Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Lambic Digest #0454
From postmaster at lance.colostate.edu Tue Sep 27 03:15:38 1994
Status: O
X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil t nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
["3715" "Tue" "27" "September" "1994" "00:30:16" "-0600" "subscription requests only" "lambic-request at lance.colostate.edu" nil "96" "Lambic Digest #454 (September 27, 1994)" "^From:" nil nil "9" nil nil nil nil]
nil)
Received: from longs.lance.colostate.edu by goodman.itn.med.umich.edu with SMTP id AA02264
(5.65b/IDA-1.4.3 for spencer at hendrix.itn.med.umich.edu); Tue, 27 Sep 94 03:15:32 -0400
Received: (daemon at localhost) by longs.lance.colostate.edu (8.6.9/8.6.5a (LANCE 1.01)) id AAA00219 for reallambic at longs.lance.colostate.edu; Tue, 27 Sep 1994 00:30:16 -0600
Message-Id: <199409270630.AAA00219 at longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Reply-To: lambic at lance.colostate.edu (postings only - do not send subscription requests here)
Errors-To: lambic-request at lance.colostate.edu
From: lambic-request at lance.colostate.edu (subscription requests only - do not post here)
To: lambic at lance.colostate.edu
Subject: Lambic Digest #454 (September 27, 1994)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 1994 00:30:16 -0600
Lambic Digest #454 Tue 27 September 1994
Forum on Lambic Beers (and other Belgian beer styles)
Mike Sharp, Digest Coordinator
Contents:
Re: Lambic Digest #453 (September 26, 1994) (ptimmerm)
Questions about the new white beer yeast(3944) ("DEV::FVH")
Send article submissions only to: lambic at longs.lance.colostate.edu
Send all other administrative requests (subscribe/unsubscribe/change) to:
lambic-request at longs.lance.colostate.edu
Back issues are available by mail; send empty message with subject 'HELP' to:
netlib at longs.lance.colostate.edu
Phil Seitz' series on Brewing Belgian Beer is available; the index
from the archives lists individual topics and the complete set.
Start with the help message above then request the index.
A FAQ is also available by netlib; say 'send faq from lambic' as the
subject or body of your message (to netlib at longs.lance.colostate.edu).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 94 08:30:02 PDT
From: ptimmerm at mashtun.JPL.NASA.GOV
Subject: Re: Lambic Digest #453 (September 26, 1994)
Michael Yee <Yeebot at aol.com> wrote,
>I was wondering if anyone can further suggest a good place in Brussels
>to sample the local brews and a market thatwould have a good selection.
Hard not to find a good place! The touristy but fun Cantillion brewery
offers tours and tasings. You need the belgain articles from the list.
See the header. For shopping, outside the city is best. If you have
a car you can go south 20 minutes to St. Genesis-Rode, where Drinks
Wets in on Opp Halle (street). Picture every belgain beer you can
imagine, and then some! Tastings, no problem. Glasses, specail
editions, you name it. Good Luck!
Paul Timmerman
p.s. I Trust you'll become a dues paying Maltose Falcon once you
arrive in our hallowed City of Angels. Octoberfest is coming!
------------------------------
Date: 26 Sep 94 10:38:00 CST
From: "DEV::FVH" <FVH%DEV.decnet at mdcgwy.mdc.com>
Subject: Questions about the new white beer yeast(3944)
Questions for the collective:
I made a Wit beer with 1214 some time ago and saved the dregs in my
fridge. My next Wit was made with 3944. I saved some of the starter
of this in my fridge. The last batch(3944) was about 5 weeks ago. I
whipped up another batch this weekend and had made a starter 3 days
earlier.
The starter was a combination of the 1214 and 3944. I had noticed that
the remaining bottles of Wit were developing a strong Lactic taste.
Extremely noticable. Nice complexity but getting to be a little much.
My hopes were to cut the lactic critters down in populations.
Well, brew day went well until I got ready to pitch. I tasted my starter
and it tasted sour. Very noticably. I didn't want to pitch this. This
was not the same as the original 3944. I dumped it down the drain. The
starter seemed to behave normally, though.
I went to the fridge and grabbed the old bottle of 1214 dregs and
pitched it in entirety. It was tasted before pitched. The next day,
no activity. So I pitched the only good starter I had left, 1028. I'll
suffer the concequences later. Got to get it going.
Here's where the questions start.... I know that the LactoBacilli(sp?)
take a while to become noticable but where do they stop? When all the
complex sugars are gone? Is repitching 3944 a bad idea because of this
reason? Has anyone had similiar experience with 3944? By the way, the
last batch of Wit had a pound of rye flakes added(for fun). I'm sure I have
plenty of complex sugars left.
Thanks in advance,
Dirk
------------------------------
End of Lambic Digest
************************
-------