Archaeological evidence of the missing continents Lemuria, Mu and Atlantis
Premise
Starting from the consideration that we must never stop searching for the truth, it must be admitted that it is difficult to write something about Atlantis given the multitude of works present and also because this continent no longer exists. And since we atlantologists are always "pinched" on the archaeological evidence factor, I want to focus this research precisely on the evidence of the disappeared continents: is there archaeological evidence (or at least valid evidence) on the existence of Atlantis? And what are the sources? If Atlantis existed there must be remains somewhere. So let's see what archaeologists, geologists, anthropologists, historians and all those who have dealt with Atlantis have studied.
Other continents have also sunk into the depths of the sea so I will also take into consideration Lemuria, a little-studied continent but what has been written about it is really interesting, as well as Mu, a continent of essential importance.
Atlantis: the historical and archaeological evidence
The first historical testimony on Atlantis is that which Plato gives in Critias and Timaeus, handed down by his uncle Solon:
In front of that narrow mouth called the Pillars of Hercules, there was an island. And this island was larger than Libya and Asia together, and from it one could pass to other islands and from these to the mainland opposite. [...] In later times [...], earthquakes and extraordinary cataclysms having occurred, in the space of one day and one bad night [...] everything en masse sank underground, and the island Atlantis was similarly swallowed by the sea and disappeared. [...] There have therefore been many and terrible cataclysms in these nine thousand years.
Terrible earthquakes and floods occurred, a single terrible day and night passed [...] the island of Atlantis disappeared by sinking into the sea.
Some scholars have wondered how reliable this testimony is.
Is it possible that Plato invented everything or changed some details? Let's see what the scholars think. Peter James and Nick Thorpe, authors of Lost Lands (1999), argue that there is no archaeological evidence of this continent in the Atlantic. Aristotle himself, who laid the foundations of rational thinking, never believed this legend.
In turn, Tony Maniscalco, author of The Survivors of Atlantis (2008), starts from Plato's testimonies without excluding that there may be geographical errors in the Critias and the Timaeus, to arrive at the thesis that Atlantis is found in Algeria, under the sands of the desert.
Plato writes that the Atlanteans were more evolved than our race and already in the ancient Hellenic traditions we find testimonies that cite ancient advanced civilizations, which subsequently disappeared. Beyond official science, many discoveries have been made and we don't know where to place them.
The Aztecs claimed to come from a place called Aztlan (i.e. Atlantis). The prefix atl in the Mexican language means water and we find it in many names: Quetzalcoatl, Chichèn Iztlan (which in the Mayan language means saved from the waters).
The Toltecs of Mexico also claim to come from Aztlan.
There are many intellectuals who have accepted the idea of a lost continent, for example Plutarch, who called it Saturnia. Diodorus Siculus stated that the Phoenicians discovered a large island in the Atlantic Ocean beyond the Pillars of Hercules which they arrived after a few days starting from the African coast. It seems that Atlantis, before becoming an island following the catastrophes it suffered (of which the flood was the last) was a vast continent that also included present-day America. It is no coincidence that it is said that the Phoenicians were one of the first peoples to know America before Columbus.
Returning to the lost continent, Proco was told by other scholars about the existence of a continent called Atlantis. The Roman historian Timogen asserts that the Gauls have a tradition of Atlantis.
Elliot Scott, referring to the text Ancien America by Baldwin, tells us that some documents found in Central America (therefore Mexico, Guatemala, where populations such as the Maya and Aztecs were settled) testify that the American continent extended much further out than the Ocean Atlantic and that this area was then destroyed by various catastrophes; the most important is remembered as a universal flood and dates back to 12,000 years ago.
We can compare this theory with a legend widespread among the Celts who maintain that a part of Great Britain extended beyond the Atlantic Ocean.
In my opinion, the phenomena that occur in the Bermuda Triangle are not negligible either, as they seem to depend on a submerged pyramid that emanates strong energy.
As regards geology, Roberto Pinotti in Atlantis (2001) takes into consideration a series of interesting geological elements. Pinotti writes:
According to Plato, Atlantis was a mountainous country. Consequently, in the Atlantic Ocean there should be a vast mountainous region immersed in the water. And indeed the oceanological expeditions of the 19th and 20th centuries established with certainty the existence of a gigantic mountain system that extends from one polar circle to the other, passing almost to the center of the Atlantic.
Personally I believe that there is enough evidence to believe that Atlantis was in the Ocean or that in any case there was actually a continent in the Atlantic. It should also not be ruled out that the remains of Atlantis have been found in Algeria and Greece but it must also be considered that these lands may have been colonized by the Atlanteans who, as has been reported, had conquered many territories, including Egypt. So it could also be that Algeria and Greece, as well as Egypt, were colonies and not an actual part of the continent itself.
In Tibet there is an ancient book belonging to the priestly caste and found only in the early 1900s: The Rooms of Dzyan. This book, by an unknown author, describes the eras of man in different humanities and among the various human races also mentions the Atlantean race. It is one of the fundamental texts of the Theosophical Society and the work The Secret Doctrine of H.P. was derived from it. Blavatsky. It was Blavatsky herself who made the text found in Tibet known to the world.
The Atlantean civilization as well as our race (called the Aryan race), followed a path of evolution-involution. In the involutionary phase, experiments were carried out on humans and animals. Before the Atlantean race there was the Lemur race which was an experimental race, that is, made up of a series of animal-human experiments. I would like to propose a comparison between this theory regarding the Lemur race and what is reported in the Popol Vuh, the sacred book of the Mayan-Quiché people. The Popol Vuh reports, in addition to the story of the flood, the story of the creation of wooden dummies, created as human experiments. These mannequins would be layers created first with clay and then, since they were ruined with clay, with wood. However, these dummies were evil, heartless and began to eat animals and never honored the gods, until the animals themselves devoured them to take revenge and a flood was sent to punish them. Are these pure coincidences or copycats? Or is this something that actually happened? The fact remains that the issue of eating animals, considered almost as an original sin that condemned man to suffering, is also reported in Elliot Scott's text History of Submerged Lemuria (1997), in which the author writes that the antagonism between men and animals was the first to develop.
Returning to archaeological evidence, the geologist and archaeologist Angelo Pitone found a particular type of blue stone, called Skystone, in Sierra Leone. This stone has a particular shape and is found near figurines of unknown origin, deformed gnomes that the Kiui population believes are fallen angels. The stone was analyzed in the laboratory and was found to have a strange composition, made of calcite, largite, portlandite, artificially colored. It is believed that it may have been used by the Atlanteans for the construction of buildings, it is no coincidence that the Atlanteans used particular stones for the construction of their buildings, in addition to silver and gold.
Despite those who claim that the archaeological remains of Atlantis do not exist, it can be stated that the remains are indeed there, especially in the area of Cuba which seems to coincide with the location of the capital:
A few dozen miles from the coast of Florida, in the area of the coral reefs of the Bahamas islands, in 1968 long walls or roads were discovered beneath the surface of the sea, made up of megaliths, assembled with the same interlocking technique present throughout the world. Furthermore, there are megalithic stone circles equal to those found throughout the world, thus becoming a part of a large complex that sank into the ocean following a catastrophe, a complex perhaps part of Atlantis. In fact, in front of the Cuban peninsula of Guanahacabibes, immense structures were discovered in an area of 20 square kilometers of the ocean floor that form an urban network that stands out on the white sand esplanade, with its right-angled walls and connecting roads between buildings.However, radar surveys and various explorations have highlighted the presence of submerged remains of considerable interest near the Cuban coast, as if there had even been a capital of an ancient empire in that area.
The most important proof, however, is given by the discovery of underwater pyramids. In Mysterious Archeology by Luc Bürgin, we find evidence of many findings that are not disclosed by official archeology to avoid calling into question everything we have believed so far. However, it must be said that today there is an ever-increasing number of educated people who are not satisfied with knowledge purely academic or conventional and who are also approaching "forbidden" archeology and a new way of seeing the history of humanity without even "scandalising" themselves too much: humanity is opening its mind to new horizons.
Bürgin, in addition to disclosing the discoveries near Okinawa (which I will talk about in the section on Mu) also tells us about the secret of Rock Lake, a lake located east of Madison (in Wisconsin) and which has pyramidal constructions at the bottom and stone artefacts.
Atlantis and the problem of its location
Where Atlantis is, its exact location, is a mystery that still remains. There are those who place it in Sardinia, those in England, those in the Atlantic Ocean, those in Algeria. Atlantis would seem to be more of a collection of lands than a single island that sank into the sea. From what has been said so far it can be seen that the location of Atlantis is a complex problem which is highlighted as this continent has suffered various catastrophes, therefore it may have occupied more or less large territories, as well as it may have conquered other territories.
First of all, it must be remembered that Atlantis, according to various scholars, possessed seven islands which corresponded to the seven stars of the Pleiades, a constellation with which the Atlanteans seemed to be in contact. However, it is not possible to give a precise temporal location to the presence of the aforementioned islands, that is, it is not clear whether they were present before or after the various catastrophes. Plato says that Atlantis sank in a single day and a single night but the island to which the Greek philosopher refers was already what remained of a larger continent, previously destroyed or submerged. The dominant paradigm holds that Atlantis was located in the Atlantic but there seems to be valid reasons to accept further theories. In reality, Atlantis is not the only place that has disappeared, so when a discovery occurs we must try to understand which continent it may have belonged to, for example the buildings on Easter Island they are most likely from Lemuria (and not Atlantis), given that the area of Australia was occupied by lemurs16 who apparently were giants.
Most texts on Atlantis tend to support the thesis according to which this continent existed in the Atlantic. Elliot Scott quotes the following passage from the scholar Starkie Gardner:
in the Eocene period the British Isles were part of a large island or rather of a continent that extended into the Atlantic; it is certain that a large continental region then existed where the sea and Cornwall, the Scilly and Channel Isles now lie; Ireland and Great Britain itself are the summits of the highest peaks.
Indeed, if we consider the very high culture of the Celts, who lived in Ireland and northern France, we can think that perhaps Gardner's theory is not exactly pure fantasy. It is no coincidence that the Celts themselves claimed to come from a land submerged in the Atlantic Ocean, the mythical Avalon18, about which many books have been written.
Elliot Scott informs us that, through an investigation, it was discovered that in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean there exists a real mountain range - the peaks of which form the Azores, St. Paul, Ascension, Iceland itself, St. Helena, and Tristan d'Acunha - covered in volcanic debris and this debris would reach the American coasts.
The chain in question, which I also mentioned earlier by quoting Pinotti, is the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and is mainly made up of basaltic rocks. According to geologists, this underwater chain dates back tens of millions of years ago. The professor of geology Martinis, who deals with Atlantis, dates it back to 135 million years ago. However, despite his passion for the lost continent, he declares that there is no Atlantis in the Atlantic Ocean and also James and Thorpe declare that there are no archaeological remains of it at all. Instead, they take an opposite line scholars like Jirov and Heezen, who despite the absence (perhaps only apparent absence) of archaeological remains, do not exclude the existence of the continent. Heezen stated that:
There are many elements that demonstrate how at certain moments of their existence these chains came out to the surface of the oceans, forming vast areas of land, which, due to their vastness, can be considered as real continents. Evidently a part of such chains existed on the surface even in the post-glacial period. Beyond any tradition, therefore, the existence of these sunken mountain chains and plateaus actually leads one to think of the previous existence of lost continents: Atlantis in the Atlantic, Mu in the Pacific Ocean and Lemuria in the Pacific.
Many scholars are now of the opinion that ocean water masses move for various reasons, submerging some lands and causing new ones to emerge. All this would lead to the possibility that there was a continent in a remote period of humanity and today there are many scholars who support this theory: Colin Wilson, Charles Hapgood, Graham Hancock are just some of the names of scholars who have dedicated themselves to topic very seriously. The problem of submerged remains that are difficult to find and date, as well as the excessive amount of time that passed between the end of the Atlantean civilization and our race, have led most scholars to give up the study of Atlantis. Indeed, there are difficulties and they are not few. We try to adduce more or less valid theories, based on studies or field research.
Another point on which many scholars have stopped to reflect is the mystery of the Bermuda Triangle. It is claimed that in this area there is a powerful energy that "sucks up" planes and ships that pass by. This powerful force is believed to be caused by an Atlantean pyramid that continues to channel its energy from deep within the ocean causing mysterious currents.
One of the most widespread theories claims that the Egyptian pyramids and Egyptian civilization in general belong to the Atlantean tradition and that therefore Egypt may have been the true Atlantis. Not everyone agrees on this.
When similarities are highlighted between various parts of the world, before considering that the Atlantis continent extended for who knows how many kilometres, we must remember that the Atlanteans had also colonized many countries. Egypt was certainly not part of Atlantis but it is likely that the Atlanteans visited or colonized it and built some works such as the Sphinx there.
James and Thorpe declare that the affinity hypothesized by many atlantologists according to which the Egyptian and American pyramids (of the Mayans) are the work of the same people is wavering as the datings are different: the Egyptian ones date back to 2700 BC, the American ones date back to until 1487 AD and the oldest American pyramids were created in the first centuries BC. Therefore, if we want to base ourselves on the pyramids themselves, a common origin should be excluded, however the hypothesis that these two peoples may have had relationships should not be discarded. The Egyptians may have inherited the knowledge to build the pyramids from the Atlanteans.
However, the origin of the Sphinx remains in doubt. The Sphinx of Giza is carved directly into the rock. The official dating dates it back to the period of Pharaoh Chefren (2500 BC, the era of the two pyramids) but it was discovered that this work is at least ten thousand years older, a period in which North Africa had a much rainier climate than 'current. The Sphinx has been traced back to the period of Chefren because there is a plaque dedicated to him but the monument is too eroded and, considering the sandy mantle of Egypt and also considering that the climate in Egypt in the last five-six thousand years has been very dry, it is too strange that the erosion is so accentuated, if not by backdating its origin. Thus the geologist Robert Schoch, the geophysicist Thomas L. Dobecky and a team made up of an oceanologist, an architect and two other geologists discovered that the erosion was due to water, therefore to the rain of North Africa ten thousand years ago. Who built the Sphinx more than ten thousand years ago?
Elliot Scott tells us that 80,000 years ago the first two great pyramids already existed (Chefren and Menkaure, therefore for Elliot Scott the two pyramids are well before the time in which official science places them) and they would have survived a catastrophe, which occurred precisely in that period and after which the Karnak temple was built. However, Elliot Scott believes that a group of Atlanteans (specifically a White Lodge of initiates) migrated to Egypt 400,000 years ago, when this the territory was still sparsely populated and isolated. We must not forget, then, that Egyptians and Americans had similar habits so the idea of colonization or migration is quite plausible. However, it remains to be understood why Egyptian civilization only began around 3000 BC. If the Sphinx was erected already in 8000 BC perhaps the Egyptian people already existed, or perhaps it was another people, different from what we know as Egyptian.
The mysteries of Spain and the map of Hecataeus
An inexplicable language for linguists is the language of the Basques. The Basques, despite being halfway between Spain and France, speak a particular language which is very similar to the Mayan language. No one has ever managed to understand what kind of origin this language has.
Another interesting site that we find in Spain is Tartessos, an ancient city of which we find mention in the ancient Bible, precisely in the First Book of Kings (10.22). In the Bible we read that King Solomon traded in Tartessos and that this city was located near the Guadalquivir River. It would have been a very rich, cultured city with a language that did not belong to any type of Iberian linguistic group:
From linguistic research it seems probable that a particular language was spoken there, the so-called Tartessic of which there is literary trace. Tartessic, surprisingly, is not related to Basque, Iberian and Lusitanian (the latter certainly Indo-European), which are the other linguistic families of Iberia prior to the arrival of the Celts. There is uncertainty whether to make it a separate language family or to attempt to fit it into existing language families.Tartessic actually shows some similarity with the Indo-European Anatolian languages (such as Hittite and Luwian) as well as Etruscan and this would strengthen the thesis, proposed at the time, that the founders of the city were the so-called Teres of the Sea Peoples.
On page 58 of Atlantis and the mystery of the disappeared continents (2006) is shows the image of the map of Hecataeus (5th century BC), in which the city of Tartessos appears in the south of the Iberian peninsula. Hecataeus, of Greek origin, was a writer of historical and geographical texts. Historians believe that Tartessos was destroyed by the Carthaginians in 500 BC but it's there even those who believe that this city has sunk below sea level. In reality, what strikes me most about Hecataeus' map is the indication of the Hyperborean population in the far north of Europe (Europe in the map also includes part of Asia). In the 5th century BC. the Hyperborean population was known, of which there is trace in The Rooms of Dzyan. This ancient text, mentioned above, believes that the Hyperborean race occupied North Asia (therefore its location on the map is correct because it is believed that the Hyperborean population came from the north) and it would be the second human race to appear on Earth. The ancient Greeks called the god Apollo Hyperborean and claimed that he traveled to North Asia every year. Hyperborea means beyond Boreas. The Hyperborean race, according to the Theosophical school, was a non-physical race, made up of energy alone. Even the Atlanteans, at least in the first phase of their life, were mainly made up of energy. However, it is not possible to argue how much time passes between one race and another (for example between the lemur and the Atlantean) also because when we talk about everything that happened before the universal flood we must take into account a very important factor: time was inserted into a different paradigm, that is, it was not necessarily linear like ours. Science itself recognizes that time is a product of our consciousness, just think of when we dream: we can have a very long dream even in just a few minutes of sleep. Man's consciousness was also different. And if the Hyperborean race was the second race - Dzyan's stanzas speak of five human races, of which the Hyperborean race is the second, the Lemur is the third, the Atlantean the fourth and ours the fifth; the first race would be a race of divine beings who inhabit the imperishable sacred Land guarded by the North Star, what the Hindus call Svita Dvipa- we must think that these Hyperboreans were certainly very different from us.
Lemuria: a laboratory of humanity or an advanced civilization?
The Commentaries on The Rooms of Dzyan narrate that Lemuria was the third continent. This name was coined by M.P.L. Sclater based on zoological research: finding specimens of monkeys called lemurs in Madagascar decided to call this continent Lemuria but there are also those who maintain that the term Lemuria can be associated with the term lemurs which in ancient Roman meant ghosts.
Lemuria is generally believed to predate Atlantis and to have been an advanced civilization. This continent started from Madagascar to reach Australia. Madagascar is in fact known for the diversity of its flora and fauna compared to the rest of Africa. According to Elliot Scott's theories, the lemur population was anything but advanced, in fact, it wasn't even very human, however the lemurs were endowed with a certain culture.
Lemuria could therefore have been an island on which men experimented, it is no coincidence that some scholars believe that primitive men were "unsuccessful experiments" with the aim of creating a human race and that we are not evolved apes, but apes would poorly managed or convoluted humans.
Elliot Scott tells us that lemurs were giants and the Atlanteans were giants too.
Very probably, therefore, it was the lemurs who built the statues on Easter Island and if this was the case it means that despite their animal appearance a certain intelligence and ability was possessed by these individuals. Lemuria would later collapse but a part of it was saved and this part contributed to the formation of Mu. The existence of Lemuria has been generally accepted:
As the Lemuria theory gained some prominence, it began to appear in the work of other scientists such as Ernst Haeckel, a German taxonomist who proposed Lemuria as the explanation for the 'missing link'. Its fossils could not have been found because they were buried. at the bottom of the sea. The Lemuria theory disappeared with the appearance of the theory of plate tectonics.
The hypothesis of the existence of Mu did not have the same resonance. In fact, in the Commentaries on The Rooms of Dzyan, Lemuria is succeeded by Atlantis, not Mu. This may be due to the fact that the two continents were contemporaneous. In fact, when Atlantis was in the Atlantic, Mu was in the Pacific but strangely no one mentions it.
The mother continent: Mu
The "myth" of Mu was born at the end of the 19th century with Colonel Churchward (1852-1936), of British origin. The colonel, having left his working career, went to India in 1870 and became friends with an Indian priest. Both were passionate about archaeology, so the priest showed Churchward some ancient tablets that spoke of the origin of humanity. According to the priest, these tablets were sacred because they were written by the Naacal, or the "Holy Brothers" who came from a mother continent in south-eastern Asia.
The priest and the former colonel translated all the tablets and discovered that they spoke of the creation of the world and the origin of man, who appeared for the first time on the continent of Mu. After a few years, professor and researcher William Niven discovered 2,600 tablets referring to Mu in Mexico during excavations.
So Churchward, after having translated the tablets and having traveled to find other valid elements to support his hypothesis of the existence of this continent, traced the following history of Mu.
Mu was located in the Pacific Ocean and was inhabited by several tribes governed by a king called Ra-Mu. In Lost Lands (1999) we read that the name Mu derives from Queen Moo who was the queen of Atlantis but this name could also have other origins. The kingdom of Mu was called the Empire of the Sun, in fact its inhabitants (the "muani") worshiped a deity who was called Ra the Sun, as it could not be referred to by her real name. Mu was predominantly populated by the white race (and this would explain why in America there are many depictions of white people, even before the discovery of America). The Muani brought science, religion, and commerce across the world. Mu also had colonies including the Mayax empire in America, the Uighur empire in Central Asia and Eastern Europe and the Naga kingdom in South Asia. Mu had a first catastrophe caused by volcanoes and tsunamis, during the maximum period splendor. This catastrophe affected the southern part of the continent. Subsequently, the continent finally sank 13,000 years ago. Only a few people survived. First Mu sank and then Atlantis (the latter sank 12,000 years ago).
The continent Mu seems to be the most important of all since it is "the mother continent" and was contemporary with Atlantis: in the same period Atlantis reigned in the Atlantic and Mu in the Pacific and they were both two very advanced civilizations that communicated. However, Mu is not as well known as Atlantis, perhaps because there were no philosophers (as with Atlantis that Plato told us about) to pass on its existence and, strangely, there is no mention of it even in The Rooms of Dzyan.
However, for Mu we have valid archaeological remains and I believe this is of fundamental importance. In 1997, near the island of Yonaguni (Okinawa area) in the China Sea, between Formosa and Japan, very important archaeological remains were discovered, including terraced monuments, belonging to a civilization that sank into the Pacific of which there is no track in the official history books. The account of this discovery can be found in Submerged Civilizations (2002) by Graham Hancock
The remains belonged to a period ranging between 4000 and 8000 years ago but some scholars believe that they date back as far as 15,000 years ago.
The existence of such an advanced civilization would also explain why China, since ancient times, was so technologically advanced. The first Chinese, in archaic times, even possessed a seismograph, built with a vase and a system of levers. The Chinese invented paper, they had great medical knowledge, they invented the compass... all this in very ancient times, it is no coincidence that the Chinese have always amazed us with their ingenious inventions and today we can hypothesize that this knowledge may derive from the culture of Mu.
The detailed account of this discovery can be found in Submerged Civilizations (2002) by G. Hancock, who accompanied the research with photographs of these remains. There are three geologists who dived at Yonaguni: Masaaki Kimura, Robert Schoch (already mentioned above for his research on the Sphinx) and Wolf Wichmann and as far as the author knows, they are the only geologists who have descended to those depths.
These three geologists don't have a shared opinion. Kimura and his students have carried out hundreds of dives and maintains that these are undoubtedly works of human origin and also claims that in some places holes produced by tools similar to awls have been found. The description of what Kimura saw (a sort of path paved with stones that connects the main areas of the structure; traces of excavations that suggest repairs, etc.) clearly suggest that these are the remains of a civilization. Kimura himself believes that these remains belonged to an advanced civilization.
Schoch (who dived together with the same author) however did not take a clear position regarding the nature of this submerged monument, he maintained both that it could be a natural monument and that it could be of human origin with astronomical purposes as it located on the Tropic of Cancer.
The geologist Wichmann has carried out three expeditions and claims that it is a natural work. However, Kimura believes that even if it were of natural origin, this type of topography would be too difficult to explain.
The only archaeologist who has immersed himself in Yonaguni is Sundaresh who considers the monument of human origin.
These scholars most likely found the ancient remains of Mu. It is no coincidence that there are also many terraced pyramids in China.
Regarding the history of this continent that disappeared in the Pacific and other evidence that demonstrates its existence, Domenico Pasquariello, author of Great Inquiry into Atlantis writes:
The civilization of Mu, in addition to dominating Asia, also extended its dominion to America. In fact, there are countless depictions, legends and traditions of the ancient Mesoamerican peoples who speak of white men with long beards and loose robes, also equipped with advanced technology, who came to America from the Asia/Oceania area (where Mu) was once there to teach the natives the arts and sciences.Mayan stems also report a migration from a land in the Pacific to South America and are almost certainly referring to the land of Mu which was located west of South America.
Scholars such as geologist William Niven have identified the remains of 50,000-year-old cities in the Mexican sites of Texcoco and Haluepantla. These are three cities built on top of each other that have evident remains of a flood and volcanic eruptions between them. In these sites, countless statuettes have been found depicting men with South Asian features and typically oriental attitudes. These places are supposed to be the main sites where the men from Mu settled, sites that are buried an average of nine meters below the Mexican soil.
In 1997, the remains of an ancient civilization that disappeared, almost certainly the ancient civilization of Mu, were discovered in the waters of Yonaguni island. They are the remains of a civilization that lived between 15 thousand and 10 thousand BC and are located 25 meters below sea level off the coast of the China Sea, in the strait that connects Japan to Formosa. These are buildings of enormous dimensions: the main one is as large as the Cheops pyramid and is similar to the grandiose step pyramids of the Middle East (Ziggurat). Overall, the ruins are linked to pre-Columbian and Egyptian ones.
In Aguni (north of Yonaguni) there is a gigantic wall, while in Kerama there is a circular building, all connected by a road.
Megaliths and constructions of monolithic and gigantic blocks using the interlocking technique are widespread in South America, Egypt, Lebanon, Israel, Japan, Central America, England, France, etc., as if had been inherited from an antediluvian civilization.
Conclusion
I conclude this research with a quote from Bürgin:
Just to give an example, how did a “spark plug” end up in a 500,000 year old stone? How do we explain the impressions of perfect perforations in stone blocks that date back to the Egypt of the pharaohs? Where conventional science fails to find explanations, alternative hypotheses must be considered.
The remains of ancient civilizations, advanced as much as we are, or perhaps much more than us, are there. You just need to want to see them.
Leonella CARDARELLI
Comments