Does the Starchild skull belong to an alien ?
The natives of the Chihuahua region in Mexico tell of an ancient legend, dating back more than 200 years, whose protagonist is a certain "Starchild". In summary, their myth speaks of persons descended from the sky that impregnated the human women in the remote villages. The women fertilized by these alien beings were allowed to raise their own children, also called "starchildren" until the star beings returned from the sky to pick up and take their stellar offspring with them into space.
Ultimately this legend is very similar to many others that developed among the Native Americans of the North, but it has a decidedly different stamp from the paleoastronautics of past millennia, in which the alien advent was instructive and creative, in fact it takes on a more modern definition in the field of alien abductions. However, we cannot exclude that abductions did not take place in the past: perhaps we ourselves are the result of a cosmic hybridization that occurred in the early days of the appearance of man...
However, the legend seems to be confirmed after some discoveries that are truly out of the ordinary.
But let's finally analyze the facts.
We are in Texas, for some time now there has been news of the discovery of two different skeletons, in which a definition of "alien" would be more than appropriate. The story begins with a couple who come into possession of two skulls, one of which is human while the second has very little in common with humans. The couple, who wish to remain anonymous, handed over the two skulls to two researchers, Mark Bean and Lloyd Pye who studied them thoroughly to discover something.
Another premise leads us to also consider another case of skeleton discoveries: a news reported by MUFON in 1999. A fossil researcher, Richard Wallace, would have found an anomalous skeleton from any human anatomical criticism that had been unearthed ten years earlier and then handed over to Robert Slaughter, professor of paleontology and director of the Shuler museum in Dallas (Texas).
Both cases, documented by some photos of the finds, have increased the aura of mystery and the definitive research towards the alien thesis, although there is, as usual unfortunately, no evidence in this sense. This type of analysis seems the most credible.
According to a probable reconstruction of events, the two skulls would have belonged to two entire skeletons unearthed in a cave south of Chihuahua in the state of Chihauhau, a state very close to "el Paso" in Texas. The two skeletons would have been hidden, but a storm would have scattered the bones, except that a local girl would have found the two skulls and kept with her until her death.
After passing through the hands of an American couple, they finally reached the anonymous couple we have already mentioned and, finally, the researcher Pye.
The researcher studies the connections it may have had with unusual humanoid beings such as Bigfoot or Yeti and comes to the conclusion that the skull referred to an unknown humanoid being. As regards the second skull, he attested that it was an adult Amerindian woman of approximately 20-30 years of age. It is yet to be verified from DNA tests whether the two findings may have any parental connection.
However, when it concerns the other skull, he expressed himself on the subject as if it belonged to a child of around 4-5 years old, due to the sutures on the bones and the shape of the teeth, although the skull was missing the lower jaw and part of the upper one.
From the data reported, very important characteristics are highlighted:
- Paranasal sinus. Pye points out that, although the paranasal sinus (part of the skull in the area of the nasal septum) exists in all mammals, this bony conformation does not exist in this skull. However, a specialist reports that in particular malformations it may not be present.
- Orbital cavities. "truly disconcerting, even for experts": this is how Pye reports it. These cavities appear to be extremely flat and it also appears that their conformation, different from human standards, identifies a very lowered position of the optic nerve, preventing a respectable movement of the eyeball. The vision of space in this way would occur more through the movement of the head than through that of the eye.
- Shape of the skull. The shape of the skull appears to be very strange: the parietal area protrudes a lot and therefore the temples do not appear, the posterior part of the skull instead appears to be greatly enlarged and at the same time flat. Although it could be objected that the characteristics of the skull may derive from genetic or artificial malformations deriving from skull bandaging, as in primitive peoples, the skull presents a perfect symmetry so as to discredit the aforementioned hypotheses, since in such conditions of malformation the symmetry is not present; furthermore there are no types of bandages or malformations that allow the shape of the skull that is studied to be shaped.
- Cranial base. Unlike normal human beings, the foramen magnum, i.e. the hole on which the spinal column is inserted, appears to be moved far forward, this to allow the skull to balance on the base of the neck.
It seems quite strange that such a discovery was possible, if in fact the legend of the starchild is applicable to these archaeological finds, we would have expected that the child had already been taken by aliens many years ago; perhaps the mother and child had died accidentally and divine honors were performed to bury her as the "chosen one", or perhaps the mother was afraid and wanted to keep with her a child who, even though she had given birth, was not hers.
He was a child of the stars.
