Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

HOMEBREW Digest #0538

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
HOMEBREW Digest
 · 8 months ago

 
HOMEBREW Digest #538 Fri 16 November 1990


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Rob Gardner, Digest Coordinator


Contents:
Christmas recipe for naff beer wanted (jeremy)
Re: Homebrew Digest #537 (November 14, 1990) (Bagel the Dough)
WASSAIL MEAD (card)
Freshhops' address (Chris Shenton)
media attention (Kevin L. McBride)
stuff (Russ Gelinas)
Re: Sam Smith Oatmeal Stout (dbreiden)
hop plugs (Bob Devine 14-Nov-1990 0939)
RE: Using Oak Chips (Dave Resch)
oak in beer (Bob Devine 14-Nov-1990 0943)
Leaf hops (John Freeman)
Ugh! Something's growing in my Beer! (Stuart Crawford)
Mike Schrempp's mash questions (mcnally)
More Recipes Please (Alan Edwards)
Various, incl. more mead info ("FEINSTEIN")
Re: Usefulness of blow-off (John DeCarlo)
partial mash (Victor J Bartash +1 201 957 5633)
please add ACS_JAMES@JMUVAX1 to homebrew list (ACS_JAMES)
mead yeast (Dick Dunn)
Fermenting Temperatures (Alan Edwards)
Keg equipment (sbsgrad)
First All Grain (Mike Charlton)
Mead recipe (Kevin Karplus)


Send submissions to homebrew%hpfcmr@hplabs.hp.com
Send requests to homebrew-request%hpfcmr@hplabs.hp.com
[Please do not send me requests for back issues]
Archives are available from netlib@mthvax.cs.miami.edu

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 08:46:40 +0100
>From: jeremy@eik.ii.uib.no
Subject: Christmas recipe for naff beer wanted

Hi,

It's been a considerable time since I've sat down to read my home-brew
digest so I've missed a lot of traffic in the last year or so. If this
subject has cropped up before, I apologise!

Several months ago I made a batch of bitter (from a 'Geordie' kit, sorry,
bit I'm cheat'n). When it was finished it didn't taste quite right - very
malty, almost as if it should have fermented a bit more. It wasn't really palatable to drink, but is great in cooking.

[Carols beer/cheese sauce:
250 g cheese (1/2lb)
1/2 pt beer (0.3 l)
2 tbs flour
some garlic and fresh mustard
big dob of marge

(All measures approximate)

Melt the marge in a pan, add the garlic and mustard. Put cheese and
about 1/4 of the beer in the pan and warm gently until gooey. Add
more beer until runny. Mix the flour with a small amount of beer to
make a paste, stir this in to the mixture. Add more beer if its too
thick. Keep stiring all the time, else the cheese will stick/burn.
]

Anyway, last weekend we made another sauce and tasted the beer 'just to
see'. It was *almost* drinkable, but not quite - so my question to the
readers of this digest is does anyone have a kind of beer-punch type
recipe that I could use for the Christmas doo that we'll be having next
month ?

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy Cook .----.
Parallel Processing Laboratory / / / / /
University of Bergen / / / / /
Thormoehlensgate 55 /----' .----. .----. .----. / / .----. /----.
N-5008 Bergen / _____/ / _____/ / / _____/ / /
Norway / (____/ / (____/ / / (____/ (____/
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
email : jeremy@eik.ii.uib.no | "My other computer is a MasPar MP1208"
phone : +47 5 54 41 74 (direct) |
fax : +47 5 54 41 99 |
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 1990 21:31:34 -0500
>From: rda233b@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Bagel the Dough)
Subject: Re: Homebrew Digest #537 (November 14, 1990)

Could you mplease change the mailing address of rda233b@monu6.monash.cc.edu.au
to vac217z@monu6.monash.cc.edu.au
The old account is due to be deleted in 2 weeks and as such I need to have the
address changed to my new account.
Thanks
Yours sincerely
Bagel


- --
/// __ _ __ ___ \\\ I don't have a drinking problem:
/// /__) /_\ ( _ \___ \ \\\ I drink, I get drunk,
((( /__) / \ \__) \___ \___ ))) I fall down,
\\\ rda233b@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au /// No problem!
The telephone pole was approaching fast. I was attempting to swerve out
of its path when it struck my front end.
-- Seen on an insurance form

NEW QU PATH IS /rdt/vac/vac223l/bin/qu
Change this now to avoid getting this stupid insipid message all the time!

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 09:01:23 EST
>From: card@APOLLO.HP.COM
Subject: WASSAIL MEAD


Hi:

I have paraphrased a recipe out of 'BREWING MEAD' Gayre/Papazian.
It was intended for first time brewers so I left out a lot of
the basics.


Ingredients for: 5 US gallons

Light clover honey -- 12.5#
Acid blend -- 4 tsp
Yeast Nutrient -- 5 tsp
Adequate wine yeast

O.G - 1.110

Add honey, acid blend, and yeast nutrient to 2 gallons of water and
boil for 1/2 hr. Add this to ~ 1 1/2 gallons cold water for primary
fermentation. Pitch yeast when temp reaches 70-75F.

> you should probably use a blow hose at first if you use a carboy.

Allow fermentation to proceed at 65-75 degrees F in an area away from
bright sunlight or bright direct artificial light. Primary fermentation
may take from 3 weeks to many months, depending on the type honey, yeast,
temp, etc. When primary fermentation is complete, the mead becomes fairly
clear.

After clearing, rack to secondary leaving sediment behind. Attach air-lock.
During its time in the secondary, the mead may undego a secondary
fermentation. At any rate, leave the mead to sit for at least 3 weeks or
until secondary fermantation is complete and the yeast once again settles
to the bottom as a sediment. When the mead is clear its ready top bottle.

>Bottle as you would beer taking care not to aerate. If you want a sparkling
mead, add ~ <3/4 cup corn sugar. "Fresh yeast may be added at this time also".


But

Papazian mentions. "Generally sparkling mead would have to be lesser strength
in order for the yeast to survive a second fermentation in the bottle; it
should generally NOT have an original specific gravity greater than 1.090.

My interpretation is that if OG is substantially higher, the resulting alcohol
level will be too high for yeast to survive -- thus flat mead


/Mal Card

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 10:21:08 EST
>From: Chris Shenton <chris@asylum.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Freshhops' address

A couple people have been looking for hops and hop plants (rhizomes). I got
my rhizomes last spring from Freshhops and have had fun growing them. They
also are the place for hops -- especially if you need a lot!

Freshops: 36180 Kings Valley Hwy; Philomath, OR 97370; 503-929-2736
Hop Flower: 4oz, 8oz $, 12oz, 1#, 2#, 3#, 4#, 5-10#, 11+#
Discounts: based on quantity
Comments: All hops, all the time. Rhizomes! (in spring)
P & H: included
Use Note: Friendly, helpful, informative staff; quick response.

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 10:06:43 -0500
>From: gozer!klm@uunet.UU.NET (Kevin L. McBride)
Subject: media attention

Well, it seems that the news media is starting to pay even more attention
to our little homebrewing "revolution."

On the front page of the "Style" section of last night's (Nashua, NH)
Telegraph, there is an article entitled "Homebrew Craze - For some,
the best beer is made in the kitchen" by Associated Press writer
Mitchell Landsberg.

The bulk of the article covers the annual dinner of New York's Outlaws of
Homebrew, where Charlie Papazian was guest speaker.

The article takes up about 2/3 of the page, including a 9 inch tall
graphic of a frothy mug of beer.

I was kind of hoping that such important news would make the front front
page of the paper but, alas, the front page was devoted to an article
about some wacked-out Texan in Washington, D.C. who wants to start a war
just because he got his butt shot out of the air way back in World War II.
:-) :-) :-) :-)

(Relax George! Don't worry! Have some camel dung! :-)

If there is enough interest expressed (please mail directly to me, don't
post requests here) I will take the time to type the article in and post it.

#define enough_interest (number_of_requests_in_my_mailbox > 5)

- --
Kevin L. McBride |Contract programming (on and offsite) |Brewmeister and
President |X, Motif, TCP/IP, UNIX, VAX/VMS, |Bottle Washer
MSCG, Inc. |Integration issues, Troubleshooting. |McBeer Brewery
uunet!wang!gozer!klm |Reseller of ISC UNIX and Telebit Modems.|Nashua, NH

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 09:13 EST
>From: <R_GELINA%UNHH.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu> (Russ Gelinas)
Subject: stuff

The latest hops harvest *is* available from Freshops in Oregon. In fact, I
have 3 lbs. of the stuff just waiting to be used, and it looks pretty good.

I *think* I've finally got some Sierra Nevada yeast going. It took more than
a week to catch (from a single bottle), probably about 10 days, and I just
transferred it to a bigger bottle last night. Morale: be patient (I threw out
the previos attempt after 5-6 days).

Someone mentioned that Crystal malt will not add any fermentables. I thought
it did. I know that black and chocolate malt just add color (and some
flavor), but I thought crystal added sugars. Am I wrong?

What is this Babyl stuff?

Russ

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 11:31:07 -0500
>From: dbreiden@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
Subject: Re: Sam Smith Oatmeal Stout

gerald@caen mentioned his enjoyment of the Sam Smith Oatmeal Stout. I too bit
the economic bullet and gave the stuff a try, my overall impression was not
as favorable. My biggest gripe was the sulphery smell and taste. It was really
overpowering. Not so bad as to make me think it was a bad bottle, but enough
to make me think I won't drink the stuff again unless I'm in England. The
popular rumor is thaat this odor comes from preservitives. In general, I've
noticed this phenomenon with imports from oversead, and from Molson Export Ale.
But then, not all the imports have this. And why on earth would a brewery as
repected as Sam Smith put its beers in clear bottles??

I snarfed an oatmeal stout recipe off the digest a couple of months ago. I
don't recall who posted it. I haven't tried it yet, but I plan to. I'll defer
to the original poster of the recipe--he can again give it to the net if he
wants. If anyone is real anxious for it, email me aand I'll send it to you.

And at the risk of sounding like a whining child,I shall repeat my request for
any recipes for beers using coriander! I'd love to give it a try.

- --Danny Boy

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 08:44:15 PST
>From: Bob Devine 14-Nov-1990 0939 <devine@cookie.enet.dec.com>
Subject: hop plugs

A new packaging idea for hops has appeared - hop plugs. A plug is
about 2 inches in diameter of compressed hops. This means that the
hops aren't chopped as they are for pellets.

As anyone tried them and compared the results to pellets or leaf hops?

Bob Devine

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 08:31:48 PST
>From: Dave Resch <resch@cookie.enet.dec.com>
Subject: RE: Using Oak Chips

In digest #537 Rick Zucker writes about his use of oak chips in a Pilsner
beer. I recently purchased the "Pale Ale" book; the first of the "classic beer
styles" series being offered by the AHA. In that book Terry Foster talks about
the misconception that India Pale Ales should have an "oak" character. He states
that the English Oak used to transport pale ales to India did not impart an oak
flavor to the beer. He also describes a conversation with an English barrel
maker who says that he would NEVER make a barrel out of American Oak because of
the off flavors it would impart! I also saw or read somewhere that the Oak used
by the Pilsner Urquel Brewery does not impart any flavor to the beer and
personally, I cannot pick up any oak flavors in Pilsner Urquel.

The oak chips used by homebrewers are very likely American oak. If you like the
flavor they impart then go ahead and use them, but don't be mislead that you are
being more true to a "classic" style. Also, as Rick points out, when using the
chips it is probably best to use them very sparingly!

Dave

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 08:50:14 PST
>From: Bob Devine 14-Nov-1990 0943 <devine@cookie.enet.dec.com>
Subject: oak in beer

A English brewer when told about the attempts to use American oak chips
said "but that'll give it a horrible oak taste" (or words to that effect).
Apparently while oak casks do impart some taste to English beers, the
tree used is a *look* less resinous than American oak trees.

Bob Devine

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 11:10:59 CST
>From: jlf@poplar.cray.com (John Freeman)
Subject: Leaf hops

>
> I used leaf hops in my last batch. All other batches used pellets. The
> loose leaf hops made it difficult to siphon from the boiling kettle to the
> primary fermentation vessel. Do most people use cloth bags to contain the
> leaf hops? I ended up pouring the cooled wort throught the net bag in my
> sparging bucket.
>

I cut a hole in the lid of a 5 gallon pail that my kitchen colander
fits into nicely. Then I strain my wort through the colander. The
hops are collected in the colander (and I squeeze every bit of wort
out of them I can - I worked so hard to make that wort). Then its
ready for the wort chiller - right in the pail. I also primary ferment
right in the same pail. The hot wort sterilizes everything, so no
need to worry.

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 11:10:53 PST
>From: stuart@ads.com (Stuart Crawford)
Subject: Ugh! Something's growing in my Beer!


A few weeks ago, I decided to make a Scotch ale. I went through my normal
routine (probably my 15th batch), observing the appropriate sanitation
procedures. I used Wyeast British, and made a culture prior to addition to the
cooled wort. I got a rapid primary fermentation and, after a week, racked to a
glass carboy.

After about a week in the carboy, I noticed a white/beige film on the surface
of the wort. When I jiggled the carboy, this left a white film on the inner
surface of the glass. After another week, and closer inspection with a
magnifying glass and flashlight, the film looks almost like very tiny
particles.

It doesn't seem to be getting any worse, and doesn't seem to extend below the
surface.

Does this sound like a bacterial infection? A mold? How do I tell? Given the
high alcohol content of a Scotch ale, I'm a little surprised at this infection,
if that's what it is.

I'm wondering if I should taste the wort and, if it tastes ok, to rack and
bottle. Or perhaps I should just write the batch off and be more thorough with
respect to sanitation next time.

I'd appreciate any diagnoses/suggestions. Thanks,

Stuart

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 08:33:25 PST
>From: mcnally@wsl.dec.com
Subject: Mike Schrempp's mash questions


I've been brewing for a little while, and after my first extract batch
have gone exclusively all-grain. I treat Dave Miller's book as a
reference of almost divine stature (no flames, or I'll issue a Global
Death Warrant! :-) Anyway, Mike says he attempted to acidify his
sparge water with gypsum as "Miller recommends". I must point out that
this is in fact false---Miller recommends using either lactic or
phosphoric acid for this purpose. I managed to find USP lactic acid at
a chemical supply store and have been using it with success. It's a
little tricky (no, make that extremely tricky) to use with the
distilled water I employ (San Jose has pretty foul tasting water). As
an alleged ex food chemist told me, a tiny amount of acid in otherwise
ion-free water drops the pH radically. Maybe I should have stayed
awake during chemistry. Anyway, a small amount of calcium carbonate
(1/2 tsp in 4 gal. water) buffers the acid enough to give good control
while acidifying. I use a Nestor pH Pen, and once you get the hang of
using it it's quite convenient.

As far as clarity of runoff, what I've been doing is to directly
recycle about three gallons worth of mash water, then transfer some
water to holding pots on warm burners on the stove. This allows the
grain bed to settle a little. The recycling continues, shuttling from
the output tap to a saucepan then back to the tun. The runoff
eventually does get pretty clear; it's kinda scary.

The structure of the lauter tun is pretty important. Dave recommends a
grain bag approach, but I've been using a pair of plastic buckets I got
from a restaurant supply store, the inner one drilled with my
handy-dandy Dremel tool.
The runoff gets a little slow towards the end, but the process takes
not much more than an hour. Perhaps Mike's cloudiness is a result of
the small size of his batch: less grain means a shallower filter bed.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike McNally mcnally@wsl.dec.com
Digital Equipment Corporation
Western Software Lab

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 90 12:25:29 PST
>From: rush@xanadu.llnl.gov (Alan Edwards)
Subject: More Recipes Please

Hello fellow brewers:
I have been reading the HBD for about a month now, so if this has been
covered all-too-well in the past, please just point me to the appropriate
back issues, and I will try to get them.

Being a novice homebrewer (first batch is fermenting as I write this--
an Altbier), I would love to read about your favorite recipes, and why
they are your favorite. There doesn't seem to be many recipes posted
here.

If your favorite recipe is readily available (like if it is in Papazian's
book) a reference would be fine.

I am especially interested in Christmas type specialty brews. Also,
I don't see a recipe for Barleywine style in Charlie Papazian's book.
Does anyone have a malt extract recipe for that? (I am not up to trying
all-grain brews yet.) I recently bought some Young's "Old Nick" barleywine
and absolutely fell in love with it. I made a direct taste comparison
with Sierra Nevada "Bigfoot" barleywine, and found Young's to be better.

Thanks,
-Alan
rush@xanadu.llnl.gov (or rush%xanadu@lll-crg.llnl.gov)

------------------------------

Date: 14 Nov 90 17:26:00 EDT
>From: "FEINSTEIN" <crf@pine.circa.ufl.edu>
Subject: Various, incl. more mead info

Hi there!


**WOW!!** I sat down with my mead info today, all ready to post, and found a
number of other people had taken care of things for me! My sincerest thanks
to one and all!

Especially since it will make *this* shorter! :-)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON MEAD: Yes, starter cultures are an excellent idea.
The more so, since those little packets of dry yeast generally contain enough
for 5 gallons of whatever, and you may be making as little as one gallon. If
I'm going to use a starter, I generally dissolve several tablespoonfuls of
honey in warm water, in a clean jar, and add the yeast. The resulting starter
is usually good for days, if kept refrigerated until shortly before needed.

Also, don't forget that sweetness _vs._ dryness in meads is not only
controlled by the amount of honey added but also by the length of time the
mead is allowed to ferment. The longer the fermentation, the dryer the
result. IMHO, the longer you ferment the longer you'll need to age the stuff
before it's drinkable, as well.

Finally, for a book on mead I recommend _Making Mead_ by Acton and Duncan.
While I don't own a copy myself, for mead recipes that are more "beer-like" in
nature, the book by Papazian and Colonel [I forget the name] seems to be
popular.

LACTOBACILLUS: I work in the Dairy Science Dept. at UF. The professor who
specializes in this sort of thing is gone for the day as I write this, so I'll
double-check what I'm about to say ASAP. I would presume the "threads" being
seen in that batch of "CitS" are precipitated milk solids and proteins, such
as casein. It's rather like the separation of curds and whey once rennet has
been added to milk. At any rate, this is nothing to worry about.

SPENT GRAINS: Are a common source of cattle feed. Any cattle or dairy farmer
can tell you all about DDGs and BDGs-- Distillers' Dried Grains and Brewers
Dried Grains, respectively. For all I know, they are also used as a cereal
source in other domestic animals' feeds. Also, they can be mulched.

OAK CHIPS: I've been on the Anheuser-Busch brewery tour in Tampa. The
beechwood chips are introduced during the lagering process; maybe this is the
route to go with oak chips, too. Definitely, a possible answer is to boil the
chips for several hours, with several changes of water, to remove tannins.

LAST: BACKTRACKING A BIT: To those who corrected me where I was misinformed
about national contests, thank you. Particularly, I didn't know that only 4
contests a year were "Club Only".

About judging: many of you know that I'm a member of the SCA. As you may or
may not know further, the SCA holds lots of Arts and Sciences contests. I've
heard all the gripes about poor/unqualified judging before in that context. I
therefore find my reactions to this discussion similar.

Since there is no broad professional base to draw upon for judges, our
competitions (unlike, say, dog shows) are going to suffer from an
insufficiency of qualified personnel. It's going to be a long time, if ever,
before homebrewing and micro-brewing are big enough to change this. Not that
"professional" judges are necessarily any more competent, mind you!

Thus, I think all we can hope to do is to make things not perfect, or "right",
but rather as *equitable* as possible. For the most part, we are all amateurs
working together. This must be kept in mind and taken into account. That
being the case, it behooves those competing, those judging, and (perhaps most
importantly) those sponsoring/organizing competitions to keep pushing and
striving for constant improvement. And when that fails to happen, it behooves
those of us who enjoy rattling cages to do just that!


Yours in Carbonation,

Cher


"I wish to the Lord someone would figure out a way of makin' baskets out of
that ol' Kudzu vine; hit's 'bout to cover up Asheville!" -- Anon. NC woman
=============================================================================

Cheryl Feinstein INTERNET: CRF@PINE.CIRCA.UFL.EDU
Univ. of Fla. BITNET: CRF@UFPINE
Gainesville, FL


------------------------------

Date: Thursday, 15 Nov 1990 07:08:47 EST
>From: m14051@mwvm.mitre.org (John DeCarlo)
Subject: Re: Usefulness of blow-off

>From: BAUGHMANKR@CONRAD.APPSTATE.EDU

>Kevin Carpenter wonders about using 5 or 7 gallon carboys
>for primary fermentation. I strongly recommend using 5 gallon
>carboys so that you get some blow-off. I think you'll find that
>some of the residual astringency that lingers in the aftertaste
>of some homebrews will disappear with the blow-off system. If
>you have any doubts--as I've mentioned before--just scrape some
>of the brown crud that is left around the top of the primary
>fermenter and taste it.

I have heard this. I have also heard that using the blow-off
method doesn't really make any difference in the bitterness or
astringency of your brew (I need to look up my _zymurgy_ issues
on this). I know I have never skimmed or used blow-off, so can't
compare, but don't find any astringent tastes in my beer.

So, has anyone tried brewing two identical batches except for
blow-off?

Also, do any commercial brewers do any kind of blow-off or
skimming? Nothing of the sort was mentioned in any tours I have
taken.

Internet: jdecarlo@mitre.org
Usenet: @...@!uunet!hadron!blkcat!109!131!John_Decarlo
Fidonet: 1:109/131

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 15 Nov 90 08:02:29 mst
>From: cos.hp.com!hplabs!hp-lsd.cos.hp.com!mtgzy!vjb@hp-lsd (Victor J Bartash +1 201 957 5633)
Subject: partial mash

I just got on this mailing list this week so forgive me if
I am asking a worn out question. I have been making homebrew
for about 2 years. I started out with hopped kits
and cane sugar (yes the instructions said to use this) and
now use unhopped malt extracts, hop pellets, cracked
grains (via steeping when the water is cold to before it
boils) in my recipes. My last 7 or 8 batches have been
good. However, I have skimmed Miller's book
and the advance section of Papazian's book a few times
and am wondering about partial mashes. The question
is: does the beer improve significantly if partial
mashes are used instead of my current methods? I want
to decide if I should get the supplies necessary to do
partial mashes (using some of Miller's recipes) or keep
tweaking my current methods ( via new recipes or improvments on
some of my current favorites). I have never had a homebrew made
using partial mashing so I can't compare it my own homebrew.

Also, I am looking for a recipe that comes close to Pilsner Urquell.
I tried one in Papazain that mentioned that it was similar but
was not pleased. I picked some up last year and really
enjoyed the beer.

Vic Bartash


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 15 Nov 1990 12:25:13 EST
>From: ACS_JAMES@vax1.acs.jmu.edu
Subject: please add ACS_JAMES@JMUVAX1 to homebrew list


I tried to access the archives at mthvax.cs.miami.edu and was told
that the system did not recognize my IP address and would not let
me login. Any ideas?

James

------------------------------

Date: 15 Nov 90 01:08:49 MST (Thu)
>From: ico.isc.com!rcd@raven.eklektix.com (Dick Dunn)
Subject: mead yeast

a note in HBD 537 said...
>About yeast: always use a chablis, sauterne, or other white wine yeast.
>Montrechet seems to be the yeast of choice. Although generally considered a
>brew, modern ale yeasts will over-carbonate a mead, leading to glass grenades.
>I doubt lager yeasts would work at all. So, stick with wine yeast.

I don't buy this, primarily because I've used lager and ale yeasts with good
results. But consider the argument that an ale yeast will "over-carbonate
a mead"...my guess is that what happened to evoke this comment is not
letting the mead ferment out before bottling...if the ale yeast were less
tolerant of alcohol, it would slow down yet keep fermenting very slowly.
If you prime for a normal level of carbonation, and you've still got fer-
mentable sugar before priming, you've effectively over-primed and you get
over-carbonation if the yeast eventually eats it all. The strain of yeast
shouldn't increase carbonation--a given amount of fermentable sugar should
produce a given amount of CO2, as long as you let the fermentation com-
plete. A weak or alcohol-intolerant yeast might give up, leaving some
residual sugar and *less* CO2.
- ---
Dick Dunn rcd@raven.eklektix.com -or- raven!rcd


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 15 Nov 90 11:04:14 PST
>From: rush@xanadu.llnl.gov (Alan Edwards)
Subject: Fermenting Temperatures

G'day HB'ers:

I am in need of your expert advice. I found a great way to keep the
temperature of my fermenting ale pretty constant. I put the plastic
7 gallon bucket in my bathtub, and fill the tub with water. (I also
used this method to cool the wort before pitching the yeast.) Due to
the large heat capacity of water, the tub stays a pretty constant 69
degrees F (+/- 1 degree), with no help at all. I assume that the wort
which is mostly immersed in the water is about the same temperature.
This makes it easy to keep a check on the temperature by just leaving
my thermometer in the tub.

The question is: is 69 degrees OK for ale? The guidelines I have read
says that ale should be kept between 60-70. Since 69 is very close to
the upper limit, should I be concerned? Maybe I should drop an
occasional ice block into the tub? I'd rather not bother, but better
beer would be worth it.

Thanks alot,
-Alan
.------------------------------------.
| Alan Edwards: rush@xanadu.llnl.gov | I post...therefore I am.
| or: rush%xanadu@lll-crg.llnl.gov | ;-)
`------------------------------------'

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 15 Nov 90 19:33:35 GMT
>From: sbsgrad%sdphs2.span@Sds.Sdsc.Edu
Subject: Keg equipment

>From: "Sparky" <sslade@ucsd.edu> (Steve Slade)
Date sent: 15-NOV-1990 11:34:57 PT

Greetings!

Perhaps a month ago I posted a question about using a pony keg for my
homebrew and got no replies, so I guess no one out there has any experience
using pony kegs. Maybe I asked the wrong question. Let me try again.

Why do people use *soda* kegs for beer? Are they cheaper than beer kegs?
Easier to use? Or are beer kegs a real hassle for some reason? Before I
spend a lot of time and money rigging up a system for my pony keg, I would
like to know why so many homebrewers use soda kegs.

Thanks very much!

Sparky the puzzled

Internet: sslade@ucsd.edu UUCP: ...ucsd!sslade
Bitnet: sslade@ucsd.bitnet DECnet/SPAN: SDPH1::SBSGRAD

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 15 Nov 90 15:11:34 CST
>From: Mike Charlton <umcharl3@ccu.UManitoba.CA>
Subject: First All Grain

mike_schrempp%29@hp4200.desk.hp.com writes:

> Mash ph: When I measured my mash ph with those damn little papers, it was too
> low so I added some stuff (sodium bicarbonate, I think, but the stuff Miller
> says to use to raise the ph).

I think you probably mean calcium carbonate. It's much better than sodium
bicarbonate because bicarbonate ions tend to impart a bitter flavour to beer.
(or at least that's what I'm lead to believe -- We have almost none in our
water supply).

> I had a half size batch (for manageability) of
> Miller's Altbier, and I put in 1 tsp and couldn't get the ph up from 4.9.

1 tsp of Calcium Carbonate in 2 and a half gallons of beer is alot. I
would say that you have something in your water supply that is acting as
a pH buffer. I'm not really sure what you can do to increase the pH.
What is the pH of your water supply? Still 4.9 may be close enough
(although, you should still try to get it above 5). I wouldn't add that
much calcium carbonate, though.

> Sparge water ph: Miller reccommends acidifing the sparge water to 5.7 using
> gypsum. I tried this and couldn't get the ph down (those damn papers again).
> After od'ing a few gallons of water, I stopped trying to measure the ph and
> just added 1tsp of gypsum to my 2.5 gallons of sparge water.

Gypsum will not affect the pH of plain water. It only reacts with some
of the chemicals found in malt to make an acid, which in turn lowers the
pH of the wort. Our water supply has a pH of aroun 6.3. We add about
1/4 cup of diluted tartaric acid to the sparge water with no ill affects.
(I wouldn't use tartaric acid if you can help it -- re-read Miller's
section on acidifying sparge water for some better choices. This was all
we could get.)

> > "Clear" sparge runoff: What exactally is "clear"? I recycled my runoff many
> times (probably about 5 times), keeping them heated as Miller suggests. The
> runoff was always cloudy.

I usually get crystal clear runoff (although, I may be oversparging somewhat).
I try to recycle the entire contents of the sparge bucket once. Since I
add enough sparge water to to make 6 gallons, I recycle 6 gallons of sparge
water. Note this is my maximum. If it goes clear more quickly (which it
almost always does) I stop recycling. Also, my sparging system is a little
unorthodox in that I add the sparge water immediately (or at least as much
as will fit in the bucket). I'm thinking of altering this.

Your mash inefficiency could be due to many things. pH is a possibility,
although I doubt it. Did you to an iodine test? Despite what Miller
implies, these tests do tend to tell you when the end of starch condition
happens. Just try to keep the grains out when you are testing. Also, the
cloudiness of your runnoff could be the culprit. I suspect that your grainbed
was not large enough to make an efficient filter bed. This will be because
you were only making a small batch. What kind of lautering tun did you use?
Did you taste the spent grains? Were they sweet? Finally, if you end up with
a low gravity wort, making up the difference with malt extract is an
excellent choice.

> Whole hops: This was also my first time using whole hops. Should they be
> broken up?

No. They will remain whole throughout. This is normal. The added size
can also apparently help the hot break because of the added motion
(I am skeptical).

>
> Overall, everything went a lot smoother than I expected it would. For anyone
> wanting to get into all-grain I have two suggestions:
>
> 1. Make a half batch. the volumes of mash and wort are manageable (3 gallon
> boil vs 6 gallon boil).

I have to dissagree with this. A very small batch will probably give you
sparging problems (as you noticed). Unless you realize this and alter your
lautertun (like, by making it skinnier), you could have some difficulty.

> Mike Schrempp

Mike Charlton

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 15 Nov 90 14:41:24 PST
>From: Kevin Karplus <karplus@ararat.ucsc.edu>
Subject: Mead recipe

Several people have been asking about mead recipes lately. Here
is one I've used for years. Incidentally, the meads I like best
are strong dessert wines, with take over 5lbs of honey per gallon
of water. They take months to ferment and years to mature, but
they're great for sipping.

Mead
(a fermented drink made from honey)
Generic Recipe

The basic ingredients of mead are honey, water, and yeast. The
proportions of the honey and water determine the final strength and
sweetness of the drink, also how long it takes to make. The ratio
ranges from 1 lb. honey per gallon of water for a very light
"soft-drink" to 5 lbs. per gallon for a sweet dessert wine. The less
honey, the lighter the mead, and the quicker it can be made. I've
successfully made a 1 lb/gallon mead in as little as three weeks, while
my strongest mead (5 lb/gallon) was not bottled for six months, and
could have stood another few months before bottling. Elizabethan
recipes varied considerably in strength, but 3 or 4 pounds of honey per
gallon was common.

The mead I make is spiced, so is sometimes referred to as "metheglin."
Elizabethan meads used large numbers of different spices and herbs, but
not always in large quantities. Kenelm Digby, after giving the recipe
obtained from "Master Webbe, who maketh the Kings Meathe," has this to
say:

The Proportion of Herbs and Spices is this; That there be so
much as to drown the luscious sweetness of the Honey; but not so
much as to taste of herbs or spice, when you drink the Meathe.
But that the sweetness of the honey may kill their taste: And so
the Meathe have a pleasant taste, but not of herbs, nor spice,
nor honey. And therefore you put more or less according to the
time you will drink it in. For a great deal will be mellowed
away in a year, that would be ungratefully strong in three
months. And the honey that will make it keep a year or two,
will require a triple propotion of spice and herbs.

[The Closet of the Eminently Learned Sir Kenelm Digby Knight Opened,
1669]

Here is a partial list of flavoring agents (mainly herbs and spices)
mentioned for meads by Digby: agrimony, angelica root, avens, baulme
leaves, bay leaves, bettony, blew-button, borrage, cinnamon,
clove-gilly flowers, cloves, dock, eglantine, elecampane, eringo roots,
fennel, fruit juice (cherries, raspes, Morrello cherries), ginger,
harts-tongue, hopps, juniper berries, limon-pill, liver-worth, mace,
minth, nutmeg, orris root, parsley roots, raisins, red sage, rosemary,
saxifrage, scabious, sorrel, strawberry leaves, sweet marjoram,
sweet-briar leaves, thyme, violet leaves, wild marjoram, wild sage,
wild thyme, and winter savory.

In my own brewing, I use mainly "sweet" spices (cinnamon, ginger,
nutmeg). The main herb I use is tea. Tea is an important addition to
the mead. It provides tannic acid, to give the drink a bit of bite.
It is particularly important for sweet meads, which can otherwise have
a rather syrupy taste (like Mogen David wines). Any sort of tea will
do--I've used genmai cha (a very light Japanese green tea), lapsang
souchong (a smokey Chinese tea), China Rose (a black tea with rose
petals), jasmine, oolong, and others. If you want to use Lipton's,
that should work as well. I have not seen any period recipes that use
tea in mead, but all my batches that omitted tea were not as good.
I am more interested in producing good flavor that in strick
authenticity, so continue to use tea.

Other ingredients I use include small amounts of orange or lemon
juice, fruit, cloves, and other spices. I've used bay leaves, cloves,
rosemary, anise, and galingale, in addition to the spices listed above.
Be careful not to over-spice the mead! It is probably safer to use
less of fewer spices, until you've had some experience.

As examples, here are the quantities for two of my mead batches:

Batch: M4
Type: Quick Mead

3 gallons water
5 lbs honey (Wild Mountain)
1/3 cup jasmine tea
1/2 tsp ground ginger
2 tsp cinnamon
1/2 tsp ground allspice
1/2 tsp ground cloves
1/2 tsp ground nutmeg
ale yeast

Started: 1 July 1979
Yeast added: 2 July 1979
skimmed: 12 July 1979
racked: 15 July 1979
bottled: 28 July 1979

yield: 3.1 gallons
clarity: excellent
sweetness: fairly sweet
sediment: slight
carbonation: variable (some popped corks)
color: light gold
An excellent batch

- ------------------------------------------------------------
Batch: M7
Type: Sack Mead

3 gallons Water
16 lbs honey
1/4 cup keemun tea
1/4 cup oolong tea
2 tsp cinnamon
1/2 tsp whole aniseseed
18 cardamum seed clusters crushed (about 1 tsp)
20 whole allspice slightly crushed (about 3/4 tsp)
about 1 inch galingale root crushed (about 2 1/4 tsp)

(Fining agent: 1 pkg unflavored gelatin in 1 cup of water)

Started: 26 Dec 1981
Wine Yeast added: 27 Dec 1981
1 rack: 10 Jan 1982 (vat -> carboy)
2 rack: 31 Jan 1982 (carboy -> carboy)
3 rack: 30 April 1982 (carboy->carboy)
gelatin added: 23 May 1982
bottled: 3 July 1982
Yield: 3.7 gallons

Comments:
sweet, smooth, potent. A dessert wine.
This is perhaps the best of my 20 or more batches of mead.
- ------------------------------------------------------------

I use tap water for brewing, but if your tap water has off-flavors,
then you might want to get a bottle of clear spring water.
Recently I've switched to filtered tap water, to remove some of the
rather grassy flavor that our water gets in summer.

The honey may be almost any cheap honey. Strongly flavored honeys
(orange blossom, buckwheat, wild flower (in some areas)) generally work
best. Clover honey works well, but very light honeys (like alfalfa)
generally lack flavor. If making a true mead (without spices), the
flavor of the honey is more important, and only strongly flavored
honeys should be used.

The yeast is important. Baking yeast is bred for fast carbon dioxide
production, and is not at all suitable for brewing. Some home cider
makers may be used to just letting the sweet cider stand a few days to
ferment on its own. This technique relies on the wild yeasts present
in the air, on the cider press, and on the skins of the apples. It
doesn't work for mead. The wild yeasts result in off-flavors, which
the honey is not strong enough to mask. For strong, still meads (3 lbs
honey/gallon or more) I use a white wine yeast, while for a lighter
beverage I use ale yeast. A beer yeast should work as well as an ale
yeast, but I find top-fermenting ale yeasts more fun to work with.
WARNING: the "brewer's yeast" sold in health-food stores is dead yeast,
it will not be usable for brewing.

The equipment you need is a large pot (I use a 20 quart canning pot), a
5 foot plastic tube to use as a siphon, and strong bottles. In
addition, a 5 gallon water bottle with a stopper and fermentation lock
is a very useful piece of equipment. Everything you use should be
sterilized to prevent the growth of vinegar-forming bacteria. There
are chemical sterilizing agents available from wine-making supply
stores, but I prefer to sterilize everything in boling water. I'll
mention sterilizing over and over. It is the single most important
part of brewing mead rather than vinegar.

If making a still, wine-type mead, any sort of bottle will do for the
final bottling. However, this recipe is for a fizzy "ale-type" mead,
so strong bottles are essential. Champagne bottles and returnable pop
bottles are usable, disposable bottles of any sort are not. I once had
an apple juice bottle explode in my room, embedding shrapnel in my
pillow from 9 feet away. Don't make the same mistake--use strong
bottles!!

Steps to making the mead:

1. Boil the water, adding the tea and spices.

2. Remove water from heat and stir in honey. (Note, stirring
implement should be sterilized!) Some mead brewers boil the honey in
the water, skimming the scum as it forms. This removes some of the
proteins from the honey, making it easier for the mead to clarify.
However, I don't mind a bit of cloudiness, and prefer the taste of
unboiled honey. If you are making a wine mead, you can avoid the
cloudiness simply by waiting an extra month or two for the mead to
clarify. If you're buying a clear honey from a supermarket, it may
already have been cooked a bit to remove pollen and sugar crystals, in
which case, a bit more cooking probably won't change the flavor much.
Digby's recipes do call for boiling the honey.

3. Cover the boiled water, and set it aside to cool (to blood
temperature or cooler). This usually takes a long time, so I overlap
it with the next step.

4. Make a yeast starter solution by boiling a cup of water and a
tablespoon of honey (or sugar). Let it cool to blood heat (or all the
way to room temperature) and add the yeast. Cover it and let it
ferment overnight. The yeast should form a "bloom" on the surface of
the liquid. (Of course, the cooling and fermenting should be done in
the pan or other sterilized vessel.)

5. Add the yeast starter to the cooled liquid. Cover and let ferment.
After a few days, it is useful to siphon the mead into another
container, leaving the sediment behind. Here's where the 5 gallon
bottle comes in handy. A fermentation lock provides a way to close the
bottle so carbon dioxide can get out, but vinegar-forming bacteria and
oxygen cannot get in. Remember to sterilize the bottle and the siphon
first!

6. Ferment for a few weeks in a warm, dry place. When a lot of
sediment has collected on the bottom of the bottle, siphon off the
liquid (without disturbing the sediment). This process is known as
"racking," and helps produce a clear, sediment-free mead. Again, make
sure all your equipment is sterilized. A wine mead may need to be
racked three or four times before the final bottling.

7. For a fizzy mead, siphon into strong (sterilized) bottles a bit
before fermentation stops. With the strength given here 4 weeks is
about right. The exact time depends a lot on the temperature, the
yeast, the honey, ... . I use plastic champagne corks to seal the
bottles (sterilized, of course!). Crown caps are also good. Real
corks should only be used for still beverages, since the amount of
carbonation is unpredictable. Too much carbonation and you'll pop the
corks, too little, and corks are hard to remove from champagne
bottles. Don't wire on the corks, unless you're willing to risk an
occasional broken champagne bottle. Still meads should not be bottled
until fermentation has completely stopped. I generally wait until the
fermentation has stopped, and the mead has cleared. This can take more
than six months for a strong wine mead.

8. Age the mead in a cool place. Note: ferment warm, and age cool. I
sometimes keep the champagne bottles upright in the cardboard box they
came in. That way, if a cork pops, there is something to absorb the
overflow, and if, despite my care, a bottle breaks, it won't set off a
chain reaction.

9. Drink and Enjoy! The light quick meads should be served chilled
(like beer), while the wine types are better at room temperature or
only slightly chilled.

------------------------------


End of HOMEBREW Digest #538, 11/16/90
*************************************
-------

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT