Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

Lambic Digest #0946

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
Lambic Digest
 · 8 months ago

Return-Path: postmaster at engr.colostate.edu 
Received: from srvr8.engin.umich.edu (root at srvr8.engin.umich.edu [141.212.2.81]) by srvr5.engin.umich.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA01783 for <spencer at srvr5.engin.umich.edu>; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 02:56:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from redheat.rs.itd.umich.edu (redheat.rs.itd.umich.edu [141.211.83.36]) by srvr8.engin.umich.edu (8.7.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA03688 for <spencer at engin.umich.edu>; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 02:56:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by redheat.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.7.5/2.2)
with X.500 id CAA03900; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 02:56:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from longs.lance.colostate.edu by redheat.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.7.5/2.2)
with SMTP id CAA03890; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 02:56:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (daemon at localhost) by longs.lance.colostate.edu (8.6.12/8.6.5a (LANCE Revision: 1.3)) id AAA16330 for reallambic at longs.lance.colostate.edu; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 00:30:15 -0600
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 00:30:15 -0600
Message-Id: <199609240630.AAA16330 at longs.lance.colostate.edu>
From: lambic-request at engr.colostate.edu (subscription requests only - do not post here)
To: lambic at engr.colostate.edu
Reply-to: lambic at engr.colostate.edu (postings only - do not send subscription requests here)
Errors-to: lambic-request at engr.colostate.edu
Subject: Lambic Digest #946 (September 24, 1996)






Lambic Digest #946 Tue 24 September 1996




Forum on Lambic Beers (and other Belgian beer styles)
Mike Sharp, Digest Coordinator




Contents:
lactic vs. acetic (korz)




Send article submissions only to: lambic at engr.colostate.edu
Send all other administrative requests (subscribe/unsubscribe/change) to:
lambic-request at engr.colostate.edu
Note that the request address is not an automated server. It forwards
to a real person who may not be able to process the request immediately.
Subscription changes often take 2-5 days, sometimes more.

Back issues are available by mail; send empty message with subject 'HELP' to:
netlib at engr.colostate.edu
Phil Seitz' series on Brewing Belgian Beer is available; the index
from the archives lists individual topics and the complete set.
Start with the help message above then request the index.
A FAQ is also available by netlib; say 'send faq from lambic' as the
subject or body of your message (to netlib at engr.colostate.edu).
A new FAQ is under construction at:
http://www-leland.stanford.edu/~jeremybb/lambic/lambic.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Mon, 23 Sep 96 10:01:56 CDT
From: korz at pubs.ih.lucent.com
Subject: lactic vs. acetic


Russell writes (quoting Jim):
>> Lactic and acetic acid do have different flavor (NOT TASTE) qualties.
>
>I'm not sure I know what the difference between flavor and taste is.
>This stuff reminds me more of a Boon Gueze, which I think is more on
>the lactic range, than of a Cantillon, which I think of as more acetic.
>Am I wrong? Oh, what to do.


The correlation is not so simple. Various batches of both of these
brewers' beers vary in lactic and acetic acid levels. I believe it was
in Guinard's book that it was written that "hard" lambic is one which
is high in acetic acid (as well as being high in lactic) and "soft"
lambic is one in which the acidity is mostly from lactic acid. I
agree with Jim that lactic and acetic have different flavours (not
tastes)... this is primarily because acetic acid has a strong aroma
(smell vinegar) and lactic acid has virtually no aroma (smell 88%
lactic acid).


I have had some very hard lambics in Brussels (I don't have my notes
here, so I can't tell you which ones), but in general, the Boon and
Cantillon are usually somewhere in the middle (IMO). Sometimes they
will have a harder batch or year, but in most of the bottles, I don't
smell a lot of acetic acid in them.


As for the difference between flavour and taste, taste is just the
four (sweet, salty, sour and bitter). Flavour is a blend of taste
and aroma.


I'm beginning to think that some aromas are not smelled very well
through the nose and they become apparent only when you swish them
around in your mouth and the aromatics reach your smell sensors
"from the inside." This is just a theory, so don't go trouncing
on it or publishing it as if it was law.


Al.


------------------------------




End of Lambic Digest
************************
-------

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT