Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

Mead Lovers Digest #0193

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
Mead Lovers Digest
 · 7 months ago

 

Mead Lover's Digest #193 Sat 14 August 1993


Forum for Discussion of Mead Brewing and Consuming
John Dilley, Digest Coordinator


Contents:
Counter flow vs immersion chillers ("Bob Jones")


Send articles for submission to the digest to mead-lovers@nsa.hp.com
Send digest subscribe, unsubscribe, or any other administrative requests to
mead-lovers-request@nsa.hp.com
NOTE: There is now an MLD FTP archive on sierra.stanford.edu in pub/mead

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 07:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Bob Jones" <bjones@novax.llnl.gov>
Subject: Counter flow vs immersion chillers

>Kinney writes:
>
>
> I often see and hear about the incredible difficulties of keeping
> counter-flow wort chillers sterile. Most of the time, though not
> this time, these fears come from people who have never used them and
> have been listening to other people who have never used them. I've
> used a counter flow chiller for over 11 years and have never had a problem.
>
> They do require some special care and feeding but the procedures
> for keeping them sterile really aren't that much of a hassel. I'm
> not sure why the speaker at the AHA conference had the problem he
> did but I'm outlining the sterilization procedure that has worked
> flawlessly for me below.

Since I'm probably the speaker that was refered to I'll just jump in here
and give my feels on this much discussed matter. I did have an infection
problem associated directly with my counter flow chiller. I was
recirculating warm bleach solution through the chiller for about an hour
before use. In retrospect I think the infection was at the connections to the
chiller. These little cracks and seals are the best hiding places for those
critters to hang out. I would suggest always take the chiller connections
apart, if possibe, and clean them good and dry well. I think Kinney's
procedure sounds very good, use it.

Now for the goods and bads of each as I see them :

Counter flow positives -

* Faster cooling of the wort as it passes through cooler, makes for
better cold break. +1

Counter flow negatives -

* the cold break ends up in your fermenter. -1
* they are more difficult to clean than an immersion or at least it
would seem that way, -1
* you have less control over the final wort exit temperature, -1


Immersion chiller positives -

* easier to clean compared to the counter flow, +1
* the majority of the cold break is left befind in the kettle, +1
* you can decide when the wort is cool enough by waiting longer,+1

Immersion chiller negatives -

* the cooling is slower and produces less cold break, -1

Final score :

* Counter flow chiller, -2
* Immersion chiller, +2

The choice IS yours, the debate rages on............

Bob Jones

------------------------------


End of Mead Lover's Digest
************************

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT