Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

Lambic Digest #0973

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
Lambic Digest
 · 8 months ago

Return-Path: postmaster at engr.colostate.edu 
Received: from srvr7.engin.umich.edu (root at srvr7.engin.umich.edu [141.212.2.69]) by srvr5.engin.umich.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA26718 for <spencer at srvr5.engin.umich.edu>; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 02:55:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from redheat.rs.itd.umich.edu (redheat.rs.itd.umich.edu [141.211.83.36]) by srvr7.engin.umich.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA20276 for <spencer at engin.umich.edu>; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 02:55:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: by redheat.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.7.5/2.2)
with X.500 id CAA17203; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 02:55:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from longs.engr.colostate.edu by redheat.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.7.5/2.2)
with SMTP id CAA17199; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 02:55:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: (daemon at localhost) by longs.engr.colostate.edu (8.6.12/8.6.5a (LANCE Revision: 1.3)) id AAA04784 for reallambic at longs.engr.colostate.edu; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 00:30:07 -0700
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 00:30:07 -0700
Message-Id: <199611040730.AAA04784 at longs.engr.colostate.edu>
From: lambic-request at engr.colostate.edu (subscription requests only - do not post here)
To: lambic at engr.colostate.edu
Reply-to: lambic at engr.colostate.edu (postings only - do not send subscription requests here)
Errors-to: lambic-request at engr.colostate.edu
Subject: Lambic Digest #973 (November 04, 1996)






Lambic Digest #973 Mon 04 November 1996




Forum on Lambic Beers (and other Belgian beer styles)
Mike Sharp, Digest Coordinator




Contents:
Tripel progress (Kenny Lefkowitz)




Send article submissions only to: lambic at engr.colostate.edu
Send all other administrative requests (subscribe/unsubscribe/change) to:
lambic-request at engr.colostate.edu
Note that the request address is not an automated server. It forwards
to a real person who may not be able to process the request immediately.
Subscription changes often take 2-5 days, sometimes more.

Back issues are available by mail; send empty message with subject 'HELP' to:
netlib at engr.colostate.edu
Phil Seitz' series on Brewing Belgian Beer is available; the index
from the archives lists individual topics and the complete set.
Start with the help message above then request the index.
A FAQ is also available by netlib; say 'send faq from lambic' as the
subject or body of your message (to netlib at engr.colostate.edu).
A new FAQ is under construction at:
http://www-leland.stanford.edu/~jeremybb/lambic/lambic.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 13:48:06 -0500
From: Kenny Lefkowitz <lefty at vt.edu>
Subject: Tripel progress






Hello Dan and all,


I learned last night that myself and 2 other brewers in the viscinity have
had tripels (made with pilsner malt and candi sugar) brewed with the
Westmalle yeast stop fermenting at approximately 1.050. After reading Dan
Mc Connell's post (thanks again for the help!) I have learned we all
severely underpitched. Anyhow, last night I pitched the slurry from a 5
gallon batch of triple brewed with Westmalle yeast into my 1/2 BBL batch of
tripel. I am happy to report it is off and running again. :)


Here is an interesting note. Hopefully someone knows the answer to this.
In the past 2 weeks 3 brews made by different people (myself included) have
had triples (at approximately 1.080 OG) stop fermenting at 1.050. Another
brewer made a triple with LME and candi sugar (~13%) and used the Westmalle
yeast. Again he underpitched. In fact he most severely underpitched of the
4 tripels brewed. His tripel fermented down to 1.020 in 7 days. All the
whole grain based tripels stuck at around 1.050. Why do you think the
extract based tripel fermented down while the others did not?


Just curious. TIA


Kenny L.


>------------------------------
>
>Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 08:29:07 -0500
>From: danmcc at umich.edu (Daniel S. McConnell/DSMBook)
>Subject: correction
>
>I wrote:
>>This is low for a 10P (1.040)
>>gravity beer. I would have pitched 2-3 times that amount in a 10P beer let
>>alone a 40P beer. You really need to be pitching at least 15-20 M cells/mL
>>in a triple.
>
>Lets make that:
>I would have pitched 2-3 times that amount in a 10P beer let alone a 20P beer.
>
>
>DanMcC
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>
>End of Lambic Digest
>************************
>-------
>
>




------------------------------




End of Lambic Digest
************************
-------

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT