Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
HOMEBREW Digest #3922
HOMEBREW Digest #3922 Tue 23 April 2002
FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: janitor@hbd.org
***************************************************************
THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
Northern Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies
http://www.northernbrewer.com 1-800-681-2739
Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********
Contents:
re: primetabs (Robert Marshall)
Getting Serious ("Phil Yates")
Yet more adventures in bottling (Rusty)
Low Alcohol Beer (Ken Schwartz)
Re: primetabs (Demonick)
Re: High Pressure Lager Yeast L 36 (Jeff Renner)
Re: RIMS choices (Tony Verhulst)
A very interesting microscope to view yeast and other stuff! ("Hodges, Walt")
Hello again! ("Todd Kirby")
Koehler Beer (FRASERJ)
Re: HSA problems ("Larry Bristol")
water retained by grains (Rob Dewhirst)
Crystal Malt Powder ("Jack Schmidling")
Re: AHA-price gouging, afraid to post opposing viewpoints ("Kate porter")
RE: AHA (Brian Lundeen)
holiday ale/spices ("James R Bain B Elizabeth")
*
* 10th annual Spirit of Free Beer entry deadline is 5/11/02
* Details at http://www.burp.org/events/sofb/2002/
*
* 2002 Bay Area Brew Off entry deadline is 5/20/2002
* Details: http://www.draughtboard.org/babopage.htm
*
* Show your HBD pride! Wear an HBD Badge!
* http://hbd.org/cgi-bin/shopping
*
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy!
*
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org
If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!
To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.
The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.
More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org.
JANITOR on duty: Pat Babcock and Karl Lutzen (janitor@hbd.org)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 23:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Robert Marshall <robertjm1@yahoo.com>
Subject: re: primetabs
Go to your local Long's Drugs (or whatever
is in your area) and in the pharmacy
dept. they should have a pill splitter
available.
Just put the primetab in it and come down
with the lid. It has a knife in it that
will cut it in half.
Robert
- ------------------------------
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:59:44 -0500
From: Joe Yoder <headduck@swbell.net>
Subject: primetabs
Randy Walker asks: The Primetab site
says to use 3 to 5 tablets per bottle.
How many did you use?
Randy, I have had the best luck
using 2 1/2 tabs per 12 oz. bottle.
Two seemed undercarbonated and 3
was overcarbonated. Maybe we could talk
Domenick into making a 1/2 size tab??
=====
Robert Marshall
NNY Brewing Co. (NO, not N. New York, No-Name-Yet!)
[6653.5, 339.5] Apparent Rennerian
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:22:01 +1000
From: "Phil Yates" <yates@acenet.com.au>
Subject: Getting Serious
I note Steve Alexander having a bit of a go at Alistair for his comments on
HSA, or rather his disregard of it. I haven't yet heard anything more about
my comments on oxygenated sparge water. Jeff Renner did send me something
privately and suggested hot water will not easily be oxygenated. This may be
so but the water did not start out being hot and unless it is boiled, I
can't imagine hot water stripping the oxygen out.
Steve suggests an experiment heating bottles and keeping a chilled control.
This would be a good experiment and I suspect the results would be as Steve
anticipates. Why would they not be?
One of the great things about it (in my opinion) and as Steve points out,
homebrew is not stable. I, like Steve, enjoy the changes as the weeks
progress.
My post about sparge water may have had some tongue in cheek components (not
like me to be like that!) but still it was a serious question. As far as I
can see, my procedure and that of probably many other brewers allows
oxygenated (and possibly highly so) sparge water to run into the mash.
Lautering usually takes me a good hour, plenty of time for oxidation to
occur in my mash tun.
You may remember Dave Burley got so serious about it he took to boiling in
his kettle with the lid partially on, to avoid oxidation of his boiling
wort.
When and where or at what point do you stop worrying about all of this? I
wouldn't recommend Alistair's idea of throwing things around from a great
height. That isn't sensible brewing procedure. I glean from Steve's comments
he accepts that one way or the other oxygen is going to get at our beer.
So simply get on with the business of using sensible brewing procedures to
minimise ill effects. Now I suspect Steve is going to mutter to himself
"Hell Phil, that's all I've been saying, you dumb Ozzie dick!".
But reading between the lines of my off beat posts, that's all I've been
saying too.
Cheers
Phil
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 04:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rusty <kahuna_kapu@yahoo.com>
Subject: Yet more adventures in bottling
With Sunshine Challenge just around the corner, I decided to enter some
of the dry stout I have in the keg. Mind you, it's been there for some
time, so carbonation is finished.
I tried to use a counter-pressure bottle filler, much to the
entertainment of friends and family nearby. I couldn't get it to
siphon, and when I finally pushed beer, there was only foam. Of
course, there was the obligatory mess when I mixed up the valving
order.
Is there an art to this that they aren't publishing?
Russell "Rusty" Gates
Orlando, FL
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 05:59:17 -0600
From: Ken Schwartz <kenbob@elp.rr.com>
Subject: Low Alcohol Beer
George Fergussin asks:
"Does anyone have any experience with brewing low-alcohol or no-alcohol
beers? I'm talking ABV percentages in the 0.5% to 1.5% range."
I played around with this a few years ago and posted a summary at
http://home.elp.rr.com/brewbeer . Hope that helps!
- --
*****
Ken Schwartz
El Paso, TX
Brewing Web Page: http://home.elp.rr.com/brewbeer
Fermentation Chillers and More: http://www.gadgetstore.bigstep.com
E-mail: kenbob@elp.rr.com
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 07:19:44 -0700
From: Demonick <demonick@zgi.com>
Subject: Re: primetabs
Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:59:44 -0500 Joe Yoder <headduck@swbell.net>
>I have had the best luck using 2 1/2 tabs per 12 oz. bottle. Two
>seemed undercarbonated and 3 was overcarbonated. Maybe we could talk
>Domenick into making a 1/2 size tab??
It seems that most people are using 4 primetabs per 12 oz. bottle. I
personally use 3 on very flat green beer (I'm a brutal yeast rouser).
This yields a British draught carbonation level.
Chances are more likely that a 1000 mg scored oval tablet will be the first
product "enhancement", with 125 per package. However, nothing is writ in
stone and another manufacturing run is some time away.
Thank you for your interest in PrimeTab.
Domenick Venezia
Venezia & Company, LLC
Maker of PrimeTab
(206) 782-1152 phone
(206) 782-6766 fax
Seattle, WA
demonick at zgi dot com
http://www.primetab.com
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:54:52 -0400
From: Jeff Renner <JeffRenner@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: High Pressure Lager Yeast L 36
"Gregor Zellmann" <gregor@blinx.de> writes from Berlin about :
>"L36 High-pressure Lager
>average apparent attenuation, medium flocculation, broad fermentation
>range
>
>Produces an authentic-tasting, mature lager beer in about a week. Ferments
>at room temperature under 15psi until final gravity is reached.Conditioned
>at near-freezing temperatures under 15psi for a few more days. Should not be
>repitched, but rather propagated fresh every time."
>
>A lager in a week?
>
>Sounds definitely interesting. Did anybody use and experiment with this
>strain? Is it a Saccaromyces Cerevisiae strain at all?
>What is the origin of this yeast? What stands the L for?
>
>How does beer fermented with that strain taste?
I know that 4-5 years ago Dan McConnell here in Ann Arbor had such a
strain, and Bill Holmes was going to set up a 15 psi pressure valve
on a Corney to test this yeast, but I'm not sure if he or anyone else
in AABG did do it. I will check and report back if there were any
results. I believe that I fermented a lager with it at normal
pressures and temperatures with unremarkable results - that is,
normal lager flavor.*
I am pretty sure it is a S. cerevisiae strain. I seem to remember
Dan saying that it was becoming fairly popular with German commercial
brewers. The reasons would be obvious. However, I am a
traditionalist, not a commercial brewer, and I prefer the old
fashioned way of fermenting lagers.
I suspect that the "L" simply stands for lager.
* - just found my records. I brewed two batches at normal lager
temperatures with YCKC's L36 high pressure lager yeast in 1997. The
results were NOT unremarkable in that a CAP I brewed in June, 1997
and fermented with this yeast at 50F (10C) took Best of Show in the
1997 Michigan State Fair. I repitched the yeast from this (this
would be OK with non-pressure fermentations) in a Dunkel which turned
out fine. It was slow to start as the repitched yeast was old.
So this yeast is produced fine results at one atmosphere pressure and
10 degrees C. I'll still try to find out if anyone pressure
fermented with it.
BTW, I wonder if with the same "L-36" designation if the YCKC is the
original US source for this strain. I believe that Dan got it
directly from Germany, I think from Herr Durst of Durst Malting when
he was visiting GW Kent.
Jeff
- --
***Please note my new address***
Jeff Renner in Ann Arbor, Michigan USA, JeffRenner@comcast.net
"One never knows, do one?" Fats Waller, American Musician, 1904-1943
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:12:08 -0400
From: Tony Verhulst <verhulst@zk3.dec.com>
Subject: Re: RIMS choices
> .... Replace the element with a 120 volt low watt density
model like Grainger # 2E754 at 1600 watts and keep the flow rate high
enogh
to avoid scorching.
This is a delicate balancing act IMHO. You want the flow rate high
enough to prevent scorching but not high enough to compact the grain
bed. In a worst case situation, like 70% wheat 30% barley, it probably
can't be done.
(Or do like me and go to HERMS!)
and me ! :-). Scorching is simply not an issue.
Tony V
http://www.world.std.com/~verhulst/RIMS/rims.htm
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:43:05 -0500
From: "Hodges, Walt" <whodges@teamists.com>
Subject: A very interesting microscope to view yeast and other stuff!
I have just purchased at $48.52 (U.S.) a very nice microscope - warning:
no viewing optics - it uses your computer screen (with included
software). SO if you are looking to obtain a microscope, this might be
a good purchase. (The usual: no affiliation, no ownership, etc.)
applies. Just a happy client. If interested, please visit the original
posting on slash dot ( a computer geek news medium):
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/04/21/1719259
Thanks,
Walt Hodges
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:55:41 -0400
From: "Todd Kirby" <tkirby@neuralsignals.com>
Subject: Hello again!
Well, I've been off the list for several years, but I'm back! For anyone
that remembers me, I'm now in Atlanta...moved from NC in 2000. I'm ready to
brew again, and I'm hoping that someone can steer me in the right direction.
I'm looking for good homebrew supply stores in the Atlanta metro area? Also,
which microbreweries in this area should I visit?
Hope this finds everyone well. Any old members from the Winston-Salem
Worthogs, feel free to email me so we can catch up!
It's good to be back!
Todd Kirby, Ph.D.
Research Neurophysiologist
Neural Signals, Inc.
430 10th Street, Ste N-009
Atlanta, GA 30318
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:52:30 -0400
From: FRASERJ@Nationwide.com
Subject: Koehler Beer
Having a girlfriend, of last name Koehler, she is way interested in seeing
if I can get a recipe of this old brand! There is some attempt to revive
the brewery in PA, where her family originated from early in the 1900's.
If anyone knows of a Koehler recipe, please send it to me!
John M. Fraser
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:52:00 -0500
From: "Larry Bristol" <Larry@DoubleLuck.com>
Subject: Re: HSA problems
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 00:15:43 -0400, "Steve Alexander"
<steve-alexander@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>There's a difference between ignorance and not having a latent
>oxidation problem (and you shouldn't be so proud of the former).
>I suspect you've never tried to tell the difference Alistair.
><...snip...>
>Yeah - aldehydes, fading hop bitterness and a caramel note
>never develop in HB. All HBs taste identically the same at
>week 4 and week 15 because it's soooo bloody stable and
>there are no oxidation changes in the bottle. That's the urban
>legend Alistair. Major portions of these flavor changes are
>due to oxidation.
I am somewhat surprised and disappointed in the hostile attitude I
sense in your posting. I hope you are having a better day today.
At any rate, neither Alistair nor anyone else in this forum have
suggested that oxidation is not a major problem in the shelf life of
beer, both commercial and home brewed varieties. Alistair is
commenting on the lack of evidence that HOT SIDE AERATION is a
significant factor in the production of off flavors in his beers.
I am somewhat bewildered by the implication that there is a
relationship between HSA and spoilage due to oxidation. Perhaps I have
missed it, but I have seen no evidence (even anecdotal) from any source
to imply such a relationship. I would be happy to see any evidence to
which you can point.
Your experiment has nothing to do with HSA. It would prove only that
accelerated oxidation occurs at 40C and that Alistair's friends could
detect that. I am willing to concede both points, although I have
never met Alistair or any of his friends. An experiment to detect HSA
would have to eliminate all other variables. Frankly, I have never
seen an experiment proposed that would satisfy me that HSA was the only
variable.
I consider HSA and oxidation to be separate and unrelated topics.
Alistair seems pretty confident that there is no such relationship in
his beers, and I will second that notion. I do not take actions to
flagrantly increase (or decrease) aeration of the mash or of hot wort.
I suspect that Alistair's tongue was pressed firmly against his cheek
when he made his comments in this regard.
While I know that cold-side oxidation is a real-life problem, I do not
know whether HSA is an urban legend or not. But I can confidently tell
you that in the many years I have been brewing (and drinking!), I have
never detected an off-flavor in any beer that could not readily be
attributed to some tangible cause rather than HSA. HSA is simply not
something that I lie awake at night worrying about.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:31:08 -0500
From: Rob Dewhirst <rob@hairydogbrewery.com>
Subject: water retained by grains
I recently mashed a CAP-like pilsner and had close to 0.20 gallons/lb of
water retained by the grains where I usually have 0.12. The highest I've
seen before was 0.17 with my system.
Does flaked maize or 6-row retain more water than 2-row?
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:18:04 -0600
From: "Jack Schmidling" <arf@mc.net>
Subject: Crystal Malt Powder
I can't seem to find anyone who carries crystal malt powder anymore.
It's ice cream season and I am pining for the stuff. Anyone have any ideas?
js
PHOTO OF THE WEEK http://user.mc.net/arf/weekly.htm
HOME: Astronomy, Beer, Cheese, Sausage, Videos http://user.mc.net/arf
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:21:36 -0600
From: "Kate porter" <kate@aob.org>
Subject: Re: AHA-price gouging, afraid to post opposing viewpoints
John,
As moderator for TechTalk, I only look for slamming or defaming another
brewer, blatant advertising, or false information. I think that your message
contains none of these and have no problem posting your opinions to
TechTalk. In fact, I had not seen your post at all until today when I read
it here, on the HBD. I think you might have experienced problems posting if
you sent your note from an address other than that on our list serve
(segedy@gsinet.net), or the slim chance that you sent your message during a
short power outage on Wednesday of last week. Receiving a message claiming
"denial" is most often the result of posting from an unknown address.
If you would still like your opinions about the membership restructuring
posted to TechTalk, please write me back personally (kate@aob.org or
moderator@aob.org) and I'd be happy to post them in tomorrow's edition.
Kate
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:47:22 -0500
From: Brian Lundeen <BLundeen@rrc.mb.ca>
Subject: RE: AHA
Paul Gatza writes:
> Brian asks if the increased cost on AHA memberships in Canada
> is subsidizing a lower international membership rate for
> other members. The answer is no, and perhaps the fees for
> international members have been slightly reducing everyone
> else's cost over the years.
Well, to use some hockey vernacular, you neatly stick-handled around that
one. OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and not use my considerable
influence amongst the howling savages to encourage a boycott of the AHA.
>From the sounds emanating from other posters, I suspect Canada will be the
least of your concerns, anyway.
>
> "Canandians" fits neither of these choices and
> I'll submit a web request to change it on the site. I
> certainly mean no slight.
No slight taken. I knew it was a simple typo, I was just giving you the
gears.
> On a side note, keep up the brewing in Canada. I know it is
> not always easy to get quality ingredients, as the supply
> side of the industry there tends to cater less to beermakers
> than to winemakers--not that I have anything against
> winemaking, it would just be nice to have better access to
> fresher supplies with more selection for brewers.
Uh-oh, should have stopped while you were ahead. I think the two Steves at
Paddock Wood might take exception to this comment. In my opinion, they have
definitely filled a need here in Canada for a good selection of quality
ingredients. Although you certainly can't compare them to St Pat's. ;-)
And don't think that quality winemaking supplies (read: grapes) are any
better for the majority of Canadians who are not fortunate enough to live
near the Niagara or Okanagan regions. Here on the Prairies, it costs me
hundreds of dollars in shipping to bring in quality fruit or frozen musts
for my winemaking endeavours. But yeh, we have crappy wine kits up the
wazoo, if that's what you are referring to.
Cheers
Brian
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:31:46 -0700
From: "James R Bain B Elizabeth" <nutfarm@snowcrest.net>
Subject: holiday ale/spices
Next up for me will be a holiday ale for year's end, need to get it done for
aging. Have had satisfactory results in the past using a strong ale or scotch
ale recipe and upping the hops and adding spices. I've done well with the
combination of added clover honey, ginger, cinnamon, and orange zest but am
looking for new ideas. For instance, perhaps fruit flavors/concentrates,
vanilla bean, other spices (with the exception of "hot" spice).
Would appreciate the benefit of others' experience and advice.
TIA,
Jim in Chico
------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #3922, 04/23/02
*************************************
-------
