Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Info-ParaNet Newsletters Volume 1 Number 326
Info-ParaNet Newsletters Volume I Number 326
Tuesday, November 6th 1990
Today's Topics:
Re: Belgium
Williamsburg Iowa 28 October 90
Re: GULF BREEZE UPDATE
Re: NAVY INTELLIGENCE CRYPTO
Re: Horse-patooties And Sonic Booms
Re: Navy Intelligence Crypto
Re: Navy Intelligence Crypto
UFO Video
No refutations of Remote Viewing
Re: Ed Walters video
Re: Conclusion - Gulf Breeze
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michael.Corbin@f320.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin)
Subject: Re: Belgium
Date: 2 Nov 90 14:55:00 GMT
Rick,
Thank you very much for the path information. I have sent a message to the
site.
Mike
--
Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:207/109
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@f320.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michael.Corbin@f110.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin)
Subject: Williamsburg Iowa 28 October 90
Date: 2 Nov 90 15:15:00 GMT
> From: postmaster@scicom.alphacdc.com
> Date: 2 Nov 90 04:15:37 GMT
> Message-ID: <7705@scicom.AlphaCDC.COM>
> Newsgroups: info.paranet
>
> From: James Roger Black <jrblack@shemtaia.weeg.uiowa.edu>
Is there a way to get this person posting into the digest? I
would be interested in further details.
Also, Roger, check into Alpha soon. There is mail waiting for
you there.
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:207/109
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@f110.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Pete.Porro@f414.n154.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Pete Porro)
Subject: Re: GULF BREEZE UPDATE
Date: 30 Oct 90 16:37:23 GMT
I have to agree with your final statement. It's either a coverup for
disinformation, someone trying to continue the hoax (ED covering his trail),
or a group trying to discredit the sightings. As you have probably guessed
from my posts, I think the sightings by people were honest reports, I believe
the photos and other materials from GB ED are destined to be discredited as a
hoax. Meanwhile he will be laughing all the way to the bank.
As for the first theory (Govt. Cover-up) this comes out whenever the
evidence is not well managed or not complete enough. Great way to lay blame,
and makes for great controversy, but most of the time it just does not exist.
As many who study this phenomonia have probably observed, the Govt. is just
as much in the dark much of the time. Some people just can't accept that "big
brother" possibly does not know something. With all the resources available,
the powers of information cannot find a conclusive answer either. This as I
have said before is unacceptable to some people. If there is some secret
information, I can bet it's not an underground base with living aliens, or
vats of human cells disolved for absorption. The whole concept makes a nice
SF plot though.
Pass the strawberry ice cream please!
Hope this finally gets out since I paid my phone bill two days ago. 8*)
--
Pete Porro - via FidoNet node 1:207/109
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Pete.Porro@f414.n154.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Pete.Porro@f414.n154.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Pete Porro)
Subject: Re: NAVY INTELLIGENCE CRYPTO
Date: 30 Oct 90 16:40:34 GMT
Oops I have a file from June called Kennedy.txt I better rename it so there
is no confusion in the future.
Is there distribution of these releases, and what about the Paranet
newsletters, where can I get them? I think I am missing something here?
--
Pete Porro - via FidoNet node 1:207/109
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Pete.Porro@f414.n154.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mike.Kraus@f10.n371.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Mike Kraus)
Subject: Re: Horse-patooties And Sonic Booms
Date: 4 Nov 90 06:43:00 GMT
Hi Doug, I thank you for that very informative report however,I
believe you meant to post it to someone else.I don't remember who it
was. Someone asked if the Paint "REFLECTED" radar and I replied that
I had read somewhere about it absorbing radar.
DK> Thank goodness Iraq doesn't have any look-down radar
DK> capabilities (they don't - do they?)
I hope not.
DK> By the way - couldn't that super loud, superfast aircraft
DK> that pulses at 1 - 2 Hz be the Fulcrum aircraft that was
DK> supposed to havbe been developed and dropped (or something
DK> like that. Seem to remember something about that aircraft
DK> and that it would travel Mach 3+.)
Sorry,This I would not know as it is not my field.
DK>
DK> And is it really becoming this hard to discriminate between
DK> deep black projects and actual UFO's?
You went over my head at mach 3 on that one Doug>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks for the info.and I truely sorry I can't answer those
questions for you DOUG.
MIKE.
--
Mike Kraus - via FidoNet node 1:207/109
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Mike.Kraus@f10.n371.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David.Stager@f320.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG (David Stager)
Subject: Re: Navy Intelligence Crypto
Date: 4 Nov 90 05:08:00 GMT
I'm sorry I don't have an answer for any of your questions regarding
Paranet. I think you'll have to direct your query to Mr. Corbin. Are
you out there Mike? DCS
--
David Stager - via FidoNet node 1:207/109
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: David.Stager@f320.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michael.Corbin@f110.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin)
Subject: Re: Navy Intelligence Crypto
Date: 4 Nov 90 06:38:00 GMT
> Oops I have a file from June called Kennedy.txt I better
> rename it so there is no confusion in the future. Is there
> distribution of these releases, and what about the Paranet
> newsletters, where can I get them? I think I am missing
> something here?
Which newsletters are you referring to?
Mike
--
Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:207/109
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@f110.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Lou.Zucaro@f320.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Lou Zucaro)
Subject: UFO Video
Date: 4 Nov 90 16:55:00 GMT
I don't know how many of you saw my last message, but my company is
working on a series of video programs on the subject of UFOs. We're
starting the offline edit this week for the first tape, but if anybody
out there has access to photos, video, film, or any kind of info that
might be helpful, I'd really appreciate hearing from you. You can
leave a message for me on here, or you can call me toll-free at work
during regular business hours (C/M time) at 1-800-777-2223. The
company I work for is the WPA Film Library, a division of MPI Home
Video (the largest independant video distribution company in North
America).
Thanks..
Lou Z.
--
Lou Zucaro - via FidoNet node 1:207/109
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Lou.Zucaro@f320.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jim.Speiser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Jim Speiser)
Subject: No refutations of Remote Viewing
Date: 1 Nov 90 14:39:00 GMT
Thanks for that info, Keith. At my first opportunity I will look at the
references you cited both in favor of and in criticism of remote viewing.
Jim
--
Jim Speiser - via FidoNet node 1:207/109
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Jim.Speiser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jim.Delton@p0.f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Jim Delton)
Subject: Re: Ed Walters video
Date: 4 Nov 90 06:47:00 GMT
>>I think it flies ...Comments
You have fleshed out, in excellent detail, what Jim Speiser and I
discussed many months ago. Amoung the original discussions were that
there were consistent "out of place" pinpoint lights around the "UFO"
that appeared to be reflections on a plate of glass. You see usually
three small lights around the UFO that just don't make any sense to me
other then as reflections, in many of Ed's early photo's. The photo of
the UFO going behind a tree had me stumped but your method of just
blacking out the area of the glass in the appropriate spot makes sense.
Didn't some of Ed's photo's of the "scene" even show a slidding glass
door??
--
Jim Delton - via FidoNet node 1:207/109
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Jim.Delton@p0.f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John.Burke@f20.n1011.z9.FIDONET.ORG (John Burke)
Subject: Re: Conclusion - Gulf Breeze
Date: 4 Nov 90 02:47:00 GMT
John:
After reading the full text of the Salisberry interview, I must
admit that I am shocked and disappointed with Walt's handling of their
report. As you know, I have been skeptical of the Walters case for a
long time. However, I *did* believe that if the persuasive evidence of
a hoax was ever brought forth, Walt would admit to having been duped.
I gave Walt more credit than this. I guess I was wrong. On the
other hand, I have previously expressed my opinion that Dr. Bruce was
"past the point of no return" and that his professional reputation was
hanging on this. Therefore, I would never expect Dr. Bruce to admit
that his photo analysis fell short of the degree of competence which
one would expect from a PhD.
Worst of all is the irony that MUFON purports to be crusading
for an end to the government cover-up about the truth on UFOs while at
the same time, MUFON's membership is crusading for an end to MUFON's
cover-up about the truth concerning the Ed Walters hoax.
Walt's continued attempts to deny, debunk and stonewall the
Salisberry report have turned an unfortunately successful hoax into
WALTERSGATE. A cancer has been growing in MUFON which now threatens
its future existence.
At this juncture, I have no desire to renew my membership in
MUFON as I feel it would be prudent to distance myself from that
organization.
-- John
--
John Burke - via FidoNet node 1:207/109
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: John.Burke@f20.n1011.z9.FIDONET.ORG
********To have your comments in the next issue, send electronic mail to********
'infopara' at the following address:
UUCP {ncar,isis,boulder}!scicom!infopara
DOMAIN infopara@scicom.alphacdc.com
ADMIN Address infopara-request@scicom.alphacdc.com
{ncar,isis,boulder}!scicom!infopara-request
******************The**End**of**Info-ParaNet**Newsletter************************
