Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Mead Lovers Digest #0193
Mead Lover's Digest #193 Sat 14 August 1993
Forum for Discussion of Mead Brewing and Consuming
John Dilley, Digest Coordinator
Contents:
Counter flow vs immersion chillers ("Bob Jones")
Send articles for submission to the digest to mead-lovers@nsa.hp.com
Send digest subscribe, unsubscribe, or any other administrative requests to
mead-lovers-request@nsa.hp.com
NOTE: There is now an MLD FTP archive on sierra.stanford.edu in pub/mead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 07:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Bob Jones" <bjones@novax.llnl.gov>
Subject: Counter flow vs immersion chillers
>Kinney writes:
>
>
> I often see and hear about the incredible difficulties of keeping
> counter-flow wort chillers sterile. Most of the time, though not
> this time, these fears come from people who have never used them and
> have been listening to other people who have never used them. I've
> used a counter flow chiller for over 11 years and have never had a problem.
>
> They do require some special care and feeding but the procedures
> for keeping them sterile really aren't that much of a hassel. I'm
> not sure why the speaker at the AHA conference had the problem he
> did but I'm outlining the sterilization procedure that has worked
> flawlessly for me below.
Since I'm probably the speaker that was refered to I'll just jump in here
and give my feels on this much discussed matter. I did have an infection
problem associated directly with my counter flow chiller. I was
recirculating warm bleach solution through the chiller for about an hour
before use. In retrospect I think the infection was at the connections to the
chiller. These little cracks and seals are the best hiding places for those
critters to hang out. I would suggest always take the chiller connections
apart, if possibe, and clean them good and dry well. I think Kinney's
procedure sounds very good, use it.
Now for the goods and bads of each as I see them :
Counter flow positives -
* Faster cooling of the wort as it passes through cooler, makes for
better cold break. +1
Counter flow negatives -
* the cold break ends up in your fermenter. -1
* they are more difficult to clean than an immersion or at least it
would seem that way, -1
* you have less control over the final wort exit temperature, -1
Immersion chiller positives -
* easier to clean compared to the counter flow, +1
* the majority of the cold break is left befind in the kettle, +1
* you can decide when the wort is cool enough by waiting longer,+1
Immersion chiller negatives -
* the cooling is slower and produces less cold break, -1
Final score :
* Counter flow chiller, -2
* Immersion chiller, +2
The choice IS yours, the debate rages on............
Bob Jones
------------------------------
End of Mead Lover's Digest
************************