Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
HOMEBREW Digest #0911
This file received at Sierra.Stanford.EDU 92/06/26 00:07:23
HOMEBREW Digest #911 Fri 26 June 1992
FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Rob Gardner, Digest Coordinator
Contents:
Re: Priming Cherry beer (ingr!b11!mspe5!guy)
Watneys, Gordon Beirch, Brew Clubs (CHUCK)
Lager Question (SOMAK)
bottling wands (zymurgy review and question) ("Spencer W. Thomas")
oxidize,ants (Russ Gelinas)
Re: English Bitters - Theaky's XB Anyone? (gkushmer)
Sierra Nevada crib notes (Phillip Seitz)
Low sparge yield (Gordon Baldwin)
DMS vs DME (korz)
Chilled Wort and Hop Pests (Bill Szymczak)
Immersion Chiller usage! (Rick Myers)
bugs (Jay Hersh)
cylinder vs. square (Jay Hersh)
Dry Yeast Update (Josh Grosse)
Samuel Adams Boston Ale (Rick Larson)
Send articles for publication to homebrew@hpfcmi.fc.hp.com
Send UNSUBSCRIBE and all other requests, ie, address change, etc.,
to homebrew-request@hpfcmi.fc.hp.com
Archives _were_ available from netlib@mthvax.cs.miami.edu
(Stay tuned for info on a new archive site)
**Please do not send me requests for back issues!**
**For Cat's Meow information, send mail to lutzen@novell.physics.umr.edu**
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 92 12:05:57 CDT
From: ingr!ingr!b11!mspe5!guy@uunet.UU.NET
Subject: Re: Priming Cherry beer
Richard Goldstein writes:
> I am calling on the collective wisdom of HBD. I made a cherry wheat
> beer several weeks ago, and it will be time to prime soon. Someone on
> the net gave me the very interesting idea of priming with cherry juice
> or cherry jam to add a little more fruit essence/flavor. So now the
> obvious question:
>
> How much?
An interesting idea indeed but I'm not convinced that it would be practical.
While this won't help you now, you might consider priming with saved gyle in
the future. I have had great success doing this by following Papazian's
guidelines for calculating the amount to save and not being too concerned with
getting *exactly* that amount. It takes a bit longer to carbonate and condition
but the end result is worth it to me. That way, you are just adding back a
little of the same ingredients that went into the batch in question and nothing
more. It would, in your case, have contained some of the cherry essence that
was present in the brew from the start. This in combination with adding some
"fruit essence" at bottling time, as Micah Millspaw suggested in his article on
fruit beers, should be right on the mark. You might try to find some cherry
essence to add and prime with corn sugar, DME, or honey for this batch. I
recently made a Blackberry Ale using 8 pounds of blackberries which I primed
with orange blossom honey and it turned out quite well. The blackberry aroma
is there even without the addition of fruit essence. It also has a slight
floral aroma from the use of Cascade hops and, I think, the honey.
- --
Guy McConnell
"Pour me full o' Guinness and I'll never more complain!"
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 03:21:06 PDT
From: CHUCK <UNDERWOOD@INTEL7.intel.com>
Subject: Watneys, Gordon Beirch, Brew Clubs
Hi all,
Just wanted to repeat a post I saw earlier, if anyone has tried to duplicate
a Watney's Red Barrel recipe, I (and a few other people) would sure be
interested. Please send us what you got!
Also just wanted to say I got out to the Mountain View, Ca area awhile back
and got to visit The Tied House and the Gordon Beirch brewpubs in San Jose
and Palo Alto. Yum! Sure wish we had a few of those down here in NM!
Finally, thanks to all those who responded to my partial mash questions.
Your help is forever appreciated. I'm ready to do one!
Does anyone have any info on brew clubs in the Albuquerque area? I think
there's one but forgot who to contact. What do you guys talk about in these
things anyway. I'm kinda thinking about starting one, any help out there?
Always thanks in advance,
chuck
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 14:25 PDT
From: SOMAK%FITKJES2.BITNET@SEARN.SUNET.SE
Subject: Lager Question
I made an all-grain batch and fermented it with
Pilsen Wyeast. I wonder if the high FG (1012) is
normal or is their something wrong in my mashing
procedure. I used very pale malts and decoction
mashing. OG was 1044. Can anybody answer?
Markku Koivula
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 09:47:01 EDT
From: "Spencer W. Thomas" <Spencer.W.Thomas@med.umich.edu>
Subject: bottling wands (zymurgy review and question)
The latest issue of zymurgy (Summer '92) had an article comparing
three types of bottling wands. The author's primary consideration
seemed to be the amount of oxidation potential each had. He liked
Phils Philler the best because (1) the beer doesn't spray out the
bottom (so no aeration at that end) and because (2) it left very
little head room (so little oxidation potential at that end).
My question: there was a discussion of Phils Philler in this list a
while back (6 mo?) and I thought that the consensus was that the
little air hole at the top (that allows for property 2 above) at least
had the potential for introducing air into the beer as it flowed by
(by Bernoulli's principle). Has anybody had any further thoughts on
this or experiments to back it up or refute it?
I'm currently using one with the valve at the bottom. I think it's
the second kind he reviewed. There's a little "wand" sticking out
that opens the valve whenver pressed up or to the side. This allows
me to easily top off bottles by holding the wand against the (in)side
of the neck of the bottle. But it does "spray" beer out the bottom.
Still it's better than no bottling wand, by far.
=Spencer W. Thomas HSITN, U of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
spencer.thomas@med.umich.edu 313-747-2778
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1992 9:53:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: R_GELINAS@UNHH.UNH.EDU (Russ Gelinas)
Subject: oxidize,ants
I knew there was more reason for not oxidizing hot wort than just because
it will darken. What happens is that things such as melanoidins (sp?)
get oxidized, which isn't a problem in itself, but as such they will not
be able to reduce oxygen later on, and so the brew is more susceptable to
the post-ferment oxidation which can impart off flavors. Thanks to all
who reminded me.
So, pouring hot wort into a hop-back is not the greatest idea. My plan
now (at least until I get to read Kinney's Zymurgy article...amazing how
great minds think alike ;-), is to pour boiling water into the plastic
buckets/hop-back and let it sit while the wort is chilling as usual. The
heat should sanitize the buckets. Then I can pour the cooled wort through
the hop-back. No hot wort, no plastic nasties, and well-oxygenated wort
as a by-product. One concern about your hot wort/hop-back/chill scheme,
Kinney, is that the hops are not being used as a trub filter bed, at least
not for the cold break material. But I guess that's the price you pay
for all that great hop aroma that'll be extracted by the hot wort. Does
Sierra Nevada hop-back with hot or cold wort?
Re. ants on hops: Ants love aphids. They actually herd them, like cows.
If you've got a lot of ants on your hops, you've probably got aphids.
Has anyone used the California Common aka Steam beer yeast from Wyeast?
A couple of pints of Anchor Steam last night has decided my next brew...
Russ
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 10:24:26 EDT
From: gkushmer@Jade.Tufts.EDU
Subject: Re: English Bitters - Theaky's XB Anyone?
I too am one of the many who started brewing because of the want to get
a decent pint of English Bitter. (That and I had this 'calling' to
do so :).
My favorite example of the style is an English ale made by Theakston's.
These same people make Old Peculiar, which I know many of you have tasted.
However, their Theakston's XB, available on tap mainly in Lancashire and
York, is one of my favorite beers. It's hoppy, smooth, and just
slightly creamy.
Of course, I've come nowhere near duplicating it yet, but if anyone
out there has some malt/hops/brewing tips on how I can get close to
it then I am all ears.
So far, my best results have come from 6 lbs of amber extract (don't mash
yet, but I still brew :), a half lb. of crystal, a 1/4 lb. of roasted
malt, and long-term dry-hopping.
Cheers,
- --gk
-------------------
| 5,397 miles |
| - to - | THE FIRST AMENDMENT states that members of re-
| WALL DRUG | ligious groups, no matter how small or unpopular,
| | shall have the right to hassle you in airports
|WALL, SOUTH DAKOTA |
| U.S.A. | -Dave Barry-
-------------------
**Sign In Amsterdam**
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 14:11 GMT
From: Phillip Seitz <0004531571@mcimail.com>
Subject: Sierra Nevada crib notes
This past Tuesday and Wednesday the Brickskeller held its Sierra Nevada
beer tasting, and it was definitely the place to be if you're one of
those HBD mad-dog left-coast Death-by-IBUers. All the beers were on
tap (except the Celebration Ale), and all were frighteningly fresh.
How hoppy was it? Well, by the time we got to the Bigfoot all six of
the hearty beerdrinkers at my table were chewing on the tablecloth
and wiping their tongues on the carpet to try to cut through the
impenetrable hop-oil coating in our mouths. I heard that after the
open keg five people required first aid for bitterness burns and
three were hospitalized for IBU overdoses. Must have been left-
coasters. (And, no, I'm not from the Midwest.)
Anyway, Sierra Nevada's sales manager Steve Harrison was in
attendance, and shared the following information with us (please
accept my apologies for the gaps--perhaps someone who was there
on Wednesday can fill them in?):
1) All beers are made with 2-row klages malt. A single-temperature
mash is done at 156 degrees.
2) SN uses open primary fermenters so they can recover their yeasts
from the krausen. Harrison claimed they can usually reuse the yeast
for 30-40 batches before it goes bonkers, though they've found that
the yeast collected from Bigfoot and Celebration Ale is close to
useless.
3) The beers:
- --Summerfest (a lager). OG: 11.5 Balling, FG 2.7 Balling, using
only 2-row klages. Hallertauer for finishing.
- --SN Pale Ale. OG: 13 Balling, FG 3 Balling, using klages,
crystal, and dextrin malts. Perle hops for bitterness,
cascade for finishing.
- --Pale Bock. Sorry, folks, I blew it. Must have been in the
bathroom.
- --Celebration Ale. OG: 16 Balling. Hop schedule usually includes
Chinook in the boil, cascade for finishing, and centennial
as a dry hop. However, Harrison says they're willing to
change the recipe in accordance with availability of the hops
most likely to hit people squarely between the eyes.
- --SN Porter. OG: 14 Balling, FG: 4 Balling. Either Perle, centennial,
or Hallertauer in the boil, with Tetnanger and Willamette in
the finish.
- --SN Stout. OG: 16 Balling, FG: 4 Balling. Chinook in the boil, cascade
finish. Malts include black patent and chocolate, but NO roasted
barley. (Hmmm. . .)
- --Bigfoot. Must have been in the bathroom again (don't shoot!)
Also served was the Richter Scale Ale from the San Andreas Brewing Co.
in Hollister, CA. This is a cranberry ale, and our table agreed it had
the best fruit flavor of any American commercial beer (not that there are
a lot of choices).
On the recommendation of Scott Leno (HBD 907) I also tried the Traquair.
Good call, Scott. The beer is very richly malty, with a nearly silky
mouth feel. Taste rather reminscent of Belgian triples (Rochefort comes
to mind) but without the alchohol taste. VERY restrained carbonation
(I'd say there were about six bubbles in the entire bottle.) Definitely
an enormous, great beer. However, right-coasters not living near
Washington might take some comfort in the fact that a small-business
loan is required just to drink a bottle of this stuff: at $9.95 for
an 11.2 ounce bottle this is vastly the most expensive beer I've ever
consumed. At about $1.00 a sip you gotta wonder.
Anyway, those frothing-at-the-mouth hop-crazed left-coasters
wouldn't like it anyway. It's practically unhopped. So there.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 8:48:30 PDT
From: Gordon Baldwin <hpubvwa.nsr.hp.com!sherpa2!gbaldwin>
Subject: Low sparge yield
I posted here about 2 months ago complaining about low yield. The
general concensus was to slow down my sparge, and that helped, but I am
still not up to where I think I should be. Here are the details:
8 lb klages
.5 lb munich
.5 lb crystal
1.5 oz cascade beginning of boil
1 oz fuggles middle of boil
1.5 oz saaz fininshing
Wyeast German ale yeast.
I use a one step infusion mash at 155 for 45 minutes. It looks like I
get complete conversion testing with iodine. I tested before so I know
what to look for when conversion was complete. I sparge with about 4
gallons ~170 water until it no longer tastes sweet, about 6 gallons.
I sparge in the Zap-pap lauter tun (nested buckets with the inner bucket
drilled with about a thousand holes.) Sparge now takes about 45 minutes
to complete. The boil is for 1 hour and I boil the 6 gallons down to
about 5. The starting gravity is 1.036 and finishing is 1.006. With 9 lb
of grain I think I should be getting around 1.040. I just brewed a
similar receipe using 12 lb of grain and I only got 1.042. My grind
seems good, I get my grain from The Cellar in Setttle, (They are only
about a mile from my house). They have a good roller mill there that I
use, and they checked the grind and thought it looked fine.
Any pointers to what I should try next would be greatly appreciated.
- --
Gordon Baldwin
ELDEC Corp
sherpa2!gbaldwin@sunup.west.sun.com
...!hpubvwa!sherpa2!gbaldwin
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 11:31 CDT
From: korz@iepubj.att.com
Subject: DMS vs DME
Whoa! Two people in the same issue refering to the extract which still
has active enzymes as "DME." DME is the common acronym for Dried Malt
Extract. Let's not confuse beginners here! Edme makes a product they
call DMS which stands for Diastatic Malt Syrup and does have active
enzymes. DMS is also an acronym for Dimethyl Sulfide which we all know
as "that cooked-corn aroma." I know that Munton & Fison also makes a
Diastatic Malt Syrup and they might even call it DME, but lets reserve
the acronyms DME and DMS to Dried Malt Extract and Dimethyl Sulfide and
spell out Diastatic Malt Syrup (or Extract) so there's no confusion.
Al.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 15:27:34 EDT
From: bszymcz%ulysses@relay.nswc.navy.mil (Bill Szymczak)
Subject: Chilled Wort and Hop Pests
In HBD909 Steve Casagrande writes
> From: smc@hotsc.att.com
> Subject: Wort Chillers for Extract Brewers?
> My current procedure is to boil only about 2 gallons of wort (from
> extract/H20), adding hops/grains as necessary, and then dumping this
> into the fermenter with 2-3 gallons of cold H20. The temperature drops
> from boiling to pitching temperature instantly, and I can pitch right
> away. There's no "cold break" that I can notice with this method;
> I imagine the trub eventually precipitates out into the primary
> yeast cake.
Steve, I have also been an extract brewer for about one year,
but have not had the experience that the temperature drops from
boiling to piching instantly. Indeed, even if you mix 2 gallons
of boiling wort at 212 degrees F to 3 gallons of ice cold water
at 32 degrees F you get 5 gallons in the fermenter having a
temperature of
T = (2 * 212 + 3 * 32) / 5 = 104 degrees F.
Piching at such temperatures can cause your yeast (even Wyeast) to
do wierd stuff. Even worse, my cold tap water in the summer
(in Maryland) is about 68 degrees F. I cool the ingredients
in the fermenter by immersing the entire fermenter (covered)
into a large container filled with ice water. This cools
my brew down to pitching temperature (about 75 degrees F) in 40
to 75 minutes depending on the temperature of the tap water.
However, I am planning to move on to all grain and am planning
on building a wort-chiller using some of the excellent ideas that
I've read in HBD.
There has also been a lot of articles on hop pests recently. In
HBD910 Ron Karwoski writes:
> My hops have a couple of problems. I have only two plant growing
> and I fear I may have lost them for the year. The tops of both plants
> have been lost. On one, a few days of wicked storms weakened the plant
> where it latched on to the twine I have hanging from a tree. I'll make
> the twine tighter. I noticed the second top (just the top inch) was missing
> about a week later and closer inspection revealed an army of ANTS! marching
> up and down the twine. My question: Will these tops come back and the plants
> resume climbing or are they stuck for the year? How do I get rid of the
> ANTS!? Soap?
No, ants will not harm your hop plants. Ants, however, are
attracted to a secretion (honewdew) of aphids. If you look
carefully, you should also be able to find aphids. In their nymph
stage they are light green in color, with roundish bodies about
one sixteenth to one eighth on an inch long, and are soft bodied
(will squish easily if you touch them). They will change in time
developing small wings and become darker in color.
Two additional ways of controlling these pests are
1 Squish them between your fingers (they tend to cluster).
2 Mist them with water, then dust them with household flour.
One problem with these methods and the other organic treatments
of using rotenone, pyrethryn (sp?) or insecticidal soap is that
each method is a direct contact method only, (rotenone breaks
down quickly) and if you have bad aphid problems you may have
to treat them almost every day. This is probably why Al Korz
mentioned in HBD910 that Sevin worked better than Safer's soap
for him. Sevin is not organic, and will last a few days so
it is not needed as frequently. I myself try not to use
inorganic compounds, but Sevin isn't too bad, and its the
only thing I've found effective on Japanese beatles. (A
friend of mine, who is a fanatical cat lover, dips his cat in
a Sevin solution to rid it of fleas. He's so careful about the
health of his cat that he'll take his cat to the
vet whenever it sneezes!)
Also, don't worry about losing the tops of the hop plants. Last
week, while increasing the height of my hop trellis, I
accidentally cut off the top of a hop plant. It now has grown
two branches near the top and both are already over a foot long.
Bill Szymczak
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 14:23:30 MDT
From: Rick Myers <rcm@hpctdpe.col.hp.com>
Subject: Immersion Chiller usage!
Full-Name: Rick Myers
In HBD #910 Bob Konigsberg writes:
> I've been using an immersion chiller for a while now, and I don't feel
> that they're too hard to clean.
>
> Prior to use, I run hot tap water (~180 F) through it from the tap for
> about a minute (full 60 seconds) after it's hot at the far end at a
> fairly high flow rate. Then I fill it (with a funnel) with a
> Chlorinated TSP solution, and let it sit in there for about 30 minutes.
> Then the hot water rinse is repeated again for another full minute.
> The chiller is then stored with the copper tube left full of water.
Er, ah, I don't really want to tell you this Bob, but you're not using
your chiller correctly. There is no need to clean the inside of an immersion
chiller...the cold water runs through it, and you dip the whole mess down
inside your kettle. Thus, the name "immersion"...the only thing you need
to clean is the OUTSIDE, not the inside.
Don't feel bad, you're not the first person to do this, I heard some people
even bought pre-manufactured ones, only to have to change all the fittings
to get it to work like they thought it was supposed to. I'm posting this
to the digest directly because there are more people than I realized doing
this...
Rick
rcm@col.hp.com
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 18:44:26 EDT
From: Jay Hersh <hersh@expo.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: bugs
Hmmm, I saw a few aphids earlier in the season.
for $6 I got a pint (1500 or so) lady bugs.
Munch, crunch, chew, chew, no more aphids....
I also bought some Safer to be on the safe side :-)
And some Japanese beetle traps, though I have yet to see any
of these buggers :-)
Another data point, but don't call me Mr. Data :-)
JaH
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 18:49:44 EDT
From: Jay Hersh <hersh@expo.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: cylinder vs. square
I've used up to 12 pounds in my cylindircal cooler.
It was real easy toget the 3/8 to 3/8 right angle compression fitting,
6 feet of copper tubing (coiled and slotted on the bottom)
and the right angle 3/8 spigot (look under your sink, the
oval knob kind you find in plumbing stores) in local hardware stores,
all for under $10.
I think the square cooler setup is a little more complicated,
but I'm basing that on one rig I saw made with plastic tubing
of some sort in a E shape.... Still it's probably no big deal.
My preference for the cylindrical cooler holds since I brew 3 or 5
gallon batches. If you wanna brew bigger ones you'll surely need
the rectangular coolers...
JaH
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 21:47:20 EDT
From: jdg@grex.ann-arbor.mi.us (Josh Grosse)
Subject: Dry Yeast Update
I've some news of interest to active dry yeast users and
detractors, alike. First of all, some business news:
o I can confirm the rumor that Whitbread is no longer
producing dry yeast, production stopped earlier this
year.
o I can also tell you that Red Star has been out of the
beer yeast production business since last year.
I've once or twice seen the question, "Who makes the dry
beer yeast that's private labelled by G.W. Kent?" Answer:
Lallemand Inc., who are known for their 70+ strains of dry
wine yeasts, usually under the "Lalvin" trade name.
They now produce both a lager and an ale dry beer yeast, at
plants in Canada and Denmark.
This information comes from the owner of G.W. Kent Inc., a
major brewing and vinting wholesale supplier, and the U.S.
Agent for Lallemand. Some highlights from Lallemand
marketing literature they shared with me:
Until the 70's, the wine industry all used spontaneous
fermentation. About that time, experimentation began on
isolating single cell cultures that would provide
individualized and consistent characteristics. Single cell
strains were successfully isolated, but there were problems
developing commercial cultures. This was due both to
limited culture lifespan and short unpredictable grape
harvest seasons.
If you use dried yeast for brewing, you may be interested in
these rehydration recommendations from Lallemand:
"Three factors seem responsible for the effects of
rehydration on subsequent activity. The first is a
loss of cell constituents, which results in poor growth
and activity. Secondly, improper rehydration creates a
condition of poor dispersion of cells which results in
clumping of cell groups thereby reducing the efficiency
of oxygen and nutrient transfer to the cells. The net
result, poor activity. Finally, the effect of "cold
shock" can also be devastating. When dry yeast is
added to cool must, water or wort, the viable cell
count can drop by as much as 60%! Petite mutants can
be formed which may produce off flavors. Although
these mutants generally have a limited life during
normal fermentation, their effect can be magnified
because of the sluggish nature of the remaining
recovering cells."
Guidelines:
o Use 5-10 times the amount of water to dry yeast.
o Use water between 105-114 F.
o Add yeast to water, not water to yeast, to avoid
uneven rehydration.
o Let the yeast sit for 5-10 minutes before
stirring, and pitch within 30 minutes.
o If your wort is over 50 F, gradually add small
quantities of wort to the rehydrated yeast, in 5
or 10 minute intervals, to allow for temperature
matching.
o Rehydrate in water, not wort, due mainly to wort
components that are lethal during the rehydration
period, such as SO2 and hop components.
In summary, Lallemand dry yeasts are selected for
fermentation characteristics (as well as dehydration
survivability), and they recommend rather more complicated
rehydration procedures than the published homebrewing
literature I've seen. It is possible that many of the off
flavors I've had over the years of brewing with dry yeast
came from improper pitching technique, such as opening the
package and dumping the dry yeast directly into my wort.
I hope you've found this information helpful.
Disclaimer: I've never used Lallemand yeast, and for the
last 18 months have been using nothing but liquid cultures.
I don't plan to go back.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Grosse jdg@grex.ann-arbor.mi.us
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 21:13:27 CDT
From: melkor!beren!rick@uunet.UU.NET (Rick Larson)
Subject: Samuel Adams Boston Ale
Does anyone have a recipe for Samuel Adams Boston Ale? I'm
looking for an all-grain recipe to mimic this. The label says
it the hops included Kent Golding, Fuggles, and Saaz. Any idea
which is used for bittering, flavoring, and finishing?
Thanks,
rick
- ---
Rick Larson rick@adc.com, melkor!rick@cs.umn.edu
ADC Telecommunications, Inc. ...!uunet!melkor!rick
Minneapolis MN 55435 (612) 936-8288
------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #911, 06/26/92
*************************************
-------
