Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report

NL-KR Digest Volume 01 No. 09

eZine's profile picture
Published in 
NL KR Digest
 · 1 year ago

NL-KR Digest             (9/19/86 11:28:01)            Volume 1 Number 9 

Today's Topics:
SLP '86

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 10 Sep 86 06:40:30 edt
From: keller@UTAH-CS.ARPA
Subject: SLP '86


------------------------------

[Excerpted from IRList]

[...]

Hotel Reservations: phone 801-531-1000, telex 389434

The (nearly) final schedule:
SLP '86

Third IEEE Symposium on
LOGIC PROGRAMMING

September 21-25, 1986
Westin Hotel Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah

SUNDAY, September 21
19:00 - 22:00 Symposium and tutorial registration

MONDAY, September 22
08:00 - 09:00 Symposium and tutorial registration
09:00 - 17:30 TUTORIALS (concurrent) Please see abstracts later.
George Luger Introduction to AI Programming in Prolog
University of New Mexico
David Scott Warren Building Prolog Interpreters
SUNY, Stony Brook
John Conery Theory of Parallelism, with Applications to
University of Oregon Logic Programming
12:00 - 17:30 Exhibit set up time
18:00 - 22:00 Symposium registration
20:00 - 22:00 Reception

TUESDAY, September 23
08:00 - 12:30 Symposium registration
09:00 Exhibits open
09:00 - 09:30 Welcome and announcements
09:30 - 10:30 INVITED SPEAKER:
W. W. Bledsoe, MCC
Some Thoughts on Proof Discovery
11:00 - 12:30 SESSION 1: Applications
(Chair: Harvey Abramson)
The Logic of Tensed Statements in English -an Application of Logic Programming
Peter Ohrstrom, University of Aalborg
Nils Klarlund, University of Aarhus
Incremental Flavor-Mixing of Meta-Interpreters for Expert System Construction
Leon Sterling and Randall D. Beer, Case Western Reserve University
The Phoning Philosopher's Problem or
Logic Programming for Telecommunications Applications
J.L. Armstrong, N.A. Elshiewy, and R. Virding; Ericsson Telecom
14:00 - 15:30 SESSION 2: Secondary Storage
(Chair: Maurice Bruynooghe)
EDUCE - A Marriage of Convenience: Prolog and a Relational DBMS
Jorge Bocca, ECRC, Munich
Paging Strategy for Prolog Based Dynamic Virtual Memory
Mark Ross, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
K. Ramamohanarao, University of Melbourne
A Logical Treatment of Secondary Storage
Anthony J. Kusalik, University of Saskatchewan
Ian T. Foster, Imperial College, London
16:00 - 17:30 SESSION 3: Compilation
(Chair: Richard O'Keefe)
Compiling Control
Maurice Bruynooghe, Danny De Schreye, Bruno Krekels
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Automatic Mode Inference for Prolog Programs
Saumya K. Debray, David S. Warren
SUNY at Stony Brook
IDEAL: an Ideal DEductive Applicative Language
Pier Giorgio Bosco, Elio Giovannetti
C.S.E.L.T., Torino
17:30 - 19:30 Reception
20:30 - 22:30 Panel (Wm. Kornfeld, moderator)
Logic Programming for Systems Programming
Panelists: Steve Taylor, Weizmann Institute
Steve Gregory, Imperial College
Bill Wadge
A researcher from ICOT
(sorry this is incomplete)

WEDNESDAY, September 24
09:00 - 10:00 INVITED SPEAKER:
Sten Ake Tarnlund, Uppsala University
Logic Programming - A Logical View
10:30 - 12:00 SESSION 4: Theory
(Chair: Jean-Louis Lassez)
A Theory of Modules for Logic Programming
Dale Miller, University of Pennsylvania
Building-In Classical Equality into Prolog
P. Hoddinott, E.W. Elcock; The University of Western Ontario
Negation as Failure Using Tight Derivations
for General Logic Programs
Allen Van Gelder, Stanford University
13:30 - 15:00 SESSION 5: Control
(Chair: Jacques Cohen)
Characterisation of Terminating Logic Programs
Thomas Vasak, The University of New South Wales
John Potter, New South Wales Institute of Technology
An Execution Model for Committed-Choice Non-Deterministic Languages
Jim Crammond, Heriot-Watt University
Timestamped Term Representation in Implementing Prolog
Heikki Mannila, Esko Ukkonen; University of Helsinki
15:30 - 22:00 Excursion

THURSDAY, September 25
09:00 - 10:30 SESSION 6: Unification
(Chair: Uday Reddy)
Refutation Methods for Horn Clauses with Equality Based on E-Unification
Jean H. Gallier and Stan Raatz, University of Pennsylvania
An Algorithm for Unification in Equational Theories
Alberto Martelli, Gianfranco Rossi; Universita' di Torino
An Implementation of Narrowing: the RITE Way
Alan Josephson and Nachum Dershowitz; U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
11:00 - 12:30 SESSION 7: Parallelism
(Chair: Jim Crammond)
Selecting the Backtrack Literal in the AND Process of AND/OR Process Model
Nam S. Woo and Kwang-Moo Choe; AT & T Bell Laboratories
Distributed Semi-Intelligent Backtracking for Stack-based AND-parallel Prolog
Peter Borgwardt, Tektronix Labs
Doris Rea, University of Minnesota
The Sync Model for Parallel Execution of Logic Programming
Pey-yun Peggy Li and Alain J. Martin; California Institute of Technology
14:00 - 15:30 SESSION 8: Performance
Redundancy in Function-Free Recursive Rules
Jeff Naughton, Stanford University
Performance Evaluation of a Storage Model for OR-Parallel Execution
Andrzej Ciepelewski and Bogumil Hausman
Swedish Institute of Computer Science (SICS)
MALI: A Memory with a Real-Time Garbage Collector
for Implementing Logic Programming Languages
Yves Bekkers, Bernard Canet, Olivier Ridoux, Lucien Ungaro
IRISA/INRIA Rennes
16:00 - 17:30 SESSION 9: Warren Abstract Machine
(Chair: Manuel Hermenegildo)
A High Performance LOW RISC Machine for Logic Programming
J.W. Mills, Arizona State University
Register Allocation in a Prolog Machine
Saumya K. Debray, SUNY at Stony Brook
Garbage Cut for Garbage Collection of Iterative Programs
Jonas Barklund and Hakan Millroth, Uppsala University

EXHIBITS:

An exhibit area including displays by publishers, equipment
manufacturers, and software houses will accompany the Symposium.
The list of exhibitors includes: Arity, Addison-Wesley, Elsevier,
Expert Systems, Logicware, Overbeek Enterprises, Prolog Systems,
and Quintus. For more information, please contact:

Dr. Ross A. Overbeek
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Ave.
Argonne, IL 60439
312/972-7856


ACCOMODATIONS, MEALS AND SOCIAL EVENTS, TRAVEL, CLIMATE,
SLP '86 Symposium and Tutorial Registration Coupon,
SLP '86 Hotel Reservation Coupon:
[edited out - Ed]


SLP '86 TUTORIAL ABSTRACTS


IMPLEMENTATION OF PROLOG INTERPRETERS AND COMPILERS

DAVID SCOTT WARREN
SUNY AT STONY BROOK

Prolog is by far the most used of various logic programming
languages that have been proposed. The reason for this is the
existence of very efficient implementations. This tutorial will
show in detail how this efficiency is achieved.

The first half of this tutorial will concentrate on Prolog
compilation. The approach is first to define a Prolog Virtual
Machine (PVM), which can be implemented in software, microcode,
hardware, or by translation to the language of an existing
machine. We will describe in detail the PVM defined by D.H.D.
Warren (SRI Technical Note 309) and discuss how its data objects
can be represented efficiently. We will also cover issues of
compilation of Prolog source programs into efficient PVM
programs.



ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND PROLOG:
AN INTRODUCTION TO THEORETICAL
ISSUES IN AI WITH PROLOG EXAMPLES

GEORGE F. LUGER

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO

This tutorial is intended to introduce the important concepts of
both Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming. To
accomplish this task, the theoretical issues involved in AI
problem solving are presented and discussed. These issues are
exemplified with programs written in Prolog that implement the
core ideas. Finally, the design of a Prolog interpreter as
Resolution Refutation system is presented.

The main ideas from AI problem solving that are presented
include: 1) An introduction of AI as representation and search.
2) An introduction of the Predicate Calculus as the main
representation formalism for Artificial Intelligence. 3) Simple
examples of Predicate Calculus representations, including a
relational data base. 4) Unification and its role both in
Predicate Calculus and Prolog. 5) Recursion, the control
mechanism for searching trees and graphs, 6) The design of search
strategies, especially depth first, breadth first and best first
or "heuristic" techniques, and 7) The Production System and its
use both for organizing search in a Prolog data base, as well as
the basic data structure for "rule based" Expert Systems.

The above topics are presented with simple Prolog program
implementations, including a Production System code for
demonstrating search strategies. The final topic presented is an
analysis of the Prolog interpreter and an analysis of this
approach to the more general issue of logic programming.
Resolution is considered as an inference strategy and its use in
a refutation system for "answer extraction" is presented. More
general issues in AI problem solving, such as the relation of
"logic" to "functional" programming are also discussed.



PARALLELISM IN LOGIC PROGRAMMING

JOHN CONERY
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON

The fields of parallel processing and logic programming have
independently attracted great interest among computing
professionals recently, and there is currently considerable
activity at the interface, i.e. in applying the concepts of
parallel computing to logic programming and, more specifically
yet, to Prolog. The application of parallelism to Logic
Programming takes two basic but related directions. The first
involves leaving the semantics of sequential programming, say
ordinary Prolog, as intact as possible, and uses parallelism,
hidden from the programmer, to improve execution speed. This has
traditionally been a difficult problem requiring very intelligent
compilers. It may be an easier problem with logic programming
since parallelism is not artificially made sequential, as with
many applications expressed in procedural languages. The second
direction involves adding new parallel programming primitives to
Logic Programming to allow the programmer to explicitly express
the parallelism in an application.

This tutorial will assume a basic knowledge of Logic Programming,
but will describe current research in parallel computer
architectures, and will survey many of the new parallel machines,
including shared-memory architectures (RP3, for example) and
non-shared-memory architectures (hypercube machines, for
example). The tutorial will then describe many of the current
proposals for parallelism in Logic Programming, including those
that allow the programmer to express the parallelism and those
that hide the parallelism from the programmer. Included will be
such proposals as Concurrent Prolog, Parlog, Guarded Horn Clauses
(GHC), and Delta-Prolog. An attempt will be made to partially
evaluate many of these proposals for parallelism in Logic
Programming, both from a pragmatic architectural viewpoint as
well as from a semantic viewpoint.

Conference Chairperson
Gary Lindstrom, University of Utah

Program Chairperson
Robert M. Keller, University of Utah

Local Arrangements Chairperson
Thomas C. Henderson, University of Utah

Tutorials Chairperson
George Luger, University of New Mexico

Exhibits Chairperson
Ross Overbeek, Argonne National Lab.

Program Committee

Francois Bancilhon, MCC
John Conery, U. of Oregon
Al Despain, U.C. Berkeley
Herve Gallaire, ECRC, Munich
Seif Haridi, SICS, Stockholm
Lynette Hirschman, SDC
Peter Kogge, IBM, Owego
William Kornfeld, Quintus Systems
Gary Lindstrom, University of Utah
George Luger, University of New Mexico
Rikio Onai, ICOT/NTT, Tokyo
Ross Overbeek, Argonne National Lab.
Mark Stickel, SRI International
Sten Ake Tarnlund, Uppsala University

------------------------------

End of NL-KR Digest
*******************

← previous
next →
loading
sending ...
New to Neperos ? Sign Up for free
download Neperos App from Google Play
install Neperos as PWA

Let's discover also

Recent Articles

Recent Comments

Neperos cookies
This website uses cookies to store your preferences and improve the service. Cookies authorization will allow me and / or my partners to process personal data such as browsing behaviour.

By pressing OK you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge the Privacy Policy

By pressing REJECT you will be able to continue to use Neperos (like read articles or write comments) but some important cookies will not be set. This may affect certain features and functions of the platform.
OK
REJECT