Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Info-ParaNet Newsletters Volume 1 Number 294
Info-ParaNet Newsletters Volume I Number 294
Saturday, August 25th 1990
Today's Topics:
National UFO Conference Tapes Available
Re: Prophecy
Re: ILL BREEZE
Marcel Interviews
"Out There" / Howard Blum
Re: Prophecy
Indian Point 3
Prophecy?
Re: EXOGLYPHS
Re: NEW JFK THEORY OUTL
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jim.Speiser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Jim Speiser)
Subject: National UFO Conference Tapes Available
Date: 23 Aug 90 03:46:00 GMT
The following tapes are now available via special arrangement with ParaNet
from Shining Star Productions, Scottsdale, AZ.
These tapes were made at last year's National UFO Conference in Phoenix,
AZ. All selections marked with a * are ParaNet Gold Selections, meaning
they are of vital interest to serious researchers.
1. Dr. Frank Stranges Welcome
2. Dianne Tessman Message from the Stars
3. Martin Cannon * Is the CIA behind abductions?
4. Jim Moseley The Wright Field Story
5. Allen Benz * Cloak, Dagger and Saucer
6. Pat Diegel Are You From Another Planet?
7. Joshua Shapiro The Mysteries of the Crystal
Skull
8. Brad & Sherry Steiger 4000 Years of the Other
9. Antonio Huneeus * UFOs in South America
10. Jenny Randle * British Perspective on UFOs
11. Wesley Batemen UFOs and Spirituality
12. Hal Starr * The Seamy Side of UFO
Investigation
13. Rich Sauder Personal Contact & Testimony
14. Roundtable #1
15. Roundtable #2
16. Frank Stranges Inspirational (2 tape set)
17. Al Bielek Philadelphia Experiment
Audiotapes:
Each $6.00 + .75 S/H
Any 3 $16.00 + 1.50 S/H
Any 5 $20.00 + 2.25 S/H
Entire Conference: $75.00 (includes P/H)
Videotapes:
Each $19.95 + $3.00 P/H
Any 3 $50.00 + $4.00 P/H
Any 5 $75.00 + $6.00 P/H
Entire Conference: $275.00 (includes P/H)
Arizona Residents, please add 6.7% Sales Tax
Make checks payable to:
Shining Star Productions
7820 E. Evans Rd. #900
Scottsdale, AZ 85260
(602) 948-6856
___________________________________________________________________________
Please send me the following:
Selection Audio/
Number Selection Name Video
________ _________________________________ ______
________ _________________________________ ______
________ _________________________________ ______
________ _________________________________ _______
________ _________________________________ _______
Name_____________________________________________________
Address__________________________________________________
City_______________________ State______ Zip_____________
Telephone(___)________________________ Beta____ VHS____
--
Jim Speiser - via FidoNet node 1:30163/0
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Jim.Speiser@f37.n114.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: steve.rose@f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG (steve rose)
Subject: Re: Prophecy
Date: 22 Aug 90 08:02:26 GMT
> 6. Dormant volcano erupts in Hawaii in 89.
> 7. Hurricane in Gulf of Mexico in 89, UNPARALLELED!
> 8. Events to bring the Bush Administration down in late 89.
> Possible nuclear warhead? Nicaragua involvement?
> 9. Limited nuclear exchange between now and March, 1991.
Goodness...what are we reading here? The latest "Criswell Predicts" book? :-)
--
steve rose - via FidoNet node 1:30163/0
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: steve.rose@f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Frances.Jones@p5.f701.n362.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Frances Jones)
Subject: Re: ILL BREEZE
Date: 21 Aug 90 21:26:39 GMT
In a message of <07 Aug 90 09:23:41>, Pete Porro (1:154/414) writes:
>I think if I happened to finally catch a reasonable photo of a UFO (since
>i've never seen one yet) it would be suspect because I run a BBS that
>specializes in UFO and Paranormal. On the other hand, I would not
>hesitate to release it for standard rates for publication. If someone
>suddenly comes up with massive quantitys of photos, which look like paper
>garden lanterns, and can get them at will. I get suspicious. When a book
>is announced shortly after, then denied, then published. I'm skeptical.
>When no other photos from the same sightings look the same or are as
>good, and one person can use assorted cameras and still get good photos.
>I'm very skeptical. The evidence is enough to make me doubt the veracity
>of this person and their photos.
I believe I stated in my original post that I was not defending Ed, but, in
response to your message, was Ed believed in the beginning or was he
immediately called a kook or fraud?
FJ
--
Frances Jones - via FidoNet node 1:30163/0
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Frances.Jones@p5.f701.n362.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michael.Corbin@f3206.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin)
Subject: Marcel Interviews
Date: 23 Aug 90 06:24:00 GMT
> Not sure they were videotaped originally, but there is a
> filmed interview with Marcel done shortly before his death
> in 1979. I believe its on the Unsolved Mysteries segment,
> if anyone has taped that.
Probably the most complete segment of that interview is contained
in the video "UFOs Are Real," a videotape which is readily
available on the open market. This session with Marcel has been
used on other shorts, and HBO did something in 1985 that had him
on it.
I have a copy of this if anyone is interested.
Mike
--
Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:30163/0
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@f3206.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michael.Corbin@f320.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin)
Subject: "Out There" / Howard Blum
Date: 24 Aug 90 20:53:00 GMT
I have reviewed the excerpt of the upcoming release of "Out There,
written by Howard Blum, author of a book dealing with the famous Walker spy
case.
There are many interesting things contained in the work, including a new
twist on the "Project Aquarius" material. Blum claims that he has received
information from his contacts within the NSA, who have told him that Project
Aquarius is a secret project utilizing psychics to perform "remote viewing"
of enemy submarines by concentrating on a photograph of the vessel. It was
during this that UFOs were seen by several of the "Viewers." From that,
alleges Blum, the "UFO Working Group" was formed to deal with the phenomenon
of UFOs and what they could be doing making contact with Earth.
The book is scheduled for release around the 10th of September. We will be
providing a reveiw of the book as soon as it is available.
Anyone know how to contact Blum, or know of him and his background?
Mike
--
Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:30163/0
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@f320.n207.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Zach.Harman@p0.f630.n283.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Zach Harman)
Subject: Re: Prophecy
Date: 23 Aug 90 17:00:24 GMT
It was a prophecy given to some doctor from an alien. It looks very
interesting, although the year seems to be off .
--
Zach Harman - via FidoNet node 1:30163/0
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Zach.Harman@p0.f630.n283.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG (John Hicks)
Subject: Indian Point 3
Date: 24 Aug 90 07:00:02 GMT
Very interesting. I think we can safely assume that the Hudson
Valley ufo isn't any kind of super-spiffy stealth bomber.
BTW, I have an abduction file written by Phil d/l from CI$. Do you
have it?
jbh
--
John Hicks - via FidoNet node 1:30163/0
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Kurt.Lochner@p22.f66.n147.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Kurt Lochner)
Subject: Prophecy?
Date: 23 Aug 90 12:55:57 GMT
> > 6. Dormant volcano erupts in Hawaii in 89.
> > 7. Hurricane in Gulf of Mexico in 89, UNPARALLELED!
> > 8. Events to bring the Bush Administration down in late 89.
> > Possible nuclear warhead? Nicaragua involvement?
> > 9. Limited nuclear exchange between now and March, 1991.
>
>
> Goodness...what are we reading here? The latest
> "Criswell Predicts" book? :-)
>
Nope, these were from a certain Dr. Corder 'bout April '89.
So far, not much wieght can be placed on his predictions...
--
Kurt Lochner - via FidoNet node 1:30163/0
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Kurt.Lochner@p22.f66.n147.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Pete.Porro@f414.n154.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Pete Porro)
Subject: Re: EXOGLYPHS
Date: 16 Aug 90 17:24:26 GMT
There are a limited number of simple shapes that can be drawn. Spirals,
circles, triangles, wavy lines, you get the idea. Some overlapping is bound
to occur between cultures. I have photos of cave drawings in the middle
states area that look similar to petroglyphs from the West. Some symbols
appear in Celtic carvings and drawings that are the same as the Red Ocre
culture of Indians. One should not be too fast to make conclusions relating
to origins, when the chance of co-incidence is very high. Someone might say
the Indians of the Eastern Seacoast are related to the Aztecs because some
symbols are the same. It's stretching for validity.
When there is a preponderance of evidence that symbols, cultural habits, and
burial ritual are similar, then one may assume with some validity that there
is a connection.
I am just mentioning this for the sake of thought and logical reasoning. I'd
love to see the Exoglyphs myeslf.
--
Pete Porro - via FidoNet node 1:30163/0
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Pete.Porro@f414.n154.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Pete.Porro@f414.n154.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Pete Porro)
Subject: Re: NEW JFK THEORY OUTL
Date: 16 Aug 90 18:08:00 GMT
Interesting article which has more than the AP service offered. Saul was the
AKA for one of the hired hands in "Appointment In Dallas" I don't remeber the
author. Much of this story follow that books plot. (listed as fiction) This
is going to be a never ending story until the sealed records are opened in
2013 (or whatever it is???)
1) It should be easy enough to go to the practice site and see what sorts of
debris is left from the target practice.
2) The Grassy knoll observation has much to do with apparent sounds
attracting the view of the witness. No shell casings found after extensive
search.
3) The Investigator who handled follow ups on the case did make a public
statement that there was nothing he could see in White's claims. (CIA or FBI
???)
4) There are 15 volumes of "Hearings Before the Presidents's Commission on
the Assassination of President Kennedy" which cover the testimony verbatum. I
only have access to summary exerpts and the Warren Commission report. Roscoe
White was never questioned. (one of my users noted this perviously)
Note: on #3 it was Bobby Inmanformer CIA Deputy-Director made the statement
that the story was phoney.
--
Pete Porro - via FidoNet node 1:30163/0
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Pete.Porro@f414.n154.z1.FIDONET.ORG
********To have your comments in the next issue, send electronic mail to********
'infopara' at the following address:
UUCP {ncar,isis,boulder}!scicom!infopara
DOMAIN infopara@scicom.alphacdc.com
ADMIN Address infopara-request@scicom.alphacdc.com
{ncar,isis,boulder}!scicom!infopara-request
******************The**End**of**Info-ParaNet**Newsletter************************
