Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

HOMEBREW Digest #3550

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
HOMEBREW Digest
 · 14 Apr 2024

HOMEBREW Digest #3550		             Wed 07 February 2001 


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: janitor@hbd.org


***************************************************************
THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

Northern Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies
http://www.northernbrewer.com 1-800-681-2739

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********


Contents:
Re: Castlemaine xxxx (Stephen Neilsen)
Ballentine ale (Hop_Head)
50 litre kegs (Ant Hayes)
Fining beer in a CC fermenter (Ant Hayes)
Hot Weather Homegrown Hops (Ken Schwartz)
SORGHUM MALT ("Hill, Steve")
Lallemand Kroner Yeast (mohrstrom)
new toys to play with (Marc Sedam)
Budvar (Wyeast 2000) Yeast; Organic ME; Dirty hops ("H. Dowda")
RE: low final gravities, Phillers (Brian Lundeen)
Starting boil early (The Freemans)
Can grolsch bottles handle higher carbonation? ("H Stearns Laseur")
Re: Lurker - Coming Out of the Closet (Jeff Renner)
PRESSURE COOKER ("Hill, Steve")
Victory's new brew ("Spinelli, Mike")
false bottoms (Gene Collins)
MCAB3 ("Dave Sapsis")
Goofy question ("Peed, John")
Sight glass ("Strom C. Thacker")
Re: Sorghum Malt ("Sean Sweeney")
Re: 50L Kegs, Starting the Boil Before the Sparge is finished ("Mike Pensinger")
Alcohol Content ("New Brewer")
Seeking advice on exhaust hoods ("Strom C. Thacker")
oak chips (Jason Gorman)
Re: headspace and carbonation (chris buck)


*
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy!
*
* Bluebonnet Brew-Off Entry Deadline is 2/25/01!
* http://welcome.to/bluebonnet for more information
*
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we canoot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org.

JANITOR on duty: Pat Babcock and Karl Lutzen (janitor@hbd.org)


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 17:14:03 +1100
From: Stephen Neilsen <sneilsen@bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: Castlemaine xxxx

XXXX.
First question would have to be...why?!!!!!
Typical of Australian commercial beers Castlemaine is brewed
with a large proportion of cane sugar.
In fact, the XXXX bottles used to boast of the
quality qld cane sugar used in production.
I would guess that about 50% of the sugars should come from
cane sugar.
The hop will be Pride of Ringwood, but very sparingly
Not much point in trying to balance the maltiness achieved by
cane sugar !!.
The finished beer should be cold, wet and fizzy with the flavor profile
of sparkling spring water.

Stephen Neilsen
Australia




------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 01:16:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Hop_Head@webtv.net
Subject: Ballentine ale

A friend of mine would like me to teach him to brew, and he mentioned
that he would like to try something like Ballentine (sp?) ale. I am not
familiar with this ale and cannot seem to find it in my area. Can anyone
give me an idea for a recipe to recreate this brew?



------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:33:50 +0200
From: Ant Hayes <Ant.Hayes@FifthQuadrant.co.za>
Subject: 50 litre kegs

Jason Gorman asked

>I was at a local micro-brewery last week and found that they had 50L kegs
as
>decoration. I was wondering if anyone knows of any breweries that
distribute
>their beer in 50L kegs. Perfect size for a boiling pot.

50L kegs are the standard for draft beer in South Africa. My mashtun is made
from an old keg, and my boiler from two welded together. The difficulty is
getting hold of a keg that has been scrapped as the breweries out here don't
sell their kegs.

Ant Hayes
Gauteng; South Africa


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:40:20 +0200
From: Ant Hayes <Ant.Hayes@FifthQuadrant.co.za>
Subject: Fining beer in a CC fermenter

I carry out primary fermentation in a stainless CCV. At the end of
fermentation I draw off the yeast from a valve at the bottom of the cone,
and then pump the beer to a 50L conditioning keg, using the same valve. I
have been reluctant to use gelatine finings in the fermenter, in case doing
so clogs up the valve.

How to people using CCVs fine their beer?

Ant Hayes
Gauteng; South Africa



------------------------------

Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 06:10:56 -0700
From: Ken Schwartz <kenbob@elp.rr.com>
Subject: Hot Weather Homegrown Hops

Gene Collins asks:

"I was wondering if it would be worth my time to grow hops here in
Oklahoma. It gets so hot here in the summertime that everything melts
(me included). Most posts on this subject comes from you fellows in the
northern regions."

I'd be willing to wager it gets hotter here in El Paso than Oklahoma! I
grew hops last year for the first time. Since I wasn't sure how it'd
go, (our soil is poor and our average summer humidity is about 15%), I
planted them in containers so they'd be easy to chuck if they totally
failed on me. I also put them on the east wall of the house where they
only got a little direct sun, in the cooler morning (a mountain to the
east also provides shade for a couple extra hours in the morning). The
house next door reflected plenty of light in the afternoon. So I'd
guess they got four hours of direct sun a day. I had them on an
automatic drip system getting about a quart of water twice a day (this
is important), and I put gravel over the soil surface to help hold in
moisture. For a trellis, I ran maybe 10'-12' of twine from each of the
pots to a scupper on the wall above, two twines per pot in sort of a "V"
pattern.

They grew pretty well (considering) though in mid-summer they got rather
wilted and dry. All four reached the top of the twine and a couple
doubled back down a couple feet. I got a few cones of Cascade and
Nugget, but no Perle or Willamette, though this might not be unexpected
in the first year. They came back a bit by September but didn't produce
any more cones and by mid-October they looked ready to bag it for the
year. This past weekend I transplanted them to larger 5 gal buckets
(they were in rather puny planter pots, also perhaps partly to blame for
their performance) so I hope this will help. They are already putting
up green buds so perhaps the growing season will start sooner and I'll
have better results before the hot weather sets in, come April and May.

I had also given identical rhizomes to a neighbor who likes gardening
and wanted to grow hops for me ("why sure!"). They were planted in
direct sun (mid-March) and barely got out of the ground before becoming
Fried Green Hops. All instructions I have seen say "plant in full sun"
but I think this means Yankee sun and not Desert sun. I think this is
key for growing hops here.

Other directions and good info in general can be found at
http://www.freshops.com

Good luck & let us know how it goes for you if you try it.

- --
*****

Ken Schwartz
El Paso, TX
Brewing Web Page: http://home.elp.rr.com/brewbeer
E-mail: kenbob@elp.rr.com




------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:27:09 -0500
From: "Hill, Steve" <SHill@advanta.com>
Subject: SORGHUM MALT

Ant Hayes mentions that he has been using sorghum malt for the last 6
months. I find this very interesting.

I was at "The Craker Barrel" restaurant a few months back and they were
selling Sorghum Malt Extract in 2lb Jars; I bought two jars.

I recently moved and actually just unpacked the jars two nights ago. I
wanted to try them out in a golden ale I make to see what it tastes like in
a beer. (and NO, I am quite sure it does not taste like chicken)

Anyone else try sorghum?

Ant, please elaborate as to the taste and mashing requirements, it would be
very helpful. Thanks.

Steve


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:02:54 -0500
From: mohrstrom@humphreypc.com
Subject: Lallemand Kroner Yeast

Has anyone use the (now discontinued) Lallemand Danstar Kroner yeast? I
have come by a quantity, and am curious about fermentation temp ranges,
characteristics, etc.

Mark (snowbound sans luggage) in Connecticut




------------------------------

Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 09:39:19 -0500
From: Marc Sedam <marc_sedam@unc.edu>
Subject: new toys to play with

I was the fortunate recipient of a high temperature pump for
Christmas. I had planned to use it today to brew a mild, but
this damnable flu going around makes that appear to be a pretty
stupid endeavor. Sooooo, I have some time to get more info.

I plan to use the pump for recirculating the mash on my direct
fired kettle. I know HERMS would be better, but I don't have the
heat exchanger just yet. More correctly I don't have the heat
exchanger at all. If I run the recirculation slow enough, will I
be able to do a step mash OK? Also, how slow is slow. Clearly
this pump has a throughput of several gallons/minute based on
testing with water. Does anyone have a recommended recirculation
rate? Do you speed it up when it goes into the kettle at all.
Is extraction improved?

Pumps are cool. Does anyone use the pump to move beer between
fermenters? I know sanitization is the key. I think boiling
water runs through the pump and your occasional PBW rinse will
solve that well enough.


Cheers!
Marc



------------------------------

Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 09:43:09 -0500
From: "H. Dowda" <hdowda@axs2k.net>
Subject: Budvar (Wyeast 2000) Yeast; Organic ME; Dirty hops

Used a pack this past weekend. Smacked on Friday. Saturday late
afternoon the pack was turgid, not swollen, actually. Odor odd, some
sulphide, as expected, but also a scent reminiscent of emesis. Pitched
to a 1.5 qt starter. Sunday mid day, bubbles every 15 seconds, no
foam; afternoon, the same. Monday AM first hint of krauzen, PM a little
better. Same odor profile, more to emesis side. Since wort was likely
dead anyway, pitched into well oxygenated wort. Tuesday AM, no
activity. This doesn't seem reasonable, but I've not used this yeast
before. Comments (e-mail fine) from those who have actually used this
yeast will be appreciated.

Does anyone have a source for CERTIFIED organic malt extract, hops?

Recently bought 8 oz. of Czech Saaz from a well known and previously
reputable seller. It was full of large stems and hop plant leaves.
Never could get the hops to 'sink'. Anyone experiencing problems with
1999 Czech Saaz?




------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:48:21 -0600
From: Brian Lundeen <blundeen@rrc.mb.ca>
Subject: RE: low final gravities, Phillers

Stephen Alexander writes:

> A 62C mash will give ~80% attenuation and a 72C mash will give ~40%
> attenuation (see Kunze on Jump mash). I would expect your
> 68C mash to yield
> something like 55-60% attenuation of the wort, tho' it
> depends on other
> factors.

Well, I suppose this is as good a lead in as any to my problem which is the
opposite. I habitually (apart from a stout that quit on me about 1.020) end
up with lower terminal gravities than I want. This has reached a new low
with my last batch, a 1.053 pale ale, finishing up at 1.006. That's 88%
apparent attenuation, assuming my hydrometer is accurate (which it may very
well not be, since I have never checked it against a known solution). Some
particulars on the latest batch, including some things I did that I suspect
may have contributed to the low TG:

Grist was mostly pale, some Munich, some 60L crystal mashed 1 hour with 1.25
qts/lb at 67C (checked in several places throughout mash, most sitting at
66-68 for the duration, although again I have no idea how accurate my Hanna
CheckTemp1 digital thermometer is), pH was 5.5

Ran off into kettle (no mashout, no sparge) and added in sufficient RO water
to reach pre-boil volume. At this point, I had to run out for a couple of
hours and I neglected to measure the temperature at this time. When I got
back, it was in the 30's. Could I have inadvertently left the beta amylase
active during this sitting period?

Fermented with Wyeast 1318 at 65F, roused daily for several days in the
primary, then racked at 1.013 thinking it was nearly finished, even though
there was still a good krausen. I chose to rouse because I was a little
concerned for the yeast's health. I underpitched (XL pack straight into 22
liters of overchilled wort)and it took almost two days to get a decent
krausen forming although I wasn't too worried since I had treated the wort
with lysozyme (a lactobacillus killing enzyme). Given that, I really
expected this one to poop out on me, but it did just the opposite.

Thoughts, suggestions?

Axle writes of his Philler:

> My question is
> If the filler
> leaked any faster I wouldn't have to worry about pushing down
> on the filler
> to fill bottles, is this how they all are or did I get a bad one ?

I would say you got a bad one. I would also say your experience with Phil's
Phillers is not uncommon. I also got a bad one, it would stick partly open,
it leaked, it foamed, it was just a royal PITA to use. Now, I'm not going to
complain too loudly, as both Paddock Wood and Listermann offered to replace
it. I just chose not to bother and went back to using my old plastic spring
tip which has served me well for many years. I'm still apologizing to it for
my little fling, and I believe it has forgiven me. In any case, there have
been a few people in the various brewing forums complaining about problems
with their Phillers. Given the comparatively small on-line population, I
view the number of complaints about the product as indicative that there may
be a quality control problem. Perhaps Dan has some stats to dispute this,
but needless to say, Axle, you are not alone. However, you should have no
problem getting it replaced.

Cheers,
Brian


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 08:57:17 -0600
From: The Freemans <potsus@Bellsouth.net>
Subject: Starting boil early

There should be no negative repercussions from starting the boil before
the sparge is finished. I routinely do this. IMHO a boil is a boil. I
do however take into consideration that a portion of the wort is boil
away during the remaining time it takes to fill the boiler and I do not
collect quite as much as I would if I were not starting early. Trial
and error with the final gravity can help resolve just how much.

Once I have about 4 inches of wort in the boiler on "the perfesser", I
start the boil burner. I have already bumped the temp of the wort being
pumped up to the boiler up to about 170 degrees by simply running it
through the heat exchanger.

It saves time, and in your case relieved you from having to do the
"heavy lift".

Bill Freeman aka Elder Rat
K P Brewery - home of "the perfesser"
Birmingham, AL



------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:58:45 -0600
From: "H Stearns Laseur" <h_stearns_laseur@email.mobil.com>
Subject: Can grolsch bottles handle higher carbonation?



I would say so. Anyone that has brewed in the Middle East is probably very
familiar with the German Rauch Apple and Grape juice bottles that are similar to
the grolsch bottles. They have the same hinge mechanism but are liter bottles
and not the smaller pint? bottles. I use my Rauch bottles for ales and lagers
and have never had a bottle explode. I have also used as much as a cup of sugar
to prime a batch. I would think my larger Rauch bottles are weaker than the
smaller grolsch bottle as Rauch bottles are longer. Soak the gaskets in your
beer so as to provide a better seal for your beer priming and forget about it.
If you are at all concerned go ahead and put a towel over your bottles.
Later
Stearns




------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:08:49 -0500
From: Jeff Renner <nerenner@umich.edu>
Subject: Re: Lurker - Coming Out of the Closet

Gene Collins <GCollins@cranecarrier.com> asked

>I was wondering if it would be worth my time to grow hops here in Oklahoma.
>It gets so hot here in the summertime that everything melts (me included).
>Most posts on this subject comes from you fellows in the northern regions. I
>have heard some lore about some individuals trying it here but no real
>success stories. I'm sure that Jeff Renner probably has some wisdom about
>this.

Since I was asked I guess I ought to answer. All I can say is that
I've heard it is possible to grow hops in every state. I'd suggest
checking ou the links at http://realbeer.com/hops/.

Jeff
- --
Jeff Renner in Ann Arbor, Michigan USA, c/o nerenner@umich.edu
"One never knows, do one?" Fats Waller, American Musician, 1904-1943


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:03:10 -0500
From: "Hill, Steve" <SHill@advanta.com>
Subject: PRESSURE COOKER

Hello,

I am looking for a very large pressure cooker. I would prefer stainless
steel. A while back I found a site that produced "professional" sizes and
was located in Canada.

Unfortunately, I lost the website. Anyone with any sources would be VERY
helpful.

I LOVE PRESSURE COOKING THAT MALT for the that VERY YUMMY maltiness!

Steve


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:40:38 -0500
From: "Spinelli, Mike" <paa3983@dscp.dla.mil>
Subject: Victory's new brew

HBDer's

> Victory Brewing has made its 1st brew exclusively for Ludwig's Garten in
> Philly . It's called Mad King's Weisse. A strong (6.2%) pale colored
> hefe weizen with a pronounced hoppiness not unlike that of Schneider
> Edel-Weisee. Beer is only available at Ludwig's and the brewery on tap.
>
Mike Spinelli
Cherry Hill NJ


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:57:58 -0600
From: Gene Collins <GCollins@cranecarrier.com>
Subject: false bottoms

Thanks to al who contacted me directly about growing hops.

I plan on being in Seattle next week. I wanted to buy a false bottom from
Stainless In Seattle. My question is are they still in business? Someone
told me that they might not be. Secondly, will they sell direct to me if I
just show up there?

Gene Collins
Beer Consumption and Heavy Truck Specialist



------------------------------

Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 09:54:17 -0800
From: "Dave Sapsis" <dsapsis@earthlink.net>
Subject: MCAB3

So far, plans are progressing nicely to assuring a quality gathering of
amatuer brewers for MCAB3.

We are working on updating the link from the MCAB site to link directly to
the MCAB3 site.
Information currently at http://www.bayareamashers.org/mcab3/ included
information on accomodations.
We have secured a block of rooms at a reduced rate at the Berkeley Radisson
Hotel on Berkeley's marina. This is an unbelievably beautiful location
right across the Bay from The City. The Marina is only about a mile from
the event site at Pyramid, and offers the (oxymoronic?) mix of being right
next to the action of the east bay, but removed and peacefully serene due to
the Bay itself.

We are very close to posting the list of qualified brewers and their
styles - for any of you out there that have qualified, please check over the
list to make sure it is accurate. If not, post a note to Mike Riddle
(riddle@sonic.net) indicating the error. Formal letters indicating
submission rules will be sent out soon.

The speaker list for the technical session is also shaping right up. In
following with some of the orginal motivations behind the creation of MCAB
in the first place, the technical session will focus on beer evaluation and
the role of amateur brewers in advancing the art and science of brewing.
There will be talks and tasting seminars on flavor analysis, beer styles,
and experimental designs. The competition itself will be used to test
hypotheses related to judging effects. It promises to be interesting,
informative, and hopefully humorous as well.

So far we have:
* Ray Daniels
* George Fix
* Scott Bickham
* Martin Lodahl
* Louis Bonham
* John Palmer
* Peter Garofalo
* Mike Riddle

A number of other notables are currently tentative, so it can only get
better. As all the speakers get established, and formal titles for their
talks get firmed up, it will get posted to the website.

Of course we are relying on a great turnout of judges to do the real work.
Registration info will be ensuing shortly, but anyone wishing to get put on
the list can email me. It looks like there will be two sessions -- Friday
afternoon and Saturday morning.

Commercial vendors who would like to set up a display are encouraged to
contact Dave Brattstrom (davidb@cdepot.net) who is handleing that stuff.

More to come soon.
- --dave sapsis





------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:13:55 -0500
From: "Peed, John" <jpeed@elotouch.com>
Subject: Goofy question


Does anyone know what happens when you pitch two different kinds of yeast?
Anyone ever wanted to mute or modify the effects of a certain yeast by
pitching it with another one?

John Peed
Knoxville, TN



------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:09:03 -0500
From: "Strom C. Thacker" <sthacker@bu.edu>
Subject: Sight glass

Brian Lundeen and others have been discussing sight glasses vs. other
methods of measuring kettle volume. I rigged up a system, probably
derived from someone else's setup from a web page, that allows me to
use a sight tube without tapping into the kettle wall (except to
attach a screw near the top, which you could probably devise an
alternative for if you really didn't want to drill the ss).

Here's my description of it from last March. (Brian, I'm not worried
about the tiny volume of wort in the sight tube not reaching boiling
temps. If I were, I could simply blow gently on the end of the tube
until there was no more wort in it and then let it fill up again to
exchange the existing wort for new.):

Posting 2: Extracted from file: 3280
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:54:46 -0500
From: "Strom C. Thacker" <sthacker@bu.edu>
Subject: Sight tubes

I have a sight tube setup that works (for me, at least) without any
extra welding or a bulkhead into the kettle (1/2 barrel sanke). The
basic principle is to tap into an existing fitting on the kettle
drain. I fitted my kettle drain with a brass T, with a female pipe
fitting facing up. Into that I placed a compression fitting, which
was attached to an approx. 2' length of polypropylene tubing (polypro
tubing is cheap, food grade, and heat resistant, but too stiff to use
with hose barbs/clamps). Make sure the tubing rises above the level
of the top of the vessel, and you shouldn't need to drain it back
into the kettle. This tubing is milky white, but clear enough to see
wort or even water through. A couple of inches below the top of the
tubing, I wrapped a small piece of approx. 1/2"-wide copper long
enough to go around the polypro tubing with a couple inches to spare
on either side (thick wire might work, too). I then attached the
copper to the top ring of the sanke keg with a ss screw to keep the
top of the sight tube stationary. The polypro tubing is pretty
stiff, so the whole thing doesn't move around much at all (giving, I
hope, consistent volume measures). The fittings should be available
at a hardware or plumbing supply store, and I got the tubing from US
Plastic (http://www.thomasregister.com/olc/usplastic/) (yadda,
yadda). Calibrate and mark with a permanent marker.

The trick, which I learned the hard way, is to attach a valve or air
cock of some sort to the top of the sight tube. Leave it open except
when draining the vessel. If the top is open when you drain it, you
will suck in large amounts of air and, at least in my case, the flow
will slow to a trickle or stop altogether.

I haven't checked to see if my sight tube yields measures consistent
with other types of setups, but so far my yields to the fermenter
have been consistent with the rough measures given by the sight tube.
This setup isn't as pretty as others, but it works for me, it's easy,
and it's cheap. Of course, YMMV.

Hope this helps!


Strom Thacker
Newton, MA


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:11:12 -0600
From: "Sean Sweeney" <glutenfreebeer@home.com>
Subject: Re: Sorghum Malt

We have been using sorghum malt as the base malt for some time now in our
Gluten Free Brewing Project. Until our most recent batch, we had been using
red sorghum, most commonly utilized as animal feed. Although the red
sorghum was acceptable, there was always a tannic bite lingering in the
background that we could do without. It took a bit of doing, but we finally
found a source for what you probably use now, white sorghum. This is a
grade of sorghum grown specifically for human consumption. Our latest batch,
which is our first attempt at a lager as well, uses malted white sorghum and
millet.
The next batch due up will swap malted corn for the millet and use a just
finished batch of malted sorghum that was kilned to be crystal malt.

Now there's something you don't find on your brewstore shelves very often...
'Yea, I need a pound of 20L Crystal Sorghum'. I guess that would be right
next to my Black Patent Buckwheat.

Please feel free to contact me via email. We can exchange sorghum stories.

Sean Sweeney
Gluten Free Brewing Project
and the
Amateur Hop Growers Journal
http://www.fortunecity.com/boozers/brewerytap/555/index.html

E-mail: glutenfreebeer@home.com


> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 09:17:20 +0200
> From: Ant Hayes <Ant.Hayes@FifthQuadrant.co.za>
> Subject: Sorghum Malt
>
> I have been incorporating sorghum malt in my mashes for the last 6 months.
> The results are quite pleasant, and add a new dimension to tired recipes. Is
> there anyone else who has tried this - I would like to swap notes.
>
> Ant Hayes
> Gauteng; South Africa



------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:26:04 -0600
From: "Mike Pensinger" <beermkr@bellatlantic.net>
Subject: Re: 50L Kegs, Starting the Boil Before the Sparge is finished

I know that Bass Ale and Guinness are packaged in 50L kegs. I will dispute
the value of them as boiling pots for a 10 gallon batch though. They work
out to be 13.2 gallons and I experienced boil over in them when putting 11
plus gallons in to boil.

They do however make great mash tuns. I have made a 1.070 beer in one
before with 28 lbs of grain. There was room for a little more but it would
have been VERY full.

Bob Barrett asks:

>are there any repercussions from this process that will affect the beer?
We
>have made this recipe 5 or 6 times before and always wait to start the
boil.
>Is there anything that we should notice will be different about this batch
>vs. the others? Do most homebrewers start the burner on the brew pot
before
>the lauter/sparge is finished?

I too do this and the only thing I have had a problem with (I did not think
about it first) is when you FWH. I think the proccess works best if the
heat is kept at a constant temp (i.e. 150-160 F) And starting the boil early
will add bitterness instead of the flavor and aroma.

Mike Pensinger
beermkr@bellatlantic.net
beermaker@mad.scientist.com
Mikes Homebrewery - Norfolk Virginia
(in lay-up while suffering in Chicago till April)



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 08:32:22 +1100
From: "New Brewer" <new_brewer@hotmail.com>
Subject: Alcohol Content

Hi all,

I am relatively new to the brewing game and a friend of mine has just
challenged me to brew him a beer that has a 12% (by volume) alcohol content.

I am still using can kits from my local homebrew store so I am thinking
although it will be just a simple matter of adding more sugar to the wort,
the resulting product will not be very pleasant to drink.

Does anyone know of a way to boost up the alcohol content while still
retaining the beers drinkability?

Cheers,

Newbie.


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:58:12 -0500
From: "Strom C. Thacker" <sthacker@bu.edu>
Subject: Seeking advice on exhaust hoods

SWMBO doesn't like the smell of boiling wort (it seeps up through the
basement ceiling into the kitchen above), so I'd like to either buy
or build a simple exhaust hood that I could vent outside via a dryer
vent or the like. I've searched the archives but have not found the
definitive solution.

Does anyone have any advice? How many CFM would be necessary (I
typically brew 12 gallon batches)? Would it be easy to construct
something with a muffin or other kind of fan and aluminum flashing
shaped into a large cone, for example? Has anyone tried this?

Thanks,

Strom
Newton, MA


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:05:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Jason Gorman <beergod@msuspartans.com>
Subject: oak chips

I have seen several posts stating that
oak chips should be boiled to sanitize.
I want to make a scotch ale with oak
chips and soak the chips in single
malt scotch. Will this sanitize or
should I take the extra step and boil
my wood? What would be a good
recommended amount of wood to
add to my beer?





------------------------------

Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 21:51:41 -0500
From: chris buck <cbuck@jhmi.edu>
Subject: Re: headspace and carbonation

It seems a year and a half of periodic lurking is still not enough
to learn all of the finer points of posting etiquette. In my first-ever
posting I left out my location: Baltimore, Maryland. The JHMI in my
email address is for "Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions" - where I
occasionally run into long-time HBDer Alan Meeker (sorry - can't resist
the shameless name-dropping).
I guess it's my mission to beat the carbonation thread to death. In
order to try to keep my earlier post semi-contained to the subject of
"how to test for the O2 model of the 'high-fill/low carbonation
effect,'" I left out my reasoning for why I like the O2 model better
than the pressure-inhibition model.
I don't like the pressure-inhibition model because I'm skeptical
about the idea that CO2 bubbles form in the bottle during priming. I've
never seen the supposed bubbles accumulate at the surface - even in
beers with great head retention. I always do a couple of clear-glass
bottles per batch, so unless such bubbles were microscopic, I'm sure I'd
have noticed them. The CO2 starts off in solution when it's created by
the yeast (it's secreted as [HCO3-] and [H+], I think?). So in the
absence of CO2 bubbling, you'd have to assume that the beer is slightly
supersaturated with dissolved CO2 right up to the point that equilibrium
with headspace CO2 is reached. So high and low fill bottles should both
reach similar heaspace pressures at similar levels of carbonation. I'm
not clever enough to use math to back this up, but it seems logical.
Even if bubbling is occuring during bottle priming, my math-less
intuition is that headspace CO2 would reach equilibrium with the beer
pretty quickly. Partly this comes from experience with
carbonate-buffered cell culture media I use at work. A half-liter
bottle of medium can become de-carbonated (and therefore higher pH) in a
matter of hours. And likewise if I put de-carbonated medium into a 5%
CO2 incubator, it'll re-carbonate in a matter of hours. Along the same
lines, I get the impression that kegged beer becomes carbonated in just
a matter of days - not the weeks it takes for a high-fill bottle to
carbonate (I've never kegged beer, so correct me if I'm mistaken).
Though I concede that in a keg, there's more surface area per unit
volume than there is in a bottle.
Which brings up yet another experiment! The CO2 bubble model might
be testable as follows: high-fill two bottles then leave one upright
and lay one down on its side. I did a rough and ready measurement - in
a bottle with about 1/2" of headspace, there's something like 1.4 square
inches of surface area in an upright bottle, and 2.4 square inches of
surface area when you lay the bottle on its side. Also, the
top-to-bottom diffusion distance goes from 9 inches in an upright bottle
to less than 2.5 inches in a laid-down bottle. So if
re-dissolving/diffusion are playing a role, you'd expect the laid-down
bottle to carbonate faster. On the other hand, if it's just a matter of
how much O2 there is in the bottle, both bottles should carbonate
equally slowly.
OK, now a question/possible explanation about the reported
phenomenon of halfway-filled bottles exploding. I've heard the theory
that yeast evolved to make ethanol both as a microbicide, and a way of
"storing food." In my understanding, if glucose concentrations fall
below respiration-inhibiting concentrations (<0.4%) and there is O2
available to the yeast, then they can aerobically metabolize ethanol.
Presumably the yeast ate up all the glucose in the beer during the
gluttonous orgy of primary fermentation. So what's to stop the yeast in
a bottle half-filled with air from chewing on the ethanol in the
finished beer? Is there some other respiration-inhibitor around?
What's to stop the yeast from using up every last molecule of O2 to
oxidize ethanol? Could aerobic fermentation of ethanol give enough
extra CO2 to account for exploding bottles?



------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #3550, 02/07/01
*************************************
-------

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT