Mead Lovers Digest #1472

eZine lover (@eZine)

Published in 

Mead Lovers Digest

 · 7 months ago

Subject: Mead Lover's Digest #1472, 28 May 2010 
From: mead-request@talisman.com 

 
Mead Lover's Digest #1472                                  28 May 2010 

                      Mead Discussion Forum 

Contents: 
  Re: Correction - Ultrafiltration in Ohio and not Reverse Osmosis (MeadGuil...) 

NOTE: Digest appears whenever there is enough material to send one. 
Send ONLY articles for the digest to mead@talisman.com. 
Use mead-request@talisman.com for [un]subscribe and admin requests. 
Digest archives and FAQ are available at www.talisman.com/mead#Archives 
A searchable archive is at http://www.gotmead.com/mldarchives.html 
Digest Janitor: Dick Dunn 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Subject: Re: Correction - Ultrafiltration in Ohio and not Reverse Osmosis 
From: MeadGuild@aol.com 
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 07:02:30 EDT 

Carl McMillin wrote: 

> Sorry for the confusion.  You are absolutely correct.  Jilbert Winery in  
> Valley View, Ohio does NOT use reverse osmosis (which would only provide the  
> water/alcohol - but uses ultrafiltration using ultrafiltration cartridges. 
  
Is an ultrafiltration system more practical for homebrewing than 
the Buon Vino system?  You can self-define the term "practical". 

Dick  
Richard D. Adams, CPA (Retired) 
Ellicott City,  Maryland 

------------------------------ 

End of Mead Lover's Digest #1472 
*******************************