Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

HOMEBREW Digest #2457

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
HOMEBREW Digest
 · 7 months ago

HOMEBREW Digest #2457		             Tue 08 July 1997 


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: janitor@hbd.org
Many thanks to the Observer & Eccentric Newspapers of
Livonia, Michigan for sponsoring the Homebrew Digest.
URL: http://www.oeonline.com


Contents:
RE. Bottle of ice questions (Clif Moore)
Mead (Antony Hayes)
Black Beer and Other American Styles ("C&S Peterson")
Opening Frozen beer, etc., ("David R. Burley")
Phil's Phalse bottom ("Kerr, David")
Outbreak Ale (Jerry Cunningham)
Re: aluminum pots (Larry Johnson)
RE: On Botulism ("Larry F. Byard")
Removing Corona Painted labels (SCRIT)
Genny Cream Ale / exploding beer cups (Larry Johnson)
Ideas (Dan Wieleba)
Re: Iodophor-stained hoses (Mike Uchima)
Botulism - Other Resources ("Richard Cuff")
Cream Ales ("Raymond Estrella")
Report on FiveStar Products Trial (RANDY ERICKSON)
My Dogs Plus/insecticides/fertilizers ("Grant W. Knechtel")
Lager pitching temps, phloating phalse bottom (rbarnes)
Barleywine ect (huskers)
Blue Moon Belgian Wit (Chris Dodge)
The Brewery now at realbeer.com?? ("Robert Marshall")
tally of juggling brewers (AlannnnT)
Cream Stout Extract Recipe ("DPC Michael E. Sandell")
Homebrew in Pennsylvania ("DPC Michael E. Sandell")
Pre-chiller (Jason Henning)


NOTE NEW HOMEBREW ADDRESS: hbd.org

Send articles for __publication_only__ to homebrew@hbd.org
(Articles are published in the order they are received.)

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to homebrew-request@hbd.org.
**SUBSCRIBE AND UNSUBSCRIBE REQUESTS MUST BE SENT FROM THE E-MAIL
**ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, the autoresponder and
the SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE commands will fail!

For "Cat's Meow" information, send mail to lutzen@alpha.rollanet.org

Homebrew Digest Information on the Web: http://hbd.org

Requests for back issues will be ignored. Back issues are available via:

Anonymous ftp from...
hbd.org /pub/hbd
ftp.stanford.edu /pub/clubs/homebrew/beer
E-mail...
ftpmail@gatekeeper.dec.com (send a one-line e-mail message with
the word help for instructions.)
AFS users can find it under...
/afs/ir.stanford.edu/ftp/pub/clubs/homebrew/beer

JANITORS on duty: Pat Babcock and Karl Lutzen (janitor@hbd.org)

----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 01:39:26 -0800 (AKDT)
From: Clif Moore <cmoore@gi.alaska.edu>
Subject: RE. Bottle of ice questions

>I was recently served a bottle of beer (in a hotel pub) that
>had been stored at an improperly low temperature. When I
>opened the twist top, "pfffffft", the contents sprayed out,
>instantly leaving an iceberg inside the bottle. The
>beertender thought I would be upset, but instead I was
>fascinated. No, it wasn't an "ice beer."
>Questions:
>1. What happened? Please explain it in terms of temperature
>and pressure, with chemistry if necessary. Why is the beer
>liquid in the bottle until I open it, then it becomes high
>pressure gas and solid?

Under quiescent (still, quiet) conditions, and proper containment
(smooth walls so as to provide few nucleation points) water will
cool to well below its freezing point. This is called a super cooled
fluid. The shock of opening the bottle caused the water to freeze.
This flash crystallization yields significant heat resulting in a rapid
temperature rise to equilibrium temp, or somewhere in the vicinity
of 0 deg. C.
So what was once carbonated beer has now had much of the water
removed from it in the form of ice and the remaining fluid still
contains the full CO2 load. The CO2 bursts forth in a gas gush
and takes with it the unfrozen water and beer goodness.
As for drinking the spray, I'd just order another beer.
Hope this cartoon view is of use.
Clif Moore


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 13:30:22 -0700
From: Antony Hayes <ahayes@oldmutual.com>
Subject: Mead

Jeff said, "

Now, I brewed my first mead last week. Gravity went from
1058 OG down to 0995 FG in 5 days. One thing is wrong,
however. This stuff is SOUR!!!! It tastes like an infection, but
I'm not sure. At this point, it is absolutely undrinkable. Should
I throw it out or does it need to age?

Don't turf the mead. I have had batches that smelled and tasted like
detergent/ disinfectant afer three months, only to smooth out as
intended after another nine. Most mead recipes recommend waiting for a
year before drinking, and this is possibly why. On the other hand, I
have also had batches ready after four months.

Ant

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 97 12:02:42 UT
From: "C&S Peterson" <CNS_PETERSON@msn.com>
Subject: Black Beer and Other American Styles

HBDers-

I have been reading with interest the recent musings on "Black Beer". I have
not yet noticed this style emerging in my local micro retail cooler, but
always felt that Schwartzbier styles had far more general appeal than other
dark styles of beer. Stout and porter fanatics may disagree here, but I think
that overall, assertive styles like stouts and porters by their nature have a
limited sales potential for the microbrewer. The Schwartzbier style, being a
lager, has a smoother delivery, and more up front sweetness that I think will
catch on with a greater number of craft beer drinkers (this is not to say that
one style is better than another, just that it is my belief the dark lager
style has a better chance at challenging the appeal level of other regular
craft beer styles than stouts and porters).

The only problem was what to call the beer -- I guess the best the craft
brewers can come up with is "Black Beer."

But in any event, the Schwartzbiers I had a few years ago in Berlin were akin
to Dunkles, but with more roasted flavors and perhaps more hops thown in.
Some call this style a "black pilsener" but I disagree; I would say that the
Schwartzbier style is more like a standard strength lager with loads of Munich
malt and some chocolate malt. It is far less roasty than say a porter or a
stout, and has the body approaching the level of a normal strength Bock. I
believe BT had a great article on dark lagers a few years back -- those
interested might want to look it up.

But what is most interesting here is the development of so-called "American
Styles" of craft beer. American Pale Ale, American Wheat, American Amber,
American Pre-Prohibition Lager -- is American Black Lager next? I think it
would be a very interesting addition to the other "regular" styles offered by
most craft beer makers. So what will make this style American, if in fact it
catches on at all? Dry hopping with Cascades? 50 IBUs? Dark Caramel vs.
Munich malts? Dry vs. full bodied? Also, I find it interesting that these
styles are being released in the Summer, vs the Fall or Winter when a rich
lager might be more appreciated.

Chas Peterson
Laytonsville, Md

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 09:03:58 -0400
From: "David R. Burley" <Dave_Burley@compuserve.com>
Subject: Opening Frozen beer, etc.,

Brewsters:

I appreciate all the explanations given in an attempt to explain
why frozen beer is explosively fizzy when it is opened. However,
I suggest we all use a little restraint and perhaps
"in my opinion" or similar comment when offering speculative
explanations for physio-chemical phenomena.

Even though you are sure you are absolutely correct.

My opinions and comments follow:

Adam Dreyer's explanation of phase diagrams, while true
for water ( which is opposite BTW from most substances)
relating it to beer may have been a result of spending too
much time thinking and not enough time drinking as he says:

>"The beer turning ice is a simple chemistry problem that I have =

>contemplated on several weekend nights in college when the beer was =

>left in the freezer for a little too long. "

>You can apply this to your beer now. The beer was at a higher pressure =

>that 1 atmosphere so its freezing temperature is lower that at ambient =

>pressure. The temperature of the beer was lower that the freezing =

>temperature at ambient pressure. =


Perhaps, but only marginally so, maybe a few tenths of a degree at the
most To get ice to melt at temperatures below 0C requires several
atmospheres, which is why your ice skates are such thin blades to
produce such a high pressure ( your weight/square inches of blade
in contact with the ice you figure it out), giving liquid water on which=

you slide ( not the ice itself). The colder the ice, the more pressure
you need to apply.

>So, when you open the beer, the pressure when to 1 atm, the water in =

>the beer froze and the alcohol did not.

Unlikely to be significantly true at 4% alcohol or less, although "Ice"
beers can be made in this fashion with extremely sophisticated
temperature control, usually starting at a higher alcohol concentration.=

My really old dentist used to tell me about making apple jack by
this method, but I doubt it was very efficient.

> Also, the CO2 originally in =

>solution now is forced out causing your beer to foam and spray out. =


This is true and the cause of the spraying. Water crystallizes and
this forces water molecules into a regular pattern and takes them
away from the hydrogen bonded solvent sheath around the CO2
dipoles. Ergo the CO2 is not soluble in ice to any great extent =

- at least not to 2-3 atms.

>Now, the liquid could be collected sure. You actually are making ice =

>beer since it is now of higher alcohol content.

Theoretically true, if you have really excellent temperature control
at just around 0C, but otherwise not likely. Entropy wins out again.

>But that may still be worth the effort.

It is much easier to make a beer with a higher OG to get a higher
alcohol content. Why fool around with a process that is
theoretically as illegal as distillation, when you could have
what you want more easily?. =


Sorry, but Ken Shramm's explanation while =

It is really very imaginative, shows he took Chemistry and Physics,
but it is absolutely incorrect.

Ken says:
>As Far As the frozen beer question, The beer was in a "super cooled"
>state. The beer is below its freezing point at standard T & P, but
>the C02 pressure keeps it liquid.

Absolutely not true. Calculate the molality of CO2 at 2 atm and you
will see that the freezing point depression is very small.
Mw CO2 is 48 gmw. 2 atm is only 1/12 of a mole ( 2/22.4)
or 0.1 molar CO2. Freezing point depression for water is 1.86 F
per mole of particles per 1000 grams of water. So the freezing
point depression caused by the CO2 is only a few tenths of a
degree. A similar calculation at say 5% alcohol shows that
50 grams of alcohol per 1000 grams of solvent is 50/ Mw ethanol
=3D 50/ 46 =3D 1 Molal so the freezing point is depressed only
about 1.86 degrees by the alcohol in the beer. Adding in all the
other dissolved stuff like dextrins, salts, etc. is probably only good
for a degree or so. Conclusion? The freezing point of beer - even
in a carbonated state- is only a few degrees below that of water =


> The solubility of the gas in the
>VERY cold beer is higher than in warm beer.

True

When you open the
>bottle, the CO2 rushes out (There's going to be a pressure
>drop...Jimmy Cliff), the beer chills even further (the CO2 escape is
>exothermic)

CO2 gas at high pressure through a pinhole, yes. =

Through a normal hole - unnoticeable, especially
at only a few atmospheres and a small volume of gas.


> and the water in the beer freezes immediately, zipping
>through the 32 degree state change barrier in a matter of
>milliseconds. This will work with pop, too.

Remember - this "state change barrier"
( I assume you mean freezing) releases heat in going
from water to ice. =


>The Alcohol, having a much lower freezing point, goes blasting out
>with the gas in the gush,

Why doesn't it go blasting out with a gush when you open any beer???

> although that doesn't always happen;
>sometimes the beer just freezes into a slush of frozen water and
>liquid alcohol.

Only very rarely in uncontrolled conditions. Formation of slush does
happen occasionally and I have experienced it from time to time
when all the temperature conditions were correct. I suspect the
real cause is that the water is below its freezing point and is in a
supercooled state ( because it is cold - nothing to do with dissolved
gas) it is quasi stable because there are no sites in the very clean
new bottle on which to begin crystallization. The release of the gas
forms bubbles which act as a catalyst for the formation of ice crystals.=

As Ken points out it has nothing to do with alcohol in the beer as it
happens with soda pop as well

> The rush of gas takes all of the gas soluble esters
>and aroma compounds with it.

Yeah, just like it does when you open any bottle of beer - right ?? Hardl=
y.
=


Remember these are my opinions.
- ------------------------------------------


Keep on brewin'


Dave Burley
Kinnelon, NJ 07405
103164.3202@compuserve.com
Dave_Burley@compuserve.com =

Voice e-mail OK =


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 09:29:52 -0400
From: "Kerr, David" <David.Kerr@ummc.ummed.edu>
Subject: Phil's Phalse bottom

Dave Thomson wrote:
>I ended up buying a Phils Phase...
> the bottom tends to float up in the process.

I mash in an old Igloo cooler and transfer to an insulated Phil's
mash/lauter tun. I add about 1/2 gal 170F water to the bottom of the
lauter tun before transferring the mash, and I also hold the false
bottom down with my brew paddle until I've transferred about 2 gallons
of mash to the tun. It works well.

Dave Kerr "Be good and you will be lonely" - Mark Twain




------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 09:49:35 -0400
From: Jerry Cunningham <gcunning@census.gov>
Subject: Outbreak Ale

Hey there,

I have a beer in the secondary that's obviously infected - it doesn't
taste that bad at the moment, but it's all downhill from here if I don't
do anything. Is there any way to kill these critters before they turn my
drinkable, slightly phenolic, honey ale into undrinkable swill? Or do I
just drink fast? Can I hold the brew at an elevated temp for a while, or
does that drive off the alcohol (bad thing)?


Thanks for any help,

Jerry Cunningham
Annapolis, MD


ps I've been off of the list for a few months, it's good to see that the
botulism thread is alive and well! ;*)

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 10:32:48 -0400
From: Larry Johnson <maltster@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: aluminum pots

LNUSTRUK.CZLSSB@gmeds.com asks:

>1). Aside from reacting with some cleaning products, is there any good reason
>why I should avoid a Aluminum brewpot? I located a comercial grade 24qt
pot at
>Gordon Food Service, a resaurant supply store for about $70. I'd welcome any
>input.

Only that it sounds a little high. I bought my 10-gallon restaurant grade
aluminum Vollrath from a restaurant supply house here in Athens, GA for
$56. And they're not known for their cheap prices (being the only such
place in town).

And no, the aluminum doesn't affect the taste of my beer and it hasn't
given me Alzheimer's. My wife claims, however, that I've had Halfzheimer's
for years (that's where you forget only about half of everything you're
supposed to remember).

Larry Johnson - Athens, GA
maltster@ix.netcom.com
http://www.netcom.com/~maltster

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 10:51:20 -0400
From: "Larry F. Byard" <lbyard@gwi.net>
Subject: RE: On Botulism

I have been reading the thread on botulism for a long time. One =
question keeps coming to my mind. If botulism is possible when canning =
wort, why are we not at risk during the time that wort sits in a =
fermenter waiting for the yeast to lower the Ph? I would think that the =
risk would be even higher. Larry

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 11:09:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: SCRIT@aol.com
Subject: Removing Corona Painted labels

I have a couple of cases of Corona 7 oz bottles I want to use for bottling
a
Barley wine. Does anyone know how to remove the painted Corona labels
from the bottle. Chemicals, bead blasting, hammer and chisel, or should I
soak
the bottles in Caustic Budweiser to remove the paint?

Thanks in advance, Joe.

scrit@aol.com

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 11:21:29 -0400
From: Larry Johnson <maltster@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Genny Cream Ale / exploding beer cups

Charlie asks:

>Is anyone familiar with "Jenny Cream ale"(I think the brewery is Jenny
>Brewering Co.;NY)I really like it, and would like to approach the taste.On
>the bottle it says we use a special two level fermenting process to get a
>brew with the flavor of an ale with the smoothness of a lager.Is anyone
>familiar with this two level fermentation process,or have any idea how it is
>accomplished.

This is Genesee Cream Ale. I don't have anything right in front of me for
verification, but I would assume (usually a bad move) that it's by Genesee
Brewing of NY. Yes, a cream ale is brewed with a combination of top and
bottom fermenting yeasts. Wyeast even has a Cream Ale yeast mix in their
line-up. I've never brewed one so I can't help you there.

Then, John Myers (<JMyers@polkaudio.com>) has a story of beer jumping out
of the cup in Baltimore. OK, I'll bite. My theory is that the cup bottoms
were deformed in the downward direction (convex if seen from below the
cup), maybe from sitting out in the hot sun. When John (and others) tilted
the cup towards their mouths, the cup bottom "popped" back into shape (
concave if seen from below the cup) and this is what shot the beer into
John's mouth and face. It could also explain the stinging sensation he got
on his lips (like being popped by a rubber band, he said) as the vibrations
from the bottom "popping" went through the cup to his mouth. I predict
these cups will become very popular at fraternity keg parties here in
Athens. (Anything to get the beer from the keg to the mouth in less time.)


Larry Johnson - Athens, GA
maltster@ix.netcom.com
http://www.netcom.com/~maltster

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 11:43:01 -0700
From: Dan Wieleba <wieleba@pce.net>
Subject: Ideas

I recieved a Muntons old ale kit as part of a prize. It's 6.6 lbs of
hopped (40-50 ibu's the can claims) syrup. Since I am an all grainer I
would like to hear others ideas on what to make with this kit, I was
thinking of using it towards a barley wine of imperial stout, making up
the rest of the fermentables with pale and speciality malts. Let me
know what ya think.
Dan
- --
http://www.pce.net/wieleba/beerlink.htm

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 10:54:56 -0500
From: Mike Uchima <uchima@mcs.net>
Subject: Re: Iodophor-stained hoses

Bill Marks <bill_marks@ids.net> said:
>
> I, like everybody else who has ever used the stuff, have had my plastic
> tubing stained by iodophor. Since the staining is from the iodine content
> it would seem that the stained hoses would be less prone to growing critters
> due to the now imbeded antiseptic qualities of the iodine. True?
>
> I don't suggest that maintaining strict santization of the tubing isn't
> necessary, I am just trying to convince my self no to throw out tubing that
> has become stained. Sowhatdayathink?

My normal cleanup procedure for plastic tubing is to rinse well with hot
water, fill with Iodophor solution, let sit overnight, then drain.
Sometimes (er, frequently :-)) I forget, and leave it sitting with the
Iodophor in it for a couple of days or more. As a result, most of my
tubing is fairly dark.

Neither I (nor anybody else who has tasted my beers) have noticed any
off flavors from the iodine, and I've used the same set of
racking/bottling hoses for something like 50 batches now, with no
infections. I don't know for sure whether the iodine in the walls of the
tubing actually helps prevent growth of microbes or not, but I'm a firm
believer of "if it ain't broke..."

- --
== Mike Uchima == uchima@mcs.net ==


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 09:18:43 -0400
From: "Richard Cuff" <rdcuff@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Botulism - Other Resources

FWIW, I found a tidy online summary about botulism at
http://aac.msstate.edu/pubs/is734.htm courtesy of Mississippi State
University.

Richard Cuff
Lutherville, MD

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 97 18:19:38 UT
From: "Raymond Estrella" <ray-estrella@msn.com>
Subject: Cream Ales

Hello to all, Tom asks,

>Now, on to a question: What makes cream ale cream ale? I heard >somewhere
>(can't remember where) that you use both ale and lager yeast. This could
>be the "special 2 step fermentation" you referred to. How is it done?

Jackson says that Genesee Cream Ale is a blend of their 12-Horse Ale, and
their regular lager beer. Little Kings Cream Ale is made from a bottom
fermenting
yeast strain. I have experimented with different ways to get the ale/lager
effect.
I used to start the wort with Canadian Ale yeast for 3 days, then rack into
another
carboy with Danish Lager yeast and drop it down to lager temps. It worked
well.
Last winter I made a couple of batches using only California Common yeast,
fermenting for 5 days at 62f and then taking it down to 50f in the secondary
for a
couple weeks, and lagering for a month at 34f. I was very happy with the
results,
and will most likely not go back to the two yeast version. I plan to try the
same
recipe/schedule using an Alt yeast this fall. This is a fun style to play
with, and you
can usually get your Bud drinking friends to try it.

Ray Estrella Cottage Grove MN
ray-estrella@msn.com

*******Never relax, constantly worry, have a better homebrew.*******


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 12:18:19 -0700
From: RANDY ERICKSON <RANDYE@mid.org>
Subject: Report on FiveStar Products Trial

Back in the middle of May, there was a post from the FiveStar Products
Co. stating that they were considering getting into the homebrew market
with their cleaning and sanitizing supplies, and asking for volunteers to
try our some of their products. I had read glowing appraisals of
FiveStar's Powered Brewery Wash (PBW) from Dr. Fix, Jethro, and Dion,
so I jumped at the chance to volunteer. From the email header, it appears
that there were about twenty-five of us.

About a week later, I received the samples by UPS, a very generous
supply. It included one pound each of PBW and Chlorinated Manual
Cleaner (CMC), and one pint of Saniclean Acid Anionic final rinse.

There was also a detailed set of instructions with a brief treatise on the
importance of sanitation. One set of instructions covered PBW and
Saniclean, while the other covered all three products. The PBW is meant
as a clean-in-place (just let it soak) cleaner, while CMC is meant to be
used like a detergent. FiveStar was also looking for opinions on whether
CMC was necessary, or if PBW could be used alone.

I don't have a chemical background and the labels didn't list ingredients or
precautions, so I don't have any more details that what I have listed. If
FiveStar intends to sell their products in California, they are going to need
bigger labels ;-)

Here are my responses to the questionnaire:

*****
About These Products...
1. Did the products you were given work for their intended uses?

Saniclean Acid Anionic final rinse:
Seems to work fine, some foaming. No strong odor, unlike iodophor. I
particularly liked the short contact times.

CMC:
Works great. Nice foaming action, boiling kettle residue wiped right off.
Didn't do much for scorched extract, at least with a limited soak time.
Used CMC on primary carboy. Barely had to brush at all, with no
soaking. Residue practically dissolved.

PBW:
I like this stuff! Fantastic no-scrub, soak-only cleaner for hoses, small
parts, wort chiller, kegs, etc. Even took the green stains off my nylon
hop bag in minutes! Not perfect on scorched extract -- overnight soak,
but much more aggressive than b-brite, etc., but removed about half.
Tried overnight soak at 8 oz per gallon strength recommended on
Five-Star's website -- removed about 75% of carbon. PBW works very
well for manual cleaning too, if you don't want to wait out the
recommended soak time.

Did you find any other uses not mentioned that they were effective for?
Both CMC and PBW worked great for removing labels from beer bottles.
CMC works well on skillets, too.

2. When using the products you were given, how close did you stick to
the instructions included with the products?
Since I was evaluating new products, I stuck to the instructions very
closely (which is rare for me, I usually just eyeball cleaner and sanitizer).

3. Were the recommended portions of each product effective and
appropriate? Yes.
If not, how much of each product did you use for each product?

4. Were the instructions easy to read, easy to follow, and generally
useful?
The instructions were very useful and appropriate. The Rules for
Sanitation section was particularly good, and caused me to rethink some
of my own procedures.

5. When considering cleaning instructions, are you interested in going
into the details of the importance of cleaning and sanitizing, or would you
prefer a quick, short set of instructions?
I think the details are very valuable and should be included along with the
product (perhaps on a flyer, plastic reference card, etc.). With the
intended audience of homebrewers, you never know what level of
expertise your potential customer may have. Some of the most
successful beer ingredient kits come with a multi-page instruction set
that assumes that the customer may not know anything about brewing.

Would including both a detailed set of instructions, as well as a quick,
short version add value to the kit for you?
I would like to the detailed instruction I received be included with the
products, with the essential information printed on the container, i.e.
recommended concentrations and precautions. My only complaint with
the products I tested was that there was absolutely no safety
information or ingredients lists included with the chemicals. I'm sure your
legal staff is working on this, presuming you plan to do business in
California. ;-)

6. Which kit worked better for you and better suited your purposes:
PBW/Saniclean/CMC, or PBW/Saniclean?
____________________________ Why?
I did not have a clear preference. I liked the "feel" of the CMC, and its
foaming action, but PBW would probably work just as well as an
all-purpose cleaner.

*****

I have snipped the rest of the questions that dealt with marketing type
issues (i.e. if these products resulted in better beer, how much would
you be willing to pay?). It also appears that FiveStar is considering
packaging these products in a kit for sale to homebrewers. I expressed
my opinion that it would be better to sell them separately to allow for
differences in procedures and consumption rates.

In summary, I was very impressed with these products and would buy
them if they are ever made available to us at a reasonable price. As
was reported here before, that PBW is great stuff!

FiveStar has a website at http://www.fivestarAF.com/

I have no affiliation with this company. To paraphrase Dave Draper
(quoting one of the Jeffs, I believe) -- "I can't be bought for a mere two
pounds and a pint."

Cheers -- Randy in Modesto

Randy Erickson
Modesto, California
randye@mid.org

Stanislaus Hoppy Cappers
c/o Barley & Wine, Ceres, CA

"Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of
Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain



------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 12:47:49 -0700
From: "Grant W. Knechtel" <GWK@hartcrowser.com>
Subject: My Dogs Plus/insecticides/fertilizers

Brad : what is in a My Brew lemonade kit? I've never seen it in our corner.

Insecticides: Not from any particular knowledge base, I'm worried about home
use of insecticides on hop plants. Just because insecticides are approved for
use on home vegetable crops (which should be washed before consumption) doesn't
mean they're OK on hops which not only won't be washed but will be boiled, or
dry hopped with alcohol as well as water available as solvent. And I'd still be
uncomfortable if the manufacturers or even the FDA said it was OK. Neither have
an enviable record where consumer protection is concerned. You have to make
your own decision, but I'd be inclined toward the organic (blendered beetles) or
introduced "natural" control (such as Bacillus thuringiensis) mentioned earlier
in this thread.

Fertilizers: And if the previous paranoia isn't enough, our local paper, The
Seattle Times, had a feature this weekend about fertilizer manufacturing. It
seems that if a material has fertilizing value, Federal regulations allow its
sale as fertilizer, regardless of overall content. "It goes into the silo as
hazardous waste and comes out fertilizer." This means slags and various ashes
with *high* content of heavy metals are commonly added to or form the majority
of some fertilizers. They don't even have to be labeled as to what they
contain. Heavy metals and some chlorine based compounds are incredibly
persistent in the soil. Apologies for the paranoia, but I'd like to hear some
input on the significance of this.
-Grant

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 97 12:12:50 -0800
From: rbarnes@sdccd.cc.ca.us
Subject: Lager pitching temps, phloating phalse bottom


Regarding the recent question about floating false bottoms, I drilled
three holes through the bottom of my 10 gal gott cooler and inserted
three 2 1/2" X 1/4" stainless screws. Screws are pushed in from the
outside and secured with stainless nuts and washers, holes are drilled
in the false bottom to allow it to be placed over the studs and held
in place with nuts. Use large diameter washers and food grade (or
aquarium grade) silicone sealant and it won't leak. Very little grain
gets by since I did this.

With the warmer summer tap water temperatures I'm having trouble
getting low output temperatures from my CF chiller. Also, I find that
the flow rate is painfully slow (1 1/2 hours to drain 10 gal of wort
using 3/8" tubing in my chiller). I have a large false bottom screen
in my kettle, but I still get a lot of hop pieces (using whole hops)
which partially clogs the chiller. Is anyone using 1/2" tubing in a CF
chiller? I suppose you would use 3/4" garden hose with this, but how
long would the chiller need to be to work effectively?

I made a Classic American Pilsner yesterday (Sunday). Pitched Wyeast
Munich from a previous batch at 80 df (!), put it in the chest freezer
at 40 df. Went from 80 df at 2:00 p.m. Sunday to 50 df by 7:00 a.m.
Monday. Yeast still seems to be working, I've pitched this yeast at 70
df and chilled to 50 df over 24 hours in past batches without any
unusual flavors, but I fear that I might end up with off flavors by
pitching at 80 and rapidly chilling. Sure starts fast, tho.

Any comments?

Randy in San Diego



------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 15:07:12 -0700
From: huskers@cco.net
Subject: Barleywine ect

Hello again,

I just made my second barley wine. What a struggle. I sparged way to
much. I thought I was running slow enough but ended up with 10-12
gallons of sparge. Good news/bad news. I collected 4 gallons of wort
that was about 8 pt.s lower than I wanted for pre boil gravity. Leaving
8 gallons in another kettle needing to be boiled down to 4 gallons! I
should've just called 'uncle', boiled the 4g and make that a barleywine
and make the second runnings a pale ale. But no, I condensed the 8g down
and add the 4g. This took about 15lb of LP gas and several hours. OG
was 1108 and is bubbling away nicely as I type. How does anyone else do
their bw? My first one was so good I'll put up with all day boils if I
have to.

- ------------------

Randy Ricchi <rricchi@ccisd.k12.mi.us> subliminally doubts my u% curve:

> On Jason Hennings Hoppy beer (July 3 posting):
> I have a feeling that by getting all your IBU's in the last 20 minutes of
> the boil, the "perceived" bitterness is going to be much higher than the
> IBU's would suggest, due to an overpowering hop flavor. Please keep us
> posted as to the taste profile after, say, one week and then maybe four weeks.

If my u% are reasonable, it shouldn't matter. Especially since I'm
cutting all (most) of the dry hop additions to more acurately reflect
the late addition contributions. Also thinking of sparging 14g, spliting
in to two boils, one as mentioned and a more traditional schedule
(equall IBUs).

Cheers,
Jason Henning (huskers@cco.net)
Big Red Alchemy and Brewing
Olympia, WA - "It's the Water"


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 15:56:22 -0400
From: Chris Dodge <cdodge@ptc.com>
Subject: Blue Moon Belgian Wit

I just had Blue Moon's Belgian Wheet this week and loved
the taste.

Has anyone else tried this beer and if so does anyone
have a recipe which may come close to duplicating it.

Thanks
Chris Dodge

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 17:49:25 +0000
From: "Robert Marshall" <robertjm@hooked.net>
Subject: The Brewery now at realbeer.com??

Have I been in a time warp, or something? I went to
alpha.rollanet.org, got the form with all the link buttons, but
everytime I follow it, it tells me that page has moved to
realbeer.com/...

When did this happen? It seems that only a couple of weeks ago the
links were there at alpa.rollanet.org. If it did change, why didn't
they change the map too?

Later,


Robert Marshall
robertjm@hooked.net
http://www.hooked.net/users/robertjm/beerbook.htm
- ------
"They who drink beer will think beer."
Washington Irving - (1783-1859)

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 21:20:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: AlannnnT@aol.com
Subject: tally of juggling brewers

The results are in. Eleven homebrewers who read the digest admit to juggling
for fun or exercise. Some juggle while sparging. One juggles with his spouse.
Two juggle and do magic or sleight of hand. We [collectively] juggle, or
throw,
clubs, tennis balls, hockey pucks, basketballs, bean bags, lacrosse balls,
beer bottles, and more. I think it makes us better brewers, I know it makes
us fun at parties.
Thanks for the replies- Alan Talman

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 21:41:11 -0004
From: "DPC Michael E. Sandell" <sandellme@nassau.navy.mil>
Subject: Cream Stout Extract Recipe

I am in search of a clone for Caffery's Cream Stout. I drank it in
Italy and Spain. It is one of the best that I have had. Does anyone
have a "clone" for this? Thanks.

Michael
"Brewmeister in Training"

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 21:42:57 -0004
From: "DPC Michael E. Sandell" <sandellme@nassau.navy.mil>
Subject: Homebrew in Pennsylvania

Hello All,
I am considering retirement in PA. The AOB web pags says that it is
not legal to homebrew there, there are however homebrew supply
stores! Does anyone have the facts on the legality of homebrewing in
PA? Thanks for the assistance.

Michael
"Brewmeister in Training"


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 18:54:46 -0700
From: Jason Henning <huskers@cco.net>
Subject: Pre-chiller

Hello friends,

Val Lipscomb <valjay@NetXpress.com> pondering pre-chiller tubing size
says:

> ... so I'll try pre-chilling the water goin to the CF. The
> question is,what OD soft copper would give me the most "bang
> for the buck"?? I'll immerse the coil in a 36 quart Igloo cooler
> filled with ice and water and should hope to get at least a 10-15
> degree drop in water temp. FWIW,the chiller is 3/8 OD copper ...

I would set up the c/c (coil and cooler) chiller with 3/8" copper.
Instead of pre-chilling the c-f chiller water, why not 'post-chill' the
wort? That is, why not put the c/c chiller after ther c-f chiller? That
way you'd be cooling 82F wort more directly and efficently. I'm going to
give it a try, maybe I can save some water in the process.

[Same day several hours later] I've filled my 5g Gott with 85F water.
Wound 15' of 3/8 copper around a keg and shaped the coil in to a
playmate cooler. About 1/2 full of ice and topped up with water. Should
have made the coil smaller, they stick out of the water some. Oh well,
it's just a rough experiment. I finished connecting the racking cane and
tubing.

First I filled a gallon jug. It took 2 minutes 3 seconds, that's on par
with my c-f rate. The water temp was right at 70F, 15d drop, not bad,
not
bad at all. Second run, dumped the jug and did it again, this time
rocking
the coil now and then so as to exchange the heat better. Temperature
dropped to 58F. I'm convinced.

I don't have much of a problem running my c-f wide open. I get temps
around 70F. But I could use my c/c chiller to get a lager down to 50F. I
would rewrap my coil so all of it's under water. Carefully measure ice
and water and note them. Let it run wide open for the full 5 gallons and
note temperature. Adjusting ice and water ratios, I should be able to
dial in the temp in pretty close after a couple batches.

Cheers,
Jason Henning (huskers@cco.net)
Big Red Alchemy and Brewing
Olympia, WA - "It's the Water"


------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #2457, 07/08/97
*************************************
-------

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT