Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Info-ParaNet Newsletters Volume 1 Number 055
Info-ParaNet Newsletters, Number 55
Sunday, October 8th 1989
Today's Topics:
Re: Which One Is Nuts?
Re: Unsolved Mysteries
Re: Bill Moore
Re: Which One Is Nuts?
Re: Which One Is Nuts?
Ethics Questionnaire
Re: Unsolved Mysteries
Re: Bill Moore
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: paranet!Dale.Wedge
Subject: Re: Which One Is Nuts?
Date: 6 Oct 89 22:52:00 GMT
Dear Mr. Holland:
I was not thrown off ParaNNet, I was thrown off of
CompuServe, which may be what you are referring to, I'm
not certain.
My remarks towards Don Ecker were intended for him and
were not to be in a public message. That was a mistake.
My statement was intended as a parody, since Don ribs me
and in turn I rib him. I'm sure you can read messags in
which he has done this to me.
Don't be calling people nuts, unless your prepared to
back it up. I'll put my professional background up
against yours anyday. In addition to my pwork, I'm the
co-Sysop of a multi-user system on the UFO Sig. I have
never had the kinds of problems with idiots as I have
with "certain" members of ParaNet.
Grow up Mr. Holland and look at the crap that is being
brought forward. Moore lies, the Gulf Breeze thing is
probably a hoax, Psychiatrists investigating
"alledged" abductions should be investigating what is going
on in their own mind, if they believe in this crap.
The state of Ufology is at an all time lull. A little
parody by me is so silly when it comes to nuts that you
can't see the real "lobotimized" people involved
in Ufology.
--
Dale Wedge - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Dale.Wedge@paranet.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: paranet!Don.Sudduth
Subject: Re: Unsolved Mysteries
Date: 7 Oct 89 14:34:00 GMT
I think Unsolved Mysteries where you see it is about one year behind
us. Check the credits at the end of the show to look for a copyright
date. That will tell you for sure. Nice to hear from someone down
under!!
-Sincerely, Don
--
Don Sudduth - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Don.Sudduth@paranet.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: paranet!f319.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Keenan.Anderson
Subject: Re: Bill Moore
Date: 6 Oct 89 20:42:43 GMT
The reason everyone's so obsessed with Moore is that his previous works
"The Roswell Incident" and "The Philadelphia Experiment" were so
credible. I'm not sure whether everyone's interested in the info he
dishes out or if they want to see this guy go down (after learning of
the thing is Vegas I can't say I wouldn't mind it).
P.S...sorry I haven't posted in the echoes in a while everybody...
--Keenan--
--
Keenan Anderson - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Keenan.Anderson@f319.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: paranet!Linda.Murphy
Subject: Re: Which One Is Nuts?
Date: 8 Oct 89 02:07:23 GMT
> "alledged" abductions should be investigating what is going
> on in their own mind, if they believe in this crap.
> The state of Ufology is at an all time lull. A little
> parody by me is so silly when it comes to nuts that you
> can't see the real "lobotimized" people involved
> in Ufology.
Geez, one could do better watching Wrestling Matches on TV. (Keeps the audience all excited, so they can tune in next week and see who is dragging around who by the hair.)
*Throwing popcorn at my monitor right now*
Seriously, Dale, I would like to ask you a question, since one of your last posts dealt with Dreamland, and you claim to be above "lobotomy" tactics. Why did you say that Dreamland = deathwish? Do you base this remark on some belief based without information to back it up? Or did you make the statement with absolute conviction of something you know? (Or in other words, what kind of "disinformation" game is being played? And why is there such an effort made to make some believe in this [as you so eloquently put it] cr*p?) If you cannot remember the post, I would be glad to repost it to refresh your memory.
( 1:304/1)
--
Linda Murphy - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Linda.Murphy@paranet.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: paranet!f1.n304.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Joe.Holland
Subject: Re: Which One Is Nuts?
Date: 8 Oct 89 04:24:28 GMT
Well, when that message did show up in public, it required some
explanation, and I see you have provided that. In general, I do not
pretent to know who is nuts, in Ufology.
--
Joe Holland - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Joe.Holland@f1.n304.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: paranet!Sally.Sheridan
Subject: Ethics Questionnaire
Date: 8 Oct 89 15:45:00 GMT
Hi Jim,
I thought very carefully about how to word the premise question. I
deliberately made it ambiguous in order to highlight the importance of
ethics in an ambiguous situation such as the one in which ufologists
find ourselves. I wanted to make the point that we should be doubly
careful about harming others in a situation of mystery, lies, and
general lack of certainty. The purpose of the questionnaire is not to
preach but to help us to think about these questions in the privacy of
our own minds while we have the time to reflect on the consequences of
our actions on others. You have thought about the right questions and
that is enough.
Sally Sheridan
--
Sally Sheridan - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Sally.Sheridan@paranet.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: paranet!f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Michael.Corbin
Subject: Re: Unsolved Mysteries
Date: 8 Oct 89 20:47:00 GMT
> I think Unsolved Mysteries where you see it is about one
> year behind us. Check the credits at the end of the show to
> look for a copyright date. That will tell you for sure.
> Nice to hear from someone down under!! -Sincerely,
> Don
Don,
The Unsolved Mysteries segment was shot in August just prior to
its release in September.
Mike
--
Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: paranet!f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Michael.Corbin
Subject: Re: Bill Moore
Date: 8 Oct 89 20:49:00 GMT
> The reason everyone's so obsessed with Moore is that his
> previous works "The Roswell Incident" and "The Philadelphia
> Experiment" were so credible. I'm not sure whether
> everyone's interested in the info he dishes out or if they
> want to see this guy go down (after learning of the thing
> is Vegas I can't say I wouldn't mind it).
>
> P.S...sorry I haven't posted in the echoes in a while
> everybody...
> --Keenan--
No doubt, Bill Moore has provided *some* good information to the
community. However, to what degree this is is what I would like
to know about.
Mike
--
Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To have your thoughts in the next issue, please send electronic
mail to 'infopara' at the following address:
UUCP {ncar,isis,nbires,boulder}!scicom!infopara
DOMAIN infopara@scicom.alphacdc.com
ADMIN Address infopara-request@scicom.alphacdc.com
{ncar,isis,nbires,boulder}!scicom!infopara-request
********************************************************************************
End of Info-ParaNet Newsletter
********************************************************************************
