Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Lambic Digest V1 #030
Return-Path: owner-lambic-digest at realbeer.com
Received: from srvr22.engin.umich.edu (root at srvr22.engin.umich.edu [141.212.2.35])
by srvr5.engin.umich.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA18077
for <spencer at srvr5.engin.umich.edu>; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 17:14:11 -0500 (EST)
From: owner-lambic-digest at realbeer.com
Received: from twins.rs.itd.umich.edu (0 at twins.rs.itd.umich.edu [141.211.83.39])
by srvr22.engin.umich.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA02949
for <spencer at engin.umich.edu>; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 17:14:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from root at localhost)
by twins.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.8.6/2.2) with X.500 id RAA24776; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 17:14:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from realbeer.realbeer.com (realbeer.com [204.152.97.15])
by twins.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.8.6/2.2) with ESMTP id RAA24757; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 17:14:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mbin at localhost) by realbeer.realbeer.com (8.8.3/8.6.6) id OAA07527 for lambic-digest-outgoing; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 14:00:49 -0800
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 14:00:49 -0800
Message-Id: <199711122200.OAA07527 at realbeer.realbeer.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: realbeer.realbeer.com: mbin set sender to owner-lambic-digest using -f
To: lambic-digest at realbeer.realbeer.com
Subject: lambic-digest V1 #30
Reply-To: lambic-digest at realbeer.com
Errors-To: owner-lambic-digest at realbeer.com
Precedence: bulk
lambic-digest Wednesday, 12 November 1997 Volume 01 : Number 030
Re: lambic-digest V1 #29
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: MITCHBC at aol.com
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 23:07:37 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: lambic-digest V1 #29
Dear lambic digest
I work in both the alcohol retail and wholesale market - specializing, in
part, in domestic and imported craft brews - and the naming of products is
not only confusing at times for those who are in the industry, but the
consumer can be totally confused with broad and unreasonable naming. It
would be an advantageous step to move forward with a standardization of
styles and better defining or restrictions and regulation of names and their
use in marketing. One man's hefe is certainly not another's weizen.
Could this ever be implemented?
It would be difficult to pin down, and it is pretty obvious that we do not
need any more imput from government agencies. Only a strong movement within
the industry - at all levels - but particularly with the producers could
there be a better standardization of terms. It would make all of our lives
just that much easier, but perhaps a tad less interesting?
Cheers -
Mitch
------------------------------
End of lambic-digest V1 #30
***************************
