Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Lambic Digest V1 #015
Return-Path: owner-lambic-digest at realbeer.com
Received: from srvr20.engin.umich.edu (root at srvr20.engin.umich.edu [141.212.2.26])
by srvr5.engin.umich.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA11355
for <spencer at srvr5.engin.umich.edu>; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:12:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: owner-lambic-digest at realbeer.com
Received: from twins.rs.itd.umich.edu (0 at twins.rs.itd.umich.edu [141.211.83.39])
by srvr20.engin.umich.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA19085
for <spencer at engin.umich.edu>; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:12:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from root at localhost)
by twins.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.7.5/2.2) with X.500 id BAA20857; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:12:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from realbeer.realbeer.com ([204.152.97.15])
by twins.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.7.5/2.2) with ESMTP id BAA20817; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:12:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mbin at localhost) by realbeer.realbeer.com (8.8.3/8.6.6) id VAA06063 for lambic-digest-outgoing; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 21:14:28 -0700
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 21:14:28 -0700
Message-Id: <199709160414.VAA06063 at realbeer.realbeer.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: realbeer.realbeer.com: mbin set sender to owner-lambic-digest using -f
To: lambic-digest at realbeer.realbeer.com
Subject: lambic-digest V1 #15
Reply-To: lambic-digest at realbeer.com
Errors-To: owner-lambic-digest at realbeer.com
Precedence: bulk
lambic-digest Monday, 15 September 1997 Volume 01 : Number 015
more 3278 data
Re: lambic-digest V1 #14
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jim Liddil <JLIDDIL at AZCC.Arizona.EDU>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 11:14:34 -0700 (MST)
Subject: more 3278 data
I have only cultured one bacteria from the 3278 blend. This is a motile, Gram
(+) rod. The plates that have cyclohexamide are taking their time growing
colonies. cylclohexamide inihibits the growth of "normal" brewing yeast.
Microscopic examination of the package contents does indicate that some "wild"
yeast are present. I have not done viability testing on the package contents
directly. Also a starter made fromt he contents has a large amount of yeast
and very little of the bacteria is growing.
I think that is all I'll say here about this. If people have questions they
can contact me via private e-mail.
Jim
------------------------------
From: Scott Bickham <bickham at dave.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 15:08:59 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: lambic-digest V1 #14
John Isenhour wrote:
>
> I'll even go out on a limb and suggest that hops are not all that
> important for our type of lambic style brewing. I'd be willing to try a
> small batch (5-10 gallons) with no hops at all.
Been there, done that. Ironically, that was one batch where the
judges knocked off for the hop aroma. I personally could tell no
difference in the flavor, since the small IBU level is not enough
to significantly affect the performance of the pedio. I also sometimes
use a small quantity of spent hops from a previous batch, since I
often brew more than one batch on a brew day.
Scott
------------------------------
End of lambic-digest V1 #15
***************************
