GIANTS: MYTH OF THE PAST, REALITY OF THE PRESENT
Corrado Malanga
February 1, 2004
Sometimes what is forcibly ejected from the door bullies its way back in through the window. One of the things that is usually hard to get rid of is the lie that has just been told, and it seems that of more or less deliberate inaccuracies science has told many.
Uncertainties about true human evolution seem not to appear at all in the canonical texts that are used at the university, where attempts are made, ever more desperately, to convince the student that everything is under the control of "science."
The shamelessness of modern science, which expresses itself through its oracles (university professors), seems to have no limits. Thus the idea that beings of much greater height than our present ones really existed in the distant past is not even entertained, despite the fact that evidence of their existence is coming out almost everywhere from the subsoil of the planet. In fact, skeletons belonging to human beings of great stature are found, as we shall see better later, in all parts of the globe, and while some passing scientists have ruled that such remains should not be attributed to human beings, but rather to animals, some have also argued that they belonged yes to human beings, but crippled freaks of nature, to human beings affected by various syndromes, resulting in abnormal gigantism.
See websites:
(http://encarta.msn.com/media_461516336/picture_of_person_suffering_from_gigantism.html).
Phenomena of gigantism or dwarfism, produced by pituitary malfunction. (http://www.medstudents.com.br/endoc/endoc8.htm), (http://www.emedicine.com/ped/topic2634.htm), (http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/g/gigantism/intro.htm).
Pituitary gland malfunctions produce rickets in all parts of the body, so while some follow a normal growth pattern, others become disproportionate to the size of the skeleton.
Genetic factors, such as certain chromosomal alterations, are also capable of producing the phenomena of dwarfism or gigantism. Those who have tall fathers and tall grandfathers have a certain likelihood of also becoming tall: indeed, many finds have unearthed corpses of giants within a short distance of each other at the same archaeological site.
In these cases, it is clear that malformation had little to do with it, but it was, instead, the genetics of the locals, their race (in the broadest sense), that had re-proposed the same abnormal skeletal features.
Complicating matters are also the legends and myths from all parts of the planet, which speak of giants who were not always good, but always superhumans, more or less direct descendants of gods or demigods and born from union with a (one) normal earthling.
I use the term "terrestrial" because, if official science rules out that in the past man could be taller than now even by a span, then it must be inferred that very tall and biologically compatible "humanoid" beings (as even the Bible says) came from elsewhere.
If, in proposing the hypothesis that much taller men existed than those of today, official science cried out in scandal, now, after the formulation of the "alien" hypothesis, it is starting to laughing, or rather, mocking those who have the deontological courage to propose it, in this case yours truly. But let's clarify a bit.
In his book of which the cover is shown, above, Stephen Quayle gives many examples of giants, both from the past, with much documented historical and photographic evidence, and from the present.
Other historical traces of giants in the past can be found on some Internet sites, such as, for example, http://www.lostinn.com/lworld/index.html .
Here are some biblical examples:
(Bible-Genesis VI:1)
"When men began to multiply on the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful and took for wives as many as they wanted. Then the Lord said, 'My spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh and his life shall be a hundred and twenty years.' There were giants on the earth in those days-and even afterward-when the sons of God joined themselves to the daughters of men and they bore them sons: they are, these the heroes of antiquity, famous men."
(Bible-Numbers XIII:33)
"...we saw there the giants, the sons of Anak, of the race of giants, before whom we seemed to be like locusts, and so we must have seemed to them."
(Bible-Deuteronomy II:10)
"First there dwelt the Enim: a people great, numerous, tall in stature like the Anakites..."
(Bible - Deuteronomy III:11)
"For Og, king of Bashan, was left the only survivor of the Rephaim. Behold, is not his bed, a bed of iron, in Rabba of the Ammonites? It is nine cubits long according to the cubit of a man."
(Bible - 2 Samuel XXI, 20) - Six-fingered giant.
"There was another battle at Gat, where a man of great stature was found, who had six fingers on each hand and foot, twenty-four fingers in all; he too was born in Rafa."
Among the Maya there was talk of the giants Quinatezmin and the "Mexican Manuscript of Pedro de los Rios" states:
"Before the Flood, which occurred 4008 years after the creation of the world, the Land of Anahuac was inhabited by the Tzocuillixeco, giant beings..."
In Gargayan, Philippines, a skeleton 5.18 meters high was found and in Ceylon several skeletons about 4 meters high; in Pakistan one recovered skeleton was 3.5 meters high. Giant human teeth have been found in Peru and China (where they are called "dragon teeth"). In 1810, a giant skeleton with a huge skull and six fingers was found in California, but it is not the only example of a giant being equipped with six fingers in its hands and feet.
Another example is provided by the so-called "Nexus Giant."
Nexus, the famous international magazine that also covers unusual research implications, recently printed a photo of a Petrified Giant found in an old coal mine. The giant had six fingers and toes, was dressed unusually and was photographed leaning against a railroad car (photo above).
Giants have left much evidence of their existence on our planet, and there are localities where one only has to dig to see bones surface that are definitely out of proportion for a man of our time.
In this drawing all the examples of known tall human skeletons in the world have been gathered (http://www.mtblanco.com/).
Remember that 1 foot = 30.49 cm.
- A. Normal human being (about 1.83 m)
- B. Being 15 feet tall found in southeastern Turkey in 1950, in the Euphrates Valley. Many remains of very tall beings with giant femoral bones were found at that site.
- C. Caius Julius Verus Maximinus Thrax, Roman emperor, 235-238 A.D: a skeleton of as much as 8 feet and a half!
- D. Goliath was about 9 feet tall.
- E. King Og (Bible-Deuteronomy 3:11), Whose bed was 14 feet long.
- F. Human skeleton nearly 20 feet tall, found in 1577 under a large tree in the canton of Lucerne, Willisau, Switzerland.
- G. Skeleton 23 feet high, found in 1456 on the banks of a river near Valence, France. H. Skeleton (complete) 25.6 feet tall, found in 1613 near Chaumont Castle, France.
- I. Beyond all human comprehension appear two skeletons 36 feet high found near Carthage in 200/600 AD.
There is also no shortage of photographs of today's and yesterday's giants to testify not only to the real presence of giants on Earth, but also to the existence of an unsolved scientific problem, indeed, totally ignored by official science.
These giants are really well-proportioned and do not appear to be crippled or monstrous at all; they do not seem to be victims of any particular syndromes, but rather of a genetic recession, a memory within their DNA that made them perhaps grow based on the memory of some of their distant ancestors.
It is worth mentioning at this point that, in the investigations of alien interference that I have been conducting for many years now, and particularly in regressive hypnosis performed on adducts by aliens, we are always confronted with beings who are either very tall or very short compared to our stature.
One particular "race" of such beings is described as having six fingers in their hands, and it is not a peregrine idea, in my opinion, to suspect that at least some of those giants whose bony remains we have were not originally from our planet, but came, perhaps, "from outside."
In other words, if the starting axiom is true, that is, if the skeletons of those very tall beings cannot be "embedded" at any point in human evolution, it simply follows that aliens came to this planet long ago.
We should therefore give far more weight to the legends about the mythical Giants and perhaps we might discover that these creatures of fantasy were in fact not so fantastic.
Further information is provided by a particularly rich part of their skeletons: the skull.
Let us, then, take a look at some strange skull types attributable to very tall and/or large beings:
The skulls below show two particular types. The first two are elongated and retroverted, very similar to the heads of some Egyptian pharaohs, oddly designed and carved in this way.
The other skull appears, in fact, bilobed.
Some anthropologists have thought that skeletons of such elongated skulls may have belonged to people to whom, for aesthetic and religious reasons, they had been swaddled from childhood precisely to make them take on such a shape. (http://www.acam.it/deformazioni_craniche2.htm).
Indeed, this custom was present among some tribes, and we should ask what drove the natives to make their skulls take that shape, with who knows what suffering: perhaps the desire to resemble some of the giants, considered gods, seen transiting their parts long ago?
In fact, most of the skulls mentioned are of enormous proportions compared to ours or those of our ancestors, and it seems impossible that such bony vestiges belonged to an ordinary human being.
It is equally impossible to believe that these skulls originate from bony malformations related to syndromes of some kind, since from the analyses carried out on such findings it seems to be possible to infer that they were perfectly normal humanoids. (http://www.stevequayle.com/index.html).
See also http://www.enigmas.org/aef/lib/archeo/skulls.shtml
Here is a collection of skulls preserved in Peru.
Many of these skulls certainly belonged to very tall humanoid creatures, but perhaps not all of them.
We humans are wont to make some crazy blunders when we try to do proper research, so if a diligent and serious naturalist skilled in human evolution came along and saw these skulls he would say:
A. They are from malformed humans
B. They are of large proportions, so they are of large malformed humans.
The two statements appear to be completely laughable: I have already shown, in other works, that present-day humans have not the faintest idea of their true evolution, and that the theories bandied about in our universities today hold water on all sides.
Point B turns out to be even more delicate, because, in the descriptions made by the adducts, we are always in the presence of small but macrocephalic beings.
The hypothetical (so to speak) expert, in passing judgment on those skulls, would have applied a wholly personal criterion, according to which what is good for man should be good for any other anthropomorphic being.
In the morphology of some of those skulls I found a strange and intriguing resemblance to the cranial shape of an alien "race" described many times by the adducts I studied.
These adducts are not familiar with the skull structures reported in this study, but they describe a small being (about 1.50 m) with a large bilobed skull, just like the one shown below. What is that supposed to mean?
Mumble, mumbe, it said in the comic strip above Mickey's head when he was perplexed: who knows if that comic strip also fits those who have been adducted by these beings of short stature, with the folds of the skin of the neck very much in evidence and with something on the sides of the skull of which we have not yet figured out what it is and which someone, overseas, has reconstructed in these ways.
Here, in these fantastic reconstructions, similarities with the mysterious bilobed skulls of Peru inescapably stand out.
So perhaps it is not crazy to think that some form of humanoid alien has left its bony remains on this planet and may still be around here minding its own business in defiance of us.
