Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Info-ParaNet Newsletters Volume 1 Number 034
Info-ParaNet Letters Volume 1 Issue 34
Subjects -
Subject: Re: Info-Paranet Newsletter
Subject: Criteria
Subject: Re: Public Opinion
Subject: Re: New Issue Of Ufo
Subject: Spy in the Sky
Subject: Gulf Breeze, etc.
Subject: Re: Bruce Cathie
Subject: Re: Interesting Contradiction Part Ii
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 6 Sep 89 22:16:52 GMT
From: keithr@tolkien.wv.tek.com
Subject: Re: Info-Paranet Newsletter
M. Cannon mentioned an interest in the historical/sociological aspects
of the UFO scene. I am interested in this too. The only extensive
comment in book form that I know of is Jacques Vallee's work. See
his lastest Dimensions and Messengers of Deception. Also, go directly
to the sources and read the old contactee books by George Hunt
Williamson (a pseudonym), Howard(?) Menger, Daniel Fry, George
Adamski, etc. I will look in George Eberhart's outstanding bibliography
of UFOs and related material and report back. The trouble with
the magazine UFO literature is that most of it is in UFO specialty
magazines and newsletters which public libraries don't collect. So,
you have to depend on private collectors and organizations to get back
issues. I think CUFOS may have a pretty good collection of UFO magazines.
Keith
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 5 Sep 89 19:04:00 GMT
From: paranet!f69.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Mac.Druaidh
Subject: Criteria
What are the criteria involved in deducing whether or not a UFO can be
explained by some mundane phenomenon?
Mac "Interested" Druaidh
The System(tm) Op
--
Mac Druaidh - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: ...!scicom!363!69!Mac.Druaidh
INTERNET: Mac.Druaidh@f69.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 6 Sep 89 11:05:40 GMT
From: paranet!f110.n108.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Doug.Rogers
Subject: Re: Public Opinion
> Also say, establish an "anti-quoting" rule. No more
> then three quote lines per message.
>
I wish you wouldn't tempt us that way. <grin> The posting guidelines
for Paranet ask people to limit the scope of their quotes. I haven't
noticed anyone in particular who is over quoting, but it's something
we all must watch.
Doug
--
Doug Rogers - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: ...!scicom!108!110!Doug.Rogers
INTERNET: Doug.Rogers@f110.n108.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 5 Sep 89 19:25:00 GMT
From: paranet!f19.n19.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Bryon.Smith
Subject: Re: New Issue Of Ufo
> Have you recieved my Netmail message?
> It might not get there. I was informed by our Network
> Co-ordinator that there is a problem with Netmail, and he
I don't recall getting one from you right at the moment, I'll go check the
Net mail area again though just to be sure.
What Net did you say you were in ?
> As for the Sats, wouldnt it be nice to have a reciever that
> could tune into there frequency, and a decoder to
I read a story about a kid who was working with his own tracking system and
was able to decode signals from a Russian spy in the sky Satellite before
the military was able to figure it out. He turned the information over to
his collage instructor who gave it to the military. I understand the
military paied the kid a visit and ask him to keep all of that information
"under hat."
> These "Spy Sats" would be beaming back all sorts of
> interesting pictures, and no doubt that they would have
> caught some UFO pictures.
I would think so. I understand they can zoom in on something very quickly
and are able to identify almost anything. At least they could get close
enough to see what it wasn't.
> been over a spot where regular UFO sighting occur. Wouldnt
> you like to look through the Militaries photo album!
Yes I would :-)
...Bryon
--
Bryon Smith - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: ...!scicom!19!19!Bryon.Smith
INTERNET: Bryon.Smith@f19.n19.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 6 Sep 89 16:39:43 GMT
From: paranet!f1.n304.z1.FIDONET.ORG!T.s..Bennett
Subject: Spy in the Sky
That's a graet story about the kid with the tracking system Bryan, but
that's the kind of story that the "Enqirer" would probably not even pay
you for. The fact is that the spy satellites, both ours and theirs, are
in low earth orbit, 120 to 250 miles from the surface, they are
travelling usually at 18,000 miles per hour, since that's escape velocity
from earth's "gravity", and keeps them by means of "centrifugal force"
from "falling" back to earth in a short time. The other operative, and
most important factor that completely debunks your story is that while
Russian satellites are over us, they are RECEIVING INFORMATION, when they
get around the earth to be over Russia, they DOWNLOAD the information
picked up while over the rest of the world. Our satellites do the
reverse, DOWNLOADING while over the United States. I think if anything in
your story is true, although its hard to believe a kid has "tracking"
equipment that will follow such fast moving targets in the sky! (15
seconds from horizon to horizon, the info being dumped at incredible baud
rates, encrypted besides that) Come on Bryan, this isnt the sci fi
column!, The kid might have picked up signals from one of our satellites,
and our military told him not to give it to the Russkies.
--
T.s. Bennett - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: ...!scicom!304!1!T.s..Bennett
INTERNET: T.s..Bennett@f1.n304.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 7 Sep 89 15:00:22 GMT
From: paranet!Linda.Murphy
Subject: Gulf Breeze, etc.
>
> Oh...Linda...gotta warn about taking Tom Bearden too seriously. I
> suspect he's a mendacious fellow, and I know he's a spook. (I have in my
It is not a matter of what is said is REAL or not, but the motivational
factors behind most anything that lands our way... If it is subliminal
suggestive material to initiate thinking processes that are designed to
augment some of the theories we have bounced around, then the very fact that
the info is being diseminated to the public it SHOULD be discussed. It is
like an individual who reads that headaches may be caused by "abductions". So
the headaches increase (already, there is a suggestive implanting at a
subliminal level). If there are enough subliminal suggestives introduced into
the mind over a length of time, and the mind begins to believe it as
possibilities, then the probability of it being believed as something actual
is high. (Get the drift?).... It seems that the two go hand in hand. The
initial experience (leaving the mind in a highly suggestive state) and the
"propoganda" are neccessary in order to work. (ANY type of mind control
REQUIRES the removal of certain thought processes, and introducing new
processes)... We could equate probable new technology and methods of mind
control with short cut methods of the Persian Assassin methods of
indoctrination into the "brotherhood". The elements are there.
( 1:304/1)
--
Linda Murphy - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: ...!scicom!Linda.Murphy
INTERNET: Linda.Murphy@paranet.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 8 Sep 89 06:35:00 GMT
From: paranet!f401.n30163.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Bob.Fletcher
Subject: Re: Bruce Cathie
> Hello Bob. No, I haven't seen the N.Z. file on Quiet
^^^^
> Earth...must look in the library. Best, Clark
Sorry about my typing that was supposed to be "Film" as in "Movie".
I get new specs tomorrow.
Bob........
--
Bob Fletcher - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: ...!scicom!30163!401!Bob.Fletcher
INTERNET: Bob.Fletcher@f401.n30163.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 8 Sep 89 06:38:00 GMT
From: paranet!f401.n30163.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Bob.Fletcher
Subject: Re: Interesting Contradiction Part Ii
> Hello, Frank. Are you from "down under"? I gather that you
> must be. I'm curious -- is the Pine Gap base a NORAD facility
> or something else? You see, NORAD as far as I know is strictly
> a North American organization. Having read Bruce Cathie's
Well you are right about the organisation. I afraid they are unable
to keep it there. :-)
Bob.....
--
Bob Fletcher - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: ...!scicom!30163!401!Bob.Fletcher
INTERNET: Bob.Fletcher@f401.n30163.z1.FIDONET.ORG
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
INFO-PARANET NEWSLETTER
ADMIN paranet-request@scicom.alphacdc.com
ARTICLE SUBMISSION infopara@scicom.AlphaCDC.COM
