Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Cider Digest #1919
Subject: Cider Digest #1919, 6 December 2014
From: cider-request@talisman.com
Cider Digest #1919 6 December 2014
Cider and Perry Discussion Forum
Contents:
Re: Small batch filtering FAIL (Chris Hurley)
RE: Small batch filtering FAIL ("Charles McGonegal")
NOTE: Digest appears whenever there is enough material to send one.
Send ONLY articles for the digest to cider@talisman.com.
Use cider-request@talisman.com for subscribe/unsubscribe/admin requests.
Archives of the Digest are available at www.talisman.com/cider#Archives
Digest Janitor: Dick Dunn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Small batch filtering FAIL
From: Chris Hurley <cjhurley@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:47:06 -0800 (PST)
Somebody had to try it, Al. Now I won't ever be tempted. :-)
On Sunday, November 30, 2014 7:27:14 PM UTC-5, HappyDogFarm wrote:
>
> Sharing my "walk of shame" in case any of you
> have considered this an option.
>
>
> http://happydogfarm.com/post/104026822020/small-batch-filtering-fail-i-tried-t
o-filter-a
>
> What little I got was very bright (and
> probably sterile), but it's not a solution.
> It is, however, a mess to clean up unless you
> want to pay out $50 for a replacement filter :(
>
> Al
------------------------------
Subject: RE: Small batch filtering FAIL
From: "Charles McGonegal" <cpm@appletrue.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 19:22:30 -0600
Oh Al. You need to prefilter with pads to at least the same rating as the
membrane you're running to. I often have to run perry through a .2um nominal
pad to get it to go through a .45 absolute membrane. Also, some particles
can be soft and squishy and deformable - they squeeze through the pad only
to flatten themselves against the membrane. That crud usually needs to be
fined out first.
Charles
------------------------------
End of Cider Digest #1919
*************************
