Does human DNA contain alien code?
Today scientists are starting to ask themselves: why primates remained primates and man, in comparison, underwent such rapid evolution? What triggered such a change at the genetic level?
Homo Erectus appeared about 450,000 years ago, Neanderthal Homo about 200,000 years ago. The primates from which Homo Erectus (the Catarrhine species) descended would be completely similar to the primates we still know today.
What made us so different?
The answer certainly lies in our DNA which still reserves countless surprises and about which very little is known. When human DNA was entirely sequenced, in 2000, geneticists found themselves faced with a big surprise: of the 3 billion bases of our DNA, at least half were random and non-functional repetitions, therefore apparently useless, which would only seem burdening our genome without purpose. The functional genes of human DNA known so far would be just over 30,000, exactly like those of the mouse and much less than other species, such as wheat.
Those apparently useless sequences, defined as "garbage" (junk DNA), are actually fundamental for human development. Nothing but rubbish then! A discovery made in Singapore overturns the concept of junk DNA: not only are those repetitive sequences not useless, but they actually play a fundamental role in distinguishing humans from other species. Recent researches indicate that, if we are as we are, it largely depends on our overabundant junk DNA and that species that have many repetitive sequences, like ours, also undergo much more rapid evolution, as transcription factors can cause the activity of various genes to vary much more than what happens in other species, where transcription factors have few possible attachment points.
But that is not all. Junk DNA may have played a decisive role in human evolution.
Opposable thumb and upright gait, two characteristics that distinguish us (along with some primates) from the rest of the animal world, would have evolved thanks to changes in those regions of our genome traditionally considered "junk", which do not encode proteins, but to what apparently, they serve as switches to regulate the activity of genes. Over time, by analyzing the sequences in question, scholars have observed that in humans there was a higher number of base pairs ("letters") than in chimpanzees, proof of the fact that at a certain point man evolved with superior speed.
In particular, scientists implanted a "junk" sequence, "HACNSI" in mouse embryos, discovering that it had a decisive function in the development of the limbs, foot, hip, forearm and hand, and in particular in development of the opposable thumb and in the standing position. Basically, it seems that bipedalism and the human ability to grasp objects are due to HACNSI, despite not containing genes.
What is certain, for the moment, is that there is no garbage in Human's DNA. Furthermore researchers have demonstrated how these sequences behave according to a predefined program capable of influencing the life of cells. The problem we face here derives from the complex and unique nature of these "junk" or "non-coding" sequences, have precise functions and relationships with already known genes. How many and what functions are these billions of still unknown bases capable of performing? And above all, how did our DNA evolve so rapidly compared to primates, enriching itself with sequences that did not spontaneously appear in the genetic makeup of any other species on Earth? Some persons believe that our junk DNA is made from non-terrestrial elements and therefore "alien" by definition.
This is a strong statement!
We find ourselves faced with a new concept: that of the insemination of humanity. If true, it could mean that we were seeded at the dawn of history and that we do not depend on Darwinian evolution. This opens up numerous questions which we now try to answer, demonstrating that this statement could be partly true, partly false.
First of all, it is essential to understand that in order for Darwin's theory to be confirmed, so-called transition species would need to be found, for example between fish, amphibians, reptiles and birds; the same applies between primates and humans, but here the matter becomes even more complex and we will address it shortly.
With the absence of the transition forms, Darwin himself knew that the theory of evolution could not be confirmed and therefore, he had dedicated a chapter of his book to this very topic, asking himself some questions including:
"Why, if the species derive from other species through imperceptible gradations, don't we see innumerable transitional forms everywhere? (…) But since these transitional forms must have existed, why don't we find them buried in infinite numbers in the earth's crust?”
The famous British paleontologist and evolutionist Derek Ager noted the following:
“The idea emerges that if we examine the fossil record in detail, at any level of order and species, we come across at every turn not a gradual evolution, but a sudden explosion of one group at the expense of another.”
And again Darwin himself admits in his book:
“If many species, belonging to the same genera or families, had really appeared suddenly, this fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution by natural selection.”
To believe that all of Darwinian theory is wrong is certainly excessive.
Despite the apparent absence of transition species, there is evidence of primitive species that mark stages towards more complex species existing today, and just as much evidence of race mutations, that is, genetic mutations within the same species that changes (and therefore evolves) to better adapt to new climatic, environmental, geographical conditions and so on.
But how does man fit into this whole picture? Are primates really his ancestors? And what does the junk DNA problem suggest about our similarity to primates? Is it plausible that a sort of insemination occurred, given the uniqueness of a part of our DNA compared to other species? And if it happened, when?
Since science is not yet able to give these answers, it seems logical at this point to look for evidence of such an event in other branches of study that are equally fundamental for the understanding of human evolution: history, paleontology, archaeology and religions. We therefore ask ourselves, is there the possibility of tracing the clues to possible extraterrestrial or exogenous interventions in human history?
One of the most interesting methods is that of reading and reinterpreting ancient mythological texts.
Among the myths, one of the most widespread among all the peoples of the ancient world is undoubtedly the cosmogonic myth, that is, the myth of the creation of the world described in all civilizations with somewhat similar traits. "This is the tale of how everything was suspended, all calm, silent; all still, quiet and the expanse of the sky was empty." This text reminds us very closely of the Genesis present in the Bible. In fact it is the beginning of the story of creation, but of a much older text: the Popul Vuh, or "Book of the Community" of the ethnic groups that inhabited the Quiché Land (K'iché), i.e. one of the Mayan kingdoms in Guatemala . True Genesis of the Maya, it tells us the myth of Creation as they conceived it and describes the evolution of humanity with its various creations and its subsequent cataclysms. Beings shaped by creators in multiple phases (there are three in the Popul Vuh). No less interesting is the case of Sumerian mythology where we discover a world made up of men, heroes and gods (the Annunaki) closely linked to each other. These gods are not abstract entities and are not natural phenomena: the Sumerian divinities are concrete entities and closely related to nature of which man is also part, but like the Greek gods, indeed more than the Greek gods, the Annunaki depend entirely and for everything by humans. In short, men exist with the sole purpose of serving and working for the gods and pleasing them, and for this alone they were created.
Among the myths of the Native Americans we find stories that speak of meetings between girls from the stars and men from the Earth and there is clear that the native peoples came from the sky. The Indians could not be more clear and concise when they say that "long time ago they lived in the Sky and no one knew the Earth".
From the Bible itself, in Genesis 6.4 we read:
“When men began to multiply on the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful and took as many wives as they wanted. (…) There were Giants on Earth in those times - and even after - when the sons of God united with the daughters of men and the latter bore them children: these are the heroes of antiquity, famous men.”
In the most common exegeses, it is believed that the Giants (corresponding to the Nephilim in the Jewish myths and the Annunaki for the Sumerians) are the same children of God who, having descended to Earth, united with human women. They are identified as a sort of fallen Angels who gave rise to a lineage of "famous men".
But the interpretation is very controversial since we generally tend to identify the Giants with the Sons of God and therefore with the lineage derived from the union of these with human women. But what happens if we instead logically analyze the passage and consider the elements mentioned as three separate and distinct subjects from each other: the Giants, the Men and the Sons of God. This is one of the last possibilities that opens up in the field of interpretation of Genesis biblical which presents us with numerous questions still unanswered for science and history: did the giants really exist? How many traditions in the world talk about it? Did they come from Atlantis? Does the mythical submerged continent exist? What do the hundreds of legends that tell of the universal flood have in common? What are the ancient and unknown civilizations from which the Celts, the Maya and the Hindus were born? Peoples very distant from each other, but with very similar mythological traditions... but then are these myths really just myths or is there a grain of truth that needs to be reinterpreted to understand our origins? And if the Giants existed, then who are the Children of God?
The latest perspectives suggest that an insemination may have actually occurred and even carried out in successive phases by very distinct alien civilizations, for different purposes. One to use the resources on Earth and enslave man by positioning themselves as false creator gods, the other to make him aware, aware of a superior reality and allow him to evolve autonomously and free from false idols.
The doctrine of Plato and, more recently, of the philosophers of the Chartres school of the 12th century describe, perhaps unconsciously, the creation of man by alien intelligences called astral entities or angels, and not lost or unworthy beings, not substitutes for God, but intermediaries between God and man. To do this, as the philosophical texts tell us, these entities
«fused together the “Other” and the “Same” of which the world itself was made up, and they fused them together by “crossing” them in the shape of the Greek letter X (chi). »
If we pay attention we notice the similarity between this sign and the symbol with which biologists in genetics represent the human chromosomes: the double helixes of DNA. Could it just be a coincidence? And is it always a coincidence that the symbol of Enki in the Sumerian tradition is a double crossed snake, still used today in medicine to indicate the double helix of DNA?
In conclusion, evolved alien civilizations with different origins and purposes could have "created" man as we know him in several phases; a being different from other mammals, endowed with a divine touch and an intellect that completely distinguishes him from the animal.
Certainly this theory may seem to border on science fiction, but it is coherent and suggests a new way of observing history and science, a new starting point, a new way of reasoning and observing our planet and what is visible or visible on it. hidden, also suggesting another important truth: science and faith can be reconciled.
The most difficult thing to accept is that if proved true we will have to rewrite the history of our origins, as well as all the sciences connected to it.
Research on DNA is welcome, which certainly still contains infinite information, but too many people in the traditional scientific community still refuse the possibility of having to face new truths with respect to the knowledge commonly accepted up to now, with the risk of stalling research.
Meanwhile, doubts about our descent from primates are increasing and only a few are asking why all the peoples of the Earth have always claimed to descend from the "peoples of the stars".
