Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

Mead Lovers Digest #0221

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
Mead Lovers Digest
 · 7 months ago

 

Mead Lover's Digest #221 Thu 07 October 1993


Forum for Discussion of Mead Brewing and Consuming
John Dilley, Digest Coordinator


Contents:
Yeast + Nutrient = Death? (Jacob Galley)
Re: Mead Lover's Digest #220 (October 06, 1993) (COYOTE)


Send articles for submission to the digest to mead-lovers@nsa.hp.com
Send digest subscribe, unsubscribe, or any other administrative requests to
mead-lovers-request@nsa.hp.com
NOTE: There is now an MLD FTP archive on sierra.stanford.edu in pub/mead

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 6 Oct 93 10:34:07 CDT
From: Jacob Galley <gal2@midway.uchicago.edu>
Subject: Yeast + Nutrient = Death?

Hi. I made a small mead this weekend, but something funny happened to
the yeast. I hydrated it in a glass of warm water, with a half
teaspoon of "yeast nutrient" (no specifics on the label) in the glass.
The yeast wound up sitting there in the kitchen for at least an hour,
because there were complications in chilling the must. I pitched it
and waited for something to happen for about 36 hours. Since there was
no sign of activity, I just dumped another packet of yeast straight
into the fermentor. The mead took off a few hours later.

So I'm wondering, did the yeast nutrient somehow kill the yeast? The
phrase "osmotic pressure" comes back to me from high school biology. . . .

I'm also wondering about the yeast itself. I'm using Lalvin wine yeast
on this batch (number 77B- or 72B- something). The packet said it was
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but I thought that was only for beer. A
poster in the store said it was very attenuative and produced a fruity
aroma.

Jake.

* What's so interdisciplinary about studying lower levels of thought process?
<-- Jacob Galley * gal2@midway.uchicago.edu

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1993 13:16:08 -0600 (MDT)
From: COYOTE <SLK6P@cc.usu.edu>
Subject: Re: Mead Lover's Digest #220 (October 06, 1993)

DOn't you guys hate this! If you just REPLY to a MLD you end up with
a senseless and worthless SUBJECT line. I know it's come up before.

People People People
Puuuleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese
use a sensible subject line. The whole purpose of having a list
of subjects and authors at the beginng of the digest is to users
can look it over and get an idea what they are in for.
Please type in the mail address, and use a subject line!!!!!!!!!

ALSO: While I'm griping and grumbling- LOTS of folks are signing
up and unsubscribing IN the digest- Please use the correct address
for REQUESTS as is explained in the intro.

Sorry for the bandwidth w/ lack or mead-related info. But I'm getting PO'd!

Brew on. JDW

------------------------------


End of Mead Lover's Digest
************************

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT