Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Lambic Digest #0567
From postmaster at lance.colostate.edu Thu Mar 23 03:28:14 1995
Status: O
X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil t nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
["3944" "Thu" "23" "March" "1995" "00:30:15" "-0700" "subscription requests only" "lambic-request at lance.colostate.edu" nil "102" "Lambic Digest #567 (March 23, 1995)" "^From:" nil nil "3" nil nil nil nil]
nil)
Received: by judgmentday.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.6.10/2.2)
with X.500 id DAA15082; Thu, 23 Mar 1995 03:28:09 -0500
Received: from goodman.itn.med.umich.edu by judgmentday.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.6.10/2.2)
with SMTP id DAA15077; Thu, 23 Mar 1995 03:28:08 -0500
Received: from longs.lance.colostate.edu by goodman.itn.med.umich.edu with SMTP id AA04169
(5.65b/IDA-1.4.3 for spencer at umich.edu); Thu, 23 Mar 95 03:28:06 -0500
Received: (daemon at localhost) by longs.lance.colostate.edu (8.6.9/8.6.5a (LANCE 1.01)) id AAA00912 for reallambic at longs.lance.colostate.edu; Thu, 23 Mar 1995 00:30:15 -0700
Message-Id: <199503230730.AAA00912 at longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Reply-To: lambic at lance.colostate.edu (postings only - do not send subscription requests here)
Errors-To: lambic-request at lance.colostate.edu
From: lambic-request at lance.colostate.edu (subscription requests only - do not post here)
To: lambic at lance.colostate.edu
Subject: Lambic Digest #567 (March 23, 1995)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 1995 00:30:15 -0700
Lambic Digest #567 Thu 23 March 1995
Forum on Lambic Beers (and other Belgian beer styles)
Mike Sharp, Digest Coordinator
Contents:
Orange Peel (Aaron Shaw)
Apology to Wyeast Labs (Jim Liddil)
Send article submissions only to: lambic at longs.lance.colostate.edu
Send all other administrative requests (subscribe/unsubscribe/change) to:
lambic-request at longs.lance.colostate.edu
Back issues are available by mail; send empty message with subject 'HELP' to:
netlib at longs.lance.colostate.edu
Phil Seitz' series on Brewing Belgian Beer is available; the index
from the archives lists individual topics and the complete set.
Start with the help message above then request the index.
A FAQ is also available by netlib; say 'send faq from lambic' as the
subject or body of your message (to netlib at longs.lance.colostate.edu).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 1995 11:44:59 -0500
From: ar568 at freenet.carleton.ca (Aaron Shaw)
Subject: Orange Peel
>From: k-jones at ee.utah.edu (Kelly Jones)
>Subject: Wits and Orange Peel
>Regarding the use of orange peels in Wit recipes: Do you normally used the
>entire rind (orange and white stuff, everything but the orange pulp itself)
>or just the "zest" (the very thin, outer orange colored skin)?
You can add either the entire rind or just the zest, but the zest will
impart the most flavour into your Wit. They both should be dried
prior to use and do not use oranges that are "orange", because they
have been dyed for appearance. It is probally easier to just go to a
health food store where they can usually be cheaply purchased. They
also let me use their electronic scales so I know exactly how much I am
adding.
>In the past, when I have made wits, I used any old oranges, and just used
>the zest, added the last 5-10 minutes of the boil. I now have a chance to
It is important also to add any orange peels to the boil because the skins
carry wild yeasts.
>get some actual curacao (anyone know how that's pronounced?)
It is pronounced like "curasso"
Good luck with you Wit!
- --
"Come my lad, and drink some beer!"
Aaron Shaw
Ottawa, Canada
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 1995 14:30:14 -0700 (MST)
From: Jim Liddil <JLIDDIL at AZCC.Arizona.EDU>
Subject: Apology to Wyeast Labs
This is a formal, public apology to Wyeast Labs and it's owner David Logsdon
for the slanderous, libelous, inflammatory statements made by me in the past
and present on this electronic forum with regards to Wyeast Labs, David Logsdon
and Brewers Choice(TM) Brewers Yeast. I also want to retract all statements
made by myself concerning the quality and compostion of various Wyeast
products, particularly #3278.
Though the data I have obtained from analysis of Wyeast products may be
correct, and there is a possibility that it is wrong, the experiments were only
performed on a very small number of packages
and in no way represents a statistically significant sample. Thus my data, if
correct, does
not in any way represent the real world situation with regards to the actual
number of Wyeast packages that are used by thousands of satisfied homebrewers.
Therefore I must retract all statements made by myself regarding the contents
of Wyeast Yeast packages in the vast majority of situations. I deeply regret
any problems or loss of business that my statements may have caused Wyeast
Labs. Wyeast provides a very good product which satisfys the needs for the
vast majority of homebrewers. In conclusion I have no reason to doubt the
quality of the products that Wyeast makes and made a grave error in not
carrying out my experiments with the consent and guidance of Wyeast Labs.
Jim Liddil
------------------------------
End of Lambic Digest
************************
-------
