Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
HOMEBREW Digest #4024
HOMEBREW Digest #4024 Mon 26 August 2002
FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: janitor@hbd.org
***************************************************************
THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
Northern Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies
http://www.northernbrewer.com 1-800-681-2739
Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********
Contents:
It's SHMOO was re: yeast and schmoo tips ("Steve Alexander")
Re: Exploding Stout (Kent Fletcher)
Decoction Mashing ("Caryl Hornberger")
RE: Club-only Comps ("Houseman, David L")
Killian's Irish Red ("Mac")
Saccharification During the Sparge? ("Fred L. Johnson")
Re: Adjusting the schmoo (Peter Torgrimson)
Mead ???? ("Mark Tumarkin")
HERMS/pump query from HBD #3996 (David Towson)
CF Chiller Cleaning Help Needed (Rick)
german proverb translation? ("Larry Maxwell")
Re: yeast and schmoo tips (Jeff Renner)
RE: Classic American Pilsner - Latest easy recipe needed ("Dan Gross")
Wind shroud ("Dan Gross")
Re: Fermenting in your brew pot (Jeff Renner)
Re: Classic American Pilsner - Latest easy recipe needed (Jeff Renner)
Flooding in Plzen (Petr Otahal)
*
* Show your HBD pride! Wear an HBD Badge!
* http://hbd.org/cgi-bin/shopping
*
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy!
*
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org
If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!
To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.
HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.
The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.
More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.
JANITOR on duty: Pat Babcock and Karl Lutzen (janitor@hbd.org)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 00:19:18 -0400
From: "Steve Alexander" <steve-alexander@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: It's SHMOO was re: yeast and schmoo tips
Paul Kensler ...
>I have always read and heard that yeast
>were non-sexual organisms that reproduced via
>budding?...
Most (S.cerevisea) yeast reproduction is asexual, but they
can under the *right* conditions reproduce sexually. This
feature has been used little in breeding studies for brewing
yeast for a lot of technical reasons. Sexual reproduction
has been used more extensively as part of selective breeding
of bread yeast (also an S.cerevisea).
Bottom line is that brewing yeast are not fornicating in the
wort (but might on a plate or a surface colony) and W.C.
Field's condemnation of water does not apply to beer.
>On a related note, I seem to be growing my own schmoo
>tip, protruding out the area centered around my navel.
The Lil' Abner creature was a SHMOO not a schmoo,
and if you've ever seen photomicrographs of the shmoo
tip dimensions .... well you have a great future in porn
or freak shows. The tip is up to 10 times the cell body
length !
-S
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 22:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kent Fletcher <fletcherhomebrew@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Exploding Stout
Chuck Doucette had a small malt bomb go off in his
basement.
Chuck,
I had the same experience with my first stout, also in
a bucket. I happened to catch mine second before it
spewed, walked in the door from work and saw the lid
on that pail had morphed into a DOME!, the grout lines
on the tile floor turned black in a six foot radius.
So after that I have always used a blow off tube for
the first few days of any bigger beers, and use
carboys as well.
Your stout will probably be fine, DEFINATELY do not
throw it out before giving it a chance. Betcha it'll
taste great, and you'll enjoy it all the more so the
experience.
Kent Fletcher
brewing in So Cal
- --- Request Address Only - No Articles
<homebrew-request@hbd.org> wrote:
>
>
> HOMEBREW Digest #4023 Sat 24 August
> 2002
>
>
> FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
> Digest Janitor: janitor@hbd.org
>
>
>
***************************************************************
> THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU
> BY:
>
> Northern Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies
> http://www.northernbrewer.com
> 1-800-681-2739
>
> Support those who support you! Visit our
> sponsor's site!
> ********** Also visit
> http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********
>
>
> Contents:
> stuck ferment? (Randy Ricchi)
> Re: re: yeast and schmoo tips ("Pete Calinski")
> Club-only Comps ("H. Dowda")
> Re: flooding in Pilsen ("Pete Calinski")
> Fermentation and Temperature (John Scime)
> Yeast reproduction - important clarification (Alan
> Meeker)
> RE: Czech floods (Paul Shick)
> IPA, part 2 ("Adam Wead")
> Pilsen ("Bryan Gros")
> Re: Fermentation and Temperature (Demonick)
> Re: Hops & schedule for Fullers ESB or Redhook ESB
> clone (Paul Kalapathy)
> Exploding Stout (Chuck Doucette)
> Flooding in Pilsen ("Jim")
> ESB/Judging again (Bill Wible)
> Cellar Temps and Building Materials ("Charley
> Burns")
> Fullers or Redhook (Scott Perfect)
> Re: Fermentation and Temperature (Kent Fletcher)
> Re: Steves Treatise on Mashing (Kevin Crouch)
> Hop Socks and such... ("Todd")
>
>
> *
> * Show your HBD pride! Wear an HBD Badge!
> * http://hbd.org/cgi-bin/shopping
> *
> * Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy!
> *
>
> Send articles for __publication_only__ to
> post@hbd.org
>
> If your e-mail account is being deleted, please
> unsubscribe first!!
>
> To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message
> with the word
> "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org
> FROM THE E-MAIL
> ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR
> UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
> IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you
> cannot subscribe to
> the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not
> correct your address
> for the automation - that's your job.
>
> HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or
> unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
> http://hbd.org.
>
> The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation
> is copyright
> HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by
> their authors. ASK
> before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble.
> Digest content
> cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or
> profit.
>
> More information is available by sending the word
> "info" to
> req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.
>
> JANITOR on duty: Pat Babcock and Karl Lutzen
> (janitor@hbd.org)
>
>
>
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 08:23:47 -0400
> From: Randy Ricchi <randyr@up.net>
> Subject: stuck ferment?
>
> Adam Wead wonders if his fermentation is stuck.
>
> Adam, how do you know fermentation stopped
> completely? Oftentimes
> fermentation will be faster in the first two or
> three days, then slow
> somewhat. That doesn't mean it has stopped
> fermenting completely. If
> you're judging by airlock activity, it could be you
> don't have a great
> seal on the lid of your fermentor and now that
> fermentation is slower,
> the lower volume of CO2 is just leaking through the
> lid. I wouldn't mess
> around adding additional yeast now, only if you've
> let it sit 3 weeks or
> so and it is still a long way from being done. The
> less mucking around
> the better.
> Wyeast 1056 is a very forgiving yeast and will
> produce a delicious beer
> when fermented in the mid 70's as you are.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 08:48:45 -0400
> From: "Pete Calinski" <pjcalinski@adelphia.net>
> Subject: Re: re: yeast and schmoo tips
>
> Paul Kensler says:
>
> "p.s. - for anyone unfamiliar with "the schmoo", he
> was a cartoon character from Li'l Abner that got his
> own show in the 80's. He was a round blobby sort of
> creature, was white as a sheet, had a fuzzy
> moustache
> and could change shapes."
>
> I remember some other characteristics. A schmoo was
> an ideal being. It
> would clean house for you, drive the kids where ever
> they needed to do,
> could turn into money, would set the table, set the
> oven, then hop in and
> cook itself and come out tasting like chicken.
>
> Al Capp (I believe that was the author of the Li'l
> Abner cartoon strip) was
> a political satirist. His daily cartoon strip, in
> addition to being quite
> funny, had political or social undertones.
>
> Nobody picked up on the comment in my original post:
>
> "And I thought schmoo was how you adjusted core
> memory."
>
> At the risk of dating myself, in the days before
> computers had memory chips,
> they had core memory. It was a magnetic technology
> and required that
> adjustment of the current through the cores. The
> adjuster attached a
> oscilloscope current probe to a special loop and
> looked at the waveform.
> The current was adjusted until it looked like a
> schmoo; "round blobby sort
> of creature".
>
>
> What does that have to do with brewing? Maybe we
> can adjust the shapes of
> our schmoos. Nah, why bother.
>
>
> Pete Calinski
> East Amherst NY
> Near Buffalo NY
>
>
>
***********************************************************
> *My goal:
> * Go through life and never drink the same beer
> twice.
> * (As long as it doesn't mean I have to skip a
> beer.)
>
***********************************************************
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "H. Dowda" <hdowda@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Club-only Comps
>
=== message truncated ===
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 00:46:33 -0500
From: "Caryl Hornberger" <carylmarx@hotmail.com>
Subject: Decoction Mashing
If higher temps cause tannins to be extracted from grain husks,
then what about decoction mashing?
Caryl Hornberger Slone
Fort Wayne, IN
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 13:02:04 -0400
From: "Houseman, David L" <David.Houseman@unisys.com>
Subject: RE: Club-only Comps
All judging forms, reports and materials were prepared and placed in
envelopes on August 17, the day of the competition and went out with the
Monday morning post. The results have been posted on the AHA web site:
http://www.beertown.org/AHA/Clubs/clubonly_winners.htm
David Houseman
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 13:09:13 -0500
From: "Mac" <D.McHenry@ev1.net>
Subject: Killian's Irish Red
I'm new to home brewing, on my second batch now. I was wondering if I could
make a grain & extract beer that is similar to Killian's Irish Red?
If this is possible, does someone have a recipe they would be willing to
share?
Thanks,
Dennis McHenry
Houston, TX
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 13:11:51 -0400
From: "Fred L. Johnson" <fljohnson@portbridge.com>
Subject: Saccharification During the Sparge?
Kevin Crouch postulates that a lot of conversion of starch to sugars
is going on during the sparge. He has observed that if he stops
sparging for a short "rest" when his run off gravity begins to
decrease, the gravity in the run off wort following this "rest" is
considerably higher than before the "rest". He has interpreted this
to indicate additional gelatinization and solubilization of starch
from trapped granules in the grains and the enzymatic conversion of
this starch to sugars.
Kevin states:
>For example, when my extract levels start to
>dip during runoff, (If I haven't mashed out) I'll let
>my mash rest 15 minutes or so and the runoff has
>jumped up dramatically in gravity.
Kevin, I believe when you interrupt sparging, you are simply allowing
more time for the sugars dissolved in the water that is located
within the nooks and crannies of the grains (the stationary phase of
this gel filtration system) to diffuse into the water surrounding the
grains (the mobile phase of this gel filtration system). This is the
principal upon which most recommend sparging slowly rather than
rapidly. If one sparges infinitely slowly (by stopping the flow
completely), one is allowing infinite time for the dissolved sugars
to diffuse out from the stationary phase into the mobile phase.
I'm not suggesting that the following is a good way to extract these
sugars, but I'd bet if you simply stirred the grain in the lauter tun
when the gravity gets low, you would IMMEDIATELY see the rise in
gravity. If so, you know it's not due to enzymes converting starches
into sugars, it is simply a mixing of the mobile and stationary
phases in this gel filtration column chromatography system.
Batch sparging, by simply mixing additional sparge water in the grain
bed, accomplishes the same thing as slowing/stopping the sparge and
waiting for the sugars to diffuse into the water surrounding the
grains.
- --
Fred L. Johnson
Apex, North Carolina, USA
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 15:22:11 -0500
From: Peter Torgrimson <petertorgrimson@prodigy.net>
Subject: Re: Adjusting the schmoo
I apologize for this off-topic post.
Pete Calinski writes,
"Nobody picked up on the comment in my original post:
"And I thought schmoo was how you adjusted core memory."
I admit I saw that and just let it pass. I suspect there are
a lot of us who remember well those days of core memory. While
some may remember them as the "good old days," I do not long
for those days. Let's face it, the technology was really
primitive then, at least in the hardware area. On the other
hand, I see a lot of software now which seems to be suffering
from reverse evolution. Many of today's solutions are inferior
reinventions of elegant solutions developed decades ago. Of
course, there is forward evolution also and there are many
great new software solutions. I do like the new languages
instead of assembly language. Nevertheless, there is a beauty
and utility to assembly language.
Although core memory is long gone, I still hear references to
"core memory" although it really is semiconductor memory, and
the speakers are too young to have been around for core memory
and may not even know what the term means.
To bring this back to beer, I sense that many long for the
robust beers of long ago. My read of this is that today's beer
at least the homebrew and craft brews) are probably better beer
than much of the commercial beer brewed in previous centuries.
My belief is that if something went wrong and the beer had
problems, it was sold and drunk anyway. There was a much lower
standard of quality than today.
Peter Torgrimson
Austin, TX
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 22:29:06 -0400
From: "Mark Tumarkin" <mark_t@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Mead ????
Now, I know it's illegal to distill, and you all know I'd never do something
like that. But just thinking hypothetically, if one were to distill a mead,
what would you call the product? Mead brandy just doesn't seem right, though I
guess it works. Is there a better name for this?
Mark Tumarkin
Hogtown Brewers
Gainesville, FL
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 01:30:41 -0400
From: David Towson <dtowson@comcast.net>
Subject: HERMS/pump query from HBD #3996
I got way behind in my HBD reading again, so this reply to the following
query is very late
>Is anybody using their immersion chiller as their
>HERMS coil?
>
>Is a 1/15 hp pump to much? I have a variable
>transformer to back it down a bit. How hard is to
>step mash with direct heat on the mash tun and the
>pump?
I use a recirculating mash rig from Beer, Beer & More Beer that came with
an immersion coil that can be put in the HLT and used with the pump as a
heating coil. When I first got the system, I decided to use direct heat
under the mash tun instead, and since I have a very effective counterflow
cooler, I put the immersion coil in the attic. But after having made
several beers using direct heat under the mash tun, I had to admit that,
while it worked, it was darned hard to control. The problem was that it
was very difficult to throttle the burner down far enough to get just the
right amount of heat to hold a fixed temperature once I had achieved
it. The flame kept wanting to blow out with the burner running that
low. I found that keeping the lid off the mash tun helped by increasing
the rate of heat loss (which allowed me to use a bit higher flame), but it
was a constant struggle to juggle the flame setting, and I was never able
to set it and leave it.
So I decided to try the immersion coil, and it works extremely well. In
order to keep a constant temperature throughout the mash (avoid cooler mash
near the outside of the vessel, where the heat loss is greatest), I keep
the pump running all the time. That means the wort is constantly being
circulated through the immersion coil. And while it might be possible to
carefully control the temperature by playing with the HLT burner, that is
really just the same problem shifted to a different vessel. So I built a
"bypass loop" out of standard copper tubing fittings bought at a home
improvement store. The loop includes a half-inch gate valve that allows me
to adjust the amount of flow that bypasses the immersion coil. The loop
has only about 18 inches of half-inch tubing in it, and that has much less
flow friction than the 47 feet or so of half-inch tubing in the immersion
coil, so most of the flow goes through the bypass loop if the valve is wide
open. I used a gate valve because it has no need for a rubber washer, and
it is easy to adjust. I have found that setting the temperature in the HLT
about ten degrees above the desired mash temperature gives a good range of
control using the valve, and I can consistently and quickly find a valve
setting that gives a very stable mash temperature. To raise the
temperature for a step mash, I just close the bypass valve, crank up the
HLT burner until the water temperature is ten degrees higher than the next
step temperature, then throttle it back to a reasonable "sustainer flame"
and use the valve to adjust to the desired setpoint. A ten degree
differential works for me, but that will depend on the diameter and length
of tubing in the system, so it must be determined by experiment. The
bypass loop makes the difference between a tricky adjustment and one that
is really very simple.
One final comment: Assuming that your pump is of the centrifugal type, I
agree completely with the one other response to this query I've seen so far
in regard to not using a variable transformer to control the pump. Use the
preferred method of a valve on the OUTPUT of the pump to control the flow
rate. This will work well for your 1/15 HP pump, even though that size is
more than you really need. But don't rely on flow rate control to adjust
the temperature of the mash. Adjust the flow so the recirculation is high
enough to maintain a constant temperature throughout the mash, but not so
high that the vacuum under the false bottom turns it into a piece of
"modern artwork". I learned that lesson the hard way.
Dave in Bel Air, Maryland
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 08:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rick <ale_brewer@yahoo.com>
Subject: CF Chiller Cleaning Help Needed
I guess it's time to poll the brewing wizards out
there. I just dumped my second batch in a row due to
infection, a problem I haven't had in 7 years. I
narrowed the problem down to my CF chiller (copper
tube inside a garden hose design).
I normally pump boiling water through it for
sanitation so on my most recent batch, I went an extra
step, by running hot caustic through it, then rinsing,
then running boiling water for sanitizing.
When I finished cooling the latest batch, I ran cold
water immediately through it to clean it. When I
disconnected the feed line, the backflow pulled out a
couple of chunks of spent hops. Black ones.
Apparently in a previous brew, my zealousness to get
every drop of wort sucked some hops into the line.
This confirmed my suspicion, but also puzzled me.
How can these nasties still affect my finished beer
when I've sanitized them multiple times?
The flow rate seemed normal, so blockage didn't occur
to me. It still seems normal but now I'm concerned
about additional chunks that can be in there.
Is there any way to physically clean the inside of a
copper tube in a CFC? I tried water pressure, and
Shop Vac pressure (using both vacuum and blowing
methods). I was thinking about using copper house wire
and feeding it through but then I got concerned about
abrading the inner surfaces.
Can anyone recommend a solution, to ease my mind?
Rick Seibt
Mentor, OH
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 11:38:17 -0400
From: "Larry Maxwell" <larrymax@bellsouth.net>
Subject: german proverb translation?
I have seen a number of people sign with the
german proverb: In wine there is wisdom, in
beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria.
Does anyone know how that is written in the
original german? I'd prefer confirmation from
someone familiar with it in german, rather than
an off-the-cuff translation, as translations of an
original from one language to another and then
back again can sometimes be inaccurate.
Thanks.
Looking forward to my first Munich
Oktoberfest in a few weeks.
Larry
Atlanta
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 13:16:38 -0400
From: Jeff Renner <JeffRenner@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: yeast and schmoo tips
Catching up after a great wedding for our daughter (much homebrewed
beer was consumed - report to follow).
Paul Kensler <paul_kensler@yahoo.com> wrote:
>p.s. - for anyone unfamiliar with "the schmoo", he
>was a cartoon character from Li'l Abner that got his
>own show in the 80's.
When you say he "got his own show," I wonder if you know the history
of Li'l Abner, which was not a show (although maybe it was also) but
a newspaper comic strip by Al Capp from 1934 to 1977. I read it
throughout my youth and am sure Capp's social and political satire
helped to form my own social and political views. It also spawned a
Broadway musical, which my high school performed in 1963 or so.
You can read about the Schmoo, which was a national phenomenon in the
late 40s, at http://www.lilabner.com/shmoo.html:
"The Shmoo first appeared in the strip in August 1948. According to
Shmoo legend, the lovable creature laid eggs, gave milk and died of
sheer esctasy when looked at with hunger. The Shmoo loved to be eaten
and tasted like any food desired. Anything that delighted people
delighted a Shmoo. Fry a Shmoo and it came out chicken. Broil it and
it came out steak. Shmoo eyes made terrific suspender buttons. The
hide of the Shmoo if cut thin made fine leather and if cut thick made
the best lumber. Shmoo whiskers made splendid toothpicks. The Shmoo
satisfied all the world's wants. You could never run out of Shmoon
(plural of Shmoo) because they multiplied at such an incredible rate.
The Shmoo believed that the only way to happiness was to bring
happiness to others."
Jeff
- --
Jeff Renner in Ann Arbor, Michigan USA, JeffRenner@comcast.net
"One never knows, do one?" Fats Waller, American Musician, 1904-1943
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 15:43:51 -0400
From: "Dan Gross" <degross@starpower.net>
Subject: RE: Classic American Pilsner - Latest easy recipe needed
William Menzl observes:
>I am not all that ready to try decoction either
>but someone may make it sound easy enough to convince me otherwise.
William,
Decoction is not very difficult, it just takes longer than other mash
methods. You will be able to achieve your goal of multiple rests using
a 5 gallon mash vessel without overflowing since with decoction you
don't need to add hot liquor to raise the temp.
I mash in a cooler too and use decoction when I have the time.
Once you get comfortable with the process it is very enjoyable.
Look at it this way, you will remove a portion of the mash and raise it
to sachrafication long enough to extract the sugar, then slowly raise
the temp until it is boiling. (That's the best part because it smells
really good). The boiling hot decoction is then slowly returned to the
main mash which raises it's temperature to the next rest.
I think many homebrewers get hung up because they don't know how much mash
to remove for each decoction. The simple answer is that you won't get
it right the first time, or the second time, but by about the fourth or
fifth you begin to do it without too much trouble. At the beginning you
just use a thermometer to check the temp of the main mash as you add the
decoction and stir it back into the mash tun. If you reach the next rest
temperature and still have not added all the decoction, just wait a few
minutes to let the decoction cool and then put it back into the main
mash. And if you don't hit the rest temperature, not much is lost,
simply adjust the next decoction to compensate.
Things to remember are that the wort will darken significantly with
decoction and of course it will take a lot longer to mash. Greg Noonan's
book on lager beer has a very thorough description of different
decoction mash schedules with suggestions of how much mash to pull with
each decoction.
Ok, I didn't make it sound simple at all, but it sure is fun.
Dan Gross
Olney, Md
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 16:28:19 -0400
From: "Dan Gross" <degross@starpower.net>
Subject: Wind shroud
I have searched on HBD archives for any information about making a wind
shroud for an outdoor cooker. So far no success and I wonder if anyone has
suggestions about how to best construct a shroud for an outdoor cooker. I
wonder if it is necessary to put holes in it to allow air to pass through
and avoid gas buildup in case the flame goes out.
I brew outside with a propane cooker that I bought at a homebrew store and
boil in a 10 gallon pot. Of course the wind plays havoc with the flame
causing the boil to ebb and flow. I have considered using a big piece of
aluminum or sheet metal drilled full of holes that can be wrapped around the
cooker to block the wind. Is there a better solution?
thanks,
Dan Gross
Olney, Md
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 20:33:53 -0400
From: Jeff Renner <JeffRenner@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Fermenting in your brew pot
"Kenneth Peters" <kpeters6@cox.net> asks:
>I have a question for Jeff -when you say you ferment ales
>in a ten gallon stock pot, is this the same kettle that you boiled it in? Do
>you boil, cool, aerate and ferment without moving the liquor? Do you remove
>the trub from the kettle? If so, when? Sounds like a labor saver to me and as
>clumsy as I am, the fewer wort transfers the better.
No, not in the boiler. I have a three vessel system, and I heat the
sparge water in the HLT, then transfer it to an orange Igloo-type
cooler, thus freeing it for double duty as a fermenter. I rack the
chilled wort into this.
Jeff
- --
Jeff Renner in Ann Arbor, Michigan USA, JeffRenner@comcast.net
"One never knows, do one?" Fats Waller, American Musician, 1904-1943
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 20:48:26 -0400
From: Jeff Renner <JeffRenner@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Classic American Pilsner - Latest easy recipe needed
William Menzl <menzl@concentric.net> wrote from 100 miles north of
[0,0] that he needs "Classic American Pilsner - Latest easy recipe":
>I am looking to see if anyone has a
>successful recipe with a similar grain bill (7lbs 6 row and 1.75 lbs flaked
>maize) but with rests that can be done with infusion and still fit in my 5
>gallon Gott. I have thought about trying to do the four rest mash on my
>Cajun cooker burner but I am not sure how easy it would be to control the
>temperature on it without stirring it so much that I risk HSA.
No sweat. Just mash in your grains to 146-148F for a more attenuated
beer, or 153-155F for a less attenuated one (my preference is for the
former) and let it sit for an hour. I have abandoned multiple rests
except for the jump that adding the cereal mash gives me, plus a
mashout. With flaked maize and no cereal mash, a single step works
just fine. Just proceed as you would for any other mash and it
should work fine. Do try to use fresh flakes as stale ones may break
up and have been reported to give a slow sparge. besides, they can
get rancid.
Please report back on your results. this is a great brew!
Jeff
- --
Jeff Renner in Ann Arbor, Michigan USA, JeffRenner@comcast.net
"One never knows, do one?" Fats Waller, American Musician, 1904-1943
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:50:47 +1000
From: Petr Otahal <potahal@utas.edu.au>
Subject: Flooding in Plzen
This is a press release from the Plzensky Prazdroj website:
<http://www.prazdroj.cz/>www.prazdroj.cz
**************************************************
Damage Has Been Minimised Successfully
Michal Kacena, 20.08.2002
Negotiations with the AIG insurance company are running, loss is being
specified
The definite level of loss incurred by Plzensky Prazdroj, a.s. as a
consequence
of the flood has not been determined as yet. The estimations are being
specified through negotiations with experts from the insurance company. The
loss may be ascribed to the short time interruption of production in the
Pilsen
plant, to the damage to parts of buildings and equipment close to the Radbuza
river and to distribution stoppages. Distribution was affected by difficulties
in transport that occurred in the flooded regions and by damage to equipment
leased to outlets.
As part of the international SABMiller group, the company has a coverage of
all
the described risks provided by the AIG international insurance company.
Besides the first-class service given to the brewery in Pilsen and to the
department of sales and distribution, this brings another benefit - no claims
from domestic insurance companies already burdened enough.
Experts appreciate that the loss in the brewery has been reduced considerably
thanks to quality emergency plans and their strict observance. Most of the
contributed to the minimisation of loss: colleagues from the Radegast brewery
helped by applying their experience from a flood in Moravia in 1997. Owing to
that, first dehydrators and generators were sent to Pilsen while water was
still on the rise.
Michal Kacena
Corporate Affairs Manager
Plzensky Prazdroj, a. s.
**************************************************
Cheers
Petr Otahal
Tas. Aust.
------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #4024, 08/26/02
*************************************
-------
