Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Alife Digest Number 036
ALIFE LIST: Artificial Life Research List Number 36 Friday, August 31st 1990
ARTIFICIAL LIFE RESEARCH ELECTRONIC MAILING LIST
Maintained by the Indiana University Artificial Life Research Group
Contents:
Essence of A-Life
Polyandry and Survival
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 90 12:46:52 PDT
From: abbott@aerospace.aero.org (Russell J. Abbott)
Subject: Essence of A-Life
After watching this field with great interest for a while, I have
started to wonder whether a useful attempt has been made to identify the
essental elements of a-life systems. For the sake of discussion, here
is my list.
1. Entities in an environment.
2. Advantages to finding optimizations within that environment.
3. Mechanisms for generating, storing, and using information (about
those optimizations).
I realize that this is pretty gross: what do "entities," "environment,"
and "advantage" mean. What does it mean for an entity to be in an
environment? (At least "optimization" and "information" are somewhat
better understood.) But it is a start.
How would you modify this list? Or, if this is not a good list to start
with, is there a better one?
I have intentionally left out reproduction (even though the term A-Life
suggests that it should be included) because I am not sure how relevant
that is. One can argue that what is really reproduced in successful
a-life systems is information. But once one has a way of producing and
using information, reproducing it is comparatively simple. What is
really important about information is the existence of an interpretive
system for using it, and that is included in my (3) above.
-- Russ Abbott@itro3.aero.org
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 90 03:43 PDT
From: sds@jazzie.wa.com (Sean Shapira)
Subject: Polyandry and Survival
Marek W. Lugowski <marek@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
> My first question is to ask for any information that any of you may
> have on polyandry in Nepal. [...] I am also interested in the economics
> of polyandry, [and] in possibly modeling such emergences
In Nepal, aren't the husbands brothers? Isn't a probablistic argument,
based on the husbands' shared genetic traits combined with the "right" life
expectancies for adult males and fatherless children, sufficient to show
that polyandry may be a survival trait in some circumstances?
--Sean Shapira
------------------------------
End of ALife Digest
********************************