Giants: why does official science continue to lie about their existence?
Prologue
“At that time there were giants on the earth, and there were also afterward, when the sons of God joined the daughters of men, and had children by them.
Giants are the powerful men who, since ancient times, have been famous.
The LORD saw that the wickedness of men was great on the earth and that their hearts conceived only evil plans at all times.
The LORD regretted having made man on the earth, and it grieved him in his heart.
And the LORD said,
“I will cut off man, whom I have created, from the face of the earth: from man to cattle, from reptiles, from birds of the heavens; because I regret having done them."
But Noah found favor in the eyes of the LORD.
Genesis 6:1-8
This is what is written in the Bible about the giants.
Even Sumerian texts, albeit in a different way and with an infinite number of particular details, tell of beings who came down from heaven to earth. It was a community of people, men and women, who came from the planet Nibiru and who belonged to the Anunnaki people. They were of gigantic proportions and settled on the earth "say the Sumerian tablets" because they needed gold. According to these tales, both Anunnaki men and women intermarried with humans and had children. According to many, the Anakim, of which the Bible speaks, would be the descendants of the Anunnaki of which Anakim would be the Hebrew translation.
Other references to giants are found in other ancient cultures, in the Greek myths we find the myths of Atlas and Prometheus and of the Cyclopes, but also among the Syrians and the Hittites there are myths of an ancient race of giants, but the story often transforms in myth and legend, so the giants are confused with the gods, so in Ras Sham Ra there are tablets in which it is said that Baal was killed by the invaders, but Baal was a giant and only in later times was seen as a god evil.
Skeletons of giants
In every corner of the earth similar stories are reported, in India, in Thailand, in America (the Maya spoke of the Quinatezmin giants).
In the "Mexican Manuscript of Pedro de los Rios" we read:
“Before the flood that occurred 4008 years after the creation of the world, the Land of Anahuac was inhabited by the Tzocuillixeco, gigantic beings…”
just as we find depictions of giants in ancient temples, statues of beings 4-6 meters or more tall.
Were these texts just a way to depict characters to whom our ancestors wanted to give importance? Did the size of the statues represent the size of the characters? Who were these giants? Did they ever exist or is it just all imagination? Were they men or celestial beings?
Questions abound, unlike answers that are often non-existent because they are boycotted by the modern academic world.
The Giant of Lucerne
Yet the evidence of the existence of giants is clearly visible and tangible throughout the world:
In 1577 in Willisau, in the canton of Lucerne, a skeleton with enormous bones came to light.
The authorities in the area hastened to convene a commission of experts headed by the Swiss anatomist Plater, from Basel. The scholars were perplexed, but bowed their heads before the opinion of the great specialist.
Plater declared that they were without a shadow of a doubt human remains, although their size was somewhat unusual.
The skeleton was incomplete but the anatomist reconstructed it on clay: the result was a drawing of a titan 5.80 meters tall!
He was baptized “the giant of Lucerne” and his bones were proudly displayed in a hall of the town hall.
In 1895 Mr. Dyer while mining in County Antrim, Ireland, discovered a fossilized giant.
His height was 3.70 meters, and in addition his right foot had six toes.
The MT. Blanco Fossil Museum (USA) preserves a human femur "almost" as long as the height of an average man, found in Mesopotamia.
The man would have been at least about 5 meters tall.
Gargayan: human skeleton 5.18 meters tall.
Ceylon: human remains of individuals certainly around 4 meters tall.
South-eastern areas of China: human bones of individuals certainly more than 3 meters tall.
Tools of disconcerting dimensions were also found which, to be handled, required impressive strength and a height of no less than 4 meters: 500 double-headed axes weighing 8 kg each.
Giant skeleton
- Tura, in Assam (western Pakistan): human skeleton approximately 3.35 meters high.
- Southern China: teeth about six times larger than ours and are teeth that belonged to a giant man.
- Java Islands 1940: a lower jaw belonging to a man certainly around 3.50 meters tall due to its proportions.
- In Tibet: Sven Hedin claimed to have seen gigantic mummies hidden in very deep places.
Discovery of a gigantic skeleton
When you hear about giant men, you assume that we are talking about mythological or science fiction beings or completely fairy-tale inventions. However, all this is far from being false or legendary.
The existence of the giants has been documented by written texts and archaeological finds.
It is difficult to believe this because no one has given you the opportunity to make you believe it, yet if they talk to you about dinosaurs you have no difficulty in believing in their distant existence.
Traditional archeology is based on mandatory principles that rely on the Darwinian Theory of Evolution.
With this, everything that does not fit into the writings and concepts of Darwinism becomes inconvenient and unacceptable for history because it is not part of the evolution written according to Darwin and they fill the basements of museums with unclassified objects or if completely inconvenient they are destroyed; these objects are called OOPARTS.
So you can well understand how some archaeological finds can become inconvenient to maintain evolution and traditionalist archaeology.
You have difficulty understanding all this because you simply have not been used to believing, because someone has created a mystifying channel so that it reaches our culture as something mythological.
All this because archeology takes care of passing on only that which cannot upset the knowledge with which we were raised... otherwise all the knowledge of years of studies would collapse and we would end up no longer giving archeology any credit.
For this reason many archaeologists broke away from the traditionalists because they rebelled in not wanting to pass on lies, but only true knowledge and their task was to commit themselves to passing on everything that was the truth even if some discoveries could have cause a worldwide cultural upheaval, but they were interested in behaving like "Archaeologists", like those who study the finds.
Therefore even authentic finds such as the skeletons of the "Giants" have been tampered with to the point of throwing them into the OOPARTS channel "finds beyond all logic".
Finally, are these the giants the Bible talks about? It was perhaps these mythical "giants", whose traditions and fossil remains seem to be present from one end of the world to the other, who built megalithic sites such as Stonehenge, Sacsahuaman, Giza and many others that seem to escape any constructive logic referring to those times?
And perhaps these ancient traditions of gigantic beings and the evidence of their existence, which seem to emerge every now and then from the mists of the past and the earth of the present, can be connected to other myths such as those of the Yeti and Bigfoot?
Science gives the answers, even if science often, in addition to not answering what it doesn't know, denies what it knows.
