The Pyramids
According to official Egyptology, the 3 great pyramids of Cheops, Chefren and Menkaure (three pharaohs of the 4th dynasty), in the Giza plateau, in Egypt, were built by them around 2500 BC, as huge tombs. The Sphinx, depicting the pharaoh Chefren, and the majestic temples, also in the Giza plateau, are almost universally attributed to this pharaoh.
All these attributions and dating date back at least to the time of the historian Herodotus, in the fifth century BC and agree with the official story according to which the first civilizations in the world capable of leaving written evidence, arose around 4000 BC in Egypt, Mesopotamia, central and southern America.
But despite a very superficial examination where everything seems to work well for the Egyptologists, with a a little more careful examination one can notice how a lot of things could not have gone as historians say. The three huge pyramids have characteristics that exclude that they were built by a semi-savage people like the Egyptian one in 2500 BC. Their project required such a refined and advanced technology that even today we will have very big problems in attempting such a work.
Why ? The pyramids are not just a mass of granite blocks, they are much, much more. They were built to impressive pinpoint accuracy and contain numerous messages worthy of incredibly advanced science. The Great Pyramid of Cheops was built with 2,300,000 blocks of granite weighing from 2 to 15 tons each; it has a basis square with sides of about 230.2 meters. The difference between the lengths of the sides is very few centimeters and all three pyramids are oriented according to the cardinal points with a very small error (0.015%).
The need for such precision is inexplicable, as even a 1% error would have been too small to be noticed with the naked eye, on the other hand the difference in effort required to achieve such precision with such a large construction would have been immense. The huge blocks that constitute them were extracted from a quarry, transported over great distances and inserted precisely into the complex at heights of 100-150 meters above the ground, maintaining incredible accuracy from start to finish. Even a minimal error in inclination angle of one of the sides would have brought the apex of the pyramids off center (which instead is millimetrically centered in all three pyramids).
Egyptologists do not know in any way to give a plausible explanation of how the Egyptian people could have built such a work. It is not enough to say that in ancient Egypt there was an abundance of slaves and that they probably made use of ramps, since even admitting a slope of 1:10 in the inclined plane, a ramp one and a half kilometers long would have been necessary, over three times heavier than the pyramid itself. To the 6 million tons of the blocks was added a mirror-like coating, over the entire surface, consisting of 115,000 highly polished and very smooth stone slabs weighing ten tons each; perfectly aligned and with such precise joints (0.2 mm) that it is not possible to insert the thin blade of a small knife between one sheet and the next. Such an accurate work cannot even be compared to the optical precision with which the 6-meter lens of the Mount Palomar observatory was built.
Most of the slabs were removed and used for the constructions of the inhabitants of Cairo, about 3000 years ago. Furthermore, all the other pyramids built in Egypt, both before 2500 BC and later, are ridiculous piles of stones in comparison. How was it possible that just after 2500 BC the Egyptian architects had suddenly forgotten all the advanced knowledge and highly refined technology with which the three great pyramids were built.
Furthermore, no pharaoh's inscription or mummy was ever found in any of the three pyramids. The King's chamber, inside the Great Pyramid, where the pharaoh's body is believed to have been preserved, is located exactly at the point where the area of the horizontal section was equal to half that of the base.
Its measures? Even more surprising: it was a perfect rectangle, where the sum of the height plus half of a side accurately gave the number phi (1.618) an irrational number known as the golden section. The walls of the chamber are made up of one hundred blocks of granite weighing 70 tons each, smooth as a mirror. Inside there has always been an empty sarcophagus (whose external volume is exactly double the internal volume), made of very hard stone. To hollow it out and make such sharp angles they would have had to have very sophisticated diamond-tipped tools of the kind that have only been used only in recent years.
Another detail: the sarcophagus is too large to have passed through the main entrance, so it must have been inserted during the construction of the pyramid, not afterwards.
Finally, the shape of the pyramid is such that the ratio between the perimeter of the base and the height is exactly 3.1415 (the famous pi-Greek number). I avoid talking about the Grand Gallery (the passage leading to the King's chamber), or the Anteroom, or the Queen's room, so as not to go too far. I only say that in every detail the three pyramids clearly demonstrate a very advanced technology absolutely incompatible with the Egyptian civilization of 2500 BC. the widespread practice of the pharaohs of appropriating the buildings of their predecessors.
So who was it to build the pyramids ?
Read on and you will know ...
Research conducted by Schwaller in the 1940s revealed that the Sphinx showed clear signs of erosion from precipitation. Archaeologist John Anthony West went ahead with the matter and had geologist Robert Schoch who specializes in rock erosion do some in-depth analysis. He demonstrated that the meter-deep marks on the Sphinx and on the rocks of the moat in which it lies, show very evident signs of erosion of an enormous amount of rainwater (a classic textbook example). But in Egypt it has hardly rained for millennia. To find a time when there was abundant rainfall, it is necessary to go back to 10,000 BC.
West also made thorough investigations into the similarity of the Sphinx with the statue of the pharaoh Khafre and showed that the two faces do not look alike at all (they even belong to two different races), moreover the head is very small compared to the rest of the body. This suggests that it was re-sculpted in much more recent times by the Egyptians, but not by Chefren. The same type of erosion can be seen in the Valley Temple about sixty meters away from the Sphinx. This temple was built with gigantic boulders of 200 tons each and 7-9 meters wide (each was as big as your living room, if you have a large enough living room :-)) taken in the pit where the Sphinx lies, as has been shown. What was the point of that? Why not divide these giant blocks into smaller pieces so that they can be transported, lifted, smoothed and inserted much easier? And to think that the temple is built with hundreds of blocks. Nowadays there are only two cranes capable of lifting such weights; the preparation time for a single lift is around 6 weeks.
Also, to further complicate matters, the blocks had been cut and arranged in a complex puzzle shape. But what need was there to complicate things like that? The temple dates back like the Sphinx to before 10,000 BC, and like the pyramids there was no trace of inscriptions. Quite differently, the real monuments erected by the Egyptians, much more modest and poor, from every point of view, are full of inscriptions, hieroglyphs, statues and statuettes. This as yet another confirmation that it was certainly not the Egyptians who erected the great pyramids, nor the Sphinx, nor the temples.
In 1993 the archaeoastronomer Robert Bauval noted that the arrangement of the three pyramids of Giza was exactly the same as that of the three central stars of the constellation of Orion both in angles and in magnitude. The question according to which Menkaure, despite being as rich and powerful as his predecessors, had built a pyramid that was less than half that of the other two attributed to Cheops and Chefren had finally found an answer. In addition, this map included two other buildings located north and south of Giza and placed the Nile exactly where the Milky Way was in relation to the constellation of Orion in the sky. The map was very accurate, but it reflected what the stars looked like in Egypt in 10,450 BC, not 2500 BC. The question according to which Menkaure, despite being as rich and powerful as his predecessors, had built a pyramid that was less than half that of the other two attributed to Cheops and Chefren had finally found an answer. In addition, this map included two other buildings located north and south of Giza and placed the Nile exactly where the Milky Way was in relation to the constellation of Orion in the sky.
Among other things, 10,450 BC was not even a random date, as on that date (and only that date) the three stars were at the lowest point in the precession cycle. Precession is a movement of the Earth that completes a complete cycle every 26,000 years; as a result of this movement we see the stars rise and fall very slowly against the background of the sky (to get an idea it takes centuries and centuries before the stars appear more displaced than two fingers). The stars of Orion will be at their highest point in the year 2500 AD (ie 13,000 years from the date of 10,450 BC). It was a very, very ingenious and very precise way to mark an epoch in a universal mathematical language.
Furthermore, due to the precession, the zodiacal constellation that rises immediately before the Sun, on the day of the Spring equinox (very important day for all ancient civilizations) changes approximately every 2200 years. Today we are at the end of the Age of Pisces and we are entering the Age of Aquarius (which will last for 2200 years). The Sphinx is in the form of a Lion and looks exactly to the East, at the point where the Sun rises on the day of the Spring Equinox. The Sphinx is a huge equinoctial indicator and the only era in which such a lion-shaped indicator would have been appropriate is precisely the Age of Leo, between 10.970 BC and 8.810 BC. In addition, some gigantic 40-meter ships were found next to the pyramids. The structure of these ingenious ships was of the high seas, with the bow and stern very raised. Numerous clues lead one to think seriously about a very advanced civilization that came to Egypt long before 2500 BC, and precisely around 10,500 BC.
A very curious thing, in my opinion, is the fact that, in many other parts of the known world, there are, or have existed, pyramidal constructions very similar to those, now very famous, Egyptians. Was it the Egyptians who copied from others or vice versa? Or ... did they all have a common prompter? ...
The empire of the Incas
In Peru, across the ocean from Egypt, the Incas had made something very similar to the pyramids. The ancient fortress of Sacsahuaman was built with blocks of stone even more mammoth than those of the pyramids and temples of the Giza plateau, in Egypt. Although most were roughly 100-150 tons, there were some boulders over 360 tons! What's more, they had been cut and smoothed with apparent ease and arranged in complicated three-dimensional puzzles. Had it been the Incas? According to Inca legends, they had been white bearded strangers who had come in ancient times ... also an Inca king, much later had tried to emulate the works of foreigners by trying to move a relatively smaller boulder than those used to build the fortress. More than 20,000 Indians tried to drag the boulder from one side of the mountain to the other ... at one point the boulder got out of hand and crushed more than 3000 men ... this suggested that these people had not the slightest experience of necessary techniques and that their only attempt had ended in a disaster.
In the Inca empire there were 24,000 kilometers of perfectly level roads; according to historians it was the Incas who built them. The Inca legends, on the other hand, tell that they had already found them like this and that it was instead of bearded strangers who built them in ancient times. It had been handed down for countless generations that light-skinned, bearded, tall strangers (Viracocha, in the Inca language) had suddenly appeared from the South in very ancient times. They knew all languages, were masters of all sciences and were very powerful. Wherever they passed they healed the sick and restored sight to the blind, taught love and kindness, built majestic palaces and irrigation canals with extreme simplicity. Suddenly, after having created admirable works, having brought order and well-being, having taught sophisticated production techniques, they disappeared northward, just as they had come.
In a remote area of the Andes, on top of steep mountains, stood Machu Picchu, another place built with the same advanced techniques used for Sacsahuaman and the great pyramids in Egypt. In an even more inaccessible place is Tiahuanaco, an ancient city with a large port 100 meters above Lake Titicaca. The waters of Lake Titicaca dipped a hundred meters in 10,000 BC. This proves that the city was built before that time. In the city there is an imposing pyramid built with gigantic boulders (some 440 tons, two or three times the size of your living room!) And with numerous animal designs. The animals depicted there have been proven to have been extinct for at least 12,000 years. There is no crane today that can lift those boulders off the ground, let alone on top of a mountain! If questioned, the local Indians tell that those monuments were erected by the Viracocha gods, in time immemorial, and that the stones were raised in the air at the sound of their voices.
The Nazca plateau
The Nazca plateau in southern Peru is a desolate, parched and more inhospitable place than the lunar surface. No people have ever lived here and no one will in the future ... however if you were an artist with grandiose projects it would be for you as it offers a smooth surface of 300 square km in which to engrave your drawings, a bit like you do on sand. Furthermore, you would have the certainty that your works will last forever because here neither the wind, nor the sand, nor human settlements will ever erase any trace. From the plane (and only from the plane) it is possible to admire gigantic and precise drawings of animals and geometric figures. Some of them measure several kilometers and have a particularly accurate symmetry.
At ground level these grooves in the clay are little more than small scratches and without a plane it is impossible to realize what forms they represent, also because there are no nearby mountains from which they can be admired. Whoever made them could see them from above like a condor.
Runways? It is to be excluded as the clay is too soft ... moreover the animals depicted are not common animals. The spider shown here is definitely a ricinulei, a very rare spider that lives only in inaccessible areas of the Amazon rainforest. And how did they manage to reproduce the minute details of the anatomy of the ricinulei, visible only under the microscope? The whale, the hummingbird, the monkey and so many others are as out of place here as the spider. The only "home" animal seems to be the condor.
According to the Indians, it was the Viracocha who designed them in very remote times. According to historians, however, the Viracocha are a myth and were the indigenous Indians of 2000 years ago.
The Maya
In Mexico, there are the remains of numerous Mayan cities and pyramids. The step pyramid, known as the Temple of Cuculcàn had 365 steps, as many days of the year and was designed so that on the day of the spring and autumn equinoxes (and only in those days) the rays of light formed the illusion that a giant snake was swaying on the north stairway for exactly 3 hours and 22 minutes. Near Cholula, on the other hand, stands imposing like no other building, tlahchiualtepetl, the mountain made by man. This gigantic step pyramid measures 500 meters on each side and 64 meters high, three times the size of the pyramid of Cheops.
According to Mayan legends, this building was erected by a very tall, bearded, light-skinned stranger who had come from the sea with some companions, in a raft that moved by itself. The characteristics were similar to the Peruvian Viracocha since they were considered powerful deities, masters of science and magic, able to heal with the laying on of hands and resurrect the dead. During their presence they had passed on advanced knowledge to the natives, such as the calendar, mathematics, astronomy, agriculture, etc.
The calculation skills of the Maya were impressive ... according to the Mayan calendar the duration of the year was 365.2420 days, while the exact value is 365.2422 days (an error of only 0.0002 days!).
They knew how to predict eclipses and they knew the number zero. Not only that ... they had even measured the period of revolution of the planet Venus (without errors). Isn't it strange that with all that genius they didn't know the wheel? Or that they never used all that math skill even to weigh a sack of potatoes? Just as they had come, the foreigners (Cuculcan, in the Mayan language) left by sea. Recently a Mayan pyramid semi-submerged by the lava erupted from a nearby volcano was investigated; it turned out that the last eruption of that volcano dates back to 8500 years ago.
The Mayan city of Teotihualcàn was an exact reproduction of the solar system. There was a large pyramid that represented the Sun (called the Pyramid of the Sun) and an avenue (the Avenue of the Dead) in which there were some markings. The mutual distances between the markers corresponded to the distances of the planets of the solar system. They were all there. From Mercury to Pluto, including the asteroid belt. But Pluto is certainly not visible to the naked eye ... a telescope is needed. Did the Maya also have a telescope? Of course, historians say that it is simply a coincidence and that the markings are random. Furthermore, finally, the pyramid of the Sun had a particularity. The ratio of the base side to the height was equal to the irrational number pi just like the Great Pyramid of Giza in Egypt. They didn't know the wheel, but they knew the pi which is used to calculate the circumference. I hope no archaeoscientist thinks it's pure coincidence. The clues supporting the thesis that all these buildings were built by the same authors, in an ancient era, around 10,500 BC. they seem to be getting more and more numerous.
Dozens of pyramids with the same analogies are found in China and the legends are similar in all respects. The myth of Noah's Ark, for example, is present in more than 500 legends of ancient peoples from all parts of the world. Different names are used, but in all cases, a man was advised by the divinity to build a huge boat to escape an impending flood and save what can be saved. In 10,500 BC there really was an immense deluge. But where did these civilizing "foreigners" come from and how did they disappear?
The land of the gods
For a civilization to reach a technological progress of the highest level, numerous elements are needed. It must rise in a very large area, at least twice as large as Madagascar, with a mild and stable climate, with mountains and rivers. This climate must remain undisturbed for several millennia.
Where to look for this "Atlantis"?
Oceanographers had plumbed all the oceans of the world and there was no trace of submerged land in the middle of the Atlantic or in the Mediterranean, nor anywhere else. After the sliding theory was confirmed, it became clear that Antarctica, which was once green, with a very favorable and stable climate, and large enough, could do just that. The jerky sliding of the crust causing unimaginable catastrophes around 10,500 BC and the fact that the Antarctica is buried under a kilometer and a half of ice explain very well how that civilization was able to disappear without leaving almost a trace. All the clues lead to believe that the highly civilized elusive civilization is indeed buried under the ice of the Antarctic. In the wake of the catastrophes only very few survivors managed to save themselves and pass on part of their knowledge to the primitive populations of the Maya, the Inca, Egypt, etc.
And not only.
They also conveyed an important message. And that is, that the sliding of the crust that happened 12,000 years ago could happen again. Scientists have proven that the Earth's magnetic poles have reversed 170 times in 80 million years. The last reversal occurred precisely in 10,450 BC. And they are pretty sure that any reversal causes intense upheaval throughout the Earth. It is predicted that the next inversion could take place in the years just following 2000. The Maya calculated the exact time of the end as December 23, 2012. In the 1930s it was prophesied that between the paws of the Sphinx, in the last years of the twentieth century, very important documents would be found. In 1993 it was discovered that at that point there is a large underground room at a depth of 5 meters. Furthermore, there is still a secret chamber above the Queen's chamber which has not yet been opened. The theory that the remains of the ancient civilization is buried under the ice of Antarctica seems to be gaining more and more success among scientists.
