Smith
CQ DX de KA1J
http://musician.dyndns.org/homebrew.html
http://musician.dyndns,org.rims.html
------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #4393, 11/06/03
*************************************
-------
