Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

Lambic Digest #0938

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
Lambic Digest
 · 11 Apr 2024

Return-Path: postmaster at engr.colostate.edu 
Received: from srvr8.engin.umich.edu (root at srvr8.engin.umich.edu [141.212.2.81]) by srvr5.engin.umich.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA21727 for <spencer at srvr5.engin.umich.edu>; Sat, 14 Sep 1996 02:59:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from totalrecall.rs.itd.umich.edu (totalrecall.rs.itd.umich.edu [141.211.144.16]) by srvr8.engin.umich.edu (8.7.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA16434 for <spencer at engin.umich.edu>; Sat, 14 Sep 1996 02:59:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by totalrecall.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.7.5/2.3)
with X.500 id CAA17458; Sat, 14 Sep 1996 02:59:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from longs.lance.colostate.edu by totalrecall.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.7.5/2.3)
with SMTP id CAA17454; Sat, 14 Sep 1996 02:59:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (daemon at localhost) by longs.lance.colostate.edu (8.6.12/8.6.5a (LANCE Revision: 1.3)) id AAA16872 for reallambic at longs.lance.colostate.edu; Sat, 14 Sep 1996 00:30:09 -0600
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 00:30:09 -0600
Message-Id: <199609140630.AAA16872 at longs.lance.colostate.edu>
From: lambic-request at engr.colostate.edu (subscription requests only - do not post here)
To: lambic at engr.colostate.edu
Reply-to: lambic at engr.colostate.edu (postings only - do not send subscription requests here)
Errors-to: lambic-request at engr.colostate.edu
Subject: Lambic Digest #938 (September 14, 1996)






Lambic Digest #938 Sat 14 September 1996




Forum on Lambic Beers (and other Belgian beer styles)
Mike Sharp, Digest Coordinator




Contents:
Of Corks, Pellicles, and Marriage (Rick Kessler)




Send article submissions only to: lambic at engr.colostate.edu
Send all other administrative requests (subscribe/unsubscribe/change) to:
lambic-request at engr.colostate.edu
Note that the request address is not an automated server. It forwards
to a real person who may not be able to process the request immediately.
Subscription changes often take 2-5 days, sometimes more.

Back issues are available by mail; send empty message with subject 'HELP' to:
netlib at engr.colostate.edu
Phil Seitz' series on Brewing Belgian Beer is available; the index
from the archives lists individual topics and the complete set.
Start with the help message above then request the index.
A FAQ is also available by netlib; say 'send faq from lambic' as the
subject or body of your message (to netlib at engr.colostate.edu).
A new FAQ is under construction at:
http://www-leland.stanford.edu/~jeremybb/lambic/lambic.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Fri Sep 13 08:39:43 1996
From: <rick at NJ06mon.house.gov> (Rick Kessler)
Subject: Of Corks, Pellicles, and Marriage


I just had my first bottle of Boon Marriage Parfait 1989 last night. As
far as I know, it has just recently come to the Washington, DC area. It
was truly a great beer and far better than the standard Boon Kriek. I
must get more of this. Ah, but is the $10.00 better spent on that or
Cuvee Rene or Marriage Parfait Gueze? The choices around here seem to
get better and better. If only we could get Hansens here, too.


I was very interested in to learn about the study of Champagne aging
recently posted. I have laid down for aging a bottle of Cuvee Rene, a
bottle of Chimay Grande Reserve, and a bottle of Cantillion Gueze that I
brought back from the brewery last year. It occurs to me that although
there are many similarities between champagne and lambic bottling, there
are some distinct differences. For instance, some gueze is bottled with
a straight wine-type cork and then capped. Would it be better to stand
this up or lie this down given the shape of the cork and the addition of
the cap. On the other hand, Chimay has a cork that is very similar to
champagne, but the beer lacks the acidity of champagne and gueze --so,
lay it down or stand it up? It would great to get a discussion going on
this since I'm sure I'm far from the only one who's currently aging
bottles of beer.


On a quick, final note, I just took a look at my latest batch of plambic
which recently turned 7 months old. It's got a great pellicle on it and
while I'd love to taste it, I'm too afraid of ruining that pellicle. The
plambic is sitting in a glass fermenter on top of oak chips and it has
never been racked. It was started with a Wyeast brett culture, cooper
ale yeast, and dregs from bottles of Boon Gueze, Cantillion Gueze, and my
own pframboise. I think I will probably wait until February and then
blend 4 out of 5 gallons of the stuff with the one gallon of plambic I
have left over from my previous batch. The extra gallon will be about 3
years old by that time and should be about right for blending, although I
havent tasted it in about 2 years. Anybody see anything wrong with this
game plan?


Thanks,


Rick




------------------------------




End of Lambic Digest
************************
-------

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT