Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Abduction Digest Number 34
Abduction Digest, Number 34
Thursday, December 5th 1991
Today's Topics:
Re: abductions
abductions
Abduction research
abductions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John.Powell@p0.f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG (John Powell)
Subject: Re: abductions
Date: 27 Nov 91 04:22:00 GMT
-=> Quoting Sue Widemark to Doug Rogers <=-
>What you have stated are your unsubstantiated opinions. How am I
>to refute them? Your response still lacks specific evidence. I
>would suggest that any
>"evidence" based on an unprovable "belief system" is going to be
>called suspect by any scientifically based researcher, myself included.
SW>
SW> So you say UFO's are more believable than God? Interesting...
There is currently more observational evidence to support the existence of
UFos as a phenomenon worthy of study than there is observational evidence
to support the existence of an alleged being, a supreme being...
John.
... Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence.
--
John Powell - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: John.Powell@p0.f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dieter.Hummel@f4.n1021.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Dieter Hummel)
Subject: abductions
Date: 22 Nov 91 08:33:00 GMT
>
> So you say UFO's are more believable than God? Interesting...
>
I would say, the probability that UFO's really exist is higher...
cheers
*Dieter*
--
Dieter Hummel - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Dieter.Hummel@f4.n1021.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Keith.Basterfield@f12.n1040.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Keith Basterfield)
Subject: Abduction research
Date: 29 Nov 91 02:58:00 GMT
I would certainly support the call to see if we can get David Jacobs
online. I for one would certainly like to stimulate more discussion on
current abduction research. You may be aware that I have been
suggesting the investigation of psychological explanations before we
commit ourselves to more exotic explanations. However, this is only a
working, testable hypothesis. Whatever, the outcome the subject is
fascinating and demands research.
--
Keith Basterfield - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Keith.Basterfield@f12.n1040.z9.FIDONET.ORG
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Steve.Rose@f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Steve Rose)
Subject: abductions
Date: 30 Nov 91 16:21:00 GMT
>>
>> So you say UFO's are more believable than God? Interesting...
>>
DH> I would say, the probability that UFO's really exist is higher...
I would say they are both improbable...but UFOs are easier to look for. :)
--
Steve Rose - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Steve.Rose@f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG
****************A**B**D**U**C**T**I**O**N****D**I**G**E**S**T*******************
Submissions UUCP {ncar,isis,csn}!scicom!abduct
Submissions DOMAIN abduct@scicom.alphacdc.com
Admin Address abduct-request@shemtaia.weeg.uiowa.edu
Mail to private Paranet/Fidonet addresses from the newsletters:
DOMAIN firstname.lastname@paranet.org
UUCP scicom!paranet.org!firstname.lastname
****************A**B**D**U**C**T**I**O**N****D**I**G**E**S**T*******************