Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

Lambic Digest #0782

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
Lambic Digest
 · 8 months ago

Return-Path: postmaster at lance.colostate.edu 
Received: from srvr8.engin.umich.edu (root at srvr8.engin.umich.edu [141.212.2.81]) by srvr5.engin.umich.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA12619 for <spencer at srvr5.engin.umich.edu>; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 04:16:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from judgmentday.rs.itd.umich.edu (judgmentday.rs.itd.umich.edu [141.211.83.37]) by srvr8.engin.umich.edu (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id EAA13003 for <spencer at engin.umich.edu>; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 04:14:13 -0500
Received: by judgmentday.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.7.1/2.2)
with X.500 id EAA04416; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 04:01:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from longs.lance.colostate.edu by judgmentday.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.7.1/2.2)
with SMTP id EAA04411; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 04:01:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: (daemon at localhost) by longs.lance.colostate.edu (8.6.12/8.6.5a (LANCE Revision: 1.3)) id AAA05662 for reallambic at longs.lance.colostate.edu; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 00:30:06 -0700
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 00:30:06 -0700
Message-Id: <199602070730.AAA05662 at longs.lance.colostate.edu>
From: lambic-request at lance.colostate.edu (subscription requests only - do not post here)
To: lambic at lance.colostate.edu
Reply-to: lambic at lance.colostate.edu (postings only - do not send subscription requests here)
Errors-to: lambic-request at lance.colostate.edu
Subject: Lambic Digest #782 (February 07, 1996)






Lambic Digest #782 Wed 07 February 1996




Forum on Lambic Beers (and other Belgian beer styles)
Mike Sharp, Digest Coordinator




Contents:
Acetobacter pathways (BrewsMead)
Sachromyces diastaticus (wyatt)
Re: Copyright ("Paul A. Hausman")
send index (wyatt)




Send article submissions only to: lambic at longs.lance.colostate.edu
Send all other administrative requests (subscribe/unsubscribe/change) to:
lambic-request at longs.lance.colostate.edu
Note that the request address is not an automated server. It forwards
to a real person who may not be able to process the request immediately.
Subscription changes often take 2-5 days, sometimes more.

Back issues are available by mail; send empty message with subject 'HELP' to:
netlib at longs.lance.colostate.edu
Phil Seitz' series on Brewing Belgian Beer is available; the index
from the archives lists individual topics and the complete set.
Start with the help message above then request the index.
A FAQ is also available by netlib; say 'send faq from lambic' as the
subject or body of your message (to netlib at longs.lance.colostate.edu).


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 06:11:34 -0800
From: BrewsMead at eworld.com
Subject: Acetobacter pathways


>From what experience I have here and reading up on the subject ,it seems that
acetobacter are ethanol tolerant and will reduce it to vinegar if no
competing mechanism stops them from doing so. My beers have gone all the way
to vinegar and alas ,in my misery, I dumped it before giving it to the wife
to bottle for friends as XMAS presents. The other beers that have won awards
for sour styles have gone partway to that level and stopped ?


I have not checked those for ph or GC'ed for organic constituent content but
I suppose from tasting them at different times of the year and different
cellar temps, that the competing microbes ,as in malolactic fermenters ,are
taking over and killing off the acetobacter as well as other beasties to
smooth out the flavor profile. Lucky me I suppose but maybe all those little
tricks that this cellar throws me allow my brewing style to flourish as in
the Zenne valley


While being a technically competent brewer and from years of pilot plant anal
retentiveness ,I can assure you all of such, IT STILL MEANS SQUAT IN THIS
ENVIRONMENT OF AIRBORNE MICROFLORA . The newest trick I'll be attempting is
to go totally closed from hot side boiler to primary to secondary to serving
keg.


If that works and I can get stable results of normal beers then my technique
will be flawless but the art will be gone ....and the fun!


It still doesn't explain the acetobacter theory but I'll take the luck of the
draw and live with it. I do know for sure that it's more prevalent in the
summer when the cellar gets to 62 or so and the air is full of nasties. I've
had good weizen turn in 3 weeks after racking from secondary to serving keg.



Several other brewers up here in Maine had problems this past summer when it
was very dry and beers went south for no reason and no change in their
brewing styles. Kit Anderson may be lurking here and could refresh my memory
as to whether it was sourness or another vile indicator that the beer was
funked. That's all for now from here . Brews


------------------------------


Date: Tue, 06 Feb 96 11:04:45 pst
From: wyatt at Latitude.COM
Subject: Sachromyces diastaticus



Hello All,

I was looking through the catalog from Head Start and noticed
Sachromyces diastaticus(sp). Has anyone used this culture? The
description doesn't sound too inviting although it does state that it
was isolated from lambik and also that it is a super attenuator and to
used only by experienced brewers. It also states that it is a heavy
producer of phenolics. As most Sachromyces species contribute little
to the flavor, I wondered about this yeast. Would the phenolics age
out? I didn't buy this one but I'm curious.

I also wanted to know if anyone had tried the Flanders Red and Brown
culture packages from Head Start. The Flanders Red consists of a
mixed yeast culture and L. Flanderii.

While I'm on the Flanders Red topic, does anyone have some suggestions
about culturing mixed cultures? My guess is that a liquid to liquid
transfer might be best. by adding the culture to the slant in a liquid
form. When propagating,add wort and allow it to grow then transfer the
liquid to another slant or liquid medium, depending on the
application, using sterile technique. I realize that this is going
back to a more primitive method but how else can you insure that you
get a representative daughter population. By mixed cultures I mean
either all yeast or all bacteria not mixed together.

One last thing, A friend of mine is moving to the greater Boston area
and I have talked her into shipping me a few cases of Cantillon (did I
spell it right?). I understand that it is sold in this area. Where
can she get it. I also told her that I would find out the name and
location of the Belgian cafe there. Anyone have this info? Thanks in
advance.


Wyatt




------------------------------


Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 11:06:52 -0500 (EST)
From: "Paul A. Hausman" <paul at lion.com>
Subject: Re: Copyright


in Lambic Digest #779, we read:

> > >Copyright 1996 Al Korzonas
> >
> > Why is this necessary?
>
> In fact, I studied this a few months ago, if you claim copyright
> protection then you have it (temporarily, till you file), but if you do
> not file for copyright on a consistant basis then you are considered to be
> abusing copyright. If you do a net copyright search for all the stuff Al
> claims is copyrighted (newsletters etc) and match the fileing expiration
> dates, he's actually open to prosecution for copyright abuse. As long as
> he doesnt PO anybody on the net enough to mention it to the goverment, he
> is probably safe.


Pardon the bandwidth, but I couldn't let this one go by. In answer to
the first question, it's not. If you write something, you have all
copyrights to it, whether you claim them or not, until you explicitly
give them up (or loose them through other means. This is law, so there
are always exceptions). This means (GROSS GENERALIZATION WARNING) that
noone can reprint your writings on paper, electronically, or otherwise
unless you give them permission to do so.


Adding a copyright claim has a minor effect on what kind of claims
you can make in court when/if you go to enforce your copyrights.
Registration of a copyright is only required WHEN you go to court
to enforce it.


If anyone is really interested in this topic, a good summary and
starting point can be found on the web at
http://www.clari.net/brad/copymyths.html


The above earlier response sounds like a slight misinterpretation
of _trademark_ law, a completely different animal. If you care to
find out more on that topic (in the USA), I suggest going direct
to the US Patents & Trademarks Office at http://www.uspto.gov


Personally, I don't think I've ever written a piece of e-mail
for which I cared about the copyrights; but that doesn't mean
I need not respect the rights of others who might care.


P.S. Identity: Responsible for copyright and trademark management
in my company. Lurker on this list for the past 4-6 months.
Homebrewer for 2-3 years. Hoping to attempt my first lambic this
spring. Thanx to all for the excellent info. Now I'll go back to
lurker status. Maybe someday I'll have something useful to say on
brewing lambics.


***************************************************************************
* Paul A. Hausman Clever quote cleverly omitted *
* paul at lion.com in the interest of copyright preservation *
***************************************************************************


------------------------------


Date: Tue, 06 Feb 96 14:29:14 pst
From: wyatt at Latitude.COM
Subject: send index








------------------------------




End of Lambic Digest
************************
-------

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT