Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

HOMEBREW Digest #0159

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
HOMEBREW Digest
 · 6 months ago

 
HOMEBREW Digest #159 Thu 25 May 1989

FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Rob Gardner, Digest Coordinator

Contents:
Re: Short Boil OK (Dr. T. Andrews)
lagering (uiucdcs!att!iwtio!korz)
Introduction and a Few Questions (Jim Somerville)

Send submissions to homebrew%hpfcmr@hplabs.hp.com
Send requests to homebrew-request%hpfcmr@hplabs.hp.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 May 89 7:25:19 EDT
From: Dr. T. Andrews <tanner@ki4pv>
Subject: Re: Short Boil OK

) This gentleman stated that he felt that single stage was better and
) the goal was to reduce the amount of trub formed. He stated that if
) you limit your boil to 20 minutes their [sic] would not be as much
) chance for the protein to coagulate; thus less trub.
Ahem. I beg to differ on short boil periods, even with extracts.
There are several things being accomplished with the boil. One of
the most important is bringing out the hops; you want to get the oils
as well exposed to the water as you can. A longer boil period allows
you to get a better hops flavour. Adding your own hops of course
makes this argument even stronger.

By boiling the stuff, and racking as in a two-stage ferment, you get
rid of them. When you rack (strongly advised: I always use the two
stage method, and get clear beer this way) you also get rid of a fair
load of dead yeast. I rack again at bottling time, not bottling from
the carboy (with its own accumulation of dead yeast) but from a
bucket sterilized for the purpose.

Dr. T. Andrews, Systems
CompuData, Inc. DeLand
--
...!bikini.cis.ufl.edu!ki4pv!tanner ...!bpa!cdin-1!cdis-1!ki4pv!tanner
or... {allegra killer gatech!uflorida decvax!ucf-cs}!ki4pv!tanner

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 24 May 89 11:30:13 CDT
From: hplabs!uiucdcs!att!iwtio!korz
Subject: lagering

>HOMEBREW Digest #158 Wed 24 May 1989
>From: noah@june.cs.washington.edu (Rick Noah Zucker)
>Subject: Lagering (was Re: Sam Adams Doppelbock)
>
> The word lager means to store in german. The reason this beer
>style is called lager (which applies to all bottom fermented beers) is
>that it was stored (lagered) in caves that were colder than above ground
>temperatures. This allowed bottom fermentation to be used.

Yes and no. Yeasts which can withstand colder temperatures, the first of
which was discovered by Carlsberg (see elsewhere in HD#158), are what make
lagering necessary. These types of yeasts, which are now commonly called
lager yeasts, could ferment at colder temperatures and subsequently produce
less by-products such as esters. This resulted in a beer flavor that we
associate with lager beer. The colder temps required longer brewing
periods and the beer had to be stored (in german, lagered). The only reason
I said no is that you could use lager (bottom fermenting) yeast at higher
(ale) temps and get good tasting beer - but it would not taste like lager.
Anchor Steam beer (San Francisco, CA) is brewed with lager yeast at warmer
(more ale-like) temperatures.

Al.

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 24 May 89 18:10:39 EDT
From: hplabs!rutgers!gpu.utcs.toronto.edu!utai!gpu.utcs.toronto.edu!bnr-vpa!bnr-rsc!jim (Jim Somerville)
Subject: Introduction and a Few Questions

Hi Everyone

My name is Jim Somerville. I have been brewing for about a year
now, my last batch being a dry malt powder and honey brew. The
alcohol content is quite high >7% by my estimates. Is this
normal for having started with 30% honey? I have been drinking
it for a few days now, but the one I had last night had a strange
mouth feel, which can best be described as kind of gelatinously
slimy. Any ideas as to what causes this? I boiled the wort for
an hour as usual, and there was quite a lot of trub at the
bottom of the primary (I use 2 stage fermentation). Could serving
temperature have anything to do with it?

My guess is that it is caused by the dry malt powder. I have
noticed that some recipes call for dextrine malt. Is it the
same stuff as "brewbody"? The dry powder I used was not brewbody.

On the topic of sanitation, is it worth boiling the bottlecaps?

On the topic of yeast, should a person bother to add yeast
nutrient to an all malt batch?

If someone is keeping a canonical list of questions and answers,
please send it to me.

-Jim

------------------------------

End of HOMEBREW Digest #159, 05/25/89

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT