Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Info-ParaNet Newsletters Volume 1 Number 576
Info-ParaNet Newsletters Volume I Number 576
Friday, July 24th 1992
(C) Copyright 1992 Paranet Information Service. All Rights Reserved.
Today's Topics:
MJ-12 The Ultimate Secret?? - Part 7
MJ-12 The Ultimate Secret?? - Part 8
MJ-12 The Ultimate Secret?? - Conclusion
The Ultimate Secret Correction
Re: Request: Roswell Information; And How To Get More
Re: Closed Abductee Conference
North American UGMs in 1992
Re: Closed Abductee Conference
Phoenix group-quincy report
Pulsed jet aircraft -- why?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ParaNet.Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (sm)
Subject: MJ-12 The Ultimate Secret?? - Part 7
Date: 20 Jul 92 03:09:07 GMT
<<<<<<...Continued from previous message>>>>>>
NASA MISSIONS CONCERNED WITH PROJECT ZEUS AND SDI
4/4/83 -- Project Zeus - SDI -- Shuttle Challenger,
Mission STS-6
NASA, KSC Release # 107-86
The first flight of the Shuttle Challenger lifted off
at 1:30 p.m. EST this date. Payload: TDRS-A, a tracking
and data relay satellite, deployed on the first day of
the mission. This mission also included the first
spacewalk which lasted 4 hours and 17 minutes.
Commander: Paul H. Weitz
Pilot: Karol H. Bobko
Mission Specialists:
Donald H. Peterson
Dr. Story Musgrave
8/30/84 -- Project Zeus -- SDI -- Shuttle Discovery,
Mission STS-41-D.
NASA: Release # PMS-204-A
The was the maiden flight of the Space Shuttle
Discovery. It was launched at 8:41 a.m., this date.
Payload: Two communications satellites (SBS-D and Telstar
3-C) and one SYNCOM IV-2 for DOD.
Commander: Henry W. Hartsfield, Jr.
Pilot: Michael L. Coats
Mission Specialists:
Judith A. Resnick (female)
Steven A. Hawley
Richard M. Mullane
Payload Specialist: Charles D. Walker (McDonnell Douglas)
11/8/84 -- Project Zeus - SDI -- Shuttle Discovery,
Mission STS 51-A
NASA: Release # PMS-204-A, January 1988
The Shuttle Discovery was launched at 7:15 a.m. this
date. STS 51-A had two primary objectives, to deploy the
ANIK-D2 (a Canadian communications satellite) and SYNCOM
IV-1 for DOD. In addition, to capture and return to Earth
two satellites placed in improper orbits by a faulty
launch from STS 41-G.
Payload: ANIK-D2 and SYNCOM IV-1 (DOD)
Commander: Frederick H. Hauck
Pilot: David M. Walker
Mission Specialists:
Joseph P. Allen
Anna L. Fisher (female)
1/24/85 -- Project Zeus - - SDI -- Shuttle Discovery,
Mission STS-51-C.
NASA, KSC Release # PMS-205, August 1986
This was the first Space Shuttle mission totally
dedicated to the Department of Defense. Its cargo was
classified.
Commander: Thomas C. Mattingly
Pilot: Loren H. Shriver
Mission Specialists:
James F. Buchli
Ellison S. Onizuka
Payload Specialist: Gary E. Payton, USAF
Note: The payload was two orbiting spy satellites and
three orbiting laser mirrors for SDI.
4/12/85 -- Project Zeus -- SDI -- Shuttle Discovery,
Mission STS-51-D.
NASA, KSC Release # PMS)005, August 1986
Discovery lifted off from KSC at 8:59 a.m. EST this
date. Payload: An Anik C-1 spacecraft (Satellite) for the
Canadian government, and SYNCOM IV-3 spacecraft with
satellite for the Defense Department (DOD).
The SYNCOM series of rocket propelled communication
satellites each comes with its own booster stage,
identical to the third stage booster of a Minuteman
Missile. These satellites are used primarily for
Department of Defense (DOD) high-priority communications.
Commander: Karol H. Bobko
Pilot: Donald E. Williams
Mission Specialists:
M. Rhea Seddon (female)
S. David Griggs
Jeffrey A. Hoffman
Payload Specialist: Charles D. Walker, McDonnell Douglas
Observer: E. H. "Jake" Garn - U.S. Senator.
This flight included the first flight of an elected
official, Senator E. H. "Jake" Garn (R-Utah), Chairman of
the Senate committee with oversight responsibilities for
NASA's budget.
6/17/85 -- Project Zeus -- SDI -- Shuttle Discovery,
Mission STS-51-G.
NASA, Release PMS-005, August 1986
The Shuttle Discovery was launched at 7:33 a.m., this
date.
Payload: Three communication satellites (1 for Saudi
Arabia, 1 for Mexico and 1 Telstar for AT&T). In
addition, seven unnamed canisters were launched. Also
launched was the (HPTE) High Precision Tracking
Experiment for the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) --
Star Wars.
Commander: Daniel C. Brandenstein
Pilot: John O. Creighton
Mission Specialists:
Shannon W. Lucid
Steven R. Nagel
John M. Fabian
Payload Specialists: Patrick Baudry (France) Prince
Sultan
Salman Al-Saud (Saudi Arabia)
8/27/85 -- Project Zeus -- SDI -- Shuttle Discovery,
Mission STS-51-I.
NASA: Release PMS-005
The Shuttle Discovery was launched at 6:58 a.m., this
date. This mission had the unusual responsibility of
recovering and repairing the SYNCOM IV-3 Satellite
launched by Discovery in April (Mission STS-51-D,
4/29/85).
In addition, SYNCOM IV-4, for the DOD was launched and
deployed on 4/29/89. Two communications Satellites were
also launched: one for Australia and one for the American
Satellite Company.
<Continued in next message...>
--
ParaNet(sm) Information Service - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: ParaNet(sm).Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ParaNet.Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (sm)
Subject: MJ-12 The Ultimate Secret?? - Part 8
Date: 20 Jul 92 03:10:08 GMT
<<<<<<<...Continued from previous message>>>>>>>
Payload: SYNCOM IV-4 (DOD), Aussat-1, ASC-1.
Commander: Joe H. Engle
Pilot: Richard O. Covey
Mission Specialists:
James Van Hoften
John M. Lounge
William S. Fisher
10/3/85 -- Project Zeus -- SDI -- Shuttle Atlantis,
Mission STS-51-J.
NASA Release # PMS-005 KSC
This was the maiden flight of the Shuttle Atlantis and
the second mission dedicated solely to the Department of
Defense (DOD). Its cargo was classified. The mission was
declared successful.
Commander: Karol J. "Bo" Bobko
Pilot: Ronald H. Grabe
Mission Specialists:
David C. Hilmers
Robert L. Stewart
Payload Specialist: William Pailes (USAF)
1/28/86 -- Project Zeus -- SDI -- Shuttle Challenger,
Mission STS-51-L.
NASA: Release # PMS-005
The Shuttle Challenger was launched at 11:37 a.m.,
this date. This was the first mission which included 2
women on the crew. At just under 74 seconds into the
flight an explosion occurred, which caused the loss of
the Shuttle Challenger and its crew.
Payload: A TDRS (Tracking and Data Relay) Satellite for
SDI, a Spartan free flying module designed to operate
independently of Challenger and to be used for observing
Halley's Comet with two ultra-violet spectrometers and 2
cameras.
Commander: Francis R. Scobee
Pilot: Michael J. Smith
Mission Specialists:
Judith A. Resnick (female)
Ellison Onizuka
Robert E. McNair
S. Christa McAuliffe (female) Teacher, passenger and
observer
Payload Specialist: Gregory B. Jarvis (Hughes Aircraft
Co.)
9/29/88 -- Project Zeus -- SDI --Shuttle Discovery,
Mission STS-26.
NASA Pub # MR-026, NASA Facts, KSC Release No. 27-89
Payload: A 4,905 pound communications Satellite (The
Tracking and Data Relay Satellite-TDRS) one of the
largest and heaviest applications satellites ever sent
into orbit. TDRS-C was the prime objective of the
mission, and is expected to improve Earth-to-space and
space-to-earth voice and data exchanges. TDRS-C will
increase the capacity of command data flows for unmanned
research and applications satellites orbiting at
relatively low altitudes. The STS-26 crew are all
experienced astronauts.
Commander: Frederick H. Hauck (Capt. USN)
Pilot: Richard Covey (Lt. Col. USAF)
Mission Specialists:
David C. Hilmers (Lt. Col. USAF)
John M. Lounge (USN, Retired)
George D. Nelson - Astronomer
The TDRS-C satellite was lifted to its 22,302 mile
orbit by an AF IUS rocket, after being deployed by the
shuttle, for positioning over the equator north of the
Phoenix Islands, south of Hawaii, in the Pacific Ocean
(171 Degrees west longitude). There the satellite can
work in tandem with an identical TDRS-1 positioned in
geosynchronous orbit in 1983 over the Atlantic Ocean near
Fortaleza, Brazil (41 degrees west longitude). These two
satellites can act as data relays for other satellites.
TDRS-C will maintain nearly uninterrupted
communications with the ground and will rapidly transmit
huge volumes of data.
So vast is the capacity of these two satellites that,
at their highest transmission rates, they can in a single
second transfer data equaling the contents of a 20-volume
encyclopedia with 1200 pages in each volume and 2000
words on each page.
A third Tracking and Data Relay Satellite, TDRS-D,
will be launched at a later date and deployed over the
Atlantic Ocean. It will replace TDRS-1, which will be
relocated south of White Sands, New Mexico where it will
serve as an in-orbit spare.
One communications experiment inside the shuttle
spacecraft was the testing of a new voice communications
system using infrared waves rather than standard radio
frequencies. An advantage of infrared is it cannot pass
through the spacecraft's windows as can radio waves.
Infrared communications would prevent a spacecraft from
eavesdropping, thus protecting sensitive astronaut
conversations, and enhancing security, and the crew's
privacy.
Note: This extraordinary procedure must pertain to the
Greys. Note the word "spacecraft." Whose? Earlier NASA
Missions had reported UFO encounters. The Greys are
suspicious.
12/2/88 -- Project Zeus -- SDI -- Shuttle Atlantis,
Mission STS-27.
NASA Facts, KSC Release No. 84-88
The newest shuttle Atlantis lifted off today from
Kennedy Space Center on a classified mission for the
Department of Defense.
This flight is the first of three national security
missions conducted in fiscal 1989 by NASA for the Defense
Department. STS-27 will have a five-member crew. All are
military personnel.
Commander: Robert L. Gibson (Cmdr. USN)
Pilot: Guy S. Gardner (Lt.Col. USAF)
Mission Specialists:
Richard M. Mullane (Col. USAF)
Jerry L. Ross (Lt.Col. USAF)
William M. Shepard (Cmdr. USN)
The Shuttle Atlantis has flown twice before: Mission
51-H in October 1985, a classified DOD mission; and 61-B
in November 1985.
Note: The payload consisted of two orbiting mirrors
for SDI (Project Zeus) and a communications and spy
satellite for DOD.
<Concluded in next message...>
--
ParaNet(sm) Information Service - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: ParaNet(sm).Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ParaNet.Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (sm)
Subject: MJ-12 The Ultimate Secret?? - Conclusion
Date: 20 Jul 92 03:11:09 GMT
<<<<<<<<...Continued from previous message>>>>>>>>
3/13/89 -- Project Zeus -- SDI -- Shuttle Discovery,
Mission STS-29.
NASA Facts, KSC Release No. 8-89
The Space Shuttle Discovery launched at 9:57 a.m. EST
today has as its primary objective the deployment of a
Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS-D).
The TDRS-D, to become TDRS-4 in orbit, will be
deployed on the first day of the mission. The satellite
will join TDRS-1 and -3 in orbit to provide high-capacity
communications and data links.
TDRS-1, also designated TDRS-East, is now in
geosynchronous orbit over the Atlantic Ocean just east of
Brazil. TDRS-3, designated TDRS-West, was launched by
Discovery on mission STS-26 in September of 1988, and is
positioned over the Pacific Ocean south of Hawaii. TDRS-4
will replace TDRS-1 over the Atlantic as TDRS-East.
TDRS-1 will then be relocated south of White Sands, New
Mexico where it will serve as an in-orbit spare.
The five member crew of Discovery for STS-29 are:
Commander: Michael L. Coats (Capt. USN)
Pilot: John E. Blaha (Col. USAF)
Mission Specialists:
James F. Buchli (Col. USMC)
Robert C. Springer (Col. USMC)
James R. Bagian (M.D.) Civilian Doctor
In addition to launching the TDRS Satellite, the crew
of Discovery will conduct numerous scientific experiments
and photograph the Earth with a hand-held IMAX camera.
4/26/89 -- Project Zeus -- SDI -- Magellan Venus
Probe, Shuttle Atlantis,
Mission STS-30.
AP Wire:
The Atlantis commander says his crew is mighty proud
to be part of the first space shuttle planetary mission
scheduled to blast-off this Friday. The countdown, which
started Tuesday, continued toward a liftoff at 2:24 p.m.
Friday.
Six hours after launch, astronauts Mark Lee and Mary
Cleave are to release the 7,600-pound Magellan probe and
a rocket to propel it on a 468-day journey to Venus.
Magellan is to reach its destination in August 1990,
swooping into orbit around Venus to begin a 243-day
period during which it is to map up to 90 percent of the
cloud-shrouded planet's surface with the probe's high
resolution radar system.
"We're not really in charge of the deep space probe,"
said Commander David Walker. "We're fortunate enough to
be part of the team that gets to send it up there. The
rest of the NASA team will make sure that it gets to
Venus and does its job."
UPDATE: NASA, KSC Release # 24-89, March 1989
Magellan marks the first U.S. planetary mission since
Pioneer Venus 12 in 1978. It also kicks off a core
program of solar system exploration involving NASA and
organizations from the United States and the
international community.
Project ZEUS: One of the payload experiments on this
Shuttle Mission includes the Mesoscale Lighting
Experiment, a NASA sponsored effort involving several
universities. Its objective is to study the visual
characteristics of large scale lighting in the upper
atmosphere.
Note: Part of the Project Zeus effort to study laser
beam diffusion in the upper atmosphere.
In addition, as another experiment, the Shuttle
Atlantis will act as a calibration point for a third
experiment involving the Air Force Maui Optical System
Facility in Hawaii.
Note: Project Zeus - SDI Experiment.
Although unstated in this NASA Release, Atlantis is
acting as an orbital target being tracked by the Air
Force facility (SDI ground based laser facility) named in
the above paragraph.
1989 -- 8/8/89 -- Project Zeus - SDI -- Shuttle
Columbia -- Mission ??
AP Wire & Mercury News Service 7/27/89
The Space Shuttle Columbia lifts off with five
military astronauts and a classified Pentagon spy
satellite. Columbia will be making the 30th shuttle
flight and the fourth this year, solely dedicated to the
Defense Department. For national security purposes, the
Pentagon would not permit NASA to announce the exact
liftoff time or the length of the mission.
Note: The payload is the last of 4 orbiting laser
mirrors for SDI. With this mission completed, SDI becomes
partly operational. It is estimated that SDI will become
fully operational within the next 12 months, barring
unforeseen events.
Note: The following NASA launch information was
derived from the American Academic Encyclopedia. The
Project Zeus (SDI) comments, are those of the Phoenix
Project.
1989 -- 8/13/89 -- Project Zeus - SDI - Shuttle
Columbia
The 30th mission, flown by Brewster H. Shaw, Jr., and a
crew of four, orbited another military satellite.
1989 -- 11/22/89 -- Project Zeus - SDI - Shuttle
Discovery
The 32d mission, flown on Discovery by Frederick M.
Gregory and a crew of four, launched a spy satellite.
1990 -- 1/9/90 -- Project Zeus - SDI - Shuttle
Columbia
On Jan. 9, 1990, Daniel Brandenstein and a crew of four
flew Columbia to launch Syncom IV and to retrieve the
Long Duration Exposure Facility, a research satellite
left in space for six years.
1990 -- 2/28/90 -- Project Zeus - SDI - Shuttle
Atlantis
Another spy satellite mission followed on Feb. 28-Mar. 4,
1990, when John O. Creighton and a crew of four flew
Atlantis.
1990 -- 4/24/90 -- Project Zeus - SDI - Shuttle
Discovery
The long-awaited Hubble SPACE TELESCOPE was finally
placed in a high orbit by Discovery's crew of four,
commanded by Loren J. Shriver, during the Apr. 24-29,
1990 flight, but Columbia, scheduled for launch the
following month, was grounded by a series of hydrogen
leaks, as was Atlantis.
1990 -- 11/15/90 -- Project Zeus - SDI - Shuttle
Atlantis
The 37th flight of the space shuttle program took place
on Atlantis, from Nov. 15-20, 1990, carrying a secret
military payload into orbit. Unconfirmed reports
suggested that Atlantis carried a spy satellite intended
to monitor activities in Iraq and the Persian Gulf
region. Mission commander was Air Force Col. Richard O.
Covey, and he was assisted by a crew of four.
1991 -- 4/28/91 -- Project Zeus - SDI - Shuttle
Discovery
Space shuttle Discovery was launched on Apr. 28, 1991,
and returned to Earth on May 6. Its military mission was
concerned with collecting data for the Strategic Defense
Initiative ("Star Wars") antimissile program. Mission
commander was U.S. Navy Capt. Michael L. Coats. He was
assisted by a pilot and crew of four.
1991 -- 8/2/91 -- Project Zeus - SDI - Shuttle
Atlantis
Flight number 42 for the Space Shuttle program--and the
ninth for the Atlantis--was launched on Aug. 2, 1991, and
returned safely to Earth on August 11. The crew, under
the command of Air Force Col. John E. Blaha, consisted of
three men and one woman. The mission successfully
deployed the Department of Defense's large Tracking and
Data Relay Satellite, sending it into an orbit about
22,000 miles (35,400 km) above the equator. The mission
also conducted experiments on the ozone layer, made
medical experiments, and tested computer and mechanical
equipment.
..end of file
[ For a complete, printed copy of the entire document,
including all exhibits, contact Advent Publishing Company
at the address supplied. ]
END
PARANET FILENAME: ULTSEC.TXT
--
ParaNet(sm) Information Service - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: ParaNet(sm).Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ParaNet.Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (sm)
Subject: The Ultimate Secret Correction
Date: 20 Jul 92 03:14:19 GMT
This file was uploaded to ParaNet separately as a correction to a portion of
the ULTSEC.TXT file. I have not incorporated it into the original file so
that you can see what was intended to be changed. It is incorporated as an
addendum to the original file.
[PPRCOR.TXT]
This is a correction that should be inserted to replace the
original text to the Phoenix Project Report ULTSEC.TXT, ULTSEC.ZIP.
For those who received it as messages over various echoes the area
to be replaced falls into part 8 of 17.
Separate projects under the umbrella of Project Aquarius are:
PROJECT GRUDGE: This project was originally established in
1948, and is under the control of the CIA, NSA, and MAJI. Project
Grudge went underground and another project, Project Sign, was
created in December of 1947, was used as a cover operation.
In February of 1949, Project Sign was officially abolished,
however, unofficially it continued its operations until Project
Blue Book was created in June of 1951. Project Aquarius, became the
overall umbrella operation controlling all these projects. Project
Aquarius was funded by CIA confidential funds (non-appropriated).
The Project assumed full responsibility for investigation and
intelligence of UFOs/IACs in December 1969 after Project
Grudge/Blue Book was closed. The purpose of Project Aquarius was to
collect all scientific, technological, medical and intelligence
information from UFO/IAC sightings and contacts with alien
lifeforms. This orderly file of collected information has been used
to advance the United States' Space Program and provided the data
needed to develop present stealth technology.
....
end of correction.
--
ParaNet(sm) Information Service - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: ParaNet(sm).Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michael.Corbin@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin)
Subject: Re: Request: Roswell Information; And How To Get More
Date: 20 Jul 92 03:38:01 GMT
* Forwarded from "Alt.Alien.Visitors"
* Originally from Student Class Account
* Originally dated 07-19-92 12:45
From: ee3401cb@carina.unm.edu (Student Class Account)
Date: 18 Jul 92 17:31:23 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Message-ID: <j2amy7b@lynx.unm.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
In article <1992Jul17.173640.17428@crc.ac.uk> sgamble@crc.ac.uk (Steve Gamble
x3293) writes:
>To coincide with the MUFON Conference last weekend in Alberquerque
>Stanton Friedman and Don Berliner's new book "Crash at Corona" was
>released. This week Stan is doing a lecture tour around New Mexico.
>
I just heard Stanton Freidman speak at U.N.M. last night, and recently
finished reading his "Crash at Corona". The BIG difference between
Freidman's and Randle's books are the claims by the fromer of a second
crash site 160 miles west involving a different saucer. I seem to remember
Randle and Schmitt dismissed claims of another site due to lack of evidence.
The new book also has a chapter about MJ-12 with the documents themselves
in an Appendix.
After the conference I asked Freidman about Robert Lazar. He said that
his claim that he (Lazar) worked at a secret govt. installation back-
engineering
UFO's is total bunk. No proof exists (that he could find anyway) of where
he claims he went to school or that he was even a Physicist as he claims.
He also found evidence that he was at one time owner of a couple of brothels
in Nevada, which would have made his getting a security clearance very
difficult.
James
>At the MUFON Press Conference at Alberquerque there was a heated
>exchange of views between Kevin Randle, representing a local Roswell
>paper (also author with Don Schmitt of Crash at Roswell) and Stan.
Maybe this debate was over the second crash site or something?
James
--
Michael Corbin - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: afglsc.span.nasa.gov!WEBB
Subject: Re: Closed Abductee Conference
Date: 20 Jul 92 16:44:32 GMT
From: WEBB@afglsc.span.nasa.gov
To: Mike Corbin
Mike, I think you misunderstand the intent of the MIT Abd.
Conf. I too was at the conference (in fact it was I who introduced Dave
Pritchard to the local MUFON group), gave a talk, and signed the agreement
which Robert Sheaffer posted. Although I did not like the tone of the
agreement, Dave and John Mack obviously thought it was necessary to protect
the researchers and abductees who were there and to insure a professional
conf. and publication. Dave and John are certainly not out to make money on
this; more likely they will lose money and they are putting their
scientific reputations at considerable risk. They are to be commended for
bringing together most of the key people in the field, including our own
Keith Basterfield from Aust. and Jenny Randles from England, on short
notice and attempting to ligitimize the field by producing a quality
professional procedings. Realize that without eventually getting scientists
and their funding agencies involved, UFO research will probably never
advance beyond its present state. So I think just the opposite of your
comments about the agreement was intended and others on the net should
realize this. Unfortunately, we can't talk in detail about the conf., but
suffice it to say it was very worthwhile and interesting and the ensuing
document will be widely available to anyone and will be highly recommended
reading.
Dave Webb
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ccu.UManitoba.CA!rutkows
Subject: North American UGMs in 1992
Date: 21 Jul 92 20:49:16 GMT
From: Chris Rutkowski <rutkows@ccu.UManitoba.CA>
For those who are interested, the following is the latest information
from NAICCR.
1992 North American Crop Circles and/or UGMs
Reported to NAICCR as of 21 July 1992
920426 Jonesboro, Georgia
- a 'formation' of crop circles, 'exactly' like those found in
1991 in the same location, was discovered.
Source: Rosemary Ellen Guiley; Vance Tiede
9204?? , New Hampshire
- UGMs were found following a small local flap of UFO reports.
Source: Rosemary Ellen Guiley; Vance Tiede
920506 near Edmonton, Alberta
- a 'space cookie' UGM was discovered in a meadow. It is a
perfect circle, 6 metres in diameter. Its depth varies from 5 cm
to 31 cm. Grass is growing straight up both inside and outside
the circle. No tracks were found leading to the area. The UGM
is not a sinkhole.
Source: Gordon Kijek
9205?? Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- two crop circles were found in a cornfield just north of the
Philadelphia city limits. Soil samples taken by a UFO
investigator 'showed no irregularities'.
Source: Steve Bernheisel on FIDONET
920627 Raeford, North Carolina
- a circle of flattened grass was found in a hay field following
a CE2 UFO sighting. A loud noise, 'like a freight train', was
heard, and two witnesses ran to look out their front door. A
object 'the size of a swimming pool', 'like orange windows all
around it', was in a field about 300 feet away from their house.
When they went to call other witnesses, the object disappeared.
Source: Patrick Kirol on FIDONET
9206?? , Massachusetts
- a small area of flattened cattails was found in a marsh close
to a major highway and reported as a crop circle.
Source: Tom Randolph on DEC COM via INTERNET
920701 St. Adolphe, Manitoba
- nine 'horseshoe-shaped' patches of flattened grass were found
on either side of a brook in a Winnipeg suburb. Because of recent
storms and heavy rainfall, lodging was thought to be the cause.
Source: Guy Westcott; NAICCR
920705 Hobbema, Alberta
- two ovals of flattened barley were found in a field after
unusual lights were observed descending to the ground. The
largest UGM has a major axis of 47 feet. The crop is pushed away
uniformly from the centers of the patches, but the centers are
'clumped', like breaking waves. Barley inside the circles is
'white', and devoid of colour. It was later suggested that the areas
were due to spilled seeds and fertilizer, combined with lodging.
Source: Gord Kijek
920715 St. Adolphe, Manitoba
- a field beside a highway was discovered to have numerous patches of
flattened crop, in irregular patterns. The formations were discovered
by the same person who found case 920701. Investigation by NAICCR and
interviews with the owner of the field established that the crop had
been laid down by strong winds and heavy rain. The person who
discovered the formations was convinced that aliens created the
flattened patches.
Source: NAICCR
--
Chris Rutkowski - rutkows@ccu.umanitoba.ca
Royal Astronomical Society of Canada
University of Manitoba - Winnipeg, Canada
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michael.Corbin@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin)
Subject: Re: Closed Abductee Conference
Date: 21 Jul 92 21:54:03 GMT
+ From: WEBB@afglsc.span.nasa.gov
+
+ To: Mike Corbin
+ Mike, I think you misunderstand the intent of the MIT Abd.
+ Conf. I too was at the conference (in fact it was I who introduced Dave
+ Pritchard to the local MUFON group), gave a talk, and signed the agreement
+ which Robert Sheaffer posted. Although I did not like the tone of the
+ agreement, Dave and John Mack obviously thought it was necessary to protect
+ the researchers and abductees who were there and to insure a professional
+ conf. and publication. Dave and John are certainly not out to make money on
+ this; more likely they will lose money and they are putting their
+ scientific reputations at considerable risk. They are to be commended for
+ bringing together most of the key people in the field, including our own
+ Keith Basterfield from Aust. and Jenny Randles from England, on short
+ notice and attempting to ligitimize the field by producing a quality
+ professional procedings. Realize that without eventually getting scientists
+ and their funding agencies involved, UFO research will probably never
+ advance beyond its present state. So I think just the opposite of your
+ comments about the agreement was intended and others on the net should
+ realize this. Unfortunately, we can't talk in detail about the conf., but
+ suffice it to say it was very worthwhile and interesting and the ensuing
+ document will be widely available to anyone and will be highly recommended
+ reading.
Thank you for the comment Dave. While I agree that some of this might be
mis-stated on my part, I feel that in order for this type of effort to be
truly scientifically objective, it will be necessary to establish some type of
independent board of review. Even the best intentions can get clouded when
methodology is employed which appears to remove something from the view of the
public. I have discussed some of this with a couple of contacts of mine who
are main-stream scientists. They did affirm that it is not unusual to have
"closed-door" meetings to discuss research candidly and away from the formal
protocols, however I was also told that peer review is a very important part
of validating findings and determining the veracity of the research. As we
have been promised, the proceedings will be forthcoming. I guess we shall
just have to wait and see.
On a similar note, could you perhaps tell me why Jacques Vallee was not
invited to the conference despite the fact that he offered some of his work
and wanted to attend?
Thanks for your time.
Mike
--
Michael Corbin - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: blitzen.gvg.tek.com!mike
Subject: Phoenix group-quincy report
Date: 22 Jul 92 23:14:57 GMT
From: mike@blitzen.gvg.tek.com (Mike Henderson)
Mr. Corbin
A coworker of mine(Dan Chaplin; danc@gold.gvg.tek.com) worked for the
US forest service in the early 70's and surveyed the 'secondary' road
referred to in the Phoenix group paper(gvg is roughly 50 miles from
Pilot Peak). It IS a very popular road among locals for Quincy to La
Porte travel(the shortest route, in fact) and Mr. Chaplin was surveying
it for future logging activity. He says removal of trees near the road
is done when the primary logging site lies further down the road and a
wide, safe right of way is desired for the large logging trucks. Mr.
Chaplin does not strike me as a conspiratorial person. I have verified
the existence of Pilot Peak with detailed sectional maps of the area
but the only meadow with a dammed pond in the area is traversed by the
road between Quincy and La Porte(not very secluded). Dan says anyone
can spend the night on the lookout(no official permission required) but
I have a young baby and cannot take off nights to do such things. The
area in question seems to be rough
Sorry I can't go there myself.
M. Henderson(mike@blitzen.gvg.tek.com)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: anubis.network.com!logajan
Subject: Pulsed jet aircraft -- why?
Date: 23 Jul 92 13:17:31 GMT
From: logajan@anubis.network.com (John Logajan)
Speculation as to why the secret aircraft uses pulsed thrust:
It has long been known than air breathing jets are more efficient than rockets,
which not only have to carry their own oxidizer, but more importantly, have
to carry their own reaction mass.
The laws of physics say that when two objects interact (in this case the
craft and the ejected reaction mass -- the exhaust) with force X, the
lightest object takes the most energy (velocity.) Energy division is
always inversely proportional to mass ratio. For any specific propulsive
force X, then, if you can increase the exhaust (or reaction) mass, you need
less total energy. Or, for the same amount of energy, you get more total
propulsive force.
In a craft, you want as much of your fuel energy as possible to go into the
craft's velocity, and as little as possible into your exhaust velocity.
With an air breather, you can interact with tons and tons and tons of
atmosphere as reaction mass. That is why commercial jet engines have
such huge intakes. The power source doesn't need that much oxygen as
oxidizer, most of the air is just bypassed around the engine. They are just
using the excess air as reaction mass. To get the efficiency up, thrust
per gallon of kerosene.
Now the problem with super high altitude craft is that the air is very thin.
And at high velocities (trans-orbital) the time to burn or push against at
a passing molecule of air (25,000 feet per second!) is very short.
What if you collected the air for a fraction of a second, and then burned it
or pushed against it in lumps. You'd get more time to burn and push against
it. It wouldn't be so rarified, so that it'd be easier to ignite it and
maintain the combustion.
Therefore I conclude that the pulsed thrust secret jet aircraft are super
high altitude air breathers, possibly trans-orbital, and likely intended for
extended flight (hence the need for efficient use of fuel) such as a
reconnaissance mission might dictate. However, other missions are certianly
possible.
- John Logajan MS010, Network Systems; 7600 Boone Ave; Brooklyn Park, MN 55428
- logajan@network.com, 612-424-4888, Fax 612-424-2853
*******************************************************************************
Submissions infopara@scicom.alphacdc.com
Administrative requests infopara-request@scicom.alphacdc.com
FTP archive grind.isca.uiowa.edu:/info/paranet/infopara
Permission to distribute Michael.Corbin@paranet.org
Private mail to Paranet/Fidonet users firstname.lastname@paranet.org
UUCP gateway {ncar,isis,csn}!scicom
*********************End**of**the**InfoPara**Newsletter************************
