Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Info-ParaNet Newsletters Volume 1 Number 536
Info-ParaNet Newsletters Volume I Number 536
Thursday, February 27th 1992
(C) Copyright 1992 Paranet Information Service. All Rights Reserved.
Today's Topics:
The Lazar Tape
Spy Satellites and UFOs
Meier and the Ozone Layer
Meier and the Ozone Layer
UFO groups in Devon, England
(none)
California CE-3's
Re: SPYSATS, BLACK TRIAN
11:11
11:11
The Lazar Tape
Richard Russell Sightings
The Lazar Tape
Melbourne Australia Sighting
Encounter over Siberia
Re: California CE-3's
x-ray
UFO-congress in berlin
Cable Radio Network
X-ray
Re: x-ray
Re: maitreya, spirits, antichrist
Re: maitreya, spirits, antichrist
Re: 11:11
Cable Radio Affiliates
Re: Cable Radio Network
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Don.Ecker@p0.f3.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Don Ecker)
Subject: The Lazar Tape
Date: 16 Feb 92 23:50:00 GMT
Peggy Noonan wrote;
> Hello Mike,
> I saw the tape too, a pre-release copy. I don't want to step on
> Don's review in UFO Magazine (not sure when that will come out) but I'm
> going to be very eager to see what he says [Don, will you be posting
> that review or part of it here?] about the tape.
Yes Peggy I will be posting my review in the ASK_UFO echo after it runs in
the next issue. That issue will be back from the printer this week. I had Bob
and Gene Huff on my show on KIEV about a month and a half ago, and when all
this is put together for the new show on national cable radio, I hope in the
next couple of weeks, I will have Lazar and Huff back.
> I found it very interesting. It had a lot of detail and
> explanation of the propulsion used by UFOs, with a sort of cram course
> for physics for those of us who're not experts in that area. Whether
> it's credible or not, I couldn't say. It's persuasive, certainly. >
Have you found the tape yet? What's the asking price on it?
The tape ad ran in the last issue of *UFO, and if you are interested, you can
get a copy by writing to;
TRI-DOT PRODUCTIONS, LTD.
1324 S. Eastern
Las Vegas, NV. 89104
The price is $29.95 PLUS $3.50 S&H.
Don
--
Don Ecker - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Don.Ecker@p0.f3.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jim.Speiser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Jim Speiser)
Subject: Spy Satellites and UFOs
Date: 17 Feb 92 15:08:00 GMT
Roger:
There is at least one photo of a "UFO" by a weather tracking satellite,
something called "DMSP-1" I believe. It was analyzed by Bruce Maccabee, and
the analysis is available from the Fund and/or CUFOS.
Jim
--
Jim Speiser - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Jim.Speiser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jim.Speiser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Jim Speiser)
Subject: Meier and the Ozone Layer
Date: 17 Feb 92 15:17:00 GMT
Dan:
That's a very interesting tract from the Meier notes. It will be more
interesting if it can be shown conclusively that there was no mention of a
danger from ozone depletion in any texts available in 1975. However, somehow I
think I've read somewhere that it has been theorized for some time, and that
it's just now getting to the level of public knowledge.
Also, it would be a helluva lot more useful if Semjase had given us some way
out of the problem...but of course they're just here to inspire and guide, not
instruct...
Jim
--
Jim Speiser - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Jim.Speiser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Steve.Gresser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Steve Gresser)
Subject: Meier and the Ozone Layer
Date: 18 Feb 92 07:03:00 GMT
> From: Dan Drasin <ddrasin@well.sf.ca.us>
> Regarding the ozone layer and the Billy Meier case:
> ----------------------------------------------------
> The initial contact in question took place on March 2, 1975, according
> to Meier's notes. The somewhat rough and awkward translation from the
> original German contact notes reads as follows:
Regarding the ozone layer:
When the sattelites went up to examine the upper atmosphere, they discovered
the ozone depletion around the south pole. However, with little knowledge of
upper air currents and expected ozone level results, many scientists decided
that the problem was an anomoly with the equipment and not (I repeat NOT) a
hole in the ozone. It existed and was measured, but was ignored for lack of
experience with the layer. However, some scientists persisted, insisting that
the sattelite had just done what it was expected to do - detect anomolies in
the atmosphere. After many years of extensive study, they determined that this
is exactly what happened. Recently, another hole in the ozone was discovered
over the Northern Hemisphere.
As a side-note: We are not talking about a hole in the ozone at all, but a
depletion of ozone in a particular area. This is not to down-play the danger;
to the contrary, it is to offer hope that if an immediate reduction in CFC use
worldwide is implemented, the destruction can be halted. However, it must be
noted that things are getting progressively worse - either last year or the
year before (I don't have the information in front of me) when the Southern
Hemisphere summer began and the "hole" was "closed", a peice of it "broke off",
not unlike a bubble, and floated over the continent of Australia, where it
slowly depleted, over the course of a week I think.
(end side-note)
Steve
--
Steve Gresser - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Steve.Gresser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dcs.exeter.ac.uk!paul2
Subject: UFO groups in Devon, England
Date: 20 Feb 92 12:32:11 GMT
From: Paul Day <paul2@dcs.exeter.ac.uk>
I'm looking for a UFO group in or around Devon, England. Does
anyone know if a serious minded group in that area. Does
anyone else from round here subscribe to paranet?
Paul Day
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: INDSVAX1.INDSTATE.EDU!ETBENT
Subject: (none)
Date: 21 Feb 92 04:37:15 GMT
From: Brian Bentz <ETBENT@INDSVAX1.INDSTATE.EDU>
Hello everyone,
I've been a silent listener here on the list for about a year now. I'm
getting a computer of my own pretty soon and would like to try downloading some
picture files with ftp. Does anyone have a list of ftp sites where neat
pictures are stored. I'm mainly interested in stuff to do with astronomy and
things like that. If anyone knows of any sites, or has files of their own like
that, I would very much appreciate any information you could give me. Thanks.
Brian Bentz
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com!vanth!jms
Subject: California CE-3's
Date: 21 Feb 92 08:41:06 GMT
From: vanth!jms@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (Jim Shaffer)
Yesterday I saw an ABC news report on an anonymous family in California who
claim that they're visited by aliens every night. The aliens probe them
with beams of light, sometimes right through the ceiling of the house while
the family is awake. They made drawings of the ships and they look fairly
complex, with rows of lights or jets on the bottom. They also have
videotape of them, but the videotape just shows large, pale circular
lights. As a telescope owner, I'm nearly certain it's way out of focus
(like part of the Scranton tape was) and possibly insufficiently bright as
well -- would someone please buy these guys a low-light camera and show
them how to use it? Or a floodlight? (The report even mentioned that
people claim the tape is a camera effect, though they didn't offer any
explanation of what lights were responsible for it.) On the other hand,
the lights move independently of each other and change brightness.
Afterwards, the local news anchor mentioned the obvious question: Why
didn't the news crew stick around until nighttime?
--
* From the disk of: | jms@vanth.uucp | 'They don't tell me
Jim Shaffer, Jr. | uunet!cbmvax!vanth!jms | nothin', so I find
37 Brook Street | jms%vanth@cbmvax.commodore.com | out all I can.'
Montgomery, PA 17752 | 72750.2335@compuserve.com | (Phil Collins)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Pete.Porro@f414.n154.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Pete Porro)
Subject: Re: SPYSATS, BLACK TRIAN
Date: 18 Feb 92 19:11:19 GMT
Thanks for the Maj... stuff. They have an office here but I have not gotten
to it yet. Yes it's Paranormal. I asked about it before, but seems like many
people hadn't heard about it. They have video tapes to lend and books. Seems
like quite the movement. Miracle healings, apperitions, and assorted unusual
events. I'll try to get more and post it for the rest.
--
Pete Porro - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Pete.Porro@f414.n154.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG (John Hicks)
Subject: 11:11
Date: 20 Feb 92 06:20:00 GMT
> Look at that place in Florida and you will see.
Say what?
--
John Hicks - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Don.Allen@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Don Allen)
Subject: 11:11
Date: 20 Feb 92 20:19:00 GMT
* Replying to a message originally to Pete Porro
MC> > new on the PA UFO flap? I keep seeing bits and pieces, but last thing
MC> > someone said it was a C-130? I don't get it. How could one plane fool
MC> so
MC> > many people.
MC>
?? Place...what place? Gulfbreeze??
Don
--
Don Allen - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Don.Allen@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Peggy.Noonan@p0.f605.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Peggy Noonan)
Subject: The Lazar Tape
Date: 21 Feb 92 17:08:01 GMT
>Yes Peggy I will be posting my review in the ASK_UFO echo after
>it runs in the next issue. That issue will be back from the
>printer this week. I had Bob and Gene Huff on my show on KIEV
>about a month and a half ago, and when all this is put together
>for the new show on national cable radio, I hope in the next
>couple of weeks, I will have Lazar and Huff back.
Hi Don,
Thanks for taking time to reply on this. I know you're very busy and
I appreciate it. Just picked up the new issue of UFO Magazine
yesterday -- Newsland has it! -- and am enjoying your report. (Just
started it, not finished yet.) Will the Mel Noel piece be in the
next issue? I don't want to miss that one.
You mentioned national cable radio. I haven't heard this on
any of the stations I usually tune in and wondered if you could give
me an idea where to find it (available in Denver?), if you have
a moment sometime. Or if you could suggest someone else to ask
about this, that'd be helpful too.
Are tapes of your KIEV broadcasts available? I'd like to
hear the Lazar and Huff bits.
Thanks again for the info!
==Peggy==
--
Peggy Noonan - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Peggy.Noonan@p0.f605.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Anson.Kennedy@p0.f25.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Anson Kennedy)
Subject: Richard Russell Sightings
Date: 23 Feb 92 01:26:00 GMT
Hi,
I'm new here (I'm the sole MICAP rep in Georgia and secretary of the Georgia
Skeptics) and have a question I hope someone can help me with.
Does anyone have any info on the sightings Georgia congressman Richard Russell
and a group of FBI men had on a trip to Russia? I've heard of this case, but
my question is the sum total that I know about it.
Thanks!
--- Anson
--
Anson Kennedy - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Anson.Kennedy@p0.f25.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Don.Ecker@p0.f3.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Don Ecker)
Subject: The Lazar Tape
Date: 23 Feb 92 06:54:00 GMT
Peggy Noonan asked;
> You mentioned national cable radio. I haven't heard this on any
> of the stations I usually tune in and wondered if you could give me an
> idea where to find it (available in Denver?),
Peggy CRN is available nationwide on your cable system and FM stations. I
spoke several days ago to Mike Corbin about it, he is going to check and get
back to me on cable systems and possible FM stations. Will let you know when I
hear from Mike.
Mike, have you checked with anyone yet?
Don
--
Don Ecker - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Don.Ecker@p0.f3.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michael.Corbin@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin)
Subject: Melbourne Australia Sighting
Date: 23 Feb 92 20:13:00 GMT
This report is very unreliable at this point, and is being further checked out
by Vlad Godic of UFORA and Brian Evans.
Brian reported that on Saturday, February 22, several witnesses, in the tens,
observed two flying disk-shaped objects in the morning hours in a suburb of
Melbourne Australia. The disks performed very unusual maneuvers and sped off.
The objects were captured on videotape and were aired over the ABC (Australian
Broadcast Network). According to Brian, the video shot of the objects shows
them clearly and without a doubt to be disk-shaped. Further, the photos, if
real, may be the best documentation of UFOs yet.
More follows...
Mike
--
Michael Corbin - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sheldon.Wernikoff@p0.f605.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Sheldon Wernikoff)
Subject: Encounter over Siberia
Date: 24 Feb 92 04:08:01 GMT
Mark,
I received the following reply from Dick Haines re: the Dec 24/25
date discrepancy I previously asked you about in his "Encounter
over Siberia" article in _IUR_. I thought you and the others on
this echo might find his comments of interest.
..................................................................
Dear Sheldon,
Thank you for your letter of 3 February and your interest in my
recent article "Encounter over Siberia". You raised some questions
and here is some information related to them. I spoke with Mr.
Kuzmin at length in his own language at Novosibirsk about the date
of his sighting. I asked if he had kept a flight log as most pilots
do and he said "yes". He promised to look it up when time
permitted; he also indicated that he remembered noting this event
in it. My paper went to the journal with the intent to correct the
date when I learned it, but otherwise to not hold the paper up. I
have not yet heard from Russia the exact date but hope to one day.
We spoke at some length (also) about his skin rash symptomology. He
did not see an M.D. for fear that his physician would revoke his
flying license and he was getting near to his retirement age. It is
obvious that you know something of the cellular changes that
accompany microwave radiation interaction with human skin. I was
struck by Mr. Kuzmin's intensity of personal/ psychological/
emotional involvement as he spoke of this skin rash. To me, he had
been neither psychologically nor intellectually. unprepared for
such an event as this. He was really worried whether it would go
away in time, and he was somewhat ashamed that it had happened at
all. Nevertheless, he answered all of my questions (as far as I can
tell) and did so without hesitation. I am still of the opinion that
he was telling the truth.
I asked him about what industry and other social activities were
going on below him and the spot where the aerial object was seen.
I had done some research on the greater Chelyabinsk region and had
learned of its long-standing nuclear industry, etc. What if his
skin rash had not been produced by the aerial object at all, but by
some beam weapon on the ground which entered the cockpit canopy
during inverted loops? Of course I did not comment on this in my
brief paper but it is still a possibility. If true, this idea
raises many more questions than it answers and I will drop the
matter here, not knowing your background or interest in the topic.
Perhaps this will fill in a few gaps for you. Thanks for your
interest. For your (possibly related) information, we have now
organized the "Joint American-Soviet Aerial Anomaly Federation"
(JASAAF), and have the participation of many groups.
(signed) Richard F. Haines
.................................................................
---
--
Sheldon Wernikoff - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Sheldon.Wernikoff@p0.f605.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jim.Speiser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Jim Speiser)
Subject: Re: California CE-3's
Date: 23 Feb 92 17:36:00 GMT
nC> Afterwards, the local news anchor mentioned the obvious question:
nC> Why
nC> didn't the news crew stick around until nighttime?
That's obvious: "Stick around til' nighttime? You mean, as if there actually
IS something going on? HAHAHAHAHA!"
Jim
--
Jim Speiser - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Jim.Speiser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG (John Hicks)
Subject: x-ray
Date: 22 Feb 92 03:54:01 GMT
Just got a print of an x-ray from Steve Jones that shows an odd object.
It's the lower part of a head and neck, facing left, and at the lower throat
there's a black dot that has several black "legs."
It looks like the object is inside the throat, but it's impossible for me to
tell.
Joey Swails said that you'd been working on an x-ray and found the "alien
implant" to be a brooch pin. Does this sound like the same x-ray?
Steve got the x-ray from a doctor; I don't think he's trying to pass off a
hoax, but someone might be pulling a fast one on him.
jbh
--
John Hicks - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Andre.Eichner@f2.n1021.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Andre Eichner)
Subject: UFO-congress in berlin
Date: 20 Feb 92 19:29:00 GMT
Hello All!
The first UFO-Congress in Berlin is from April 16. to April 20. in the
UFA-Fabrik (a alternative project) in Berlin.
Speakers:
Dr. Fred Bell about the plejaden spaceship technology
Randolf Winters about the contact between Billi Meyer and the
plejaden girl Semajse
Alfred Bialeck about the philadelphya experiment
Valerij ... about the aliens in USSR (GUS).
and many more...
For more information call
UFA-Fabrik Berlin
Tel-Voice: ++49-30-752 80 85
Tel-Fax..: ++49-30-752 23 44
or call
Faber-Jakobsen ++49-30-394 14 79
cheers
Andre
PS: I'll try to get some more information.
--
Andre Eichner - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Andre.Eichner@f2.n1021.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Peggy.Noonan@p0.f150.n30163.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Peggy Noonan)
Subject: Cable Radio Network
Date: 24 Feb 92 13:23:00 GMT
> > You mentioned national cable radio.
>Peggy CRN is available nationwide on your cable system and FM
>stations. I spoke several days ago to Mike Corbin about it, he
>is going to check and get back to me on cable systems and
>possible FM stations. Will let you know when I hear from Mike.
>Mike, have you checked with anyone yet?
Thanks, Don. When you say "on your cable system," that's referring
to cable TV? (Sorry if that's an incredibly dumb question, but when
you don't know, you don't know.) I hope Mike will post the reply so
I get a copy too...sure would like to be able to hear the show!
==Peggy==
PS--Check CIS --message for you in EMail.
--
Peggy Noonan - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Peggy.Noonan@p0.f150.n30163.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sheldon.Wernikoff@p0.f605.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Sheldon Wernikoff)
Subject: X-ray
Date: 25 Feb 92 06:35:01 GMT
In a message to Jim Speiser <21-Feb-92 20:54> John Hicks wrote:
JH> Just got a print of an x-ray from Steve Jones that shows an odd
JH> object. It's the lower part of a head and neck, facing left,
JH> and at the lower throat there's a black dot that has several
JH> black "legs." It looks like the object is inside the throat,
JH> but it's impossible for me to tell.
That's *really* strange John, because I also received this x-ray
reverse print from Steve, and mine exhibits a lateral view of the
lower abdomen, vertebrae, and pelvic area. The object with the six
"legs" appears to be in line with the upper pelvis, possibly near
the spleen, although this can not be determined conclusively
through this single view. It is certain however that the object is
nowhere near the esophagus or trachea, which is not even visible!
Perhaps Steve sent us different photos???
JH> Steve got the x-ray from a doctor; I don't think he's trying to
JH> pass off a hoax, but someone might be pulling a fast one on
JH> him.
Someone's undeniably pulling *something*, the question is what?
Stay tuned...
Sheldon
--
Sheldon Wernikoff - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Sheldon.Wernikoff@p0.f605.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jim.Speiser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Jim Speiser)
Subject: Re: x-ray
Date: 25 Feb 92 21:56:00 GMT
John:
Ah-HA! That must explain the X-ray I got in the mail from Steve Jones. He
sent it to me along with a note explaining that it was the X-ray he was
talking about on FIDO UFO. Well, due to financial difficulties (as usual), I
have not been on FIDO UFO for a while, and didn't know what he was talking
about. I saw the black dot, and I don't know what it is, but then I don't
know the first thing about reading an X-ray. As far as working on an X-ray
that showed something that turned out to be a brooch, ...not me. Must be
someone else. I am working on one X-ray that I know of, and so far it has
not turned out to be a brooch.
I sent Steve a postcard, hopefully he'll be getting back to me with some
details.
Thanks,
Jim
--
Jim Speiser - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Jim.Speiser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Frank.Ward@f8.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Frank Ward)
Subject: Re: maitreya, spirits, antichrist
Date: 27 Feb 92 06:56:08 GMT
*** Quoting ncar!neptune.convex.com!swarren to All ***
nc> The tie-in to paranet is that many people believe that the UFO
nc> phenomena is
nc> the result of the overt deceptive activity of malevalent
nc> spiritual beings.
nc> These beings are quite powerful and therefore it is child's play
nc> for them to
nc> alter the perceptions of men in order to make them believe
nc> whatever is
nc> convenient at the moment. These creatures are also quite capable
nc> of
nc> generating bits of physical evidence to confirm the deceptions
nc> they have
nc> created.
nc>
Amen....this has been the most difficult thing for me to overcome about UFO's
and being able to accept them from another planet. In my Christian belifes, I
have always found it perplexing that there was no mention of people or being
from other planets, it dose however, talk to demons, etc. Satan was called
the Prince of the Air. Having power to cloud minds and be deceptive, it has
always been in the back of my mind, this is what the UFO's are really. I have
tried to temper my feelings about this with the possibility of there being
UFO's from ".....out there." Your comments echo my feelings and are a great
conflict within my own mind. Good stuff there...
Frank
--
Frank Ward - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Frank.Ward@f8.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Frank.Ward@f8.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Frank Ward)
Subject: Re: maitreya, spirits, antichrist
Date: 27 Feb 92 07:06:17 GMT
*** Quoting Doug Rogers to Neptune.Convex.Com!Swarren ***
DR> Assertions as to a religious tie-in for UFO's are unprovable, and
DR> therefore simply take up band-width. The whole idea of Paranet
DR> is to attempt to use the scientific method to dispell the mystery
DR> from Paranormal experiences.
Oh? And when did they prove that flying saucers really exist? Your rather
narrow perspective of the subject is not what I would call "scientific." I
would rather think being open minded and considering all possibilities to be a
more prudent approach, but again, it's only my humble opinion.
Frank
--
Frank Ward - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Frank.Ward@f8.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Frank.Ward@f8.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Frank Ward)
Subject: Re: 11:11
Date: 27 Feb 92 07:18:40 GMT
*** Quoting Jim Greenen to John Hicks ***
JG> C-130 almost on stalling speed. As I think about it, how do you
JG> refuel a helicopter in flight? You know, the chop-chop of the
JG> blades could chop-chop the hose.
Jim, when I was with the 302 SOS (helios), nearly all the birds had air to air
refuling capabilities. You're right, the bird has to fly at nearly max speed,
but the 130 can and does refuel rather easily. You can change the angle of the
blades and the refueling petoe(sp) is low enough that it doesn't get chopped up.
Frank
--
Frank Ward - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Frank.Ward@f8.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Don.Ecker@p0.f3.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Don Ecker)
Subject: Cable Radio Affiliates
Date: 27 Feb 92 06:38:00 GMT
Paul Faeder wrote;
> Here's all I have on Cable Radio Affiliates:
>
> CABLE RADIO NETWORK AFFILIATES
Much deleted.
Thanks for the input Paul.
Best;
Don
--
Don Ecker - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Don.Ecker@p0.f3.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Steve.Rose@p0.f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Steve Rose)
Subject: Re: Cable Radio Network
Date: 24 Feb 92 16:29:00 GMT
PN> Thanks, Don. When you say "on your cable system," that's referring
PN> to cable TV? (Sorry if that's an incredibly dumb question, but when
FM Radio is carried on many cable systems...the same as TV signals.
Just hook the wire up (after it is split in two) to the FM receiver and
you might here all the local stations plus imported signals.
--
Steve Rose - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Steve.Rose@p0.f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG
********************************************************************************
For permission to reproduce or redistribute this digest, contact:
DOMAIN Michael.Corbin@paranet.org
UUCP scicom!paranet.org!Michael.Corbin
********To have your comments in the next issue, send electronic mail to********
'infopara' at the following address:
UUCP {ncar,isis,csn}!scicom!infopara
DOMAIN infopara@scicom.alphacdc.com
For administrative requests (subscriptions, back issues) send to:
UUCP {ncar,isis,csn}!scicom!infopara-request
DOMAIN infopara-request@scicom.alphacdc.com
To obtain back issues by anonymous ftp, connect to:
DOMAIN ftp.uiowa.edu (directory /archives/paranet)
Mail to private Paranet/Fidonet addresses from the newsletters:
DOMAIN firstname.lastname@paranet.org
UUCP scicom!paranet.org!firstname.lastname
******************The**End**of**Info-ParaNet**Newsletter************************
